You mean, they're embracing open source?... I wonder what comes next....
878 posts • joined 12 Jun 2007
Banned... or not
This is an "interim injunction" - which basically means that the court isn't entirely sure that there's a case here, but they've taken the decision to block sales until the whole case can be presented.
Either way, it's a massive win for Apple, even if the court eventually decides that Samsung have breached anything legally.
Do we even know exactly what Apple's accused them of breaching? Last I heard almost all of the "patent" disputes were thrown out and it was just some copyright stuff around the style of the device.
It would be madness for Samsung to lose because of the "grid of icons" issue, considering that this is an Android construct that every other Android device uses (and not even as the Home screen as they original said). Plus, Win3.1 had such grids in Program Manager, and I'm sure 100s of other pieces of software of yore.
What do they mean by console?
Having played with OnLive, this seems the most logical way forward in an Apple-esque world - they're in complete control over what you can play and when.
Personally, I was very impressed with OnLive, but I can't see it pulling me away from Steam at the prices they charge. Partly because I have a powerful PC and I like to continually upgrade and tinker with it. I'm sure there's a massive market for something like OnLive.
Saw one once
Played with it in a shop State-side. Was actually quite impressed with the UI.
I guess it was just too little, too late (and it never reached the UK)
Yes, but if it isn't official it looks like a grotesque tumor :(
I did this with my Hero, but didn't bother with the Desire. I can cope with 1 - 2 day battery, but would much prefer double that over a smaller/lighter phone.
Can I have one thicker with longer battery life?
Not a fan of Apple products/ethos, but massive respect for what Steve did with the company and what he helped do to the consumer tech market.
56 is far too young, and he clearly was very passionate about what he did.
Odd choice of words
"slavishly copies", and now down to just one possible patent infringement...
Another Date/Time API!
As someone with an IT degree who regularly interviews to hire developers, I can say that I don't personally rate IT degrees much at all.
I agree that a degree should be more than just about learning a subject; a true degree teaches you how to solve problems, not how to solve *a* problem (that's the job of GCSE).
My biggest issue is that IT degrees seem to be simplifying and removing a lot of the deeper knowledge that I require in all of my developers. I don't care if you only work in Java/.NET, if you can't discuss the heap and the stack at a conceptual level and you don't know what an "abstract" function does, you're going to need to blow me away with your understanding of your chosen framework.
I'd much rather hire someone with 3 years of industry experience than a degree, because if they can talk about it, they've gone out to learn it themselves. But, as a lot of people have said, it's very rare a non-graduate gets passed the CV filter stage.
It's exactly these sorts of ill-thought ideas that will destroy independent developers.
I'll stick with my Sony, but the keyboard on the Kindle was the reason I didn't go for one, so it's interesting to see they've finally dropped it.
A portable movie-rental device sounds interesting, though.
I never thought it did start with the Simpsons - I assumed they were referring to how the Simpsons was written... my bad.
So, when will someone experiment with using manitees to write Family Guy episodes?
This morning the "when it's available" for my building changed from 30-Sep-2011 to (drum-roll please) 31-Dec-2011. And this isn't the first time they've knocked it back.
I'd rather they just said "no current plans" than getting my hopes up until days before the date they give me.
I imagine this is the state trying to make it clear that publishing private CCTV footage is illegal.
IANAL, but it seems to be common with CCTV footage appearing on YouTube (remember the woman in the "mall" who fell in to the fountain?).
Yet to be convinced
My PC has a lot of real estate and while I want as much content on it as possible, I need all of my common tasks to be quickly available through a simple keyboard or mouse gesture.
My phone/tablet, on the other hand, do not have a lot of real estate and having tasks hidden until I make a clear gesture to find them is an acceptable productivity hit.
So, is Windows 8 really two OS's rolled in to one, or will the tablet interface be like Media Center, an application on top of Windows "Classic"?
Maybe I'm an exceptional case, but the convergence doesn't feel like a step forward to me...
Each to their own
But I prefer one that fits me and does exactly what I need a hat to do
Certainly, in theory, pure .NET apps will be fine assuming MS release an ARM-based .NET framework.
I know a lot of companies that just wouldn't bother considering Win8 on ARM if they don't.
WOROW (Write Once, Run On Windows)
Here's your reason: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_DSL#United_Kingdom
TL;DR: BT don't think anyone wants it
Although, I don't think it would remove the line rental cost, since you'll still need the final mile cable.
What are you driveling on about?
Most providers DO give you the option to pay a monthly charge for all your calls. Even mobile operators do this (though, normally with a use limit).
The 084* (and 0870, among others) numbers you list are /premium/ numbers - the people using them have asked for them specifically to make some money out of taking your call.
If you're still stuck: http://www.saynoto0870.com/
I live in London, and I still always dial the full code.
Most people here believe London's area code is "0207" or "0208", when it is actually "020".
Even knowing this, I'd rather waste a fraction of a second of my life dialing three extra digits than mistakenly trim the number and get the wrong person.
Academic argument really, since I never use my landline and tend to use the phone's contact list for nearly all my calls.
The good money is with something FAT32-related at the minimum.
Probably some vague (and questionable) UI/UX ones thrown in for good measure.
If only one of these companies asked for more proof than just threats and either leaked the details or at least gave their thoughts on the credibility...
A responsible approach? How... novel...
I'm sure no one would have batted an eye-lid if they'd just stayed schtum and investigated in private.
And these are 200,000 drives from the same manufacturer and, presumably, there won't be too many different manufacturing batches involved (unless they've been stock-piling drives for years) - so you could potentially see a situation where 50+ drives die in a very short time frame...
Although, I'm sure they've thought it all through and we're just missing some info.
I feel sick
Did he say all that with a straight face? He's taking the CEO role to heart, that's for sure
Only Big And Famous Guys Know More Love Than You?
Looking forward to getting my sneak on again
You have to use the "joke alert" tag for that kind of comment, I'm afraid. There are enough imbeciles around that comments like that could be taken seriously :)
I'd like to see actual punishment for these types of problems.
Too often the "organisation" is "criticised" - big whoop. It should be the individual who is penalised; they are the ones in the position of responsibility to secure and protect the data in their charge.
If you're a sysad and you can't even use a complex password yourself, you don't deserve the job.
Fining places like this (and the NHS, quango's, train companies, etc.) doesn't work, because they just recoup their "loss" through higher fares or taxes...
Quality of tech reporting
At least you didn't stoop to the Beeb's coverage of screaming of the doom of this "security flaw".
I was impressed until I read the detail and realised that I'm sure I did similar things to this in the days when software came with 30 day trials.
"Who runs a totally watertight operation with absolute secrecy? No-one"
So you *think*! How do you know?
Pah! I thought you were going to say "they *convert* energy"
Personally, I find Steam a better experience than non-Steam games. They're always patched (without each publisher having to come up with different ways to patch games), and things like Steam Cloud means you never lose game progress.
Plus, the offline mode works, assuming the game doesn't have another form of DRM.
However, just last night I fired up BioShock 2 for the first time and Valve have been forced to include Games for Windows in it... my broadband being down until this morning, I carried on without signing in to GfW and played for about an hour before finding out that I can't save without GfW... REALLY?!
To make matters worse, I tethered to my phone so I could sign in to GfW and guess what happens - after waiting for five minutes for a mandatory update to GfW (having only downloaded it a few days ago), it prompts that the GfW account has changed and boots me to the main BS2 menu...
I was seriously pissed - not sure if I can be bothered to go back to BS2. I'll certainly avoid all other GfW-encumbered games in future. Why the hell would 2K (MS?) insist on TWO forms of DRM?!
When did Valve ever do this? Only Valve titles I know of that require constant Internet are L4D, L4D2, and TF2 (etc.).
Certainly, though, I'm shocked Ubisoft and EA haven't learned their lesson - this doesn't stop pirates at all and just makes me want to pirate the game more.
As an example, I really wanted to like StarCraft 2, but I just got so fed up with the DRM that I gave up and never went back. Annoyingly, they already had my money by that point, but I'll never buy a game with so much DRM again.
Sounds well worth the £10 for some light-hearted evening gaming.
Actually, it really sounds like what I thought the final Populous would be like - not the awful travesty that tarnished the series' name. Maybe I'll save myself £10 and brush off my Populous II copy in DOSBox :) Armageddon!
I assume by "we" you mean Americans, because Russia still have Proton and Soyuz. Perhaps they aren't quite as elegant, but they do the job.
Begs the question
How serious does it have to be?
Name, address, phone number. That's pretty valuable information right there.
Politicians: "You are all idiots. Also, this stuff might be dangerous, so we're just going to ban it for your safety before it's invented."
Public: "Have you asked any medical experts to evaluate just what the dangers are?"
"No, but it isn't taxed like tobacco or alcohol, so it must be dangerous. In fact, we've disbanded the medical and science advisory boards because they said that some of these things weren't actually dangerous, but my public school education tells me otherwise."
"Oh, thanks; have some extra expenses."
Nothing wrong with that
But it would be nice if Apple didn't try to enforce the revisionism that the iPhone was a magical device with no precedent.
Sure, it was a well-designed and refined product (especially given the state of things like Symbian at the time), but I think the revolution was actually in placing the consumers' experience over the developers' (and Apples over that).
What's missing from those stats is the cost of those two games.
I don't disagree that mobile gaming is a boom market, but I don't personally find it comparable to console/PC gaming.
I have quite a few games on my phone and tablet, but when I'm home and fancy some multiplayer FPS, you're never going to convince me to give up my keyboard/mouse or controller.
Casual games are certainly becoming more phone/tablet-based, and rightly so. Consoles and PCs will just become further niche in more "hard-core" gaming.
"There is no 'freedom of speech' enshrined in British law AFAIK."
Human Rights Act 1998 (based on Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights).
I agree with your statements, though.
The way papers (tabloids) behave right now is "print first, ask later". If it sounds juicy, get it out there and deal with the consequences later.
I can't get the image of a monkey on amphetamines out of my head!!
acronym / abbreviation
"TLA is not a TLA by your definition"
And why not? Are you saying that "TLA" is not an acronym?
Using your dictionary link, "acronym" means: "a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words"
So regardless of what "A" stands for, "TLA" is an acronym; and a three-letter one at that. Granted, acronyms are also abbreviations (but not vice versa).
I really don't understand what you're being pedantic about.
I'd be pretty pissed if my password was being stored hashed without a salt. I'm not naive, I know it happens, but it should be be illegal under DPA for lack of due care.
Not saying this is an infallible solution, but I'm always amazed when a service warns users that their passwords have been compromised.
But if you've changed your DPI, it will be useless (as I have done on my HTPC). Refuses to let you see the whole host screen.
Works equally well for streaming audio to a second set of speakers, assuming you can't hear both at the same time because of the half-second lag. (i.e., upstairs and downstairs)
Do you need us to buy you a pint?
All together now!
Dur dah dur dah dur dah dah, dur dah dah, dur dah dah...
I'm glad to see they've picked one of the many interopable and open video-chat standards that are already in use. Oh, wait...
Why would any browser or OS use a DNS lookup for something that fits the pattern of an IP? I can't believe any browser out there doesn't attempt to go direct to IP addresses, so his example is a fail - but it does highlight the kind of attacks that people will be thinking about,
I wondered that
What do they mean by "leak users' IP addresses"? If they didn't provide servers with their IP addresses, I think users would have a bigger problem.
Monday apathy prevents me from actually trying to find out what they mean. (but doesn't prevent me from typing this reply)