Re: Hoovers???
"I thought we'd stopped doing that last century."
News to me. I use a hoover to do the hoovering. My hoover is made by Dyson.
1018 publicly visible posts • joined 16 May 2011
"I know I am going to lose and decide beforehand how much. If I come out losing less than I have designated then I have had a cheap night and coming out with a profit is simply a bonus."
But the people who have this knowledge and attitude are inherently unlikely to gamble. You are going to be a rare exception.
1. Why would such a critical piece of equipment be left in the hands of a relatively low level operative?
2. Would these flashing warning lights only be seen by one person?
3. Would his superiors be such blockheads that they would not deduce the same things this man deduced?
It doesn't matter. Whether the shares have been 'conjured up' or bought on the open market, there has been a cost to shareholders in the form of either a devalued shareholding or money leaving the company. The only issues are whether the executives are worth the cost, and which transaction is cheapest to execute.
Everyone can argue from 20-20 hindsight, but if Apple hadn't entered the market in 2007 (and in doing so showed Samsung how to make smartphones normal people want to use) Nokia would have been doing very well. I shudder to think of the barely functional monstrosities they would have been making, but they would have been doing well.
The peons whose job it was to sign the documents stating when prisoners were ready for court were most likely on a bonus, or knew they would get their arses kicked if they didn't get prisoners to court on time. People aren't stupid, and will tell lies to save their jobs, particularly when they are made to do the impossible.
Of course, given Serco created these conditions, they should have checked up on this. They appear not to have done so, and are being deservedly humiliated.
"Under the ISAs the RSPCA promises to dispose of the information when it is no longer needed: "In most cases, it is expected that information shared with the RSPCA will therefore be destroyed within a maximum timeline [sic] of 6 years."
But there's simply no way of knowing whether this is true."
I suggest that the chances of any organisation correctly disposing of data within a given time period is close to zero. Data will be copied around a computer network, backed up, copied to memory sticks and so forth.
"I'm an RT customer, using {outlook,word,excel} on a laptop that's been running two days without a recharge.. I may be one of only a few customers, but I'm a pleased one."
I hope you weren't doing work for a business, or you broke the license agreement.
If a business was sued every time they made an unsuccessful product, there would be no businesses, no new products, and lawyers that own everything that is still worth owning.
Did Microsoft not include the relevant nonsense stating "this might not sell"? Who cares - unless investors were lobotomised, they must know this is a possibility.
"One ex–staff member, Jay Palmer, who brought a failed legal action against the firm, claims he was repeatedly called a "stupid American" and saw staff writing "No Americans/Christians" on a board during a meeting."
This bit does not ring true. Who on earth would write "No Americans/Christians" on a board, even if that was their hiring policy?
"Someone searching for UFO's and who exposed the weaknesses in the US military systems"
I agree that on the face of things this chap is alleged to have committed a more serious crime than Gary McKinnon, but please stop regurgitating crap about UFOs and the like. McKinnon was a trumped up little idiot who was only saved from facing the music because of his mummy, and the munificence of a Tory Home Secretary - and don't bleeding well forget it.
"I've had it explained to me that the reason they ask us to switch off the phones especially during take off and landing is these are the times that the plane is most likely to crash - and therefore, the full undivided attention of everyone on the plane is required in case of an emergency exit."
If that is true, why are we allowed to use phones on 'flight mode' at all? And why are people allowed to read books and magazines when the plane is taking off or landing, or converse with others? Surely these are also things that could prevent people from giving the cabin crew their undivided attention?
"Woooow I wasn't expecting to be in a jury Deciding a paedophile’s fate, I’ve always wanted to Fuck up a paedophile & now I’m within the law!”
I do not know the case here or the quality of evidence, but imagine if you were an innocent man wrongly accused of paedophile offences. Wouldn't the standard of critical thought on evidence here terrify you?
Regardless of whether the companies have a case or not, this just adds to the cost of outsourcing. It isn't just a case of following procurement procedures, it is a case of proving it. Therefore, an enormous paper trail must be created to show that everything was followed by the book. Lawyers need to be hired. Cases must be fought. Time must be wasted.
After taking these costs into account, it may still work out better to use the private sector, but it is still a cost.
"There is also widespread suspicion in the West that even non-state owned businesses have close ties with Beijing through the ubiquitous Communist Party committees which operate within them."
I sympathise with the western intelligence agencies. It must have been conceptually almost beyond them that a non-state owned company could have close ties with the government. Such a thing has never occurred in the West.
Er, you would need to know the quarterly changes in the number of customers before the deal was announced before one could make a reasonable conclusion as to the effect of the Sky takeover.
No doubt some people will leave O2 solely because of Murdoch, but Sky's large customer base suggests most people don't care.
Taken for itself, the porn blocker is debatable. But it was the way Cameron presented it: he (or his 'advisor') explicitly linked child pornography (or 'child abuse images' or whatever we are supposed to call it now) to bog standard porn.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076
In other words, the new law is being made in a spirit of hysteria.