All your blocks are belong to chains.
With all these Blockchains out there we're obviously going to need a Blockchain-Blockchain to track changes in all the other Blockchains.
468 posts • joined 6 May 2011
With all these Blockchains out there we're obviously going to need a Blockchain-Blockchain to track changes in all the other Blockchains.
As for when we will all be attending the local multiplex and putting on our headsets, well, that is still some distance away.
I don't think that this will ever happen, at least not on any large scale. You might see a few VR movie parlors open up here and there but these will not last very long IMHO. Why would I bother to go to out to a public space full of other people just to put on a headset that completely isolates me from said space and people?
It's sort of the point of VR that you get to go somewhere without actually going anywhere.
With a fabric cover, available in three shades, this is essentially a means of strapping a phone to your face and immersing yourself in VR content.
So I take this phone with a nice explody-possible battery and I put it real close to my eyes in an enclosed container made of flammable material?
What could possibly go wrong?
No no no... They're just dead and in hell.
You know, because they played D&D in the 1980s.
What is currently called the Internet of Things should more rightly be called "Putting Things on the Internet." A proper "Internet of Things" would be devices in my house that communicate with *each other* and receive instructions from me via the Internet through a managed gateway device attached to my router.
At no point should any of these devices ever get direct unfettered access to the Internet for reasons which should be obvious if you read this article.
This is already happening.
How does the character think of itself in a way that you can relate to? What is its childhood?
Jesus tap-dancing Christ, when did Google become the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation?
I do not want to have conversations *with* my phone - I want to find out what the weather forecast is or check my email or whatever and then have it shut the hell up.
Because they'll want to gouge out their eyes and thus be unable to use their phones?
If it were me, I'd have renamed it to "lettuce_encrypt.sh".
But not over the horizon...
It's the "limited" part that is now being violated.
Well *technically*, it *is* limited, even if they keep extending it. (See also "Eldred v. Ashcroft")
Even assuming that this extension continues unabated (perhaps some sort of copy-right extending robots can take over once the lawyers all die?), the sun will eventually consume the Earth in roughly 4.5 billion years.
Or in the worst-case scenario if we've arranged for some off-planet backup lawyers to be cached somewhere safe, the heat-death of the universe will arrive in about 10^100 years; ironically this is "one googol" years from now.
You use MD5 Hash!
It's not very effective...
these things need to be done quicker as it took year from buying the vehicle to getting the recall notice
To be fair, Honda probably did not have several million spare airbags sitting in a warehouse somewhere. Nor did they have millions of service technicians qualified to install all of them at once.
So they did it in stages/groups of however many they thought they could reasonably manage at once while not making it take too long for any one group.
But then I realized that I too will one day grow older...
Or die trying.
The placebo affect works in animals too.
Sorry but no, not really:
In general, for a placebo response to occur, it would seen require that the patient being treated recognize that there is an intentional effort to treat. Animals would appear to lack the ability to comprehend such intentions (other than they may not like a particular intervention). As such, animals would not be able to participate in placebo-generating experiences.
[Source: Is There a Placebo Effect for Animals?]
I'll agree that cars in America have a 3% utilization implying that 97% of the time the car is idle.
The problem here is the fallacy that this is some sort of artificial limit - cars are used 3% of the time because that's how much we use cars each day. Once the rush-hour traffic gets to work or home then the vast majority of drivers are basically done driving.
Or in other words, most cars are idle most of the time because we don't need a lot of cars most of the time. The limited number of people who can take advantage of an idle car during non-commuting hours is very low compared to the number of idle cars available. At best your car will drop you off at work in the morning and then return home for your spouse/child/whatever to use before it picks you up again after your shift ends. It's highly unlikely that you'll hire it out to randos; with such a potentially high supply and low demand the price will be too low to be worth the bother.
NASA spent millions on developing a pen
Actually NASA paid only $2.95 each for the original "Space Pens" they used (about $21 in 2016 dollars.)
I'm sure the best possible name (obviously "spider.web") will already be taken so there's really no point is there?
what's known in law enforcement circles as an “ass call”.
In the States this is colloquially known as a "butt dial."
Iodine 131 has a half-life of ~8 days so there's basically none of it left in the exclusion zone.
I can't imagine the number of Hail Mary's this guy is going to have to go through.
Um, zero? He's Presbyterian, not Catholic.
The difference is that Uber tells you "go to this location and take this person somewhere else" and if you don't do it, Uber will stop hiring you. They also set prices as they see fit.
eBay pretty much does not care what you sell or to whom you sell it or even if you sell the item elsewhere before the auction ends so long as you operate within the law and pay them the listing fees. You are also free to set whatever price you like.
The offer price is supposedly £17 per share, which currently amounts to ~US$22.55.
ARMH is currently trading around US$66 which is nearly 3x the officer price.
So am I an idiot or is everyone else?
Think Zip car. You call them up they deliver the car and you pay for the time . They even pay for the gas and insurance.
Still not ride sharing - that's called "renting a car."
PS: You ARE paying for the gas and insurance. What you meant to say was that they don't charge you *separately* for gas and insurance.
Only two of the Atom branded chips (N270 and N280) are 32-bit (IA32) only.
All other CPUs produced under that moniker are 64-bit (AMD64.)
So if I'm a new VoD startup, how do I compete with Foxtel's cosy arrangement with Telstra?
You call them up and get your own arrangement.
Let's face it, unless you're trying to set up a YouTube type of service (that is, user provided videos), the only real barrier to entry for creating a Video On Demand service is the cost of licensing the content. The internet connection(s) are probably the least expensive part.
I hate those things least of all for the fact that they use a combined data and power cable that is NOT user replaceable.
The real news here is that if you have a dog and a gullible enough sheriff you too can have $10,000.
But please also make sure you check and verify that the certificates involved are the ones you're expecting when you make that connection. Doesn't do much good to encrypt the data if your DNS gets hijacked and you're redirected to the bad guy's server without noticing.
I always liked the way the Globals had two pull-stops on the screen. Pull it out half way for normal use, or all the way for side-by-side apps or a wider single app.
I just revoked the System's and Administrator's NTFS permissions on the GWX folder which blocks it quite nicely.
Then what do you do with people with bad memories?
IMHO a strong password that is written down (and hidden in your wallet/billfold) is better than a weak password that the user can remember. Or else use a password vault I guess?
The number of in-person hacking attempts is almost zero these days when compared to the number of online automated ones. Unless your login has some special privileges then any ne'er-do-wells just need *an* account but not necessarily *your* account.
They made something like USD$4.2Billion in profit after taxes just this quarter (Q12016). So yeah, $7B isn't going to be a problem for them.
The new proposal, the NCTA argues, is the same: it has the FCC requiring cable companies to use a specific format and make it available to others to build cable boxes. In effect, setting that format in stone.
Defining and establishing technological standards is part of the FCC's raison d'etre. Why is the NCTA pretending that it doesn't know this? Standards create a level playing field so that everyone* has equal opportunity to succeed or fail.
And I am so tired of multi-billion dollar companies pretending that they can't have slightly lower profits without claiming that this will destroy everything that is right and good in the world and threatening to never invest anything into anything ever again like pouting children.
[*] - For varying definitions of "everyone" natch; obviously I'm not going to go out and start a cable company next week without having won several lotteries in the intervening time.
I just verified that I'm right - I just updated my Oculus software to the new version and Steam VR still works with it as does VorpX.
On Friday Oculus broke its word and instituted DRM (digital rights management) controls on its virtual reality headset, blocking non-approved games from its kit.
My understanding of this change was that they are blocking non-Oculus hardware from displaying Oculus exclusive titles. AFAIK they're still allowing 3rd party games and such to use the Rift.
Realistically isn't this what we all do?
You pretend that you're an Irish citizen in order to reduce your taxable income in other countries?
Corporations have a much easier time dodging taxes because they can use shell companies and other accounting shenanigans to shift numbers between different columns on the spreadsheet until they sum to zero or whatever numbers suit them at the time.
Just a high-end smartphone... Which will probably cost just as much as a high-end PC.
Also, I'm not terribly keen on having a potentially explodable Lithium battery in such proximity to my face. Speaking of which, VR is a resource hog - heavy CPU and GPU usage will very quickly drain the battery of any smartphone light enough to be worn for any length of time.
So you'd be happy for a video of you going to the toilet being available for someone else to watch? Really? If you *are* happy with that, then we should treat your previous posts with the contempt they deserve.
Why is the police officer in the toilet with me?
"Surely a nurse or technician with special training would take such a sample and not the beat cop that responds at the scene of a crime."
No. "Beat cop" is called "response" because they respond to anything turns up.
Huh? Camera or not, the police officer that responds to a crime is NOT going to be collecting evidence - that's a crime-scene technician or detective's job. You don't want evidence tainted or damaged by someone who isn't properly skilled and allow a criminal to escape justice based on a technicality do you?
"And again, most likely the kid is going to be handled by an expert who knows how to explain things to little kids."
No. You really have no idea what you're talking about.
If you say so. I happen to personally know a CPS (that's Child Protective Services) agent and he does this sort of thing all the time. The police call CPS when they have a child in a situation like this because CPS agents have the knowledge and experience that the police officers don't.
"I don't see how it being recorded is somehow a problem"
Then you really need to see more people in emotionally stressful situations
Well then I'd need a video of it wouldn't I?
What's the scenario here that has you so worried? So cop tells family that their grandpa is dead and then the camera like blows a raspberry at them or something? Or does it just start immediately uploading to YouTube and leaving racist comments?
Seriously though, how does the presence of a camera recording these events ruin or complicate them?
You might be ok, but I bet you're in a minority.
Well I also have no issue with those things, so that's two to one so far...
How about when taking the intimate sample from the rape victim? Think she's going to want that on video?
Surely a nurse or technician with special training would take such a sample and not the beat cop that responds at the scene of a crime.
Or explaining to a four year old why mummy is in the ambulance and daddy is being taken away for a while.
It's a passive device on the officer's uniform - not a camcorder with bright lights being stuck in your face so I don't see why this would be a problem. And again, most likely the kid is going to be handled by an expert who knows how to explain things to little kids.
Or whilst asking the local "youth" to grass on the rival gang members
I guess maybe? But then again, what's the issue here? Do you think the gang members will get a copy of the tape in order to take their revenge?
Or passing granddad's death message.
Again, what's the issue here? Sure it's sad to tell someone their relative is dead but I don't see how it being recorded is somehow a problem. It isn't as if the footage will be broadcast.
Whatbout the cop who inadvertently looks through my living room window and gets a view of the inside of my house? This is creepy state surveillance by the backdoor
Welp, I guess it's curtains for you then.
I haven't had a cable company issued box since at least 2000. My TiVo does everything including "Pay Per View" and "On Demand" video using the existing FCC mandated CableCard standard.
In a rare display of bipartisanship the US House of Representatives has passed the Email Privacy Act (EPA) in a 419-0 vote.
Bi-partisanship had nothing to do with it! They just realized that *their* email would also be easily obtainable via subpoena without this law. There are a lot of skeletons to be found in those closets I'd imagine.