Re: That is not the real reason
You got any source for those claims?
Sounds like complete bollocks to me...
1205 posts • joined 11 Jun 2007
You got any source for those claims?
Sounds like complete bollocks to me...
Its certainly the most likely cause, but its next to impossible to prove with any level of certainty. Hence why they call this a transient event.
You don't claim something you cant prove without a very high level of certainty in the space biz. Its far too costly when you find out you were wrong later! ;)
Thats quite a Resolution you have there. We wouldnt want to scuttle it...
... its called Switzerland. Where referendums are a very common occurrence (about once a month on average I think). Admittedly Switzerland is a much smaller nation than the US and Swiss people are conditioned to take part in decision making due to a very long history of this within the cantons, but it doesn't mean its an automatic fail idea everywhere in the world...
Although saying that, opening up online polling for decisions is a total recipe for disaster...
But that seems like an excellent way to gather people's emails and passwords...
"Roll up, roll up, Ladies and Gentleman. Give ME your emails and passwords and I'll check to make sure they have been compromised by other miscreants."
"Here you go. Has my account been compromised?"
"Well it hadn't been..."
Having worked on a Mars mission in the past I had to take part in the Planetary Protection course at ESA. It's very interesting, but bloody hard (and expensive) to achieve the levels of cleanliness you need, I can assure you. But just to correct one thing, the reason for Planetary Protection is not to protect potential life on other planets or to stop contamination of other planets, but its purely there to protect future science missions. i.e. making sure that when a future mission declares that they have found XYZ, then there is no doubt that they actually have found native XYZ, and not XYZ coming from a previous mission. (XYZ could be life, water, organic materials, titanium deposits or whatever). No one wants to have to send up 3 or 4 missions to confirm they have found something just because someone earlier might have screwed up.
That's the real reason, the protecting of other potential lifeforms and prevention of contamination is really just a side benefit.
Mind you, if I ever get on another interplanetary mission then I'm stealing that Interplanetary Genocide line. Brilliant! :P
What's life without a little bit of risk?
What's the robot equivalent of the local donut shop?
I'm not that old fortunately, however, the vast majority of those losses weren't from dogfighting with the North Vietnam Airforce but from ground to air losses (if my quick skim of Wikipedia was right). Additionally, the current generation of radars doesnt really allow for pilots to get surprised in the middle of the sky by an enemy squadron. The detail you can pick out with modern radars is frankly ridiculous! :)
Still we've been lucky enough to have avoided an air war for a while, so I'm hoping my conjecture stays just that for a while longer. We dont need the Yanks and the Ruskies taking pot shots at each other over Syria anytime soon...
In this day and age, if your fighters are getting within visual range of the opposition then you're doing it wrong.
Dogfighting is no longer a necessary skill for fighter pilots, you fly to within missile range (i.e. radar range only), fire your missile and keep an eye out for missiles coming at you. Fire some jamming missiles to block the other persons missiles if necessary and then return to base. If the enemy gets close enough to see you, your SAM defences should be making their life hell, if you get close enough to the enemy to see them, then you better hope you've already taken out there SAM defences. And if you, have why are their airports still in operation?
Dogfighting stats are just willywaving and don't have any bearing on reality....
Well naturally. There is a reason the F-22 is not being exported to anyone (not even close allies like Australia). It is the pinnacle of combat jets (and with a price tag to match). The F-35 is to be the normal workhorse for the US "allied forces" and that's why its being bought into by dozens of countries including such "friendly" nations as Turkey. If it could take the F-22 in a straight fight, there's no way the US would have allowed it to be a multi-country program...
Wow another totally racist reply missing the point. From the list you mention I see very few that are from Syria, Iraq or Afghanistan the ones that make up the "1 million rapists" mentioned by John156. Most of those are North African migrants or Südlander, (which loosely translated means southern European - i.e. Balkan migrants). Note migrants not refugees.
Also you've listed 29 cases in the month of January across Deutschland. 29. Out of a population of 80 million. I would suggest this is a very small number across Deutschland for one month. That is not to say it is good. 1 is too many! there will always be bad apples, but to claim those figures mean every migrant or refugee is a raping scum bag is just blatant racist xenophobia. Pathetic really.
That's a hell of a lot of racism in one paragraph! I live in Germany, you don't (obviously). Germans are not as bothered about the number of migrants coming except that we worry where we can locate them, how to house them, how to integrate them, etc. 1 million people is a lot to take care of in a very short period of time. To classify all of the refugees (even the women and children!) as "men of fighting and raping age" is a ridiculously racist generalism.
Don't comment on something you know nothing about, and don't drag strawmen into an argument which they have absolutely nothing to do with.
By the way, the raping you talk about, I assume is related to the New Years Eve incidents in Köln and a few other cities. The "people" involved in those have been discovered to be North African migrants (Moroccan, Libyan, Tunisian, etc.) not refugees from the 1 million middle eastern refugees that you're so freely condemning. So get your facts straight before you spout misguided racist rubbish.
The best way I can think of to get rid of these calls is to go after the firms who are being advertised for. If that fine is huge, it will quickly stop people employing these bastards and then the market goes away.
Remove the market and the end product goes away....
How will they possibly survive without their daily dose of Caviar and Don Perignon '55?
A (paraphrased) quote from an Aussie author I read once (but I forget the name... woops - I'm on a roll today!):
"The man in a tuxedo is never overdressed. The moment he arrives at the party, every other male in the room becomes underdressed."
Salafists (like IS) believe that the world should return to the time when Mohammed walked the Earth. but ever notice how they have no problem with using weapons more advanced then Swords, modern medicine and things like Social Media to get their message across.
Hypocrisy is the term I believe...
True, but he should lose the proceeds of the crime. An 800 quid fine on 50,000 takings. Hardly discourages further criminal activities, does it?
Everyone knows the maps are all upside down and the "Southern Hemisphere" is really the top half of the planet! Hence the expression "Australia is Tops!"
3D Printing will never come close to replacing mass production, but for low volume operations it "can" be more cost effective. And low volume doesn't necessarily mean "niche industry". Aircraft are only produced in lots of hundreds to thousands. If you have a single part that is expensive to manufacture for an aircraft by traditional methods then producing this by 3D Printing might be cheaper. The Space industry is another which can benefit hugely from 3D Printing.
3D print parts can be far more effective/efficient then many traditional parts, because you can build in a single part things which would take multiple parts in traditional manufacturing (think internal cooling channels, etc.). However, the technology is not really there yet except for on a very limited number of parts. The time for production of metallic 3D parts is still too high, and the cost/part analysis really only works on extremely short volume runs at the moment. 3D metallic parts also require significant amounts of post work machining (surface finishes, hole punching, thread tapping, support material removal, etc), so they will never replace the traditional workshop.
Still the metal 3D printing industry does hold some promise, just forget about it for mass production - areas like Space, Aero, Medical and custom engineering jobs can all benefit. Auto and consumer goods - not a chance!
Yep sounds like the kids at college alright...
I'm reading a lot of comments here, about how Boeing should keep their documents away from internet accessible servers. Well I'd love to know how you can do that when you're an international multi-site company.
I don't work for Boeing but I work for another International multisite company. I work on part of the design here in Germany, colleagues in the UK and France work on other sections, we all need to collaborate on the CAD models and documentation. Yes, the servers are secured, with all the usual jazz, but the fact is we all need to access to that data, and that means there is ZERO chance that we could run this company with all of the data locked away on servers with no access to the internet! Should we be sending that data around the world with memory sticks? Should every single worker in the firm be on a machine that has no access to the internet? Probably we should get rid of email as well, right, because that's an internet facing server?
In this day and age, it is not possible to run a multinational firm, or even a multi site one, without pretty much every computer having a potential internet presence. All you can do is attempt to lock down permissions enough that if someone is compromised that the level of compromise is negligible. And have the systems in place to quickly notice when a system is compromised.
From this article it appears, this guy identified the location of servers and the names of people to be targeted for phishing. Externals did the actual hacking. That would have made it harder for detection of the compromised information, as the hackers could zero in quickly to where they wanted to go. Still 3 years is a long time to get away with this. So Boeing needs stronger detection strength, but in the modern world you cant get away from having internet accessible computers. So accusing Boeing of being foolish for this, is just wrong.
I totally agree with this, but I'm willing to go further.
If the exposure of your extra marital activities was likley to lead to you wanting to commit suicide then sorry you are the last person who should be indulging in those activities. If you are going to have an affair you better be damned ready to take the consequences when it all goes pear shaped. The hackers might have brought this data out into the public when you werentexpecting it, but affairs have a way of being discovered by themselves anyway, despite what those in the act might think...
"The truth will out" applies in the case of an affair just as much as any other "conspiracy"...
Fraud - Wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. From the OED.
This certainly seems to meet those requirements. Perhaps the FTC should be passing the details over to the Feds for action. Because bastards like this should not get away so lightly.
if there are any argentinians here what they think of the whole Falklands debate?
Considering that the claim is based entirely upon the claim of the nation of River Plate's soverignty of the islands which lasted from 1826-1832 (and was not the first claims to the islands that being from the British and Spanish in the 1770's). It seems strange that the Argentinians are not also claiming the lands of Paraguay and Uruguay which were also part of the River Plate nation. The claim is also made weaker by the fact that there has been a continual presence of the british on the island since 1840 (all these details from wikipedia).
If 175 years of history isnt enough to claim to be one nation and not another, then I dont know what is....
I have to admit I cant remember ever using any website outside of the .com's (the various nationality ones), the .gov's (sometimes you just cant escape those), and the occasional .org or .net.
I know there are now dozens of other ones that have come out, but frankly why would I bother to go them?
Does anyone use one of them on a regular basis? Anyone?
If you read the article (and some other articles I've read seem to confirm this), then you'll see that the hackers took over the login webpages. Thus the passwords were grabbed before they were encrypted, similar to if someone had a keylogger installed on your computer.
From the details I read on a different website (but dont take this as confirmation) it seems that the hackers had the website under control for 1 day (March 3rd), but until some more details come out, that might turn out to be an underestimate...
Still, annoying for those people who use Twitch...
I never really get why bosses are allowed to sell stock in their own company whilst there still employed with it. Actually I would also set a limit that you cant sell your shares until you've been away from the company for more then 5 years.
That would mean you cant pump and dump the shares, you cant co-incidentally schedule a selling of your shares to happen a week or so after a brand new product comes to market, or before you announce something causing the shares to dive. You are stuck with the shares for good or bad. And you have to leave the company in a good enough position, and with a good enough person at the helm that your shares will still be worth something in 5 years time.
That would certianly provide incentive to make good decisions for the company and for its long term future. Still cnsidering how greedy the twats at the top are, something like that will never happen...
I feel like we do not have all of the facts here. He was thrown off the flight for being a disruptive passenger. Writing in a notebook hardly seems like that would count. I have no doubt once the cops got him THEY probably looked at his notebook sure, and probably asked him some hard questions. But as they have released him without charge then they didnt take that stuff seriously (well done the plod for not being stupid!).
BUT we seem to be missing the information as to what he was doing that was disruptive and why he was thrown off the flight. Airlines dont throw people off a plane for writing in a book. More info please El Reg, otherwise it feels like your going for clickbait.
There is one easy way to fix the US Patent system. When you submit a patent application, you pay the full amount and whether they approve it or not you lose the money. Allow one appeal for rejections. If the appeal is rejected, and someone wants to resubmit with additional paperwork, they pay again.
The USPTO would then have no reason to just approve anything that comes, because they get paid either way. It would also decrease there workload, as fewer cranks would be willing to stump up the fee knowing they were going to lose the money even if their patent was rejected. Simple and effective.
Am I seeing an increased likelihood of crime around the El Reg office in the next month? Well I guess it is Friday, and some things have to head out the back door whilst the bosses are enjoying their Friday liquid lunches, no? wink, wink, nudge, nudge...
UAV's have a lot of benefits, there is a lot of things they can do smarter and cheaper than anything else (reconnaisance, mapping, etc.), but acting as a delivery service is never going to be anywhere near as cheap or effective as regular delivery from a van.
First, there is carrying capacity - a drone cannot carry a great deal of weight; second, there is fuel economy - a drone uses significantly more fuel per km per kg then any automobile on the planet; third, there are all of the other issues associated - securtiy, regulation, the actual delivery, etc. Your Fed Ex package might occasionally get thrown over the back fence, but in general if they cant deliver it, they take it back or maybe they give it to a neighbour, or it goes in your letter box, but a drone is unlikely to be able to do any of that. So your parcel will get dropped on the lawn and you can kiss that goodbye in many neighbourhoods.
So bring on more practical uses of UAV's but can please stop the nonsense about drone deliveries, it distracts from the useful applications!
A lot of companies having developed a proprietary system requiring extra bits of hardware would have stuck by their system indefinitely (if only to get the added sales involved in buying the proprietary bits of hardware).
So fair call to them, if they are dicthing the bridge because they dont need it anymore that's to be applauded. Have to say I'm quite happy with my Sonos system, but I might try switching over to the bridgeless system in the coming days. If nothing else, it saves me an extra bit of kit slurping the electrical juice!
A good lie contains at least half truth...
It's the ultimate answer (ok times 1000). Julian just thought the Ultimate Question was "How many pages of evidence do the US government have on me?"
Ahh yes, great game (if you dont mind low rent fun!).
I can clearly remember the Saber Tooth Tiger Race (i.e you raced away from the Saber Tooth Tiger chasing you and then up a tree (if you're lucky)), the Mate toss (sticks in my mind for when the cave lady in question got up and bonked you on the head with her club), and the Dino Race (because you just couldnt bloody well get the silly things to go where you wanted them to!).
But the Global Gender is 70% Male, 30% Female?
To the best of my knowledge I would guess its much closer to 50-50, otherwise I imagine there wouldnt be very many single ladies living out there!
If they mean Global Gender in Work around the world, I would have thought the figure would be even lower (considering how many woman are prevented from working due to various religious beliefs). So I'm really not clear on that graph. Seems a bit wishy-washy...
Look, not to be defending the cops too much, but I am certain they have walked into MANY domestic situations and been told "Everything is fine officer", when its quite clear that one (or more) people are clearly terrified in the situation.
Now in these Swatting cases, that terror might be induced by having a SWAT team arrive at the people's house, but again it might not be. And the police would be absolutely vilified if they came to such a situation, walked away, and then the next morning discovered that the entire family was murdered by that nice seeming father, who assured the officers that it must have been a hoax call and of course everyone in the house was fine and not at all about to be murdered.
This is a lose-lose situation for the cops. Either they are overbearing (when they arrest someone) or they are potentially negligent (when they walk away and the people end up being killed). It's not really a surprise given the choices that they go for overbearing...
I havent played Tropico 5, but I spent many a happy hour with Tropico 4. The city building is great fun, the atmosphere and theme is incredibly well done and the music is highly addictive. The game is very challenging, as you try to squirrel away as much money in your swiss bank account whilst setting up enough housing and industry to keep your people content. There's also numerous factions on the islands which you need to keep happy which often involves balancing your actions so as to favour the most popular factions.
All in all, a great game! I might have to dig it out again this weekend...
Sorry Paul, I'm afraid you're missing the point. With a conventional rocket you fire once in the direction you want to go, accelerate quickly up to speed, and then cruise the rest of the way, until its time to turn around and put the brakes on. That means you get quickly to a crusing speed and then its coasting all the way, you cannot go faster.
With a continuous action drive (like this one or an ion drive), you only need to apply a small thrust because there is nothing slowing you down. So you are constantly accelerating, the acceleration might be much lower, but you are always getting faster and faster. It doesnt take long even with very modest accelerations to start travelling faster then your conventionally powered satellite (which is still stuck at the same speed it was when its rockets turned off).And once your faster, you will quickly catch up and overtake the conventional satellites.
These things are no use in the atmosphere, where things slow you down, but out in Space, they have great possibilities...
I was actually thinking the same thing. A felony implies a crime, which means its not a lawsuit. A lawsuit is when one party sues another, and there is no involvement of the police. A person can be involved in both a lawsuit and a crime proceedings (think OJ Simpson), but those are two different things instigated by different parties (the state and the family).
So this guy doesnt seem to understand even the basics of law. That's a worry...
You're assuming that it was made of the same stuff as the first one. Who knows it might have been hollow? Or made from something lighter...
(It probably wasnt, but you know, volume does not automatically correlate with mass...)
If researchers were to find a particular primsing strain of DNA (say a particular mutation gives extra protection against a disease), I can see there being a desire by the researcher to try and get a few more samples from that person or there immediate family.
This legislation is designed to stop them trying to find these people, and instead go back to the governing body, who can decide if they want to contact the people or not.
Someone donating blood/DNA/whatever to a research body, might be willing to do so again, but that doesnt mean they want to be approached by random scientists demanding their liver...
I cant imagine in this day and age (especially after the first lot of NSA data breaches was revelaed) that he would have made such a definitiev statement if he knew it was bollocks. He would have used weasel words, and specially formulated statements that said something without ever denying the possibility of anything.
This sounds to me like he said what he thought was the truth, and which now turns out not to be. Mind you I could be wrong, and when he said those sorts of things what he meant was that they dont do it to USAians. Since Yanks dont usually consider the other inhabitants of the world to be people I wouldnt be surprised by that turn of events...
Step up one and all, place your bets:
5/2 North Korea
1000/1 All of the EU
"... the stock has outperformed both the S&P 500 and the stock of Icahn Enterprises."
And take that! ;)
You have obviously never worked with any sort of space based plant research project so really you should keep your mouth shut as you dont know what your talking about.
The space environment causes dramatic changes in the way plants grow and react to various stimuli. Different chemicals are produced or are produced in greater quantities in space comapred to terrestrial plants and as such small variations in the concentrations of chemicals in the plants and their seeds/fruits can turn something which is perfectly harmless (and quite tasty) on Earth into something quite poisonous in space. There are also the effects of various bacteria which react very differently under space environments, which can render the output of plants dangerous even when the plants themselves are not.
So frankly your assertion that this is useless research could not be further off base. This is great work from the Russians and the ISS to produce strains of plants which can grow (and multiply, which is also a huge problem of the space environment) in zero gravity. Well done those plant boffins!
I cant think of a single reason, why a third party firm should be given a list of Yahoo's users email addreses, let alone giving them the users email addresses PLUS the passwords. Honestly, can anyone tell me even a single reason that would happen? Anyone?
(and lets not go into the fact it seems to have been done in plain text, which is frankly gobsmacking!)
So in order for our species to thrive on a distant planet somewhere else, we need to go there and make the beast with two backs with the locals?
Where's Captain Kirk when we need him?
There's a Lego movie???
How did I miss that???