Re: Rapidly changing (negative) dynamic for Microsoft
what are you even trying to say?
676 publicly visible posts • joined 4 May 2011
The same question has been asked do answered a number of times already.
The point is that it makes it easier for developers working in a Microsoft environment to integrate with non Microsoft environments. You know, like not needing to leave Visual Studio at all.
Again, as so many people have pointed out already, the concept isn't new. Microsoft had Windows services for unix for example. Also, there is the andLinux project which goes a lot further, but imo is very shakey.
Also, the most popular OS running on Azure is Linux I believe, thus defining the use case as potentially being. Net developers who are working with a Linux on Azure from a Windows desktop.
One of the major complaints of Windows 8 was that MS were perceived as assuming everyone would be using a touch interface in some way to control their computer of choice.
Whilst the architecture and usability of this OS is commendable in its current form, what is the expected benefit of bringing an entire ecosystem of touchscreen based applications to the desktop?
The main product is the UltraTablet, which looks like a Chinese knock off Surface. The unique selling point for the mini seems to be a capacitive power button.
I can see what they are trying to do and its a fairly good idea, but I get the feeling that for this to work they need to have compelling hardware and right now, imho, they dont. I wouldnt want this installed on my own personal machine as I like playing games and I wouldnt see the need for installing it on a USB drive to boot from whatever machine as I would normally be carrying an Android phone and/or tablet.
For me personally, I would much prefer this to be installed on my phone and have the ability to hook that up to a monitor, keyboard and mouse either via USB or bluetooth.
captain badmouth, you are talking out of your arse. Windows 10 does not install itself.
Even the link you provided didnt affect all Windows users and would only affect those who chose to automatically download and install the available updates.
As we can tell from you malformed posts, she didnt let her laptop automatically install Windows 10, nor did she click on a button to automatically install it - you already told us you were updating her latop. Did you just see it in the list of available updates or something? This made your blood boil so much? The mere thought of your daughter using something made by Microsoft was so disgusting that you had to go out there and add to the blazing bonfire that is the current public perception of Windows 10 by, wait for it, lying?
Fuck me, I wonder how many more lying cunts like you are out there.
I dont know how big the games industry is for Windows these days.
Does it cost more for a developer to make a Linux version of a cross platform game? And even then, is there enough of a market place for it?
Here is an interesting example, Kerbal Space Prorgam has been chugging along on 64 bit Linux for quite some time. It plays like a dream. The latest preview of the Windows version has only just brought 64 bit support in. This version has been rebuilt against a new engine and comes with a new physics engine etc and has primarily been put together for the upcoming console release. None of this has brought many changes to the Windows (or indeed Linux) version of the game, so how relevant is Windows 10 to the gaming community?
(gamer here, I use lots of OS's, mainly old Windows, to play games)
to be honest, comments like "Windows server hell" are probably made by people who dont even work in IT.
I think even the infrastructure guys I have worked with in the past didnt care about the Windows/Linux debate. They just wanted to get stuff done with Windows and with Linux.
I think the Linux fantards need to pick their words pretty carefully now. In the past it has always been Microsoft telling you point blank how they can do it better than anyone else (because they are a business) and consultancies pushing Linux telling you they can do it better than anyone else (because they are a business).
Now we seem to be in a situation where the real Linux community is overshadowed by this group of screaming, mewling, complaining fantards who may have read a copy of Computer Active back in the late 90's telling people point blank that you should use Linux for everything because Microsoft has been "duping" people for the last forever into using products that are not fit for purpose. If Linux was the pinnacle of computing that it is being made out to be, it would have superceded every other OS out there since 1992. And fuck me, it hasnt.
Instead we have competition, which is a much better thing to have than the narrow oligarchy offered by either MS or the Linux community.
It's a free OS, not just a free upgrade.
You can choose to upgrade from your existing installation of windows or you can choose to to an install from scratch.
I cannot see how Windows is still Microsoft's main cash supply. They make way more money selling one office licence. You can go further, just one MSDN subscription blows the cost of a Windows 10 Home install dvd with COA.
As for promoting another OS, I am not entirely sure how you got to this "point", but anyway... Microsoft doesn't need to promote Linux, it never has - Linux does a good job of that all by itself.
As for your "Windows server hell" scenario, well, do you Internet?
I would seriously consider moving over to PSake then.
With your current problem, is it that nmake is defaulting back to the windows directory when you are trying to invoke a target in nmake?
Oh, and MSBUILD has been around since the first days of .Net, its the only thing I have ever used to build ,Net to be honest. Its just that in 2013 it became the only way to build .Net
I am not entirely sure if you are taking the piss, but OK, I will bite.
NMake has been deprecated for quite some time now, MSBUILD took over back in 2013 and is better, by and large, than NMake.
You can execute MSBUILD from PowerShell at any point in time, as long as you have you path set up to point to the correct version of MSBUILD (you will have a separate exe for each version of .Net you have installed, or explicitly call the one you want).
Alternatively, try PSake, its a PowerShell based build engine. Its actually OK, the build is defined as code as opposed to mark up, which makes it quite powerful, along the lines of Rake etc.
the point is that it gives people choice. Now, in the Linux world, there are a hundred and one tools to develop in the same language, adding in another tool isnt a bad thing.
From the perspective of the Windows developer, this now gives them the possibility of working with Linux infrastructure in a less frustrating manner. If you can build a Linux console app in C++ from Visual Studio on your Win X box then remotely build it against a separate Linux machine, wouldn't that be a not bad thing to do?
Im sorry, but VB.Net is many things, but c# with VB syntax it is not. Its also not a successor to VB6, VB.Net is the successor to VB6.
Obviously from your post, you havent used Visual Studio in quite some time and definitely not longer than 5 or 10 minutes.
As for the actual topic itself, if MS wants to add support for Linux C++ devs then all the better, it gives those guys another tool they can choose to use if they want it. Indeed, it looks like you haven't read further than the title, as none of the templates offered appear to be relevant to visual development.
you will find that a lot of the Windows 10 and 8.1 hate will come from windows 7 and XP users, I honestly dont think Linux users actually care one way or another about Windows of any version unless they are forced into using it.
For this group of people, they simply dont want things to change, they just want the same user experience that they have been getting since XP was released. Its this group that will complain about the Windows 8.1 and 10's GUI without actually using the OS, there are a lot of them on this thread. They will shout and whine, demanding that we all roll back to Windows 7 in order to avoid the dreaded "telemetry" and "data slurping" intrinsic to Windows 8.x and 10. So, it would seem we are in the second age of the Wintard as MS added all these dreaded features to Windows 7 last year: KB3068708. KB3075249 and KB3080149
Next, you have a group of Windows users who are just confused with the latest release strategy from MS. We were all pretty used to the good release/crap release schedule. These people just want to know whats going on etc
I am a little different in that regard.
As a Sony VAIO laptop user (there are only about 4 of us in the wild) we were prevented from upgrading from 8.1 to 10 automatically until a few weeks ago. Sony had basically set VAIO Care to not allow it to be sent out to its devices. Their reason was simple, they were not sure it would be stable. The only stability issue with Windows 10 I have had so far is with my graphics card, which when it went wrong was a complete bugger to get fixed.
The only reason I upgraded to 10 before that point was because my HDD died and needed a new OS.
Now, I will assume that all the Linux beards will be guffawing into the froth atop the real ale in their dimple mugs at hearing that; "Why not install Ubuntu!" they may mutter between themselves.
The Linux hipsters will be screaming me down from behind a distro that isn't mainstream, so you probably never heard of it. But screaming quietly, in case they are caught by their mothers.
The Apple users will be a bit confused as they think that an OS is just something you get for free with the box you plug your iphone into.
At the end of the day, I had a working internet connection, a USB drive, the ability to put the installer on said drive and the desire to see something new.
It was either that or stick with the XP user experience for the next 14 years....
well, if you go by the comments here, it means you are a complete liar. It would be impossible for you to even boot your machines once Windows 10 was installed, let alone use them according to the commentards.
Given that Windows 8.1 and 10 have been so terribly, terribly awful there must have been something even worse wrong with all the Linux distributions that came out over the same time frame.
Again I would call you out on your ability as a "developer".
If you have a machine with "full" access to the internet, why is the application running on that machine and not out on some server somewhere, you know, so that you can control it a lot easier?
Or do you prefer maintaining n amount of kiosks on a regular basis more than you need to?
Doesnt this have more to say about your software and your testing practices as opposed to the OS?
Not disabling auto updates on a testing environment, or even not isolating it from the internet at large seems like something you need to sort out way before you get to testing...
there is seriously nothing that wrong with Windows 8.1 or 10 - the only thing wrong with 8.1 is the start screen. 10 is actually quite good. If you have used any version of Windows, then 10 isnt going to be a problem for you.
One thing I have noticed recently is that there seems to be a difference between the upgrade version of Windows 10 (from 8.1 to 10) and the regular 10. Its mainly cosmetic stuff and I only noticed it recently after reinstalling post new hdd installation.
Also, I get the feeling that a lot of the people complaining about Windows 10 have never actually used it for longer than 10 minutes....