Real-Life vs Digital Parental Guidance
In real-life parants are legally responsible for thier kids and yet there is an abaundance of juvenile crime especially in the UK.
We are reminded time and time again that there are no bad kids just bad parents and that good parents bring up good kids .. Politicians harp on about how criminals begat criminals.
How ironic that Zuckerburg himself has been tarred by the same criminal brush as he basically stole the FB from the twins ... so his parents are criminals too ?
So, if parents are to be responsible for their kids then organisations like FB should be made to adhere to the same law and provide parents with full access to thier kids activities, so long as they can prove they are who they say they are.
How long then until FB et al have a sign up requirement of your personal national insurance number or social security number .. or what ever the hell it gets called all around the world.
The british government are already considering farming out such responsibilities to the like of FB and Google ...
The fact is parents have a right and requirement to know what their kids are doing
Until those kids are legally adults they have to adhere to parental rule. The ones that don't stand to be punished.
I lived next door to a family who were so unruly that the backdoor to their rented property was legally sealed up to stop the kids dealing drugs in their back garden because the single mother parent was unable to control it.
I realise this little <rant> is a bit disjointed but then so is the issue of parental responsibility.
Technology should be forced help resolve societies issues not make money exploiting societies weaknesses.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
