Additional stats required
Readership - all well and good. Now, how about:
- Servers
- storage stats
- bandwidth used
etc
1609 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2011
...is never gonna work.
For one - Never in a million years does the meal before look you anything like the one on the posters.
Two - just because the database says "supplier of branch x beef is manufacture y" doesn't make the contents accurate. Something Tesco is only now discovering.
A tad extreme, surely?
Afterall, if all the marketards become extinct, who will:
- you be able to dump some redhot "blame potatoes" on?
- buy all the Porche Cayennes?
- run the infomercial and shopping channels?
- try their hardest to drink our EU beer and wine lakes?
Marketards are underrated IMO. Though not as much as the old days when they were useful as "arrow fodder".
@ AC
So what - with all the evasion they engage in, they provide little to the local economy
Corp tax doesn't go to the local economy either.
Neither does the PAYE and NI the employee pay, nor does the Corp NI on those employees. Those go to HMRC. The government makes plenty from indirect taxation of these orgs, and corporate tax is a mere topup.
Only the rates/council tax (and possibly rent for council owned buildings) and the retail outlet of said org contribute locally.
people are will still be here, they still need goods and services; so having UK based companies supply those (and pay their taxes) would be to the betterment of the UK.
Whether a company is international or UK based, the majority of revenue comes from indirect taxation, and the creation of jobs and thus a local economy. Ask Sunderland how much it would like Nissan to go home, which it would consider if you bumped up corporation tax.
Also, read this:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/25/tax_and_tech_biz/
...once more, this time with feeling:
Avoidance != Evasion
Frankly, the sour grapes about the whole thing boil down to two things:
- You didn't think about using the same scheme yourself
- You didn't think about taxing the same scheme yourself
Think it's unfair? Campaign for the rules to be changed. Also campaign for bigger harbours, since all the international Corps will be exiting these shores the moment it comes it effect.
Agree with this.
There is the fact that most retailers are trying to ship commodity items to attract as many punters as possible, often selling the same bland things as each other with next to no difference.
Extend this approach, and you see why in the UK there are massive malls, filled with all the same bland names, selling all the same bland stuff. Zero choice, zero differentiation, designed to conform to some marketing statistic, and the USP comes down to the "retail add ons" (ie who's coffee shop is better). All of them are struggling, because when you can get the same commodity x online.
Witness if you will, shopping for a suit in Next. A tale of utter anonymous woeful tat it is. Pop next door to River Island, and it's the same tat, with a difference sense of woe. Down Saville Row, and things start to look up. Or indeed...different. And better. 1 Saville row for the price of 3 bland bits of cloth from Next? Bloody bargain.
To actually attract people in, you actually need to take the risk and go for different stuff and go for more vertical markets, and actually products are genuinely unique. The "boutiques" are all doing better than the chains, ta v much.
...if his comments are anything to go by:
- Developed world approaching saturation. No shit!
- Emerging markets are where it's at. No shit!
- Emerging markets can't afford Developed World prices. No shit!
- To sell in the emerging markets, you need to sell at prices they can afford. No shit!
Just stunning. And he got paid how much?
In addition to PH comments, there is the law of unintended consequences...
The swiss know they got shafted by US gov, so now, you'll be hard pressed to find any CH bank that will accept *new* US customers - there are only a few now that will, and there are restrictions and agreements you have to sign. Some have even got rid of *existing* US customers.
They don't want to comply with the US playground bully in the future, so this is merely the Swiss way of politely exiting the playground altogether and saying "We have no US customers to disclose on, so f* off".
1. In order to run this jailbreak, you need to have a second machine with Visual Studio running a remote debugger session to the Windows RT device.
For now. But there's blood in the water, and progress will be made. Put the kettle on - won't be long.
2. There is no pre-compiled ARM software out there for WinRT. You'd have to write your own.
The first ones will be permanent rootkits (malicous or intentional), and they'll be on the blackmarket in 3...2...1...
3. Even if you did, the jailbreak does not - and cannot! - survive a boot. So one boot later, your imaginary software won't run unless you jailbreak the device again, using the VS remote debugger.
Won't really matter if you've loaded your rootkit from step 2
4. The stuff Microsoft charges for is Windows Store apps, and you can already sideload those - in fact, MSDN specifies exactly how to do it. Not exactly a big money-saving secret.
Once I've got my rootkit running, I'll sideload, download, diagonalload, throughload and circleload to my hearts content. You might want to clarify that you need an enterprise licences to officially sideload.
@ aqk
Some application using on the corporate level cannot be accessed over a unsecure LAN. This means cert-based authentication via SSL channel to a virtual App session over closed wire connection.
Lenovo = corporate, so this is indeed an omission. 30 bucks per adapter x the total users in the department in question = lots of money.
Helicopter...because some app need to be really REALLY secured from prying eyes.
Reuters rubbishes report rubbishing cheap iPhone rumor .
For the sake of consistency, I think I'll rubbish this article about Reuters rubbishing a report which rubbishes cheap iPhone rumors.
Cue downvotes to rubbish my post about rubbishing this article about Reuters rubbishing a report which rubbishes cheap iPhone rumors.
Load of rubbish if you ask me.
Netham45 reckons you can jailbreak a slab in about 20 seconds just by running the runExploit.bat file on the tablet and pressing a button
Even more damning will be that improving/fixing this particular security issue will probably be harder for the end user than running the hack in the first place...
Easy...yes.
Cheap...no. If it's done right.
You need to pay for the upstream filtering at the ISP, configure the rule scenarios and then there's the DNS re-direction and hosting to consider. The things you can do locally (rule-based request filtering, window resizing, run site in no graphics/maintenance mode, etc) only take you so far. They won't protect you from 50gbits of layer 2/3 traffic - 100,000 SYN-ACK/ACK's (or RST's) per second still adds up, and chances are the CLOSE_WAITS alone will kill your server.
Do I detect some New Labour style spin here? "luxury mountaintop gaffe"? I think the word your looking for are:
"Evil Lair of doom"
Is the "complete rebuild" anything to do with the contstruction of the submarine base/rocket base/death ray underneath? If so, you'll definitely need more than 1.5kw. And a self destruction button.
Exactly.
Sell OS upgrade on touch capability to a market where 99% of customers have no touch hardware. Even if they wanted to, there's almost no touch hardware updates other than complete machine replacement.
Ergo: Upgrade sales in the toilet, causing a full depedency on the natural machine replacement cycle for licence sales. Which is also in the toilet.