1706 posts • joined 12 Feb 2011
There was twice as many Samsung phones but the headline mentions only iPhones?
Nice clickbait, Phil.
Because increasing the potential pool of investors (if only slightly) is somehow a bad thing? Yeah, right.
Re: long view...
But if enough people follow you away from cable/satellite TV, the networks will find a way to get their money. That is, they'll start charging for the programming that's now free on their sites, and/or require an app to watch the programming to insure there's no way to capture the stream or skip the ads.
Two networks said they'd pull all their valuable content (i.e. sports plus any high-rated prime time programs) off their affiliates and distribute it in other ways if Aereo wins. That may be an empty threat, but if they figure they can make more money by becoming "CBS Network" available on cable and satellite they will.
There is not much reason to keep broadcast TV around anymore if you think about it, there are better ways to distribute the same content. If they don't make enough money from it (required to pay for the high cost of sports rights deals they've made) the whole network/affiliate broadcast TV model may collapse.
Re: Dear Broadcasters. Fek Off.
To play Devil's Advocate, your right to have an antenna and have a recording device accessible remotely doesn't necessarily extend to paying someone else for that service.
The same logic would have prostitution legal, since I have a right to have sex with any willing partner, but it is illegal to pay for it :)
Re: I've got an idea
Dave 126 has the right idea. Those who want a more durable phone or with longer battery life and don't care about weight/thickness are free to add an aftermarket case to provide one or both. Or choose another brand, like the Razr Maxx or that one company that sells "contractor grade" phones that can be dropped from 30' onto concrete.
Some of us have no problem at all with the battery life on current phones, and aren't in the habit of dropping them on concrete like those durable old Nokias. Not all of us wish to compromise for others' needs by having a heavier phone with a unbreakable plastic shell.
Re: I've got an idea
Bigger phone = heavier. Thinner phone = lighter. The thinner they make it, the closer it is to the weight of the 5/5S, rather than the weight of the 3gs/4/4S.
I know it won't be a problem
But somehow I'd be worried a phone that large that's thinner than the 5/5S might snap in half if it gets bound up in your pocket in the wrong way when you sit down!
You do realize that has nothing to do with this patent
Whatever one may think about the patentability of what Apple describes, it has nothing at all to do with what you're suggesting. Apple is talking about having the phone figure out where in the car it is by looking at the windows to decide whether it is being held in the hands of the driver.
In the highly unlikely event this was behavior you couldn't turn off, one possible fix would be to set it for the UK (if in the US, or the reverse if in the UK) and then it'll let you text as the driver but not the passenger :)
Idiots will always find a way
Look for people to be holding their phone over the passenger seat with their right arm extended to be able to text.
The rumors seem to point to TSMC being the sole source for the A8 (with Samsung still making the A7 for the "last year" models) But maybe TSMC hasn't proven all that nice to work with, so they want to go with GloFo, and preserve Samsung as a second source since they've never worked with GloFo before and they may have trouble handling Apple's volumes.
Re: "The industry's first at 28nm"
Name one ARM CPU made in a smaller process than 28nm. That process has only been available from foundries in the last few months. At any rate, Apple still has the only 64 bit ARM shipping.
Intel is the only company shipping x86 smaller than 28nm (22nm, though perhaps a few 14nm are slipping out now) but that's irrelevant to a discussion of ARM.
"The industry's first at 28nm"
They probably will be the first to 28nm, but by the time they launch Apple will be shipping A8s made in TSMC's 20nm process.
In America CEOs still get pensions. The regular workers don't.
Re: Umm, not so sure.
More importantly, had he not left, he wouldn't have founded NeXT, whose software provided the foundation for what became OS X, which became iOS.
There's no telling what would have happened if things had gone differently back in 1985. Its too bad he believed too strongly in alternative medicine thanks to his hippie background, so by the time he consulted real physicians for his cancer it was too late, because we also don't know what else he might have accomplished if he had been around another few decades. Say what you will about Jobs as a CEO, at least he was no Ballmer!
You gotta remember
Economists may say markets are efficient, but that's only true in the long term. The full value of Yahoo's Alibaba stake isn't reflected in Yahoo's stock price because 1) it hasn't had an IPO yet and 2) even when it does, Yahoo is unlikely to be able to/willing to sell it for some time, if ever.
If I owned a 50% stake in Nortel in 2000, I would have been the richest man on the world on paper. If I never sold that stake, I'd be worth exactly what I am today.
Who wants local/regional spectrum?
Certainly not wireless carriers or their customers. The day when people are willing to subscribe to a carrier that has you roaming when you get 50 miles from home are in the past.
Maybe the FCC will get companies interested in deploying wireless broadband rather than cellular, but they certainly won't realize the maximum return on the auction by chasing away the national carriers.
This is what started happening to Apple
Wall Street was spoiled by constant earning beats, so they raised their estimates higher and higher above Apple's guidance, and the stock started getting punished when they'd announce earnings that handily beat their guidance, but failed to meet Wall Street's inflated expectations.
Since they've pushed the P/E and as a result Google's stock price too high, the same thing will afflict them and the stock price will eventually fall back to Earth. Then they'll pick the next tech darling for the same treatment. Microsoft perhaps, as I'm sure they can tell a compelling story about how the new CEO is going to fix the lack of direction over the past decade under Ballmer's inept leadership.
Has one improvement over Glass
It would be easier for people who wear glasses, or sunglasses, to wear this.
Plus, from the side it might look like a Bluetooth so people will only think you're a Bluetard instead of a Glasshole!
I remember the pre-launch hype about Kindle Fire
Lots of discussion about revolutionary features that would reshape the tablet market. It wasn't anything special. If Amazon launches their very first phone with revolutionary technology that other phone makers have probably been researching and holding off on because it sounded better than it looked/worked, I expect to see a half-baked product that gets a lot of launch buzz but a lot of meh reviews and Android customers go back to buying Samsungs.
Re: Good Grief!!! @ I. Aproveofitspendingonspecificprojects
Physical media doesn't mean "no electronics", it means it isn't bits. Apple was smart to insure the agreement went that way, and Apple Corp apparently didn't have people looking far enough ahead to realize that physical media would largely disappear within two decades of that agreement.
But you're not allowed in an Apple/Android thread because you're entirely too reasonable and level headed when you're going around making statements like this:
*Note I said LESS likely, that's not an insult to those who are technologically literate and have made the decision to accept the idevice's limitations in return for 'just works'
Count me among the technologically literate who prefer "just works" to something I can tweak to death. I have a Linux desktop PC if I feel the urge to tweak. I can understand those who feel differently, or who chafe under the restraints (real or imagined) of the iTunes walled garden, but I think it is ridiculous that people feel the need to fling insults at those who choose differently.
I guess some people are so narrow minded they can't accept that others can be as smart or smarter than they are but arrive at a different choice than they did.
Re: Apple Corp vs Apple Inc
The lawsuit started in the early 80s, and they claimed a trademark on the Apple name extending to anything in the "entertainment" realm, which they figured included home computers. Apple eventually settled and paid them $80K to go away.
Then in the late 80s they came back at Apple because people were making MIDI boards for Apple computers, and they did another settlement, which this time expressly forbid Apple from entering into the market for physical music media.
Then after the iPod/iTunes came out they went after Apple a third time, and even though Apple offered them $1 million to settle they took Apple to court, but they lost and got nothing - because the judge ruled that digital files are not PHYSICAL music media.
Presumably at some point after that they buried the hatchet for good and Beatles music finally become available on iTunes. Maybe Apple paid them off to make that happen or maybe they (well Michael Jackson, since he owned the Beatles music by that time) decided fighting Apple and staying off iTunes was costing money in the modern digital world.
Apple Corp vs Apple Inc
Started in 1971? Starting lawsuits a half decade before a company is founded is an aggressive strategy, I agree!
Keep it mind it was Apple Corp (i.e. Beatles) who sued Apple, not the other way around. Claiming the name Apple in all markets when they were only a record label is as bad as the abuses over rounded corners.
Curious what would make it a finer material for a driver than Titanium? Given that the USGA and R&A limit both the coefficient of restitution of the driver face, as well as the overall volume of the head, it doesn't seem as though there's any room for more advanced materials to improve over the current state of the art.
Re: I think the article is wrong
Apple is "greedy" in terms of wanting to maximize their profit, but I highly doubt the profit maximizing prices are where you think. If they can arbitrarily increase the price of the iPhone 6 just because it is a bit larger than the 5s, why didn't they do it with the 5 when it was a bit larger than the 4s?
I think the article is wrong
I'll bet this is for the larger of the two. If it is supposed to be released this fall, they have to get carrier agreements in place before that.
The slightly larger one (which will probably just have more screen less bezel but be the same size) will be the same price, the larger one will cost more.
Only if you don't mind giving away your personal information to be used in ways you can't control or know anything about.
Never forget: you aren't Google's customer, you're their product.
What about Hyundai? Or Häagen-Dazs?
Buy a few ads during the Super Bowl that mentions your name a half dozen times and people will learn how to pronounce it, even if it isn't obvious from the spelling.
Anyway, Galaxy isn't the name of the company that makes that line of phones, nor iPhone for that matter. Nothing stops them from making the "Xiaomi <insert English word here>" for the US market, and people will refer to it as the "xPhone" or "Universe" or whatever.
Hopefully the GNOME foundation falls apart, and someone picks up the pieces who doesn't share their moronic "vision" that has turned so many off from GNOME.
@LedSwinger "Giving up nuclear weapons..."
Do you really believe the outcome would have been different if Ukraine had kept some of its nuclear weapons? The reason they rolled over for Russia in Crimea (and may yet in the eastern part of Ukraine) is not because they believed Russia would nuke them. Putin still would have come in if they had nukes, because he knows no one would start a nuclear war over it.
This was/is never going to be anything but a conventional war, if that, and Russia has a larger and more modern military than Ukraine. More importantly, most of the people in Crimea, and in the area that may yet be annexed to provide a land path to Crimea, are ethnic Russian (ignoring the messy historical reasons why that is the case) That would make it very difficult for a Ukrainian army to fight them, both because some of their number would be unwilling to fire upon Russians, and a majority of the local population would aid a Russian army that was being fired upon by a Ukrainian army.
Re: Makes sense
Except the technology to get there exists now, so it isn't going to provide the boost it did in the past because there are no problems that need solving.
Re: The race is on!
And why exactly should the lunar surface be worth $1000 an acre? Or even a penny per acre? You can't grow anything there, it costs a fortune to support people there and there's nothing for them to do that they can't do better in zero-G orbit.
The only reason you'd ever go to the Moon would be to collect He3, but until we can do something useful with that, it is pretty pointless, and whether it would ever be economical to ship it out of the lunar gravity well is unknown.
Re: Could not have timed it better
It is easy and free to talk about, and fills the citizens with nationalist pride. But don't mistake talk for action, they aren't going to go to the Moon any more than the US went back in 2012 like Bush promised in 2004. They won't even land anything there.
The NSA needs to be split up
Having one organization that is (supposedly) responsible for helping secure the US internet infrastructure and for spying has conflicting goals.
Why should 64 bit drive demand?
It improves performance, but performance improves every year anyway. 64 bits isn't enabling any new category of apps that will drive demand on their own, so I don't see how it would drive demand any more than a faster GPU or marginally improved battery life would.
Re: Ought to point out
It really doesn't matter. Since the US spends more than it takes in, it sells treasuries to make up the difference. They've got a pretty good idea of how much will be coming in and plan sales based on that. So on average they'll have around the same amount of cash on hand year round.
Re: Apple is misleading
How is Apple responsible for notifying people about the potential security issues of the million plus third party OS X or iOS apps? They simply said that iOS and OS X are not vulnerable. They don't have source, they wouldn't be able to determine which apps are vulnerable if they wanted to.
If held to your ridiculous standards, every OS vendor out there is "vulnerable" forever because it is possible that someone may have a vulnerable app installed on their PC/phone today and may choose to never update it.
If I replace the OEM tires in my car, and they sometimes blow up and cause fatal accidents so they get recalled, the manufacturer of my car isn't "vulnerable" to this defect. If asked they'll simply state their cars are not affected by the recall.
Re: Why permit the secrecy
Since all Android vendors seem to be signing up, one would assume it is in base Android. Surely one of them has shared the details with Google of exactly what they're licensing (whether the contract allows it or not) and if it was easy to remove Google would have done so.
Presumably iOS also violates some of these patents (the non-FAT ones) but Apple and Microsoft have had a cross licensing agreement since long ago so Apple didn't have to pay up.
Including in your post the language "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" implies that you think that FRAND has something to do with this. It does not. FRAND is reserved only for standards essential patents, and standards essential patents only come into play when standards bodies get together to create standards that 100% of products in a category must comply with to be compatible (i.e. standards like USB, SATA, h.264, LTE, HDMI, ATSC, etc.) Patents must have been voluntarily submitted to the standards making organization to become FRAND, patents can't be made FRAND against the will of the owner.
If among the patents Microsoft owns is ExFAT, that is not covered by FRAND because it is NOT a standard. It is a Microsoft owned technology that became prevalent in the market because Windows PCs can read it. There's no requirement that phones support ExFAT, and smartphones can be produced that are still smartphones that do not support ExFAT.
Even if Android owned 99.9% of the market, if there were MS patents infringed by Android they would not be FRAND and Microsoft would be under no obligation to license them to anyone at all, let alone on equal terms. They would be within their rights to charge Samsung $30 a handset, and HTC $0.30 a handset if they so chose, or to make per handset price contingent on selling a certain percentage of Windows Phone handsets (at least so long as Windows Phone didn't approach a monopoly share of the market, which doesn't appear too likely)
Bankers want you to do the opposite of what you're currently doing, because they always think the grass is greener.
If Apple sold a hybrid product, they'd be talking about how much more Apple could make if they sold an individual laptop and individual tablet, for those who don't want a hybrid of both.
Re: For $63Bn
Apparently this analyst thinks if you have two successful products, that combining them into one bastardized hybrid that does neither as well as the two perform their individual roles, that the new product will outsell two individual products?
I guess that's why Surface is taking over the market. Oh wait...
Wiped out species in existence?
Wasn't this back when the earliest single celled life was believed to begin? There wouldn't have been much to wipe out, and they would have been clustered around smokers in the deep ocean so the impact probably didn't bother them much on a global scale.
What is heartbeat used for?
Can someone explain why it was added, and what use it is, and why it is enabled by default?
It looks to me to be a way for the client to send something to the server and have it echoed back. Is there a reason why the server should be echoing back client supplied data, and in what way this (as opposed to sending back data that the client doesn't control) is a useful addition to the protocol?
Beyond bad programming, I'm wondering if this is a "kitchen sink" mentality, where stuff that is of narrow interest has been included, but was enabled by default against all best practices.
Re: How to fix all IE compatibility issues
Karma has definitely come around to bite Microsoft in the ass with the problems they have with websites that equate "IE" with "IE6" and present the quirky version that is broken in a modern IE. That's how IE6 rose to such dominance and made it so difficult for other browsers to get traction. Had Microsoft been smarter and kept updating IE instead of deciding IE6 was "good enough" since it had 95% market share, web developers wouldn't have grown tired of the lack of updates and started creating standards based web pages.
The average person knows nothing about User Agent strings and how to fix this, so they'll assume IE is broken and switch to Firefox or Chrome. Microsoft has no one to blame but themselves, had they followed standards instead following the "extend" part of their recipe for dominance to kill Netscape (which was such a bag of crap by the end it would have collapsed under its own weight without Microsoft's help)
Re: The fat lady has sung
You're looking at this with the assumption that human activity is warming the world. If you for a moment look at it with the assumption that the world is warming naturally (we are still coming out of an ice age, climatically) then this shows that natural warming can happen more quickly then previously believed.
So what this does is tear down one of the "humans must be responsible" arguments, which is that the rate of warming is faster than could possibly have occurred naturally.
Where do I get an analyst job?
It isn't know for certain Apple will ever release a watch, and definitely no one knows exactly what its capabilities will be. Yet he's figured out a specific price and sales total?
I take it he's purchased a ton of Apple stock, because if they really sold $17.5 billion worth of any new product in the first year, the stock would go through the roof.
Re: Can't see this being that much use in situations where it is actually needed.
How many people put "plenty of sunscreen" on while wearing a watch, unless perhaps they've got on some $20 throwaway?
Re: Nevermind Windows XP, did you see the Windows 7 vs Windows 8 numbers?
Except those numbers are for the market as a whole, not for corporations. Come the curve of uptake for Windows 8 with that of Windows 7, and see how poorly Windows 8 looks by comparison. Sounds like you're an MS fanboy who eats whatever shit they serve, but most people have decided trying to force a touchscreen type single tasking interface on PCs is a terrible idea.
Re: Fixated on Apple
You need only look at the prices to see that Apple only sells to the high end of the market. Do you think there is some secret discount store selling iPhones to chavs for half price?
If they're on benefits and can still afford a $600+ phone you should take it up with your government, or the local police, depending on how legally they were acquired.
- Asteroids as powerful as NUCLEAR BOMBS strike Earth TWICE YEARLY
- Apple stuns world with rare SEVEN-way split: What does that mean?
- Got Windows 8.1 Update yet? Get ready for YET ANOTHER ONE – rumor
- Patch iOS, OS X now: PDFs, JPEGs, URLs, web pages can pwn your kit
- RIP net neutrality? FCC boss mulls 'two-speed internet'