Re: Let's all be more inclusive
That would be most of the British, then.
26710 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"Also ask them why bathrooms frequently no longer contain their namesake item. It's somewhat misleading to describe a property as 5 bed, 11 bath unless he's expecting people to relax and soak in a WC."
Here in CA, that property might be listed as 5 bed, 6 and 5 half baths (WTF is a half bath?). Or 6 full, 4 half and a powder room (downstairs guest toilet+sink). Or 4 full, 2 shower only, 4 half and a powder room. Or any other way to describe the rooms without actually saying "toilet".
Realtors are weird. Ever seen how badly they dress up an empty house? I'd rather see it empty ...
I think every one of us here on ElReg has worked under a hanging ceiling.
The chandelier in my dining room hangs from the ceiling.
There are pictures hanging on my walls.
The roadbed of the Golden Gate Bridge is hanging from the suspension cables.
I just put new foundation in an old hive, it's hanging nicely in the frames.
Etc. etc. etc.
It's not "black and white", per se, it's light and dark. Think about a small group of proto-humans a couple million years ago. Fearing the dark of night, because that's when the nocturnal predators hunted. The light of day brought relative safety. In other words "dark == bad, light == better" is embedded in our very genetics.
And let's not forget that those first early humans were undoubtedly dark skinned.
The entire concept of black vs white being a racist thing in this context is laughable.
As with much such claims, it depends on how you look at it. If you include scientific and technological terminology and so-called "import words" that are now quite common in English (pasta, sushi, etc.), most scholars would give a number that is somewhere North of 1,000,000 individual words, with more being added near daily.
Also, is a word like "post" one word, or many?
All in all, this is one of those silly subjects with no real answer that only exists for argument.
Which is always fun over a pint. My round, I think.
Snowflakes come on one flavo(u)r: Frozen water. Until they are polluted by humans, of course.
I'm not upset at all about so-called "inclusive" language. Use it all you like! Feel free, if it suits you. Just don't try to force other people to use it. Forcing other people to adopt your views has a name, and I seriously doubt you want to be called that name.
Nice use of "dear" in your rather failed attempt to talk down to me. Is talking down to people considered "inclusive" in your mind? Somehow it wouldn't surprise me ...
"The lack of recent posts was attributed to the initiative having succeeded."
Actually, it's because the "initiative" is being completely ignored by the vast majority of people. I am still hearing whitelist and blacklist, master & slave, hanging processes and etc. pretty much all over Silly Con Valley, which is one of the most mixed melting pots on the planet. Nobody seems to have any issue with it ... EXCEPT a few holier than thou loudmouths.
These words have technical meanings, when used in a technical manner. If you are offended when I discuss the master clock on my network, or the slave cylinders on my car's brakes, or the blacklist of IP addresses that I block at the border routers, or what have you, when it is bloody obvious that there is absolutely zero intent for those words to have any negative meaning ... well, I respectfully suggest that you have deep seated issues to work through, and taking it out on my proper use of the English language isn't going to help matters any.
You don't want a boat. All they are is a hole in the water into which you pour money.
However, if you insist, the intelligent owner will minimize the size of the drain by keeping the boat away from the four things guaranteed to ruin it: Sunlight, oxygen, water, and salt. People in the know add humans consuming alcohol to that list.
I wouldn't know about modern Fluke ... most of my go-to kit of that genre are indeed Fluke, but I bought them in the mid late '80s, and have felt no need to buy more since. Why bother, they still work fine, and electricity hasn't changed in the last 40 years.
I do know that I will not purchase anything that uses proprietary data formats unnecessarily, and I flat out refuse to purchase anything that won't function unless it can call home over the Internet for no reason other than because it's fashionable.
I'd be annoyed, too. Have a beer.
Yes. "ping" is not an acronym, and never was.
It was released as public domain software first (1984ish), later changed to the BSD license (1985ish). It was included in 1986's 4.3BSD. Obviously we used it in 4.2BSD as we were building 4.3.
Note that some variations of ping include an audible option. Handy occasionally. Usually annoying.
Also, see: https://www.catb.org/jargon/html/P/ping.html
... is that such "magical" bits and bobs are always superfluous to the organization. And usually, so is the secretive person attached to it.
In fact, so much so that when I run across such things as a contractor, I make a bet with the company owner that it's junk, and we can safely "accidentally" delete it during the upgrade (after making suitable backups just in case, of course.), and that the company will continue running without change.
In over thirty years, I have never lost that bet.
Targeted advertising doesn't scale to a network the size of the planet. For example, say you are looking for handmade greeting cards. If you go to your local boutique, you'll probably find some. No need for ads at all. If you search for them online, with no filters enabled you'll be inundated with ads for said cards from all over the world. The advertisers claim this is targeted because you were looking for the cards ... but from your perspective, you're getting spammed by a ton of junk from all over the world (who knew they made greeting cards out of chinesium‽‽‽) ... and the person you were sending the card to received it three weeks ago. You don't need or want any more, but still the ads come ... So if you are like my computer incompetent DearOldMum or computer illiterate GreatAunt, you find and install ad blockers out of sheer frustration over the barrage of shit.
"Currently, I only ever seem to be shown ads for stuff I'm not remotely interested in."
More likely, based on complaints of my users, it'll also be ads for things you have already bought and don't need any more of.
"adverting provides a pointer to likely quality."
I think I see a serious problem with your thesis.
"“clean rooms” provide a concept space where you AI avatar can inspect information to help you decide what to spend money on"
More like provide more fodder for my filters. A corporate shill working out of the 27th floor on Madison Avenue and living in a 300sq foot, $3500/month "apartment" in Manhattan (San Francisco, London, Paris, Rome, Tokyo ... ) has absolutely no idea whatsoever about the needs of Middle America, much less what I need out here in the wilds of the West Coast. Why should I pay any attention to them, much less allow my network to waste the bandwidth downloading their useless drivel?
There is a huge difference in the meaning of the word intelligence in "military intelligence" and "artificial intelligence". The original article was about the latter, not the former. Trying to conflate the two is akin to madness.
Actual real-world info is not the same thing as inferred and synthesized info. One is reality, the other is illusion and fantasy.
TV has been a vast wasteland since the 1950s. Hollywood officially went TITSUP[0] with the release of TriStar's Godzilla in 1998. It's all been downhill from there, IMO. Fire the lot of 'em, no great loss.
[0] Total Idiocy To Sucker Underbred Public
"AI is not going away"
You're right. But it's time for it to start hibernating again. Winter is upon us.
"is only going to grow in stature"
It'll grow in stature, sure. It's already getting fat, and moving on to extremely ponderous and obese.
"and reputation"
It's sure got a growing reputation. That it doesn't work as advertised, can't work as advertised, and is nothing but pure marketing dross as advertised.
"and increase its intelligence hold"
Let's get this straight: There is absolutely no intelligence involved. Machines cannot now, and never will be able to think. All they do is repeat the garbage they are told to regurgitate. No machine has ever created anything new, nor had an original thought. Nor will they, at the current state of technology ... and most actual experts on the subject are pretty certain that it won't ever happen. Anybody who says otherwise is suckering you, in search of the almighty buck. Or trying to start a new religion, which comes to the same thing when you think about it.
Over 7 facilities. That's only $20 million per.
Which won't pay for the necessary computers, networking and electricity with today's bloated, inefficient software ... much less the salaries of the mindless management drones that'll be required to report back to Congress (even though they won't understand a word they are parroting ... ). Etc.
More feel-good bullshit wasting the taxpayer's dollars.
It only takes a very small bit of viable DNA to produce a calf. "All that" will not be all that much physically. Probably something roughly the size of a medium sized household chest freezer[0] would be plenty of space. I'll bet some important person somewhere figured splitting such a small amount across multiple locations was a waste of money.
[0] Note that while a household unit might work in a pinch to keep the stuff cold for a short time, keeping it viable for long periods requires a cryo system that is a trifle more robust.
Another way of looking at it ... In the early days, large companies rolled their own IT ... Boeing's internal network was larger than the fledgling "Internet" until roughly 1986; IBM's internal network was larger until roughly 1989. Ford's internal network was larger until roughly 1991, GMs roughly 1992.
Hardly unique. There are probably a dozenish ElReg commentards who wrote, and possibly still maintain ML code at least partially using COBOL.
And of course ELIZA (one of the, if not the first modern chatbot) was written in an extension to Fortran called SLIP (Symmetric LIst Processor).