Re: Its always the simple things
"I plan to redo the siding on the house"
No need, it'll take care of itself any day now.
26707 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
I have absolutely zero confidence in the current SCotUS. In fact, if push comes to shove you might say I am in complete and utter contempt of that Court.
HOWEVER, I really don't think even those hand-picked fuckwits would have the damn gall to proclaim Montana's latest tomfoolery Constitutional.
"This is America, THC gummies are legal and available everywhere"
And because it's legal, the scofflaw side have stopped getting stoned. Now they are killing themselves off with fentanyl.
"but they don't light up very well"
Just exactly how stoned would you have to be to even try that? Remember, kiddies, don't smoke dope when you're already stoned. You don't get any higher, you just get lower on dope. (Apologies to Gallagher.)
This is nonsensical. There is a reason the two concepts are called out in different line-items in The Constitution. It would seem the authors and signatories understood the difference, and why they shouldn't be conflated into a single whole, and indeed require their own completely separate conversations.
"The left-sided wingnuts (twist on / twist off!) have never passed legislation to ban books"
The left wing nuts are trying to ban specific WORDS, regardless of the context in which they are used.
What's worse, burning books or brainwashing the population with newspeak? Burning books inevitably leads to burning humans (read your history), but the idea of massive, wide-spread thought control by intentional language modification scares the ever loving shit out of me.
"Instead you will have to download it from third party sites"
Nope. All you'll have to do is cross the state line and you'll be able download it to your heart's content without fear of the Montana Thought Police kicking in your door. Nothing in the law says anything about using the spyware, it just says you can't download it while in the state of Montana ... and in fact, it puts the onus on the "mobile application marketplaces" (whatever that is) to ensure it's not possible in Montana.
Similar to some anti-alcohol laws, and just as effective I'm sure.
Also, it doesn't take effect until January 1st next year. It'll be struck down long before then.
"there are some really good ones"
From what I've seen, only if you have the attention-span of a cocaine addicted weasel.
Who are they to tell me how I communicate, and with whom? Have they never heard of freedom of speech? Does the Constitution mean nothing to them?
With that said, I do not use Pooh-bear's spy tool, and nothing will coerce me to change my mind ... but it's MY decision, not the decision of some wing-nut fuckheads on Capitol Hill.
On the bright side, the Trump-stacked SCotUS will have no choice but to strike this new law down, thus demonstrating that the Republicans in charge of Montana are really, really good at wasting the state's time and money. Perhaps the electorate will take note of this and do something about it.
The answer, as always, is education of the general public ... but the wing-nut politicians of all stripes can't have that, now can they?
"Microsoft has done really well with RDP."
Sure, if you're a crook. See this ElReg article, posted this afternoon (Wed 17 May 2023 // 20:32 UTC).
Roughly 96.2% of a typical filthy meatbag's body weight is oxygen (65%), carbon (18.5), hydrogen (9.5) and nitrogen (3.2). The next 3.4% consists of calcium (1.5), phosphorus (1.0), potassium (0.4), sodium (0.2), chlorine (0.2) and magnesium (0.1). The final 0.4% consists of trace elements ("contaminants", if you will), all under 0.04% of total body weight.
As a mine for raw materials, a human is pretty low-grade ore.
""a model that can persuade, manipulate, or influence a person's behavior, or a person's beliefs" - would that include basic chatbots, such as we've been seeing for a decade or so now?"
Try closer to five decades. We used ELIZA to influence which brand of soda sold out first in the coin machines at Tresidder Union, Stanford, mid 1970s.
"Would it include YouTube's recommendation algorithms?"
Of course.
"I am suspicious of an industry calling for itself to be regulated."
ABSOLUTELY!
"Yes, surely it should be."
Should it? As it is, the technology is pretty much junk. Regulating it will stifle innovation, and in fact bring it to a grinding halt entirely. Which is going to happen anyway, once the general public, the shareholders (and the technological incompetents on Capitol Hill) realize they've been hoodwinked[0] and pull funding. The whole AI thing is about to go back on the back burner for a decade or so, do we really want enduring legislation ensuring nobody will pick it back up again in the future?
"But equally surely, we shouldn't be asking its own CEOs how to go about it."
We can ask all we like, but they are going to ignore us anyway, because The Royal They know better than everybody else. History has shown that industry in general ignores petty things like laws and regulations, looking at fines as just a cost of doing business.
[0] Current so-called "AI" is just brute-force pattern matching on a grand scale.
Even assuming a machine can somehow achieve consciousness, which I very much doubt, a machine, and the running thereof, is entropy poor. They break. Constantly. And are not self-healing. They can not, and will not, "take over" until they are capable of running their entire supply chain, and the care and feeding of all that, without Human help. The very concept is laughable. When was the last time you tried to make a simple steam powered traction engine, from scratch, starting with raw ore? Now try it with a modern machine, for example a late '70s era pocket calculator or Casio wrist watch. You really think an intelligent machine could somehow marshal the necessary forces to reproduce, even one random part at a time?
To say nothing of electricity ... as long as there is one Human in the chain, the power can be cut/pulled/blasted.
Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer ...
"wonder how long it is before some bright spark has two AIs responding to each other !"
Just over half a century ago. RFC-439 shows what happens when you have a chatbot talking to itself. Ostensibly it was "The Doctor" talking to "PARRY", but both were merely instances of ELIZA.
Of course back in 1972 we weren't stupid enough to take and act on their advice ...
You don't want a boat. All they are is a hole in the water into which you pour money.
However, if you insist, the intelligent owner will minimize the size of the drain by keeping the boat away from the four things guaranteed to ruin it: Sunlight, oxygen, water, and salt. People in the know add humans consuming alcohol to that list.
"brought up in a strict Catholic environment"
I'm sorry. Have beers.
I quite honestly think that most of humanity's problems would go away if everybody were to read, parse, and understand their version of a holy book or books (warts and all) before the age of 10. But that'll never happen, because the shamans would be out of work before a generation had passed, and we can't have that, now can we?
I dunno about hydroplaning, but there's sure a lot of screaming and a probable eventual crash.
The problem is that the Right Wing Nuts and the Left Wing Nuts are living on the opposite side of the same coin. They represent an extreme minority, and yet are extremely loud in their bellowing. Makes them seem far more important than they really are. The vast majority of us live quietly in the center and wish the loudmouths, who do NOT represent the majority, would just shut the fuck up. They are not fixing anything with their bullshit and bluster, all they are doing is creating strife and dissent for no good demonstrable reason ... and contrary to what their handlers seem to think, no matter how many times they repeat a lie, it remains a lie. (Note there are many kinds of lie before you clam to not be lying.)
And if you're one of those wing-nut loudmouthed liars, here's something to think about: Do you honestly think that anything you type here in the pages of ElReg means jack shit to anybody, anywhere? Do you really think you are making a difference somehow? Do you really think you are changing anybody's mind about anything? Now be honest with yourself before answering (if you are still capable).
And now ask yourself "Why am I wasting my time with this here on ElReg?".
/rant
I'm off for a pint. All y'all are welcome to join me. Leave your wingnutpolitics outside the pub. Ta.
"AFAIK as early as first chapter of the bible it refers to black people being the descendants of someone who had been marked as evil by god"
Have you ever even bothered to read the fucking book for yourself? Or are you like most adherents of the Abrahamic religions, and just parrot what you have been told?
D-, must try harder.
The album you took your handle from just turned 50 last month. Many of ElReg's commentads were already adults when it was released.
A little over a year ago, I was looking at the album cover for The Stooges Funhouse (autographed by Iggy and framed, on a friend's wall behind UV resistant glass) and realized it had been well over half a century since I first heard it.
The tunage of my misspent youth is now considered art ... I nearly had to sit down.
Wait ... that space rock is HOW old? Never mind ...
Not surprising at all. Certain classes of meteorites (of which this was one) are known to have originated at specific times in the past. All you need is a photo, or a description supplied by an expert, to take more than a reasonable guess at the age.
If anything, I'd be very surprised if the expert was wrong.