This "hole" has always been known
Mozilla has just decided to waste resources making an iOS version no one wants. Unless there's some particular value proposition over Safari, I don't see why anyone should switch. They certainly haven't on Android.
3640 posts • joined 12 Feb 2011
Mozilla has just decided to waste resources making an iOS version no one wants. Unless there's some particular value proposition over Safari, I don't see why anyone should switch. They certainly haven't on Android.
There are two reasons to sue if someone stole your idea (I have no idea of the facts, let's just assume for the moment that is what happened)
One, you want to stop them from selling theirs so your implementation can win in the marketplace.
Two, you want to be financially compensated from your role in making possible their financially successful product.
Strategy One only matters if you think you can successfully bring this idea to market yourself. That's not always the case. Even inventors of some pretty major ideas have been unable to do that. Think about who invented the GUI, and who made it financially successful - Xerox was no lone inventor nor short of resources, but it took Apple to popularize it and Microsoft to make it ubiquitous.
You seem to be arguing that they should sue the moment they know someone has stolen their idea, but the law doesn't say they have to do that. Nor does the law in Europe. You have to defend trademarks in that manner, but not patents. If you are pursuing Strategy Two you want them to be successful in the market so you have something to recover, so you wait until that's the case.
They waited until there was a launch date for the Oculus announced, so they can get their cut for their part in its invention. They could have waited until 2020 hoping it would become the next iPhone so they could really cash in, but by waiting until after its release they run the risk it will flop and they get nothing. By suing now they hope for a lump sum payment based on its hype value plus a royalty. If its a mega hit they'll get less that way but the lump sum would mean they get something no matter what.
It will be up to the courts to decide whether they had any part in its invention, and if so what they deserve in compensation.
There is no conceivable way around this. You either have to be able to perform an attack against the encrypted data, which is a problem for everyone using AES if there is such an attack, or you have to have possession of the device before the key is erased. There are methods to get the key off similar products such as Bitlocker, by booting the device into Linux and dumping the memory contents during early boot. You can't do that against iOS but with enough (read a LOT of) resources you probably could find a way to do something like that.
But the important thing to note here is that you'd have to have my phone BEFORE I wipe it. Once I wipe it, you can't get squat from it. The article is about weakness in Android's erasure - so everyone who did a factory reset before selling/giving away their old phone potentially gave away their data (to the 0.0001% of people who would care to try this against a random phone they bought second hand)
Not sure how serious your statement was, but an OS using full disk encryption, like iOS or Windows with Bitlocker enabled, simply has to dispose of the key and any data written on the partition(s) protected by it is instantly and permanently inaccessible.
I would assume that while Google probably implemented this in Android, it wasn't the default because in order to support it across a wide range of hardware capabilities they couldn't sure that every device would possess hardware able to support FDE. Whatever Android version made or will make FDE a requirement is the minimum one you'd have to be on to be safe from this, because you can't trust OEMs to care about stuff like this.
They will have to be built to a higher standard to be able to "pile on the miles" as the author says. Apple seems to do pretty well selling fewer more expensive phones. So it is certainly possible for Detroit to have a bright future when driverless cars are the norm...whether it goes that way for them is another matter, of course.
Passengers are good at spotting stuff they know is suspicious based on what they've heard on the news, like someone trying to break into the cockpit or generally acting crazy. A guy fiddling around under his seat isn't likely to raise alarms, especially when there are only one or two people in his row who could even see it. If he was seated next to people who doze off during a flight, he wouldn't even have to come up with an explanation like "I dropped my pen and it is jammed under the seat somehow"
If he's in a window seat with the tray table down and his laptop out, even a wire from the window side USB port connected to something under the seat is unlikely to be noticed, as he can be sitting on all but the last few inches.
It would be even harder to build quantities here at the level Apple needs. If they did it probably wouldn't create many jobs once the plant was built & equipped, as it would be cheaper to automate production.
Releasing the Watch at a time where there would be many workers taking vacation during a period critical for getting stock up to launch levels seems like a bad decision on their part. I'm not aware of any particular reason why they had to release it in April, rather than May.
What was he supposed to do if they won't listen? A demonstration would be required. If he really did what he said, he provided that demonstration. He may end up facing jail time for it, but taking him to court would require proving what he attempted to do and what the effect was so it'll all come out unless his trial is classified. Even if it is it'll force those who have access the transcript in the FAA to quietly force changes that fix the issue.
Now I would hope no one is stupid enough to have ANY sort of interconnection between the avionics and in-flight entertainment systems, but despite those who just cry 'impossible!' without listing some heavyweight industry credentials in the matter other than what "five minutes of research on the internet told them" I can easily see how this would happen.
Here's how: when the airlines first added the screens one of the first things it could do is show the plane's position. Now there are many ways to accomplish that, but the easiest from a software perspective is to tie it into the avionics system and have it grab the info there. The developers would argue it is fine because "it is just a single API for a read-only call that is exposed" or "there will be a requirement of a firewall between the two systems". We all know what those precautions are worth in the real world, but many developers seem ignorant of the facts of software bugs.
Don't worry, once the red tape is loosened and it can be imported, it'll somehow cost $1,000 and they'll recommend booster shots every five years.
Good thing for the criminals the software can't be updated and Apple has sold 100s of millions of these so they're everywhere.
Oh wait, neither is true, so what does it matter? Even if they never fix it, that just puts it on par with every other wearable on the market, let alone true watches. Or do Rolex and Phillippe Patek have some secret way of remote disablement of their five and six figure watches I'm not aware of?
As others have pointed out, it suffers from the same flaws as fingerprint scanners in that it is not all that secure and you can't revoke a compromised finger or iris.
But even to the convenience factor that is the main point behind Touch ID, it is nice because you can automatically unlock the phone as you pick it up so it is instantly ready. Not so if you have to focus your eyes onto the camera in order to unlock it. Granted that's not much time to wait, and is still quicker than a PIN/password but with a simple touch unlock it is a lot more fluid and doesn't require you to look at it - i.e. when my girlfriend sends a quick text under the table at dinner because she knows I'll give her crap about it if I see the phone :)
If Apple starts to make a loss, that information will be taken into account when people decide what they're willing to pay for / accept for Apple shares, and their value will go down. That's true whether or not they are losing a billion a year with two billion in the bank or a billion a year with 200 billion in the bank.
If that happened, the value of Apple would eventually approximate the value of the cash they held - Apple stock would be like shares of a giant mutual fund with very conservative investments (almost all their money is in T-bills and similar instruments, so it isn't exactly invested for a high return)
If you are concerned about cached data being lost, check/fix your OS to be sure that writes are not reported as complete when written to cache, but have to be written to media. Not sure how to do that on Windows, but it is simple to do for Linux.
Most people don't consider that to be a problem, the real issue with drives without power loss protection is that the internal FTL tables can become corrupted if the power fails at the wrong time, which loses all your data. The MX200 (and MX100) prevents that. Yes, you lose data in the cache when power fails, but after a file system check you're fine. If you think such data loss is bad, consider that this is also the case WITH EVERY HARD DRIVE EVER MADE. That's why servers require data to be written to the media, or use hardware (arrays, etc.) with NVRAM flash.
Rand Paul is not from the religious nutter wing of the republican party - though he has "adjusted" his views to be a bit more in alignment with them since it is unfortunately necessary to fool them into thinking he's on their side to win the republican nomination.
He supported defense cuts and greatly reducing the scope of foreign intervention. Not complete isolationism, but much closer to that than the current US strategy of "engagement". He's changed his tune on that recently - because it is necessary to placate the mostly war-monger conservative wing of the party that votes in primaries - but I don't think he'd lead that way if he was elected because it isn't what he truly believes in.
I think the rest of the world would much rather have him as President of the US than Hillary, whose foreign policy would be indistinguishable from that of Obama, whose foreign policy has been indistinguishable from that of Bush.
Filibusters are used by the minority to stop the majority. If you look at something in hindsight, social progress is going to be held back by the minority before they no longer can, and eventually that minority becomes the majority.
It is easy to look at trying to stop integration in 1965 as "evil" from your seat in 2015. If you could look at what the fights will be over in 2065 you might find yourself on the side of the filibusterers, just like someone in 1965 would likely find themselves on the side of those trying to prevent gay marriage in 2015 (some of those who were alive in 1965 and against it then have changed their opinion, just as some who were against integration in 1915 changed their mind by 1965) "Evil" in the sense you use it is relative. Society evolves and changes, but not all at once.
I hope you weren't being serious. If the dems nominate Bernie Sanders it'll be the Mondale/Dukakis days all over again where they fall in a landslide to any decent republican candidate and would lose even to an extremist like Scott Walker. Eastern liberals (worse a self described socialist in Bernie's case) do not have a chance in US elections, no matter how much liberal democrats may wish they did. It is the same extremist fantasy that keeps republicans talking about people like Palin or Walker.
The only viable alternative the democrats have is Elizabeth Warren, but it is unclear if she'll even run. Since it has been fait accompli that Hillary would win the nomination easily, there's been no attention on anyone else in the democrat ranks who might have otherwise been in the news and started to make a name for himself like previous unknowns like Rubio did for the republicans.
Hillary is almost certain to win the nomination, and the democrats have no one to blame but themselves for assuming that for so long that no one else wants to even challenge her. If the religious right sends an extremist against her, she'll win despite her baggage. If the republicans have some sense and go for someone the people in the vast middle ground of voters can relate to, they'll likely beat her.
They are even copying Apple in the limitations! The non removable back is understandable though dropping the SD card support in the S6 is more questionable. But why would they drop USB hosting support? That's software, and doesn't make it any cheaper. It is almost as if Apple is secretly running their engineering department, trying to eliminate anything Apple haters see as a reason to criticize the iPhone when comparisons are made.
But the Yanks having all but confirmed that theory, they invite the Russians and Chinese to conclude that no US companies or technology can be trusted. So, the NSA have worked diligently to freeze US corporations out of the half of the world that don't get on with the US
They didn't "invite" this, they were just foolhardy enough that to think that they could keep their activities a secret or at least a tinfoil hat level theory. Edward Snowden showed them the error of their ways - this is why there's so much outrage directed at him. They don't care about most of their secrets, but the extent of the cooperation (if you can call it that when it was done under implied threat) from US corporations to the NSA's spying was something they really believed they could keep under wraps. If Snowden hadn't blown the whistle, all it would have taken would be for a couple highly placed people in companies like Cisco to risk the possible consequences of disclosure.
The thing is, China surely does this to an even larger extent given their political and economic structure. Like the US, they surely spy on their friends as well as their enemies. China signed a "no spying" agreement with Russia that presumably gives Putin a way to buy gear from China instead of the US but probably guarantees him and his cronies kickbacks which is the real reason behind it all. Most counties in the world, whether they are more friendly to the US or more friendly to China, don't want to be spied on by either. If I were them I'd use a mixture of equipment from both, so neither could easily get the full picture (i.e. if you can walk through "your" firewall you gotta hack your way through the other guy's firewall behind it)
Unfortunately, it appears to be delivering the performance that was promised 15 years - I am pretty sure I remember it was targeted at 800 MHz...
There was already talk about using RTGs to generate heat for a probe to (very) slowly melt its way down the ice to the ocean. Once it reaches liquid water the eel can be released to wander around.
The big issue as I see it is how to communicate back what it finds because it sure won't be able to do so through 10 miles of ice. Can the probe melting its way down unspool a fiber behind it that's connected to something on the surface? That way the undersea probe can seize the line once it reaches water and releases the eel and the eel can stay within contact of the probe which acts as a relay to the surface.
Easy for me to say, but trying so many new things at once something is bound to go wrong. Not even counting the possibility of the eel and/or the probe being eaten if Europa's oceans are as interesting as we'd all like them to be...
Which "architecture formed around iOS" would that be? It is based on OS X, which Apple released over 14 years ago which is based on NeXT's kernel which is around 25 years old which is itself based on CMU's Mach microkernel and BSD which are even older. If Ericsson has a patent that covers the basic architecture of iOS, it is invalid either due to age or prior art.
Saw another article that confirms Ericsson is trying to charge based on the price of the whole phone, rather than the chip they buy from Qualcomm that implements Ericsson's FRAND patents.
On that basis, I guess if Airbus built LTE into an A380, Ericsson would expect to be paid 2% of $100 million or whatever an A380 sells for?
Apple designs the A9 etc. SoC from the ground up, they have a foundry such as TSMC (A8) or Samsung (A7 and rumored for A9) stamp them out by the millions.
The 2G/LTE functionality is not in that SoC, however, it is in the Qualcomm modem chip. In the past, Qualcomm licensed the patents so Apple, Samsung and others who use their modem chips didn't have to deal with that. But a few years ago certain licensees decided to not license to the chipmakers for 2% (or whatever) of the chip's price and try to move up the chain and extort for 2% of the phone's retail price (giving them about 50x increase in licensing revenue)
I have no idea if that's what the dispute with Erisson is, but that is what Motorola tried to do to Apple and Microsoft and got slapped down by courts in the US and EU.
They paid Fox News (or was it CNN) to use Surface tablets during last fall's election coverage, so the Surface tablets with their kickstand were featured prominently on their desks. One shot taken from a side angle revealed they were using the Surface tablets as kickstands to hold up their iPads :)
The 12.9" iPad is always six months from release.
Most western countries have some minimal standards for crashworthiness that are increased over time. If Tata wants to sell into the US or UK, they'll have to make those changes anyway.
Just because a car was 10x less likely to crash than if I was driving doesn't mean I'd want to have one that would burst into flames if there was a crash. People will still care about safety since a crashproof car can never be built.
I don't understand why that would be a threat. Cars aren't commodity items like PCs and never will be. Today the automakers do very well selling cars that can't drive themselves. If everyone used a freeware "OS" for the car they'd compete in exactly the same way as they do today.
The only threat is that if one or two of the automakers got way ahead of the others in making self driving work well, but the freeware was "close enough" to the best software it would dilute the value of the investment those companies had made to get ahead.
I'd really hate to contemplate what you'd have to give to Google in terms of personal data or watching ads to get free self-driving software. Will they collect data on how many fast food drive throughs you go through for health clubs to push ads at you, while McDonalds tries to make sure your next drive through has a big yellow M over it?
I see friends on either end of the political spectrum occasionally sharing "cross cutting" content with outage (typical of the conservatives) or sarcasm (typical of the liberals)
t isn't changing their minds; simply reading content that challenges one's viewpoint doesn't affect that viewpoint if your mind is already closed.
Irrespective of where they belong on the left/right scale, having "socialist" in the name does not mean they actually are socialist. Ever read 1984?
Well, this article talks about a lot of ways that you could exploit OS X, not that it is actually happening. And some of it is retrospective, i.e. "until recently all Mac security software packages downloaded over unencrypted http connections" so he's listing stuff that's already been fixed.
Granted, not checking that signed applications stay signed to prevent local modification is a hole that should be closed, but Windows doesn't do this either and while Linux supports signed updates I'm not aware of any distro that signs the binaries and enforces the check. Apple is still well ahead of those because OS X and especially iOS utilize signed code far more broadly. Assuming they fix this issue it'll also fix the shared library issue he brings up.
It is good to point out issues, but calling out that anti-malware software on OS X isn't capable of detecting or defending against the sort of stuff nation-states create is irrelevant. The same is true for Windows, that's why when stuff like Stuxnet and its descendants is discovered, it is years after it was initially deployed. No one can detect that stuff - that's the whole point of it, with nearly unlimited budgets you can always stay several steps ahead of the AV world's and operating system's ability to detect it.
It costs much less to find a hole to exploit than close all exploitable holes, so when you put a nearly unlimited budget on the search for holes you always win because you only need to find a few to win while Apple/Microsoft/etc. would need to find them all to win. You basically have to accept that you can't defend against the likes of Stuxnet no matter what OS you run. The fools who think using that KGB phone or OpenBSD will protect from spooks at that level will find that out in short order if a large government has a reason to target them enough to deploy that level of resources.
This is all about reducing friction for getting involved in such efforts. If you have the data in HealthKit, and researchers have various projects going on they issue a "call for volunteers" via HealthKit, it is easy to get involved. Today the bar is a lot higher, both for people who want to help advance science and researchers who want to get access to volunteers.
This could be done on a website or app, but it is a lot easier for Apple to get the critical mass needed to make this successful than it would be for almost anyone trying to start a website with the same purpose. While Apple's security will never be perfect, keeping the data encrypted on your phone makes it more secure than if it was kept on a website where it is available to hackers the next time there's a 0 day for Apache or IIS.
The solar panels cost far more than just buying the electricity would over the short lifetime of one of these bitcoin ASICs.
Even if they were able to use GPUs, which were a win for Bitcoin until they went to ASICs. Sad that a shady "currency" is getting custom hardware support and not real science...
I don't understand your complaint. Apple lets you use a different mail app but you think it is a "fail" because you don't like where that preference is changed? Microsoft didn't let you change the default browser at all until they were forced to do, and things didn't work right when you did so. Your comparison is a FAIL.
They claim they're an "upstart"....have they checked their market cap? They've been around over a decade as the previous poster mentioned - that's a couple centuries in Silicon Valley years!
They're also worrying about something theoretical for AT&T they think might possibly happen. Yeah, they might become a major broadband provider, IF they make all the massive investments they say they plan to make. I guess Verizon is just planning on letting AT&T own the wireless broadband market? Same for Sprint, T-Mobile and US Cellular? AT&T will not be without competition, and where they offer broadband now they are not without competition - because every market where they offer DSL there's a cable company offering internet too.
The coming of fixed wireless will mean rural customers will have more broadband competition than most city/suburb dwellers by the early 2020s.
65% of desktop market and 92% of mobile market - with the mobile search market now larger than desktop? That's 80% overall and climbing fast - similar to Microsoft when the FTC first started looking at them. It would sure be a lot easier to break up Google Search from "everything else" Google does than it would have been to split off Windows from everything else.
Certainly their conduct in the way their search monopoly always prioritizes their own properties (maybe not #1 rank every time but first page every time) is much like the way Microsoft leveraged their Windows monopoly to help Office / Server sales to the tune of many billions each (and tried to help Windows Mobile, MSN and other products that were so terrible even a monopoly couldn't help them)
To some extent they were 'selected' by fuel limitations to get the orbiter out of Earth's gravity, to Mars, but stopping at Mars. Different orbiters were launched at different points in Earth's and Mars' orbits, taking different amounts of time to get there, so the delta x / delta y velocities relative to Mars were different. It is easier to brake into an eccentric orbit than into a circular orbit.
For an SSD? A few milliseconds to trim the entire range of the partition in question. Big advantage for SSDs in that regard, erasing a hard drive partition requires actual writes and if you're doing Really Bad Stuff, a half dozen overwrites to be sure.
That's easy, have a separate partition from which you run a VM where you do all your "day to day" stuff. A nice innocuous gmail account where you collect spam and get notifications for Amazon shipments, ordinary web browsing where you post stuff to the Reg and surf for a bit of porn, have a few apps installed like Turbotax and do your taxes there.
Since you'd be using it on a daily basis it would look 'fresh' but the other VM where you do Bad Things would disappear without a trace by the time police get their hands on it.
You can have the encrypted data syncing to the cloud via a VPN that goes to TOR back through another VPN and back through TOR. If the USB device tied to your wrist is removed the encryption key for the hard drive is dropped and the contents of the SSD are instantly erased. That will also save you if something happens to accidentally trigger it. They won't be able to find out about that encrypted copy on the cloud because the hard drive will be erased.
If you're clever you can resist arrest just enough that they tase you, and your lawyer can claim the Taser in close proximity to your laptop erased the SSD.
Facebook doesn't like Google recently catching up to it in terms of evil, so they're making a big move to stay well ahead!
That's the 100 kwh commercial version. They've been pretty forthcoming with the specs on the Powerwall, but I haven't seen anything on its bigger brother.
Makes it a good replacement for all those pirated XP licenses, which probably accounted for a fair bit of the remaining percentage of XP users when it went past its sell by date (yes, I know some corps still hadn't completed their upgrades, but they were the exception rather than the rule)
Admittedly I haven't looked into it too hard since I have no interest in Windows 8, but my understanding is that it is much more of a pain to pirate. Maybe they realize they went too far in that respect, and are offering middle ground with the free Windows 10 upgrades for legal or non-legal versions of 7 and 8.
The bit about the paper clips and making humans happy reminds me of genie stories, which always have someone wishing for something with the result not quite what they expected.
I think the whole thing could be neatly solved by having "people in the loop" that control the AI's survival. If a certain percentage of the humans in control believe the AI is doing more harm than good, it will be automatically shut off. To insure the AI doesn't get too clever for its own good and try to influence them, the AI should have no way of knowing who they are. In fact, maybe they shouldn't know who they are! If/when we get to true AI on this level we'll probably already have some type of brain implants for memory/intelligence augmentation, a random sampling of the implants would exercise control over a given AI.
Can lift 20 tons to GTO in a single trip, so only 20 trips if that's where the final assembly was done. I'm presuming as much assembly as possible would be done in LEO to make it easier for astronauts to get to/from to do the work. Then the ship can boost into GTO, load the water, and go forth.
The problem with the Atrix, and Android in general, is that you get a Linux desktop. Not saying that is useless (I'm posting from one) but it is less attractive to the market than running OS X or certainly Windows would be. If you just want to browse or do basic word processing, it is fine, but the further you stray the less it will meet your needs.
Plus doing it in 2011 would have left it ridiculously underpowered. I think only the iPhone 5S reached the minimum where they would be feasible (would require more than the 1 GB of RAM it came with)
Maybe Apple should buy AMD, build a couple dormant x86 cores into the iPhone SoC, and fire those up when docked, along with some additional dormant RAM. Support this only in the 'Plus' version since this would raise the cost. Then they wouldn't need ARM builds of OS X apps and could also run Windows apps under Fusion.
It might cannibalize Mac sales somewhat, but it would increase iPhone sales which Apple makes more money from, so I doubt they'd be bothered. They've had internal ARM ports of OS X for several years at least (probably the source of the rumors about Macs switching from x86 to ARM) so I'll bet this is being played with, even if it isn't a product ready to launch. The ability to continue your work on a different device is just another way to work, but supporting that doesn't mean they can't offer other options.
One thing Apple believes is that they should cannibalize their own markets before someone else does it, and it won't stop people with more heavy duty needs (photo/video editing, etc.) from continuing to buy proper Macs. An iPhone could handle browsing, word processing and other Office related tasks, but wouldn't be suited to stuff that stresses even a high end x86.
If someone rings you up, you click on the 'accept call' dialog that pops up using your mouse, and use the built in mic/speaker in the phone, or possibly in the keyboard/mouse. There isn't any requirement to stop the OS X interface to take a call, you can run any app while on a phone call (iOS supports full multitasking like OS X, they just don't expose that to third party apps presumably to prevent them from chugging away in the background and killing the battery)
There are wireless HDMI standards but they are fairly power hungry, and running the OS X GUI and applications is likely to be pretty hard on the battery so a wired connection to the monitor that allows the iPhone to suck power from the monitor makes a lot more sense.
That forum would be trolled often enough this would be a bad bet for the "dumb/lazy students with spare cash" you seem to think will all take this route.
I doubt the GS6 moves the needle enough to be noticed, as it is a minority of their overall sales. The Note is released in the fall, and there are price cuts on their flagships a few months after release that some people probably wait for so even the high end product sales are probably spread fairly evenly between the four corners.
Apple is so seasonal because they only update their product line once a year, and they don't go on sale.