34 posts • joined Thursday 9th June 2011 12:36 GMT
The tracking technology is already on its way. By 2015 all new cars must be fitted with gps and mobile phone tech... for safety purposes of course.
Great for individuals. What about companies?
Can you have multiple user IDs access a single Twitter account yet? Or are they still peddling the idea that companies run their Twitter account from one PC, with one user not sharing the password with anyone? I'm sure that works cos employees never quit or go rogue *cough* HMV *cough*.
Of course the next law that will have to be introduced is the one making it illegal to use any communication system that doesn't have a back door. "Oh, you were using that fancy foreign encryption system no back doors. I sentence you to 10 years!"
I read the Scottish play for GCSE, so I know it's not that. IIRC, Ophelia is Jamie Lee Curtis' character in Trading Places, and she says something like "yeah yeah, I know, it's Hamlet's girlfriend name".
Re: The UK has that
I know a lot of insurance policies used to do that, but I thought it stopped because insurers found lots of people insuring one car car (which the insurer deemed "low risk") but spending most of their time in a different car (considered "high risk").
Also, why is it that when buying a tax disc they need to check that the car is insured? I'm not aware of an option to say "I promise the only people driving this car will be insured on other vehicles."
Re: Rush, rush, rush
But someone else may see it as "the features we promised you, that you're waiting for, and are ready to ship are going to be delayed for 3 months because something else you don't care about isn't ready yet."
Some companies declare what they're going to ship and wait until it's ready. Some companies say when they're going to ship and ship the things that are ready at that time. Two systems, both good, both bad, it just depends which features you're waiting for.
But this is actually happening. Not to the main driving controls, but to all the others. Some manufacturers have started putting touch screens into cars, which makes it difficult to change something like the radio/heater without taking your eye off the road because you can't just feel the button/dial like you used to.
Hopefully car buyers will reject this and good old fashioned buttons and dials will stay - or the various laws in the world about operating phones/satnavs on the move will expand to cover stupid car touch-screens too.
Re: We already have a system that you pay more the more you drive...
"At the moment all drivers are heavily subsidised by those that don't own a car" I cry bullshit on that one.
Doesn't seem true - politician's always say fuel duty is going up because of the environment or congestion, never because the motorist simply isn't paying their way.
And after 5 seconds with Google I found this, http://cars.aol.co.uk/2011/12/16/angry-response-over-disproportionate-road-tax-spending/ which says in 2010 VED and fuel duty raised £33bn but total road spending was £9.4bn.
"If you're still using 10 year old software" then you probably work for the sort of enormous corporation that upgrades software as infrequently as possible... exactly the sort of company that uses Notes.
Re: Another example of why Linux fails to gain market share
Totally agree. Linux too often feels like the kit-car of the OS world. Sure you can make it be exactly what you want, but it takes so much time and effort barely anyone can be bothered.
The app stores of Android and iPhone (does Win8 have one too?) are showing it's all about the user experience of getting apps installed and working so people can get on with real-world tasks. Linux needs an equivalent but developers can't even agree between .deb or .rpm! Perhaps Steam can sort it out - at least they have a financial incentive to make it work.
Re: Parental controls: Computer level -> ??? -> DPI
Firstly it's probably a third-party solution, so tying yourself to one router would limit which ISPs you could implement it.
Secondly ISPs who supply a router tend to respond to all connection problems with "we'll send you a new router" which then resets all the user's settings. That's the point, but it would also reset the porn filter. If it's anything more sophisticated than filter=on/off then these "important" settings need to be configured again by the parent who isn't tech-savvy and probably found it difficult first time round.
Re: "Apple folk can already use AirPlay to stream pictures and video to their Apple TV boxes."
I couldn't believe he used that as the first example of an interesting use of NFC. I touch my TV a few times a year (dusting, plugging in some gadget), the rest of the time it's controlled from the comfort of my sofa. Now he wants me to stand up, walk across the room, touch my phone to the TV, then go sit back down. How 1980s! And only the tap is NFC cos the rest of the work is going to need some other technology. Solution looking for a problem.
Re: Good heavens, is Firefox still around?
"There are a few big improvements coming down the line, incremental garbage collection is one. (ever have Firefox pause briefly or become unresponsive for a short period? That's the garbage collector)"
Translation for users: "We're finally going to fix that really annoying bug where FF hangs for a few seconds."
Oh and well done on adding Flash support on Android, just as Flash stopped being available. [slowclap]
Without sarcasm now: The latest FF on Android is actually quite nice to use, a huge leap over the previous one, but it needs to stop being some beta toy for the devs and be grown up about supporting users. (eg dropping tablet support for several months really made me feel second class. Meanwhile I started using Chrome, and still do)
repurchase the particular item of electronic content
I suspect this is limited to things like online film rentals because the patent only covers "repurchase the particular item of electronic content." ie you renew the film before, perhaps gave it a good review, so you're likely to rent it again.
But as there is plenty of prior art on personalised pricing I can't see how it's novel to apply it to repurchases or to electronic content. Their algorithm might be novel, but the concept is not.
It's more like being in a restaurant where the chef is having a hissy fit and will only produce one type of meal each night. The whole restaurant has to vote on which meal everyone gets. There may be a full menu but most people want "shit sandwich" or "shit soup". You can vote for the lasagne if you like, but it will never win. It's best to vote for the least bad of the shit options.
And going to the sub shop across the street is akin to emigrating.
This is how first-past-the-post works. At least the Americans have recognised this and reduced to a (mostly) two party system.
Social networks are for sharing, not for long term storage. They are only interested in storing your old data so that if you are accused of murder/terrorism/whatever and the newspapers want your life story the social network can make a fortune from you. And you'll probably wish at that point they weren't storing it all.
And when Facebook stops being popular can you export all your photos and videos, or will it take a 1000 page loads and 1000 right-click-save-as actions to get 1000 photos back?
The real solution is: local storage. Disks, memory cards, etc. Throw in some added protection from an online backup company where your data is still yours - definitely not some free-to-use social network. That way if your local media is stolen/fails/burns-down-in-a-house-fire you have an off-site backup. Do remember to test both systems occasionally to be sure you actually have something that works (which if you use a certain Korean brand of hard disk will be required about once every 6 months in my experience!)
Re: Weird Stat Counting?
Totally agree. The sudden lurch in Firefox, Opera and Safari stats suggests something big happened, and it's big enough for end users to actually switch browsers. Or maybe StatCounter changed how they count stats.
Re: Not illegal?
It's not illegal in the same way that it's not illegal for me to overhear a conversation you have with your friends in a pub. If you want to keep it secret you should take sensible precautions to make it so.
Re: I initially had trouble
Wow! That's a multi-hour solution to a problem that causes pain for about a minute each time it happens. In my experience as a TF101 owner, it's about once a week.
On a broader note, as others have pointed out, the Android update model is broken. Imagine Dell having to package up fixes for Windows and you see how stupid it is. I'm not buying any more Android devices until there's a reliable, simple way to get security updates.
"Despite many requests the bank could not give me any direct example of my account having been inappropriately accessed"
That's probably because it hadn't been accessed. There is a difference between "security threat" and "security breach". And of course they won't give you details about the threat, that would be giving away details of a security hole that they haven't yet patched.
A PITA it happened at all, but it is the correct response.
Re: Jumping to conclusions
And my interpretation of "Size remains a key buying factor" was really "cost remains a key buying factor". Sure I'd love a 60" behemoth to hang on the wall, but I don't watch enough TV to justify the cost.
"'cause converting means converting and not replacing."
Well in the case of a download I think it does means which version they offer for download. They will have two versions of it available for download, if you have the DVD you can get the SD stream for $2 and the HD stream for $5.
There will be no "converting" in the traditional sense. It's hardly like they'll ask you to upload the DVD!
Aah. I thought my Asus Transformer wasn't compatible. I should have read the error in full... "This item cannot be installed in your device's country." I am in the UK. So is this a US-only story then? Should be used to this sort of thing from the reg by now, but I still keep thinking it's a British site. Silly me.
Asus Transformer compatible?
I'm at work and don't have my fondle slab to hand, so I thought I'd trigger a remote install to test it out when I get home. But, contrary to the article, the android marketplace says the app is not compatible with my TF101.
Re: Double privacy fault
Firstly, I think you are confusing "personal" with "private".
And when you give your details to someone do you have them sign an agreement saying what they can and cannot do with that information? I guess not. It's certainly not private, nor is there any obligation on your friends to keep it private.
If you want to keep your details secret don't tell anyone!
This might be the beginning of government interference with satnav routing. Satnavs find optimal routes which might not be the ones councils want you to take.
It might go something like: "We, the government, will give you free maps if you promise to never send someone down this huge list of rat runs unless they are going to a nearby address."
@AC "Why don't you just set your film to download after 9pm and then watch it the next day? Or if it is streamed then time it to start watching at 8pm so that the rest of the film is downloaded after the 9pm cut-off."
... because people want broadband that just works. Like how electricity, gas and telephones just work.
I'm with Be, and I can download and stream whatever I want at any time of day. Sounds like you should try it.
Is security owned by the manufacturer or OS developer?
The big problem is the halfway house where Google writes an operating system but users rely on the manufacturers to deliver the fixes.
Google needs to start acting like MS (in one respect!) and deliver security updates directly.
Imagine if you bought a Dell PC and every time a Windows patch came out you had to wait for Dell to package it up before you got it. Then after a year Dell drops your PC from the supported list and you're at risk of every newly discovered exploit.
I'm generally a Google fanboi, but they are wrong on this one - it's time they took full responsibility for their software.
because it's the world's most popular OS so virus writers, quite sensibly, write most of their viruses for it. And ASLR is not the be all and end all of combating viruses.
I'm deeply suspicious of this too. The encryption just cannot be for everything.
The techcrunch article even says it "doesn’t know anything about the file itself, really. It doesn’t see the file’s title or know its contents." And you "can share a link (file, folder) with other users". Really? Share a file it "really" doesn't know about? Oh rly! Sounds like marketing bull to me.
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Microsoft teams up with Feds, Europol in ZeroAccess botnet zombie hunt
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?