Re: Hardly surprising
"Ok. For the last fucking time. MARKET SHARE MEANS DICK YOU FUCKING MORONS."
Apple users = small dicks.
Android users = big dicks.
Crackberry users = castrati.
594 posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"Ok. For the last fucking time. MARKET SHARE MEANS DICK YOU FUCKING MORONS."
Apple users = small dicks.
Android users = big dicks.
Crackberry users = castrati.
Ohh.. that would be too delicious.. Pound shop tat having prior art on the fruitarian new gizmo that nobody wanted until now.
"So they mean rework an optical mouse into the shape of a pen. Got it."
So did Genius it seems..
And many others are no doubt also copying Apple.
"David Hockney has managed to do some good pictures on the iPad. It's all about the user not the technology."
The operative word being MANAGED..
No doubt he could do something absolutely stunning with some charcoal and a light coloured rock..
Its all about the user after all, not the technology.
"you mean cows come from eggs?
Who else knew this?"
Pretty much everybody familiar with the process of reproduction..
"I have to ask how you might know this?"
Most of us have tried American Beer.
For the fresh goat urine mouth feel, allow it to reach body temprature.
"Why now rather than when the deals were made?"
Probably because companies do not have to register the terms of all deals with a central authority in advance, and such deals are not made public.
So how would they have known if anything was wrong when the deals were made?
These things usually happen in answer to a complaint by an interested party.
Could be a different manufacturer annoyed by the special deals Apple are getting.
Could be a phone company annoyed that the competition is getting a special deal with Apple.
Could be that a phone company is trying to renegotiate their special deal with Apple.
Could be a phone company trying to get out of their special deal with Apple.
An impartial organisation is looking at a deal made between two companies, and despite the cries of victimisation and free market interference that will no doubt be howled by the faithful.. If the contracts are legit, and follow the already made and freely available rules.. No problem.
If they are iContracts.. Problem.
"Then what exactly have the EUC and various European courts been doing demanding that Google (a US based company) do this or that to "forget" a particular search that a person or company would like removed from Google's search index as a result of an order from a European Court?"
The opposite of what is being discussed.
""Muižnieks said there “should be limits on the extraterritorial exercise of national jurisdiction in relation to transnational cybercrimes”. In other words, the US shouldn’t be able to access your private data in Europe just because it wants to.""
And Saudi Arabia should not be allowed to access what ever it wants in Columbia, and China should not be allowed to access what ever it wants in Russia.
Courts should not be allowed to break through jurisdiction limits by ordering companies registered within their jurisdiction to hand over information on their servers in entirely different jurisdictions. Asking a company to break local laws is a bit of a nono.
"To paraphrase "In other words, the EUC (or any other entity) shouldn’t be able to access your private data in (wherever) just because it wants to."
"Could you people please make up your minds and figure out what you want?"
Your inability to understand it however is out of our jurisdiction.
Might I suggest acquiring some Sesame Street episodes. I believe they had a song about telling things apart that you might find instructive. They use puppets and bright colours, so I'm sure the idea will eventually sink in.
"Because it gets headlines, and clickbait and makes people like you, that believe in sky fairies also believe that it only Microsoft products that have exploits."
And of course.. it usually only works on Windows.
"So who gives a rat's arse if it doesn't arrive next day, as long as it's in the next few days?"
But it doesn't sound nearly as apocalyptic if you say it like that.
Realistically.. Anybody who waits until December to get stuff delivered for Christmas is asking for trouble.
No.. Usually just a tube
"protip: put your phone in your pocket before this happens"
You mean.. not look at it for more than a second..
Nah.. never work.
But education certainly will be, a £6 or even £20 screwdriver is bound to attract nefarious users of all kinds. There are a whole raft of laws out there you can break with a screwdriver, just not a specific one that says screwdriver. Perhaps the reg should ask their chums at Outlaw to comment, but at a guess personal screwdrivers are covered by concealed weapon legislation, privacy legislation, public nuisance and a lot of other stuff, so no peeking in bedroom windows for a start. I'd also wonder what happens if you hit someone with one, or fly it into a car. Commercial uses must be a bit of a nightmare on that front.
"If Vans can't have their version of the word Vans with a line then surely Coca-Cola can't have their comic sans logo? There are plenty of other similar word based logos that would also fail."
It appears they can.. Stylised text, how ever dull, is fine.
They can not however, have a contrasting line going from heel to toe, roughly following the contour of the top of the shoe, as it looks too much like a little bit of cosmetic greebling, and not in fact.. A logo.
In other words.. A rare showing of common sense.
It isn't the company name that is at issue here.. Or the use of the company name with a line.. It is in fact, a stripe on a shoe.
A logo so minimal even Jonny Ive would have missed it if it had been put on a Braun product.
Giving them the exclusive rights to this would be similar to granting a single car company sole use of go faster stripes.
"Japanese carriers only need to "customize" the phone like US carriers so that they can not work with other phone providers. Surely Soft Bank can pick up this trick from Sprint."
At which point, Japanese consumer law kicks in and tells them to un"customise" it.. And probably slaps them with a hefty fine.
12 year olds arguing to stay up a few more minutes on a school night sneer derisively at your strategy.
"Does this mean your PC wll be pawnd quicker?"
Only if I really need the money.
"How does holding up another privacy invading business model justify another?
I can't say that I approve of your logic but each to their own."
But it's iLogic.
If something is good. Nobody does it as well as Apple.
OMG.. Apple's new iPhones are sooo thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinn!!! squee..
If something is bad, everybody does the same.
But any phone will bend if you put enough force on it..
"Don't be silly. Americans don't have Chip & PIN."
And it seems.. no pay by bendy bonk either.
Clerk: Sir, that will be $845.34
Customer: general small talk as they remove their card from their wallet, place it in the reader, and enter their pin.
Clerk: Thank you very much sir.. Have a nice day.
Pouting iPhone user: Puts things back on shelves, and goes to see if the Apple store will do cashback.
"Novel approach: Brick hardware via MS updates. Who would know?"
Well considering the story you are commenting on.. quite a few people..
"I suspect updates with a load of brick doo-doo will be common now that the idea is out.
Management response: "We are so sorry, terribly sorry, we are really, really, really sorry. We are so very, very, very concerned about this. Really we are...concerned and sorry.
Now go away.""
Get a bollocking from MS for going too far, and stop bricking hardware.... On pain of driver blacklisting on Windows. At which point.. ALL FTDI chips would fail.
Imagine the scenario.. You do an update, and Windows defender flags the FTDI driver as malware..
No.. There is unlikely to be a hardware bricking party. Because it's hard enough to get people to update already. And FTDI's actions have not made them very popular outside the usual trolling fraternity.
Please note.. FTDI have been commanded to pack it in, and do what should have been the maximum extent of their actions in the first place.. Refusal to support non brand chips.
Mine's the one that will have a new Arduino without a FTDI chip in it next week. Supplied FOC by the company I bought the one with the fake chip from.
"Anecdotal reports of bricked 3D printers are doing the rounds on H-a-D and coincidentally one of my two Uno R3's seems to have gone "Strange Loop" and no longer shows up correctly."
Glad my RepRap is on a Linux box. It's a Melzi from RepRapPro, and it does have an FTDI. But the source means nothing. Anybody can find out they have fake chips the hard way. And I really don't want to have to reinstall and recalibrate a new board unless I absolutely have to.
Your Uno R3 should not be caught up in this, even if it is a clone. They use the Atmel Mega 16U2 chip instead of an FTDI. So unless FTDI buggered up more than anybody is letting on.. They would be untouched. Different VID and PID entirely. Differnt driver too.
"A flying platform cannot generate enough energy to propel itself by deploying a wind turbine - if it could, that would make it a perpetual motion machine..."
No it wouldn't.
To qualify as a perpetual motion machine, the device has to have zero external energy input.
Wind is external energy input.
So to qualify, the flying wind turbine would need to produce the wind as well as harvesting it. Which is not being proposed. So a turbine carried aloft by a fleet of quadcopters beaming power via some kind of wireless transfer, is fanciful, but is not perpetual motion. Just highly unlikely to work.
A solar cell in a light proof box powering a bulb it harvests enough energy to power would qualify. But it would have to be more than 100% efficient to perform this act.
A water wheel would not.
"If they think they can do the same thing they did with pilots with car drivers (ie. glue them into a seat with absolutely nothing whatsoever to do for hours, yet require them to react at the first sign of trouble) they're way more delusional than I thought they were."
Don't worry.. You are still the most delusional sweetie.
The whole idea has been to gradually introduce the automation systems. And it has been working just fine for ages now.
ABS is for whimps.. right? Not something a real manly driver like yourself would ever need. Because you know how to apply the braking system in just the right way from one vehicle to another to get it right first time every time.
You did actually practice this.. right? not just see some bloke do it on a test course on telly..
Power steering.. Not for you eh? As you take the wheel in your big manly hands, and force it to do your bidding.
Fancy a few quid off your insurance?
If your next car has one of those tailgating prevention things. You could get a discount, and a free meercat toy. Until they become mandatory in all new cars that is. At which point.. everybody gets a discount.
A system to stop you wandering over the dotted line.. Already here.
Automatic parking. Done.
Coming soon.. Faster motorway lanes for autonomous vehicles. Starting with delivery vehicles in a slow lane in convoys, but gradually becoming an auto only super fast lane.
We are already in the fly by wire age of driving.
In just a few short decades, the last curly haired denim wearing real men of driving will bellow in confusion, as they get driven to the hospital for their hip replacement by a driver-less minicab. Because nobody bothers to buy a car any more. They just hail one, and a few minutes later, one arrives. Takes you to your destination, and joins the spare vehicle pool.
And before you come back with the old "but people want to drive" nonsense..
Which day is baking day?
No.. It's ok.
Apple hardware problems are always limited to a few isolated cases, and are always the result of tampering. And courts that demand recalls are obviously infiltrated by haters.
According to what I read here......
"I think it was Sir John Harvey Jones who said that if a job can be done cheaper and better by a robot than a person it's probably not going to be a very fulfilling job."
And how often did Sir John Harvey Jones have to skip a few meals to make the rent that week I wonder.
"Except it hasn't happened. Why?"
Well.. possibly because fridges are not in fact ON ALL THE BLOODY TIME!!
I really hope this is a troll..
"A bell end who can design , where as everyone else can only copy!"
Yep.. Jonny's work with Braun is quite impressive..
"Does anyone have a recommendation for a Braun inspired mini-itx case for my Hackintosh build?"
An old Mac case perhaps?
"Only the big guys? Why don't the little guys get notification from these tools?"
Because the little guys can't kick up a public fuss and make Google's case for it.
This is still Google throwing a sulk when told to go clean it's room by the big meanies at the Data protection department. Not, as they would like to pretend.. an unjust and excessive burden on poor defenceless little google.
"Have I misread this? Apple provide more personal control and flexibility than Android...?"
Well.. Not sure about the personal control.. But some models do apparently bend rather easily.
"Or, a disc shaped death star - send the bombs down that slot."
Nah.. It's a jog wheel.. You know how Apple likes to flog an idea to death.
"I had Pizza for dinner. Just thought everyone would like to know that."
Thick or thin crust?
So the next time someone is wittering on about Linux only having 1%, I can rely on you guys to set em straight?
"So, um, an ER11 collet, a 10000 RPM spindle, ball screws and steppers that look about NEMA 17 (or 23 at best) - is it just me, or are these guys selling the de facto equivalent of a sub-$1000 Chinese CNC for $1500...?"
Yep.. Pretty much.
But it's got a cool name and it's all boxy..
"Has anyone tried bending an iPhone 4 or 5 yet? Perhaps they were always bendy but no one thought of bending them?"
Yes. And even they take considerably more force.. That consumer magazine report from a few days ago tested a 5 in the same machine where the new preciouses came last. The one that found all phones don't in fact bend so easily.
Not the best performer, but Aluminium, despite Apple's assertions is indeed bendy in thin cross section.
Cracked screen and bulging case from swollen battery.. Noticeable.
Poor reception. Noticeable.
Flat phone not flat any more.. Noticeable.
Fanboy excuses.. Laughable.
From now on, when someone says their iPhone rocks, they may actually mean back and forth when they put it on a table.
"So how many people reading this have ever received a cheque in the post for revealing (or making up, there's no way to tell) any personal information whatsoever? Likewise, whever I fill in an online registration form that asks for anything more than a nickname and a password, I don't hear the kerchinnng of a cash register anywhere in the registration process."
Well. Me for one.
A survey site I used to belong to sent me a cheque for £50 at least once a year. Not many surveys though. And I think it folded.
Plenty of others still around. £40-60 a year from the ones I use is about average All in tokens these days though..
Personal data has certainly got value. But I'm afraid they will want a bit more engagement than your email address and an expectant grin.
"That will last exactly ONE visit to an airport :)"
I fail to see the down side.
"didn't you mean to type a 13" ipad to copy the size of the surface 3 tablet???"
"The $1,000 each retail, or the ~$230 each cost to build another one?"
Funny you should mention that.
If you break an item in a shop, accident or otherwise, you have indeed bought it. And if you refuse to pay, the police can be called and will persuade you to pay.
You are not in any way obliged to pay the marked retail price. Only wholesale price. You are compensating the shop keeper for loss of stock, not loss of a sale. They are not allowed to profit from breakages, or it would be an incentive to pile up crockery in easily knocked displays.
So no.. they can not be forced to pay full retail Just the wholesale price. What that is could be interesting.
Personally, I'd put money on the kids not being charged. Unless Apple can get the sum concealed. A sound talking to by their parents perhaps, but that is about all.
"That's a bizarre list of people to link by any stretch of the imagination."
No it really isn't. But you thinking it is, is quite depressing.
It's a fairly good list of the "bad people" that politicians really really want to protect us from. But entirely by coincidence.. accidentally enable the ability to make life uncomfortable for any who asks awkward questions.
Remember.. it matters not if a hundred innocents are imprisoned, so long as one embarrassing demonstrator is denied the ability to cause people to ask why.
"Perhaps the solution to the milk problem would be a cow?"
Don't be silly.. Where would you mount the 4 little motors?
"What R&D costs? Samsung already paid for those when they developed the Note 3 years ago."
Well.. there is the picking the bigger panel out of the catalogue..
And.. um.. And...
Oh.. Beefing up the case to sto..
Um.. Never mind.
"Store layout folk really, really want to stop trying pop-psych, and work out the layout which will let folk do their shopping most efficiently."
And by "efficiently".. You mean for you?
Aww.. So cute.. So innocent..
No.. I'm afraid store layout folk really really really don't want to stop trying to pop-psyche you. Because it works very well.
This is efficient. Just not for you.
"20 mice. TWENTY? What ever do you need that many mice for?"
To make a mouse organ.
"Here's an idea - how about we give up on hard but brittle glass screens completely, and use some soft-but-unbreakable plastic instead, but one that's self-healing, so scratches never become an issue either?"
Great idea. Let us know when you invent it.
"But why should you have to buy extras?"
For the same reason I wear shoes, instead of expecting the ground to not have pointy bits. .
I buy stuff. I expect it to last longer then the warranty. A few quid for a cover = money well spent. Because the thing doesn't end up broken.
"A phone is something you use not a of art so should be able to stand up to normal use which I think we all agree is going to involve being dropped."
But expecting "should" to protect an expensive gadget.. Hell no. If I had something that cost as much as an iDiot phone, it wouldn't leave it's box until had a suitable protective cover for it.
And what exactly do you consider normal use? Dropping sensitive devices is considered a bad idea.
My new multimeter is IP67rated, but I don't kick it round my workshop.
My DSLR could probably take a few falls. But I try to avoid such things. Because if it breaks, I'll need to buy a new one. Looking at a jammed bent zoom lens on a twisted mount, and saying .. "well.. it should have been able to take that".. doesn't make it all better. Still broken.
A neck strap worn at all times while handling the camera = No dropping. No bent lens. No need to replace it..
Should is little comfort if coming down a flight of stairs, your phone goes flying, and lands 10 feet below, on a hard floor.
My PDA was unscathed by the way.
Should is meaningless if it falls out of your pocket in the supermarket and cracks as the corner of the unprotected case impacts with the hard tiled floor. Not a scratch on my e-book reader.
"Should" is why you need to buy new stuff so often, while my stuff lasts as long as I choose to use it..
"Do you go and buy big rubber bumpers for your car so that you don't write it off when you clip the gatepost?"
Do you try to ram gate posts?
"There is a reasonable expectation that a car is fit for purpose and capable of withstanding normal wear and tear and small accidents."
And there is a reasonable expectation that one will take reasonable steps to avoid damage. Paint "should" protect the underlying metal from rust. Cars still rust though. How much use is should, when the chassis splits at 60mph?
"Why do we not expect the same from our phones?"
Because we are not idiots.
"WiFI, tablet, application, Apple."
See line you quoted.
Probly one too many punters asked her to hop on the bonnet for a picture.
Quite like the chair.. The rest.. No thanks.. at any price.
"Lets say that '1 Weekend' is the number of Galaxy S5's that were sold the first weekend the nwe can judge the success (or failure) of the latest iPhone release."
Why the first weekend? Why not say.. 6 months in, or 9 months..
Oh. right.. Must count the peak sales days, and extrapolate them to the months when Apple sales are tanking.
Sorry mate.. The "OMG Apple sold more in it's first week than X is not actually a useful figure. Because it neglects the steady sales of pretty much every other company selling pretty much any product throughout the product's life cycle.
Useless single data points are bragging ammunition. Not useful data. Just like the shipped versus sold meme.. If only Apple count that way, then the metric is of no use what so ever, because it gives nothing to compare it to.
It's the same as the toy industry projecting Christmas sales to the rest of the year, and claiming huge profits.
"If by some freak Apple sell say 10,000,000 and they are sold out for the next month then even the most ardent Apple Haters might (through gridded teeth) admit it was a success."
And you imagine we care because?
Apple sells millions.. Meh.
Samsung sells millions.. Meh.
Insert name of company who makes a product that sells millions.. Unless we own it, work for it, or own shares in it.. Meh..
Because we get to see NONE of that money. We understand that that money is not ours to spend. Some small amount of it may once have belonged to us, but that is as far as it goes.
And if they sell out in the first weekend, and have no stock for a month.. that is actually poor supply chain management. Not success.
I do have a question though..
What would be the number that causes you to concede that either model is in fact, a flop?
"Are we going to end up with a similar situation with the compounds, that are used for fabricating the 3D objects, like we have with Printer ink now, that is the expense? As the prices for the 3D printers go down will we see the price of the compounds go up? Seems that we're swapping one 'Cartel' for another."
Take a look at who actually buys a 3D printer. Not who some marketing department would like to convince they need one, or who some "entrepreneur" wants to sell premium models to.. Or even who you invent to be a 3D printer customer so you can laugh at them..
Entry level for a ready made 3D printer.. About a grand. Usually more.
How many people do you know who spend that much money on an impulse buy? Considered purchase.
Fact 2) The people who are actually buying 3D printers for themselves, rather than for schools or work or what ever, are the ones who will end up buying the consumables.
£20 a kilo, or £60+ for a 200M spool in a chipped cartridge (about a third of a kilo). Choose.
Fact 3) There can be no cartel, because the barrier to entry is so low it's buried. I can set up a small business for very little outlay gathering the parts to make a kit, and sell it for about £3-500. No knowledge needed, I can download parts, buy ready made control boards.. The works. This is how many of the companies selling the printers to the domestic market start.