Re: Who's to blame
No, no. Fascism is bad. Therefore we are never fascists. The "other", however. Yes, they are fascists.
129 posts • joined 28 Feb 2011
No, no. Fascism is bad. Therefore we are never fascists. The "other", however. Yes, they are fascists.
"A Windows 8 car would have the brake pedal hidden under the driver seat."
This is the company that required you to push the "Start" button to turn your computer off...
They actually made this: Thunder in Paradise starring, of all people, Hulk Hogan. It's just as awful as it sounds.
That's not the Flying Spaghetti Monster, it's his aquatic cousin, the Swimming Spaghetti Monster.
"Try suing the responsible authorities for libel..."
They've got him there, too: you can't defame a dead person.*
* In Scots law. I've no idea about French.
Kudos to both companies for giving these advantages equally to both mothers and fathers. Much of the "gender" pay gap can be explained by the fact that women are societally expected to be the main child carer, and reducing the economic incentives to perpetuate that can only be a good thing.
I do wonder if the *ahem* angels take a slightly larger than expected share of space whisky.
It reminds me of the probably apocryphal tale of the man who phoned the police to report a burglar rummaging around in his garden shed only to be told that there was no-one available and it would probably be morning before someone could come round. So, he phones up a few minutes later and says "It's okay; no hurry in coming round: I've just shot him".
A short time later as three armed response units, a dog van and the helicopter hustle a very surprised burglar off to the cells, one of the plod asks "I thought you said you'd shot him?" "I thought you said there was no-one available?".
Black helicopter, because nowadays he'd probably be whisked off to Gitmo under the Making The Establishment Look Silly (Prevention of Paedo-terrorism) Regulations 2003.
I imagine it was also buried in the terms and conditions - you know, that little blue link (to multiple pages of dense text) you have to tick a checkbox next to (but not actually read) before it'll let you buy things.
Yes, although bear in mind where we're coming from: TCP/IP doesn't follow the ISO-OSI model; TCP has always been a bit too ready to assume that it's operating over IP. If all we get out of this is a better separation of the transport and network layers, it'll be a win.
While I can understand the Heath-Robinsonesque setup required to play old games requiring you to play the game in the wrong aspect ratio, could you not at least have re-sized the screenshots for publication so things don't look squashed?
I don't want the BBC to be commercially successful. That most likely means lowest common denominator pap, which we can get just fine from... commercial stations. I'd like to see the BBC get back to the Rethian goals of educating, informing and entertaining, but whenever it tries to do something highbrow, it gets attacked for being elitist or wasting money on things of limited interest. Is it any surprise it reacts by trying to dumb down?
The 2015 Westminster Election polls actually got the result almost spot on. It was the analysis of them, and specifically the desire of the media to feed the hung parliament narrative, that was wrong.
They're tights that allow Alice to reveal what's contained in them to Bob, while keeping Eve unaware.
"Oh, can you get me her phone number then?"
Can it tell me if an arbitrary program will halt for an arbitrary input?
(Sarcasm icon needed)
Of course, this is because the ISS radiator is actually a radiator; i.e. it mainly dissipates heat by radiating it. The "radiator" in your car - indeed, most things us Earthbound humans call radiators - are actually more properly convectors, since we have this oh-so handy "air" stuff that you can just dump heat into and allow it to float off. Just goes to show how hard space is.
Trivia of the day: the Discovery One in 2001: A Space Oddessy was originally going to have enormous cooling radiators for the nuclear reactor at the back, but they were dropped because Kubrick didn't want to have to explain why the (otherwise fairly realistic) non-atmospheric spacecraft design had "wings".
Do not underestimate the inertia in large, bureaucratic organisations, of which the FBI is almost certainly an example. It's entirely possible that someone got the e-mail telling them the domain was about to expire, but didn't have the authority to issue a purchase order for the renewal, or even authority to pass it on to someone who does. So, the task get passed up, down, left, right, through any number of people, committees, meetings, most of whom don't care about it, or know the importance (for instance, they may not have realised that it also was involved with the Megaupload domains). It only takes one to forget or not bother and before you know it, the domain's expired.
Presumably we need the medical device certification authorities to issue some smackdown and require these standards: that will soon provide the incentive. The certification process for medical equipment is pretty tortuous already (and I would be surprised if it ignored the software entirely); it just needs to include security, too.
Bear in mind that in Scotland the Crown in Parliament does not have unlimited sovereignty - this was referred to by the Lord President of the Court of Session as "a distinctively English principle and has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law" in the result of MacCormick v Lord Advocate.
This isn't to say that Westminster couldn't legislate to repeal the HRA in Scotland, but it could result in a constitutional crisis or two if the Scottish Parliament dig their heels in and try to assert that they better represent the considered will of the people of Scotland (which is widely asserted, but has never been proved, to be sovereign in Scotland) than Westminster.
Those of us (in Scotland at least) live in interesting times.
Labour are only going to ban exploitative zero-hour contracts. They want you to think that means that all zero-hour contracts are exploitative, so they'll be banned. Of course, what it actually means is that they'll only ban the ones they have deemed to be exploitative - which certainly won't include any connected to a Labour politician, or donor for that matter.
If I'm honest I'd much rather we focussed on the exploitative bit, rather than an arbitrary number of hours. If a zero-hour contract is exploitative, surely a one-hour contract is almost as exploitative? I was on one during my student days, and although the flexibility suited me well, I can see how it could easily have been abused by a less-scrupulous employer, especially if had been a job whose income I needed, rather than like to have.
Rather than some vague aspirational soundbite, how about some concrete measures? I'd think if we had protection against detriment from refusing overtime, and the requirement that sick and holiday pay be based on the average hours actually worked over some period (perhaps the 17 weeks employers should already be monitoring for the 48-hour week) then we could keep zero hour contracts and the "flexibility" that business claims is so important, while also improving the lot of employees on all contracts, not just zero-hour ones.
If there's a hung parliament, we won't necessarily get a coalition - where two parties agree a joint programme for government, and share out ministerial positions between them. It's entirely possible we'll get a minority government with one or more other parties in a "confidence and supply" agreement, where they agree to support the government in confidence motions and pass their budget - the bare minimum. Everything else would need have support gathered on a case-by-case basis, which, if approached in the right spirit by the politicians, can lead to some nice consensus politics.
The SNP did this fairly successfully in the third Scottish parliament, although it showed both the good and the bad sides of it: while the Tories engaged fairly constructively, Labour stuck rigidly to the Bain Principle, and flounced around generally seeming upset that they weren't being allowed to run the country. Of course, the result of the election to the current parliament* shows how well that went down.
*One of the requirements for the Scottish electoral system when it was designed is widely acknowledged to have been to make it difficult for any party, and especially the SNP, to get a majority.
When we had a turtle in primary school, we were given strict instructions never to do left or right anything other than exactly 90. Guess what the first thing we did was? I believe the only way the teachers could find to abort our "right 99999999999999999" was to take the batteries out.
Surely endurance racing is a much better place for IT people? The cars there are self-jacking, so no need to leave the servers unguarded.
This is one reason for being a member of a trade union. No-one needs to put their head above the parapet: the rep just goes to management and says "our members tell us that...".
Are these strong enough to make a space elevator cable out of?
If they don't know there's a password to ask you for, you're in the clear.
Was it that the impact on landing was too high, and caused the ram pack to wobble?
Surely if the Earth's rotation is slowing down, the International Earth Rotation Service need to work a bit harder at rotating Earth internationally?
The metric sizes being odd is quite simple: they're just the (largely pre-existing) Imperial calibres expressed in millimetres: 7.62mm is 0.3in and 12.7mm is 0.5in, for example.
As to why the original Imperial measurements were so, I have as much idea as you, although I suspect the same "we've always done it this way" is in play.
Matchlock muskets looked pretty feeble compared to pikes, too. Expensive to make, took ages between shots, didn't like bad weather either. I take it you'll be using a pike next time you go to war?
At least the books aren't a complete write-off: they'll be re-issued as "Middle-Management Barbie" next week.
You're under the quaint and old-fashioned impression that the people at the Job Centre are there to get people jobs. They're not: they're there to get people off benefits. This sounds like it ought to be the same in practice, but since it's a lot easier to sanction someone - thus getting them off benefits and chalking up a "success" - than it is to find them a job, guess what the system has become geared up to do.
Worry no more. Only once since the present electoral system was introduced (1948) have Scottish votes altered what would have been a Conservative government into a Labour one. A couple of times they've given Labour a majority or denied the Conservatives one, but in both cases coalitions were entered into anyway which would negate this. (Source)
Thus, the rest of the UK is quite capable of electing a Labour government when they choose to and, indeed, pretty much have to if the UK as a whole is to get one.
This is why ICAO (i.e. aviation) English uses "affirm" and "negative".
No, sports car racing gave us modern disk brakes. Specifically, the Jaguar C-Type, although the idea had been used on Lanchesters half a century earlier.
So now you know.
Stop, because that's what disk brakes are for.
Catalunya no és Espanya.
Get a tech writer: our tame ones seem to actually like doing it: http://www.techaddiction.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/techwriting_presentation.pdf
Gosh. Your in-laws have some unconventional attitudes to naming.
Paris, because they named a hotel after her.
Although equally, if it isn't a crime to send it by letter, it shouldn't be a crime to send it by Twitter.
The people of Britain do not have a choice. We will only get to decide whether we want red or blue Tories. The people of Scotland, thankfully, do have a choice. Vote Yes in 2014!
Since El Reg can't be arsed to start a topic on this themselves, here is one.
I suspect they're mainly doing it because some marketing drone has heard that it's the "in" thing to have an app.
Inevitable XKCD: http://xkcd.com/1174/