Posts by Earl Jones Of Potatoes
48 posts • joined Thursday 14th July 2011 00:58 GMT
anti-apple irrationality
obviously someone has made a video which touches on this subject quite brilliantly.
it does reflect the usual comments we see in here
http://youtu.be/7huae767Rxg
without apple
Although Woz has my respect, i think no one would know who he is today if Steve Jobs wasn't in the picture.
Where was Woz when apple was nearly bankrupt in 1997 ? He was probably still happy to collect his monthly apple cheque but has he really contributed to the rebirth of apple? The answer is no. Everyone is talking today mr Woz and most talking like the one you're making has a cheap after taste.
....that actually make things....
This "author" is obviously a troll!
ANAL .... IST
Surely ElReg can do better than this!
Another "ANAL ist" has suggested that ElReg most loyal readers have given up on life. The Same "anal ist" and without providing any evidence has also put forward an argument which proves that the irrational hatred some of its commentators have exhibited is only enforcing the belief that ElReg survival is in jeopardy....
if you react to this rubbish then the story becomes true in your "world"
Thanks for treating some of your readers likes idiots ElReg!
android users
Perhaps they are android enthusiast..... The ones i know have similar jobs but when they talk, oh boy, they know it all. I mean, THEY KNOW IT ALL!
Re: Every time
Or maybe the demand was too high and despite good planning they were sold out...... Of course, this doesn't work too well with the agenda of your comment.
the tip of the iceberg
"Google said to tap Barclays to sell Motoroal's Home Business"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-29/google-said-to-hire-barclays-to-sell-motorola-s-home-business.html
"The world’s biggest smartphone maker is in talks with major telecom carriers on Apple’s home-turf such as Verizon Wireless about modified designs in Samsung Galaxy devices. It is also closely partnering with Microsoft (MS) to cut its dependency on Google Android, according to officials Wednesday."
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2012/08/133_118544.html
Not quite like this article makes the news sound. When you take news in the two links provided, you rather take a hint as to what may have realized with last week's Apple win over samsung.
In other words, apple has sent a clear message and the message reads "Don't F***K with us"
lets hate hate apple
Let's hate hate apple and support one another by up-voting the most hateful comment about apple and fanboys. This is what ElReg's commentators are known to do anyway.
They are experts in everything, I mean, they are know it all. Visionaries, judges, lawyers, politicians, elitists and never wrong.
Get some girlfriends and be quiet for once.
easy pick
just provide the link to the telegraph this way you don't have to add all those grain of salt.
Iran is such an easy target to pick on, the mass media are doing a good job creating a boogie man out of a peaceful country. YES, more peaceful than US, UK and israel combined. After all, they haven't attacked any country in over 300 years.
the judge also said don't show this to the jury. He made this clear too.
funny how some in here are expert in law and rush to defend samsung even if it's doing something completely unethical.
most successful
by far, this is the second most successful space mission after voyager.
gone mad
quite speechless at some apple haters who suggest that buying apple product is like financing terrorism.
So far, 30 individuals seem to agree with his/her rubbish. This is not fanaticism, this is depseration beyond belief.
You're entitled to hate apple all you like even if the behavior itself is quite disturbing but to call people who buy apple products "terrorist sponsors" is the most pathetic argument an android fanboy has made.
get some girlfriends, there's a life outside your hatred of others. grow up for god sake.
ikea....
so does ikea. they produce "furniture" the most but we all know what they're worth.
Google's response to Oracle
....come on! don't be evil!
what next ?
apple is going to tax us, send us to war, jail us for smoking weed and crash the economy like our elected leaders have and still do today.
It's a pity i wanted to get some apple shares back when they were cheap so i can be wealthy today but someone convinced me to adhere to elReg's analysis and prediction and wage daily bashing against the naughty fruity dangerous animal called apple.
no matter how hard it tries
http://youtu.be/odhQIgBOEZU
This video is very representative of the current situation :) Enjoy the crack dance.
lame campagn
Thanks samsung! enjoy your new low.
stall man
there's no such thing as free lunch
rubbish
It is untrue to claim that Apple wants Samsung out of the mobile business.
The current dispute concerns IPs on specific handsets only
The author is undermining his reputation by clearly making unsubstantiated remarks to please the usual "bashing know it all die hard android kids".
ElReg's big grain of salt
Andrew should perhaps remember Bill Ray's "Why the iPhone will fail and fail badly" before attempting to look into the future....
$5 billion
In a way this shows that the advertiser giant which our media like to call "tech giant" acknowledged that android infringes on patents held by apple. That's quite revealing and interesting if google offered to settle it with $5 billion.
Say what you like about the man, he has principals and isn't shy to tell it as it is.
W*nker
what a w*nker he is.
double loss
A blow to htc indeed but mostly to google for playing the pimp by sending htc off to fight apple with its recently obtained patents.
red cross mark
where's the red cross mark elReg? you use to have it on most articles made about apple and Steve Jobs....
Hat off to your Mr. Jobs
a Repost of my early comment about Mr. Jobs.
Very few CEOs have your vision and caliber Mr. Jobs.
Thanks for your historic contribution to the Tech world.
You've earned a prestigious page in modern history and your influence will be greatly missed.
Respect to you
RIP
The Inquirer ?
surely this is a new low for ElReg. The iPhone has never been announced and this "article" makes ElReg appear like a troll. probably a tactic aimed at getting attention but at what cost ?
This "author" has yet to learn from Bill Ray's "why the iPhone will fail and fail badly". I recon he was as right as this author will be.
in other news
It was revealed that Jobs himself was against the court battle and tried to resolve the matter without resorting to lawsuits, but apparently Samsung didn't give much choice to Apple's former boss.
who is your daddy
google acting like a pimp sending his new bitch friend for a fight.
Google to HTC : who is your daddy!
HTC to google : you are my daddy.
Google, that's right biatch.
hat off to you Mr. Jobs
Very few CEOs have your vision and caliber Mr. Jobs.
Thanks for your historic contribution to the Tech world.
You've earned a prestigious page in modern history and your influence will be greatly missed.
Thanks you
the bashing can commence....
...3, 2, 1... and the bashing can commence, whether it is rational or not and whether the law is in their side or not.
I'm sure it'll be jolly amusing to scan through comments from apple haters who seem to love reading about apple.
pissing around the pot
in a way HP tried and knew they couldn't compete with iOS. Instead of making another empty promise they decided to take the "no pissing around the pot" approach and in a way, it's brave.
some would argue that if a product doesn't sell it's cause it's not well advertised. If it sells well, it's because of a good advertising campaign. The truth is that a product sells because it is good. If they do not sell, they are not worth it even if billions are spent to make them look like pieces of heaven.
ego
This tells me that google has an ego worth $12BN.
Let's see if their $12bn worth of patents are going to be as dubious as those held by Apple, Oracle and Microsoft as they claimed repeatedly.
deja vu
This reminds me 2002, 2003 & 2004 when iPod killers were trying to convince us that they are a better alternative to Apple's mp3 players. Now it's the iPhone & iPad killers.
Where are those commentators who predicted the end of the iPod, ridiculed the iPhone and predicted its utter failure, then laughed at the iPad as the most useless device ?
Your only power is to up vote what's against apple
The truth of the matter is that many know it all have no vision.
daft comments
I'm all for it if daft comment like yours get banned as well.
advertising vs Tech field
I tend to agree with most of what was presented. I think that google is very much like an opportunist wealthy spoiled kid playing in a field he doesn't belong.
Android is better off without google. I can even dare and say that Apple would help more android than google had.
After all, it is because of iOS that Android has flourished
One must not forget that google is an advertising company by revenue.
google lawyers are commenting
wow, this subject has been flooded by google lawyers down voting anything that incriminate the advertising giant. And we're led to believe that fanboys are bad.... who knew
nothing is free
Get it free today only and please do not read the fine prints
weak strategy
hypocrisy couldn't be more obvious. why did google bid on nortel's patent if you think they are bogus ? and please, spare us the pathetic argument which goes ""instead of competing by building new features or devices, they are fighting through litigation."
an advertising empire cannot be trusted when it ventures into the tech field and pretends the game is unfair when it's not winning.
Sorry google, i won't side with you on this one. You're using android weak strategy to gain sympathy.
britania
who said that El Reg wasn't bias to things made in the united kingdom of great "Britannia".... I mean, 90% is a bloody good reason to chanting ..... Rule Britannia, Britannia rule the waves....
God save our beloved Queeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen
google and its "wrong ideas"
i think this shows in a way the weak vision of google and its over the top concept ideas which when put into practice are either ill-timed or just out of touch (e.g. chrome book and googletv)
One must wonder if Google isn't pushing these ideas just to tell the world later on that they were first to do it.
That's expected when an advertising giant by revenue ventures into a tech field. But who cares, ads are making them colossal amount of cash.
sharing the money
it's funny when the author writes that it is a pity that apple isn't sharing the money with anyone ?
Are we talking about charity or is this just another excuse to bash a successful company ?
Quite frankly, readers like me in here do demand some respect. We know where you stand when it comes to apple but please, stay objective and classy guys.
Jobs picture with a red mark is really unnecessary especially when you're only targeting his picture and no one else.
html5
someone else would rather see it as YESSSSSSSS, hulu would be plugin free, all the way html5 for a plugin free web experience.....
proof
..that quality pays off..... even if some calls it "fanboism" "sheep" or anything juvenile and demeaning to people's intelligence.
Well done Apple.
IPs
could it be that HTC's new slogan turn into "Quietly steeling IPs and calling myself brilliant"
"Murdoching" freedom and democracy.
Murdoch has corrupted the media as we know it today. journalism has become the tools of lobbyist and powerful politicians.
His media empire is a direct threat to our thinking and perception of events.
Consequently, its corruption is taking over democracy much like cancer does to a healthy body.
lawsuits or tablets ?
""App store is entirely generic, completely un-protectable, and it's farcical that Apple has been pushing the issue as far as it has. It's completely embarrassing for them, and they just should let it go," Eric Goldman – an associate professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, director of the High Tech Law Institute, well-known tech law blogger – has told The Reg."
It is interesting when an article that's supposed to cover the upcoming tablets from Amazon end up covering more the lawsuits that Apple is pursuing.
And here we have a quote from an associate professor who's opinion appears to please The Reg so much that the author forgot to find the opinion of another associate professor who's opinion is different from the "well-known tech law blogger".
Since we're discussing lawsuits I'm wondering when Amazon will engage in a lawsuit against the BIG river for the following reasons...
"AMAZON,and other Amazon.com graphics, logos, page headers, button icons, scripts, and service names are trademarks, registered trademarks or trade dress of Amazon in the U.S. and/or other countries."
