Re: Natutrally
use of the word Champagne is protected under EU law ONLY for things related to Booze and the region from which it originates.
Wrong.
688 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Feb 2011
Next thing is the Green Party copyright the colour Green, MUFC will copyright Red, Blue will copyright Blue, Goldman Sachs Gold etc etc.
Also I remember a number of cars use the colour, Dylux paint, need I say more?
I could understand the surrender monkey anger if the iPhone was an alcoholic drink but it isn't.
Here's some money, go buy a fucking clue you idiot.
If you read TFA, the problem isn't the COLOUR. It's the use of the word CHAMPAGNE, which in the context of describing a product, has protection under a shitload of international treaties and laws.
So it's got fuck all to do with being a surrender monkey, and everything to do with a multinational company thinking it can do whatever it wants. It didn't come out on top against Apple Records,Cisco or Proview and I don't think it will in this case, should it decide to press on with this 'champagne' business.
Ugg. They claim the rights to the initials NSA? Really... Really? Bloody hell...
Yeah, acronyms can be used as trademarks.
The Nantucket Shellfish Association, the National Scrapbooking Association or the National Society of Accountants might have something to say about that...
In the online dating world, NSA also means 'no strings attached'. So there.
Aside form the trademark issue, you could argue that this is parody or satire and, as such, is fair use. It's not like these guys are making fake IDs, is it?
Besides Osamba already robed NASAs cradle for its Milk Money so he could fund his Healthcare Scheme.
Osama should spend some money on education. You can't spell, and "per-say" isn't the same thing as "per se".
What you meant to write was:
America already robbed NASAs cradle for its milk money so it could fund its so-called "war on terror", build more bombs and pay compensation to the families of innocent Afghans and Iraqis that the military killed in error.
So why are they not dragging Lessing into court and not the ones doing the fan based videos of the song? More importantly how the heck did this ever get to court in the first place? This one should take 5 minutes to move to dismiss and hopefully the judge will toss it out and fine the plaintiffs for a nuisance lawsuit.
DCMA takedown notice ≠ legal action.
Lessig and the EFF are taking a case to court to argue that Lessig's use of the copyrighted material was "fair use" - that's all.
If the court agrees with them, they can reinstate the video clip in question on Youtube and tell Liberation Records to fuck off and do one.
It's far from being a nuisance lawsuit.
Funny how no one is looking at her and saying, "Why don't you pay up dummy????"
You sir are a dick.
There are all kinds of reasons why someone defaults on a loan. Not all of them involve a person being reckless or neglectful
I hope you never fall on hard times and experience debt collection first hand.
So how does this compare with the case of supermarket "own brand"..
Heinz , for example, would have their packaging designs trademarked. If you launched a ketchup brand using a bottle of an identical shape you'd find yourself dealing with some expensive lawyers.
You can't put Tony The Tiger on your frosted flakes either, but there's nothing stopping you using Charlie The Cheetah or Lenny The Leopard as your mascot.
Speaking of Tigers: Kellogg and Esso/Exxon went to court in the 90s over Kellogg's right to continue using Tony The Tiger.
Long story short- lawyers are parasites
...that a “public affairs officer” would have had an inkling of what the possible consequences of slagging off her government employer would be.
People seem to be under the impression they have freedom of speech. They don't.
The cops in this country will arrest you if you hurt somebody's feelings on Facebook FFS.
"Virtual currencies can be sent nearly anonymously, leaving little or no hope of us being to tax people", the committee's letter reads in part.
There, fixed it.
The European Central Bank had their knickers in a similar knot back in 2011.
Then, a few weeks ago, they change their mind and say that Linden Dollars or Bitcoin don't fulfill any of the three functions of money: Medium of Exchange, Unit of Account, or Store of Value.
http://globalforumljd.org/docs/events/061413/061413_ppt_ecb.pdf
Can't say I'd put my money into it, but I can see why people do...
I suppose there are Europeans with the skills to hack into it and take over the baby alarm, though why they would bother is a mystery.
Dunno if you're being sarcastic, but why do people hack anything? Boredom? Thrills? Mental problems? I'd actually be reluctant to call this hacking as it doesn't require any technical prowess to increment some letters and numbers in a dyndns address to hop from one webcam to the next.
Yeah, yeah. Gotta keep the proles living in fear of imminent attack so the money keeps flowing to Oracle, SAIC, Lockheed, Boeing and every other pig with a snout in the trough...
I haven't read so much bullshit since I read Larry Ellison's comments in the main article.
"It's great," Ellison said of the domestic spying. "It's great, it's essential. President Obama thinks it's essential. It's essential if we want to minimize the kind of strikes that we just had in Boston. It's absolutely essential."
For all their combined spying powers the NSA, the CIA and the FBI didn't have a clue that the Boston bombing was going to happen. Shit, the FBI had to plead for the public's help to identify the bombers from the grainy CCTV footage.
If you've got nothing to hide, you don't need to worry about government surveillance eh?
The insurance company could probably have another cause for refusing to pay out - trading virtual WOW items/gold for real life money is against the T&Cs for WOW
I think that violating WoW T&Cs are the least of her worries.
If she hasn't declared the $75k to the tax authorities yet, she'll need to soon.
I don't think the taxman would go for the "Sorry I can't pay you what I owe. My gold bullion was stolen..."
Maybe she'll learn a valuable lesson - keep your gold in a bank vault, not in your house.
The latest?
Would a version number like 6.1.298a be any better to give a people clue? We like it or not, them things will be updated continuously if we are to be kept (relatively) safe(ish).
The fact that the Firefox version number changes every three weeks doesn't mean anything to anybody.
Newsflash: 99% of people aren't diehard nerds like you. They barely know what browser they're using, never mind what version it is... People still use IE6 FFS.
Forget that. They need to get The Simpsons: Tapped Out ported to the Surface RT.
You know you're holding a sack of shit if you're pinning your hopes on a mail client/calendar.
Some of the stuff you can't do with Outlook RT?
*No support for Online Archive or Personal Archive mailboxes
*No ability to apply Messaging Records Management (MRM) retention policies
*No Site Mailboxes
*No support for Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policy tips
*No Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) and COM Add-in support, no support for macros, add-ins or other custom programs
*No ability to set information rights management (IRM) on new email messages
*No integration between Outlook 2013 RT and Lync (or any other of the Office Home & Student 2013 apps, for that matter
*No integration with SharePoint, as the Outlook Contact Card does not display an active link to users' SharePoint My Site pages
*No ability to add a fax account to Outlook 2013 RT
*No ability to configure Outlook 2013 RT using Group Policy (same limitation as other Office Home & Student 2013 apps face)
I am not sure if you are being facetious or if you don't know this, but the bronze, silver, and gold badges are not dependent on any number of votes
I don't know if you are being anal or if you don't know this, but you're totally wrong.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/el_reg_commentard_badges/
The qualifying thresholds for badges are:
Bronze (about 650 commentards qualify)
Operated forum handle for more than one year, and more than 100 posts in the last 12 months.
Silver (about 200 commentards qualify)
Silver badge holders meet bronze requirements and have more than 2,000 upvotes.
Gold (awarded to 10 commentards)
This discretionary badge is awarded by Reg staff, and we are starting off with 10 people who have been very helpful - to us, through news tips and beta testing, for example - and to their fellow readers, through their posts.
The door's over there. Close it on your way out. Have a downvote for your troubles too...
Re: proof God exists... it's a bit like asking me for proof my MOTHER exists. Show you her passport - could be FAKE. Show you a photo - Someone else's mother! The only thing I can do is appeal to logic that I MUST have had a mother (unless I was created from dust) because everyone has a mother.
The only thing you could do is appeal to logic? Not really.
A simple DNA test would prove that you are your mother's offspring.
But in short you're telling me there's no proof that one or any God exists - I'm simply expected to let logic wash over me?
talk about "believing despite a complete lack of evidence".
Could you elaborate on that comment please? Creationists love quoting that Dawkins interview as some kind of great Creationist win, but there is some debate on whether or not the tape of the interview was edited for "dramatic effect".
Anyhow, I could just as easily ask you to give me a few examples of proof that Odin/God/Ganesh/Yahweh exists...
Over my rather longish life, I have seen a steady decline in those professing to be religious or spiritual, and an opposite increase in the rudeness, crudeness, and coarseness in society. I believe the two are directly related.
Reality and what you believe are two different things.
Perhaps the "steady decline in those professing to be religious" might have something to do with child sex abuse, Magdalene Laundries, Westboro Baptists and all that other "selfish behavior" that comes from organised religion.
The Bible has Jesus's exact lineage back to Adam, and we have a reasonably good idea when he was born.
And The Simpsons has been on TV since 1989, which by my reckoning makes Bart Simpson at least 24 years old.
What's your point? Jesus, Adam and Bart SImpson are all fictional characters.