1696 posts • joined 12 Feb 2011
The rumors seem to point to TSMC being the sole source for the A8 (with Samsung still making the A7 for the "last year" models) But maybe TSMC hasn't proven all that nice to work with, so they want to go with GloFo, and preserve Samsung as a second source since they've never worked with GloFo before and they may have trouble handling Apple's volumes.
Re: "The industry's first at 28nm"
Name one ARM CPU made in a smaller process than 28nm. That process has only been available from foundries in the last few months. At any rate, Apple still has the only 64 bit ARM shipping.
Intel is the only company shipping x86 smaller than 28nm (22nm, though perhaps a few 14nm are slipping out now) but that's irrelevant to a discussion of ARM.
"The industry's first at 28nm"
They probably will be the first to 28nm, but by the time they launch Apple will be shipping A8s made in TSMC's 20nm process.
In America CEOs still get pensions. The regular workers don't.
Re: Umm, not so sure.
More importantly, had he not left, he wouldn't have founded NeXT, whose software provided the foundation for what became OS X, which became iOS.
There's no telling what would have happened if things had gone differently back in 1985. Its too bad he believed too strongly in alternative medicine thanks to his hippie background, so by the time he consulted real physicians for his cancer it was too late, because we also don't know what else he might have accomplished if he had been around another few decades. Say what you will about Jobs as a CEO, at least he was no Ballmer!
You gotta remember
Economists may say markets are efficient, but that's only true in the long term. The full value of Yahoo's Alibaba stake isn't reflected in Yahoo's stock price because 1) it hasn't had an IPO yet and 2) even when it does, Yahoo is unlikely to be able to/willing to sell it for some time, if ever.
If I owned a 50% stake in Nortel in 2000, I would have been the richest man on the world on paper. If I never sold that stake, I'd be worth exactly what I am today.
Who wants local/regional spectrum?
Certainly not wireless carriers or their customers. The day when people are willing to subscribe to a carrier that has you roaming when you get 50 miles from home are in the past.
Maybe the FCC will get companies interested in deploying wireless broadband rather than cellular, but they certainly won't realize the maximum return on the auction by chasing away the national carriers.
This is what started happening to Apple
Wall Street was spoiled by constant earning beats, so they raised their estimates higher and higher above Apple's guidance, and the stock started getting punished when they'd announce earnings that handily beat their guidance, but failed to meet Wall Street's inflated expectations.
Since they've pushed the P/E and as a result Google's stock price too high, the same thing will afflict them and the stock price will eventually fall back to Earth. Then they'll pick the next tech darling for the same treatment. Microsoft perhaps, as I'm sure they can tell a compelling story about how the new CEO is going to fix the lack of direction over the past decade under Ballmer's inept leadership.
Has one improvement over Glass
It would be easier for people who wear glasses, or sunglasses, to wear this.
Plus, from the side it might look like a Bluetooth so people will only think you're a Bluetard instead of a Glasshole!
I remember the pre-launch hype about Kindle Fire
Lots of discussion about revolutionary features that would reshape the tablet market. It wasn't anything special. If Amazon launches their very first phone with revolutionary technology that other phone makers have probably been researching and holding off on because it sounded better than it looked/worked, I expect to see a half-baked product that gets a lot of launch buzz but a lot of meh reviews and Android customers go back to buying Samsungs.
Re: Good Grief!!! @ I. Aproveofitspendingonspecificprojects
Physical media doesn't mean "no electronics", it means it isn't bits. Apple was smart to insure the agreement went that way, and Apple Corp apparently didn't have people looking far enough ahead to realize that physical media would largely disappear within two decades of that agreement.
But you're not allowed in an Apple/Android thread because you're entirely too reasonable and level headed when you're going around making statements like this:
*Note I said LESS likely, that's not an insult to those who are technologically literate and have made the decision to accept the idevice's limitations in return for 'just works'
Count me among the technologically literate who prefer "just works" to something I can tweak to death. I have a Linux desktop PC if I feel the urge to tweak. I can understand those who feel differently, or who chafe under the restraints (real or imagined) of the iTunes walled garden, but I think it is ridiculous that people feel the need to fling insults at those who choose differently.
I guess some people are so narrow minded they can't accept that others can be as smart or smarter than they are but arrive at a different choice than they did.
Re: Apple Corp vs Apple Inc
The lawsuit started in the early 80s, and they claimed a trademark on the Apple name extending to anything in the "entertainment" realm, which they figured included home computers. Apple eventually settled and paid them $80K to go away.
Then in the late 80s they came back at Apple because people were making MIDI boards for Apple computers, and they did another settlement, which this time expressly forbid Apple from entering into the market for physical music media.
Then after the iPod/iTunes came out they went after Apple a third time, and even though Apple offered them $1 million to settle they took Apple to court, but they lost and got nothing - because the judge ruled that digital files are not PHYSICAL music media.
Presumably at some point after that they buried the hatchet for good and Beatles music finally become available on iTunes. Maybe Apple paid them off to make that happen or maybe they (well Michael Jackson, since he owned the Beatles music by that time) decided fighting Apple and staying off iTunes was costing money in the modern digital world.
Apple Corp vs Apple Inc
Started in 1971? Starting lawsuits a half decade before a company is founded is an aggressive strategy, I agree!
Keep it mind it was Apple Corp (i.e. Beatles) who sued Apple, not the other way around. Claiming the name Apple in all markets when they were only a record label is as bad as the abuses over rounded corners.
Curious what would make it a finer material for a driver than Titanium? Given that the USGA and R&A limit both the coefficient of restitution of the driver face, as well as the overall volume of the head, it doesn't seem as though there's any room for more advanced materials to improve over the current state of the art.
Re: I think the article is wrong
Apple is "greedy" in terms of wanting to maximize their profit, but I highly doubt the profit maximizing prices are where you think. If they can arbitrarily increase the price of the iPhone 6 just because it is a bit larger than the 5s, why didn't they do it with the 5 when it was a bit larger than the 4s?
I think the article is wrong
I'll bet this is for the larger of the two. If it is supposed to be released this fall, they have to get carrier agreements in place before that.
The slightly larger one (which will probably just have more screen less bezel but be the same size) will be the same price, the larger one will cost more.
Only if you don't mind giving away your personal information to be used in ways you can't control or know anything about.
Never forget: you aren't Google's customer, you're their product.
What about Hyundai? Or Häagen-Dazs?
Buy a few ads during the Super Bowl that mentions your name a half dozen times and people will learn how to pronounce it, even if it isn't obvious from the spelling.
Anyway, Galaxy isn't the name of the company that makes that line of phones, nor iPhone for that matter. Nothing stops them from making the "Xiaomi <insert English word here>" for the US market, and people will refer to it as the "xPhone" or "Universe" or whatever.
Hopefully the GNOME foundation falls apart, and someone picks up the pieces who doesn't share their moronic "vision" that has turned so many off from GNOME.
@LedSwinger "Giving up nuclear weapons..."
Do you really believe the outcome would have been different if Ukraine had kept some of its nuclear weapons? The reason they rolled over for Russia in Crimea (and may yet in the eastern part of Ukraine) is not because they believed Russia would nuke them. Putin still would have come in if they had nukes, because he knows no one would start a nuclear war over it.
This was/is never going to be anything but a conventional war, if that, and Russia has a larger and more modern military than Ukraine. More importantly, most of the people in Crimea, and in the area that may yet be annexed to provide a land path to Crimea, are ethnic Russian (ignoring the messy historical reasons why that is the case) That would make it very difficult for a Ukrainian army to fight them, both because some of their number would be unwilling to fire upon Russians, and a majority of the local population would aid a Russian army that was being fired upon by a Ukrainian army.
Re: Makes sense
Except the technology to get there exists now, so it isn't going to provide the boost it did in the past because there are no problems that need solving.
Re: The race is on!
And why exactly should the lunar surface be worth $1000 an acre? Or even a penny per acre? You can't grow anything there, it costs a fortune to support people there and there's nothing for them to do that they can't do better in zero-G orbit.
The only reason you'd ever go to the Moon would be to collect He3, but until we can do something useful with that, it is pretty pointless, and whether it would ever be economical to ship it out of the lunar gravity well is unknown.
Re: Could not have timed it better
It is easy and free to talk about, and fills the citizens with nationalist pride. But don't mistake talk for action, they aren't going to go to the Moon any more than the US went back in 2012 like Bush promised in 2004. They won't even land anything there.
The NSA needs to be split up
Having one organization that is (supposedly) responsible for helping secure the US internet infrastructure and for spying has conflicting goals.
Why should 64 bit drive demand?
It improves performance, but performance improves every year anyway. 64 bits isn't enabling any new category of apps that will drive demand on their own, so I don't see how it would drive demand any more than a faster GPU or marginally improved battery life would.
Re: Ought to point out
It really doesn't matter. Since the US spends more than it takes in, it sells treasuries to make up the difference. They've got a pretty good idea of how much will be coming in and plan sales based on that. So on average they'll have around the same amount of cash on hand year round.
Re: Apple is misleading
How is Apple responsible for notifying people about the potential security issues of the million plus third party OS X or iOS apps? They simply said that iOS and OS X are not vulnerable. They don't have source, they wouldn't be able to determine which apps are vulnerable if they wanted to.
If held to your ridiculous standards, every OS vendor out there is "vulnerable" forever because it is possible that someone may have a vulnerable app installed on their PC/phone today and may choose to never update it.
If I replace the OEM tires in my car, and they sometimes blow up and cause fatal accidents so they get recalled, the manufacturer of my car isn't "vulnerable" to this defect. If asked they'll simply state their cars are not affected by the recall.
Re: Why permit the secrecy
Since all Android vendors seem to be signing up, one would assume it is in base Android. Surely one of them has shared the details with Google of exactly what they're licensing (whether the contract allows it or not) and if it was easy to remove Google would have done so.
Presumably iOS also violates some of these patents (the non-FAT ones) but Apple and Microsoft have had a cross licensing agreement since long ago so Apple didn't have to pay up.
Including in your post the language "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" implies that you think that FRAND has something to do with this. It does not. FRAND is reserved only for standards essential patents, and standards essential patents only come into play when standards bodies get together to create standards that 100% of products in a category must comply with to be compatible (i.e. standards like USB, SATA, h.264, LTE, HDMI, ATSC, etc.) Patents must have been voluntarily submitted to the standards making organization to become FRAND, patents can't be made FRAND against the will of the owner.
If among the patents Microsoft owns is ExFAT, that is not covered by FRAND because it is NOT a standard. It is a Microsoft owned technology that became prevalent in the market because Windows PCs can read it. There's no requirement that phones support ExFAT, and smartphones can be produced that are still smartphones that do not support ExFAT.
Even if Android owned 99.9% of the market, if there were MS patents infringed by Android they would not be FRAND and Microsoft would be under no obligation to license them to anyone at all, let alone on equal terms. They would be within their rights to charge Samsung $30 a handset, and HTC $0.30 a handset if they so chose, or to make per handset price contingent on selling a certain percentage of Windows Phone handsets (at least so long as Windows Phone didn't approach a monopoly share of the market, which doesn't appear too likely)
Bankers want you to do the opposite of what you're currently doing, because they always think the grass is greener.
If Apple sold a hybrid product, they'd be talking about how much more Apple could make if they sold an individual laptop and individual tablet, for those who don't want a hybrid of both.
Re: For $63Bn
Apparently this analyst thinks if you have two successful products, that combining them into one bastardized hybrid that does neither as well as the two perform their individual roles, that the new product will outsell two individual products?
I guess that's why Surface is taking over the market. Oh wait...
Wiped out species in existence?
Wasn't this back when the earliest single celled life was believed to begin? There wouldn't have been much to wipe out, and they would have been clustered around smokers in the deep ocean so the impact probably didn't bother them much on a global scale.
What is heartbeat used for?
Can someone explain why it was added, and what use it is, and why it is enabled by default?
It looks to me to be a way for the client to send something to the server and have it echoed back. Is there a reason why the server should be echoing back client supplied data, and in what way this (as opposed to sending back data that the client doesn't control) is a useful addition to the protocol?
Beyond bad programming, I'm wondering if this is a "kitchen sink" mentality, where stuff that is of narrow interest has been included, but was enabled by default against all best practices.
Re: How to fix all IE compatibility issues
Karma has definitely come around to bite Microsoft in the ass with the problems they have with websites that equate "IE" with "IE6" and present the quirky version that is broken in a modern IE. That's how IE6 rose to such dominance and made it so difficult for other browsers to get traction. Had Microsoft been smarter and kept updating IE instead of deciding IE6 was "good enough" since it had 95% market share, web developers wouldn't have grown tired of the lack of updates and started creating standards based web pages.
The average person knows nothing about User Agent strings and how to fix this, so they'll assume IE is broken and switch to Firefox or Chrome. Microsoft has no one to blame but themselves, had they followed standards instead following the "extend" part of their recipe for dominance to kill Netscape (which was such a bag of crap by the end it would have collapsed under its own weight without Microsoft's help)
Re: The fat lady has sung
You're looking at this with the assumption that human activity is warming the world. If you for a moment look at it with the assumption that the world is warming naturally (we are still coming out of an ice age, climatically) then this shows that natural warming can happen more quickly then previously believed.
So what this does is tear down one of the "humans must be responsible" arguments, which is that the rate of warming is faster than could possibly have occurred naturally.
Where do I get an analyst job?
It isn't know for certain Apple will ever release a watch, and definitely no one knows exactly what its capabilities will be. Yet he's figured out a specific price and sales total?
I take it he's purchased a ton of Apple stock, because if they really sold $17.5 billion worth of any new product in the first year, the stock would go through the roof.
Re: Can't see this being that much use in situations where it is actually needed.
How many people put "plenty of sunscreen" on while wearing a watch, unless perhaps they've got on some $20 throwaway?
Re: Nevermind Windows XP, did you see the Windows 7 vs Windows 8 numbers?
Except those numbers are for the market as a whole, not for corporations. Come the curve of uptake for Windows 8 with that of Windows 7, and see how poorly Windows 8 looks by comparison. Sounds like you're an MS fanboy who eats whatever shit they serve, but most people have decided trying to force a touchscreen type single tasking interface on PCs is a terrible idea.
Nevermind Windows XP, did you see the Windows 7 vs Windows 8 numbers?
Windows 7 gained more than Windows 8. That sure says something about how much people hate Windows 8!
Re: Fixated on Apple
You need only look at the prices to see that Apple only sells to the high end of the market. Do you think there is some secret discount store selling iPhones to chavs for half price?
If they're on benefits and can still afford a $600+ phone you should take it up with your government, or the local police, depending on how legally they were acquired.
Re: Fixated on Apple
Presumably Samsung makes real money on the low/mid range segments as well. If they don't, why don't they shut down such efforts immediately?
Re: Fixated on Apple
But Apple's threat was/is limited, as they only play in the high end of the market. Samsung and the rest of the Android companies have the whole midrange/low end market to themselves. Granted, that's not as profitable, but the amount of market share Apple could ever take was limited.
You'd think Samsung would be more worried about the ultra low cost Chinese companies, which could take away Samsung's low end and midrange market. Without those, it is just an Android version of Apple selling only to the high end, and they lose the benefit of being the market share leader (in terms of volume pricing, better deals with carriers, etc.)
Writing it that way sounds much better than "they walked towards an erupting volcano"
If they wanted to boycott Firefox, where would they go?
If you won't use a browser made by a company/organization that supports gay marriage, you can't use Firefox, Chrome, IE or Safari. What's that leave? Is Opera still around? No matter, pretty sure Norway is firmly in support of gay marriage.
If they wanted to boycott it because the pressure for his ouster was silencing free speech, they'd garner more support along with having some browser choices available to them.
Maybe the Koch brothers can take a break from spending millions on attack ads in the US and fund a browser built with conservative values, so when you try to visit msnbc.com it'll take you to foxnews.com, and when you try to visit huffingtonpost.com it'll take you to drudgereport.com :)
10,000 downloads is #1?
I would have thought with a billion users, it would take rather more than that.
Not sure what the article had to do with Apple, but Apple actually owns a ton of LTE patents, purchased from the dried up husk of Nortel, and surprisingly have developed a few dozen on their own (maybe they hired some Nortel engineers, or plan to someday design their own baseband instead of buying it from Qualcomm)
And Apple doesn't have a core license from ARM, they have an architectural license. Their last two SoCs used fully custom ARM cores, they didn't use an ARM designed core like the A57 Qualcomm used here. Typically Qualcomm has been designing their own cores, I guess they're a bit far behind in designing a 64 bit core so they are using the A57 as a stopgap.
I don't see where he makes the correlation
It sounds like he sees a big change since 1990, and says "hmmm, what else has happened since 1990? Aha, the internet!"
Since 75% of people are using it, why aren't there a lot more non-religious if it causes people to lose their faith?
What else has become more prevalent in the US since 1990 that might account for this? Let's see....cell phones....craft beers.....antilock brakes....
Or maybe something has left our lives and the lack makes people lose their faith? What could that be? Landlines.....fax machines.....leaded gasoline...
Of all these tongue in cheek reasons, leaded gasoline is the only one that might have a chance at being true. It has already been linked pretty well to the drop in violent crime in the US (even down to the county level, the data is quite amazing) Maybe lead in the bloodstream makes people more likely to seek religion, and with environmental lead at the lowest levels for centuries it could be causing people to abandon religion :)
Or hey, maybe it is because bible thumpers keep wanting to condemn gays, but most people under 40 or 50 have had gay friends for a long time now, and having failed to be raped by them or otherwise corrupted, realize that if the evangelicals are wrong about that, maybe they're wrong about other stuff and shouldn't be listened to any more.
Re: Eegads imagine the price! (@Bullseyed)
Do you really care about the UI on your TV though? I mean, how often do you actually have to engage the TV's menu? I do it once every few months, not counting input selection (and that would be fixed by having a remote with buttons for HDMI1 / HDMI2 / HDMI3) Sure, the remote can be improved, but for the most part you aren't interacting with the TV, but with something connected to your TV.
It would be nice to not have to switch between devices with different UIs, but the only way around that is to convince everyone else to give up their own UI (which includes advertising, which they make money from) and let Apple take over the UI. That's not going to happen. So you'll still have the DVD player UI, the Tivo UI, the Comcast UI, the Directv UI, the Roku UI and so on.
Microsoft tried to "fix" this by overlaying their own UI on top of the device's UI, which is like covering up shit with vomit. I don't see how Apple gets around that unless they pay off the others to take over for their UI. They certainly can afford it, but do they have the will?
So what are the alternatives that people recommend?
I have a single hostname I use on my parent's DD-WRT router so I can access their PCs when they experience problems. Their IP changes maybe once a month, and I access it maybe a few times a year. Hopefully there's a free and reliable alternative for that level of usage.
I'll bet the business about spammers is a load of crap, the more commercial DynDNS become the more obvious they were about no longer wanting us "freeloaders". We all knew that the "must login every 30 days to keep your account" meant this was coming, but some of us have been too lazy about investigating alternatives. I remember looking a bit at the time that was announced and every alternative I found seemed to have a "gotcha". Hopefully there's a "gotcha free" alternative out there for the level of usage I require.
Or maybe it would be possible to give my parents a hostname in my domain and have it update my nameserver. I might have to investigate how that works, that may be the best alternative!