Re: science eh?
The headline of the article didn't give you a clue then? Just asking.
206 posts • joined 16 Jun 2011
The headline of the article didn't give you a clue then? Just asking.
Upvoted Sir, brew everywhere...
Actually not true, all 6 nations games are protected so have to be shown free to air.
The only England rugby games on Sky are the Autumn internationals as ITV have the rights to the RU World Cup
must have missed the millisecond where RB was ever funny!
All this talk of pies has got me in the mood for a pie barm or a Wigan kebab
You do realise for the princely sum of 50p you can arrange to collect your parcel from your local post office of choice?
Surely it costs you more than that in fuel to drive to the sorting office?
Have a +1 sir for that blast from the past
F**k off... Splitter
Now if it was a robotic shark with the obligatory frikkin lasers we might be talking
Hmmm sounds like iOS to me too...
in the name of the heroic spokesman in the 'War on Terror'/Vegetables (delete as appropriate) having the surname Koran?
I'm sure someone (answers on a postcard) will see that as evidence of some sort of government conspiracy against immigrant veg!
Don't you be coming around here with your knowledge and expertise... what we need is snap judgements and baseless hyperbole.
They're getting the storage from Apple
Yes... one of those ones that turns into a submersible to allow him to enter his volcanic lair unseen
Thats why they died out... no frickin' laser beams
Does it come with indicators because most of the f@ck nuggets driving BMWs on the M6 during my daily commute don't seem to have them?
It can be the only reason for their inability to use them when wildly veering across 3 lanes to get where they want to be 15 seconds ahead of the pack!
Their site in the UK is less than glamourous too, it just looks like a hangar on a small private airfield rather than an aircraft manufacturer, tucked away as it is next to Whitecliff Bay on the IoW.
I should also add it has survived despite several changes of ownership and near collapse on more than one occassion.
Google contributing to the destruction of News International? I'd say that's clear evidence Google are living their Do No Evil' mantra to the full
From a personal perspective I have always found CPW far less agressive and hard sell than P4U but that isn't saying much!!
My last couple of phones have come via online channels as I am perfectly happy to wait a day or 2 to get my hands on my new kit.
Tariff wise it doesnt help that the same company (EE I'm looking at you) has such a varied price structure among its brands
Mrs Cynic wanted a Asus T100 Transformer Tablet with Windows (I know, I know) so looked online for best prices.
32gb model at PC World came in cheapest (£229 online vs £249 in store) yet for some bizarre reason you could only 'reserve and collect' for collection and payment at some stores. For other stores you could only purchase online for instore collection!!
It can't be a space issue as I live roughly halfway between 2 stores and the much much larger store was the one that didn't offer 'reserve and collect'.
Mind you it didn't get any better in store, the muppets had picked the Android version when I went to collect it!!
And they wonder why their physical stores are dying on their arses!!
As an aside the T100 is actually a useful bit of kit for what my wife wants and it has expandable memory unlike a certain fruit based kit provider.
Trust me WDTK is FAR FAR from the place that most FOIs come from.
Most of them come directly to us via corporate inboxes.
In 4 years I have received about 20 FOIs from WDTK vs 400+ via the corporate inbox.
Not much I can add to what has been said elsewhere other than to say 'Live at The met' is possibly one of the funniest comeday shows you will ever see, pure genius albeit fragile, flawed and human.
I have 2 of these, albeit the previous iteration, both of which have Skype and run without any problems over WiFi, even my parents rather flaky BT connection!!
A good value tablet which I use mainly as a media player and we have the second for my daughter for much the same reason. Far easier than lugging a portable DVD player and DVDs with us when we go anywhere.
Peronally I've never had any problems other than running certain branded apps on my daughter's tablet, the House of Mouse ones are terrible for draining the battery life if you don't shut them down properly.
Not strictly true actually, the only companies directly subject to FOI are those wholly owned by a public authority/public authorities such as Manchester Airport Group or various Housing Depts that council's have hived off.
That said public authorities will often include clauses in contracts with suppliers to say the information relating to the company and their involvement in public contracts may be disclosed as part of a FOI request.
Even so you could refuse an FOI made to you as the Act doesnt apply to you, only the authority you are providing a service for.
Actually it makes sense (albeit in a FOI context).
If information is exempt from disclosure and the requestor goes to the Tribunal where it is disclosed to them as part of the process it defeats the object of the exemption(s) in the first place.
That said I can see an argument for a requester's legal representatives having access as part of the process but given that many people that go to the Tribunal represent themselves so we again find ourselves in the position of circumventing the exemptions.
Tthe commercial interests exemption is a mess anyway but that's a whole different story!
Last time I checked he was a major shareholder in Sky which apart from being the purveyor of 000's of pointless TV channels is also an ISP...
So essentially he is legislating, or at least looking to if he spreads this manta worldwide, against himself!
Not forgetting 3 hundred weight of tealights and a bag of treat size Daim Bars!
Have an upvote sir... and you owe me a new keyboard... brew everywhere!
away from the wind at a wild guess...
Says the Admin with some of Red Tube's finest tales for Discerning Gentlemen downloaded
pfft, try Naples taxi drivers!
Imagine the Italian Job (the proper one not the shonky remake with that Wahlberg bloke) on speed and you are getting close.
Possible the scariest 20 minutes of my life.
Not quite, Russia is the next one... Qatar is the one after
I assume the Playmonaut was listening to Drake on his iPod?
Ok, ok, I'm leaving!
Because Sony NEVER pay marketing/publishing companies to 'fluff' their goods do they?
Oh and who are this Conte Nast you speak of?
I assume you mean the multi billion pound publishing company Conde Nast who are no doubt as willing to take Sony's cash as Microsofts!!
Does the loser die? If so I'm sure can come up with a comprehensive list of participants with (insert fcuk nugget of choice) top of the list!
You forgot Piers Morgan
I now have to stop numpties taking selfies in the polling booth!!!
Does this not infringe on some LOHAN patent or other?
You must sue, its the responsible thing to do.
Have you had a slip, trip or fall that wasn't your fault?
Then call NASA on 1-800-DONTFALLIN
To record the last words of the Hero Playmonaut before he launches himself into the unknown strapped atop a lit firework...
Playmonaut, we salute you and raise a glass in your honour.
or he'd have stolen loads of crisps and chocolate to feed an attack of the post pot munchies*....
*so I've been told
***cough*** iT-Shirts ***cough***
OK, leaving already...
As someone who does Data Protection for a day job I've seen some pretty shonky uses of DP as an excuse but I have to say BT have taken the prize here.
I cannot possibly conceive that this information is personal data unless the owner of the box is in some of the programmes stored on the HDD. Even then it would only be the programmes they are in that would be affected and in reality how many people would that cover? Probably Jake Humphrey and Clare 'National Treasure' Balding plus one or 2 others!!
Is this a new El Reg Metric, the Bee Sting Pain Scale?
Mom those darn Europeeeens aint playing fair and are stopping us snooping on them...
Not if you light it first
... were it not for the fact I've worked at places where that sort of logic prevailed!!
Except FOI responses arent always as black and white as you seem to believe.
Its entirely possible that an FOI response might contain the personal data or the requestor which would be disclosed to them (albeit under S7 of the DPA) but not to anyone else under FOI.
Your view is far too simplistic and doesnt reflect the often conflicting realities of responding to FOI requests.
And yes I do have a vested interest here as I am a FOI officer who oftens spends his days butting heads with Service Directors to get information released, mainly because they have an ingrained bias against disclosure.
FWIW although technically right in law i think allowing FOI requests via twitter is a fundamentally daft idea unless the request is very simple.