Re: Yup. That's me.
I used that very excuse yesterday... and got away with it!
878 posts • joined 12 Jun 2007
I used that very excuse yesterday... and got away with it!
If you can prove it doesn't exist at all, you should really be publishing your results as the scientific community is generally in agreement that this is a real phenomenon... hence this published paper.
I was with someone who had run out and (innocently) asked an American colleague if he could "bum a fag"... the look he got was absolutely priceless, and it too us Brits a fair few seconds to even recognise the oddity of the phrase.
As a G2 owner, I'd argue that the power button only has one proper location: on the back!
Thanks for the link.
Interestingly, it mentions the first thought I had: "Technology fans argue that Glass, which displays simple, monochrome information in the wearer's peripheral vision, is less distracting than satellite navigation tools that include a visual interface designed to be used while driving."
I don't get the logic behind it, but then I'm not a law-maker, so it's not my position to.
Was there a specific reason given? I don't really see the difference between this and people using a hands-free kit while having their satnav on their windscreen.
From what I've seen, some of the really fancy cars will even pop up your texts and emails on the central satnav screen... What does Glass do that's so different?
"Mafia Vampire Farm"
I would play that game!
I clearly don't work in the ad-peddling industry for a reason, but in my wildest imagination I can't see the benefit of this. Maybe it's because I'm a trackball user, but I regularly move the cursor around the screen without any relation to my next action; what are they going to learn from that?
Assuming ads work (which is something else I don't understand), people either click on them or not... which is surely all the mouse tracking you need?
Was it Asimov who said something like "the best scientific discoveries are the ones that start with 'that's funny...'"?
I got it on PC for £25, which fees about right for, effectively Arkham City 1.5.
Not saying that in a bad way; I really enjoyed City and am enjoying Origins, but it really is just more of the same.
The best bit about it has to be the lack of Windows Live; the lovely and entirely superfluous piece of software that deleted my saved game just after completion, due to a known bug...
I'm also enjoying the new style Riddler puzzles, which feel more like part of the game than an forth-wall-breaking addition.
Could be wrong (and can't be bothered to look it up), but wasn't the solution to simple run left instead of right? Then you could fall down every hole and climb up the ladder
"One might, if one were to be a bit pedantic, suggest that moving from a 32-bit processor to a 64-bit processor is something that qualifies as a bit more than an "incremental" upgrade."
I, however, will be pedantic and say that I think it is exactly an "incremental" upgrade... what other increment is there from 32-bit? 33-bit? 48-bit?
I can't make a comment on whether it will be more than incremental for performance, though.
Only needs to be partially watertight and then pressurised; a motorised diving bell/bathysphere.
Part of me thinks Top Gear might already have done that...?
I like the sentiment, but he's agreed to pay $110M, so I'm guessing he's done pretty well out of running the site.
No having a PS3 meant I missed out on Heavy Rain, but I thoroughly enjoyed Fahrenheit / Project Indigo on the PC, and interestingly had the same experience as you where my sister basically watched the game like a movie while I played it.
I feel like I've wandered in to a BBC HYS...
If you're worried about plot holes in a Star Trek film, you might be doing it wrong ;)
I think, lens flare and pop-culture-pandering aside, he's got the Star Trek "reboot" pretty spot-on. I see it as more of a homage to Star Trek than anything else, but it's highly entertaining (XI more than XII).
"digital cameras still suffer from lens flare"
I disagree; in a JJ Abrams film, it's the audience that suffers from lens flare.
I like his stuff, but I prefer to be able to see what's happening on screen.
"to find offence"
Felt to me like it was just more El Reg snark.
I like that Apple has a sense of humour; something that really doesn't come across in their other endeavours.
True, Google are a multi-tentacled beast of data/information gathering, but their humour and Easter eggs show a slightly more human face than many other companies allow.
<conspiracy>Or hide their evil ways!?
Maybe as a consumer device, but the accessibility stuff coming out of the Universities using Glass is incredible.
What I like about Musk, though, is that he comes along with fully-formed and costed solutions. This isn't an entirely vapourware concept; he's sat down with his team and figured out the initial logistics to make it real.
He's also highlighted how governments can be utterly lazy in their own solutions as they don't really care about the costs they incur.
Why don't we have more maglev?
Personally, I'd opt for quinine. Preferably in some kind of liquid form. The flavour's quite bad, though, so I'd have to mix it with something to improve it.
I've seen a few where it worked, but it worked in the way that it only made the film more immersive, so I can't actually remember which films...
I can't stand it where they've clearly designed a scene to show that they have 3D - the natives chasing Kirk in the latest Star Trek, for instance.
Now that brings back some memories!
Given you ended a rhetorical question with an interrobang, why the additional bang‽
I'm confused by this... what browser can't handle > and <?
Growth figures (like all statistics) are either useless or lies designed to cover an uncomfortable truth.
If I release a product tomorrow and it sells just 1 unit, that's unlimited growth.
I loved Kangaroo steak when I had it. I'm sure it just depends on how it's cooked, like any meat.
Wild boar is always a winner; especially the stuff I've had in the New Forest.
"Dow/Monsanto/whomever with their genetically-crippled seeds that produces "sterile/non-multi-generational" seeds, the intent being to force farmers to endlessly return to the seed trough?"
While I agree this does sound like some nefarious scheme to force farmers to continually buy GM seeds, these companies are not allowed to release GM products that are multi-generational, due to the fear that they will become the dominant version of the plant, displacing/replacing version 1.0*.
* More likely 1.1 or higher, as we've domesticated the original.
Even if it had been a true apocalyptic event, the headline would have been "Royal Baby unlikely to survive apocalypse - Public's reaction pages 2 to 32".
On a different note, why are we measuring a three-dimensional object by its length? Is it a perfect sphere of diameter 100m, or can we be told the more important mass or even volume figures? In Olympic-sized swimming pools, natch.
The average user is using such cheap, slow SD cards that the spec of their PC and data bus are the least important things of concern.
I think the news it that the IETF are completely incompetent and that at least part of it can foresee the danger that the new TLD land-grab poses to those who aren't paying huge sums of money for it (i.e., us).
I've nothing against companies suggesting new TLDs, but they should continue to be managed by decentralised, not-for-profit* organisations; and they need to be heavily vetted.
"where it is dead easy and maximum profit can be achieved"
Well, they are a for-profit company, so that seems pretty reasonable.
Were their remit just to provide the best connection to the whole of the UK, this type of thing could be easily solved.
Err... there are hundreds of travel chargers... I have one for exactly the situation when I'm using the phone heavily (screen always on + GPS, for instance) on the go.
I thought that Jelly Bean was supposed to reduce all this by allowing UI customisation without modifying the OS so much that patches can't be applied...
Obviously there'll always be some limitation to that, but being able to supply base security updates without affecting the window manager should be standard.
Pre-ICS I was always a Sense fan, but I'm happy with AOSP now.
Yeah, this new scheme is horrible...
Guys, just because you've paid a UI/graphics "designer" to tell you how things should look now, it doesn't mean they're right. In fact, my experience is that they rarely are right in terms of actually user happiness.
Can we vote to go back to the old system. Here's mine >
I couldn't find any interesting images at a cursory glance, but even during the 16th century they used hexagonal shot in cannons as early attempts at rifling.
"Just when everybody is moving to native apps again"
No they aren't. Native has it's place, but it is not a panacea
"I hate the way classes are done (I much prefer the C++/Java/PHP way)"
Excuse me if I'm having a slow day; I'm not sure if you picked three utterly different approaches to OOP on purpose or not... Short of throwing VBA in there, I can't think of more disparate alternatives.
I'm not a Firefox user, but I trust the Fx devs to fix such an exploit faster than a third-party plugin.
Hopefully the RTC thing is an option in the preferences, as well.
I really enjoyed Google Wave, while it lasted.
I made a half-arsed attempt to run my own server, but in the end people found it easier to use wikis and email.
They do just tend to look like small phones tied to your wrist right now. I do quite like the styling of the Pebble, but it was just too large for me to properly consider.
Plus, apart from during exercise, I still don't know what I'd use one for...
"That's why - unlike the American public defender system - we spend a fortune on the very best lawyers to defend the worst criminals"
It's worth keeping an eye on this, as the government are proposing to privatise (and de-regulate) the process, meaning that the companies making the most profit (i.e., with the least costs) will end up supplying such defense, and you don't get the option of who defends you.
"the plot contortions needed are too much"
You must be watching a different series to me.
I'm sure the sonic screwdriver can be used to explain it away.
I don't think you can assign Bieber a gender
Who is your doctor?
The article wasn't clear, but I'm pretty sure this was talking about LoveFilm.
As for the rest, I couldn't agree with you more. Why can't they all stop p*ssing about and stop with this ridiculous "exclusive" nonsense.
It's fine if you've funded the show, otherwise the content providers should just license to everyone and let the consumers decide which service is best.
Due to Netflix and LoveFilm being basically a non-overlapping Venn diagram, I've opted to spend my money with BlinkBox and Google Play, paying to rent on a per-movie basis.
Overly-subtle attempt at humour or fall in to self-parody?