1823 posts • joined 19 Dec 2010
The Surface Pro is coming
All 1000 of them; so that Microsoft can start another story about "extremely high demands", or are they going to do it properly this time?
A Cherry for me
I've been a computer nut for quite some time now, it started back in the days when I was a kid with a C64 and eventually worked my way up with a 286 which later became a Compaq 486 and eventually I got the PC I have now.
I've had several, unnamed, keyboards during those days but eventually came across a Cherry 6000M. The funny thing is that I don't know where I got it, but I do know is that this keyboard turned out to be virtual indestructible! You see; during those times (we're talking the 80's here) I smoked. And I also smoked behind the PC; always had an ashtray sitting near my PC because of that. And a lot of that ash (and other junk) ended up in my keyboard. Because you see; I also used to eat breakfast behind the PC or sometimes even lunch.
This keyboard eventually failed me. Approx. 20 years later, at the time of writing only 2 years ago. I cleaned it up, even found ash in there while I quite smoking approx. 25 years ago, but to no avail. It responded a bit better, but several keys failed more than often, thus making typing extremely annoying.
SO I started looking for replacements but the problem was that a lot of keyboards are quite bulky. I also liked the click sounds I got while typing (I type blindfold, and decently fast too) and not too many keyboards have that. I tried some of the keyboards still lying around the house but none felt that good as my good ole Cherry :-(
AND then I discovered the German Cherry website (link to Cherry.de). Imagine my surprise; they don't 'merely' sell keyboards, they sell mice and more advanced keyboards as well (stuff with a cardreader in 'm, as you can sometimes see being used in banks and such).
Because I didn't see my keyboard there I simply wrote them an e-mail telling them that I was looking for that particular keyboard and if they could advice me which one would best suit my needs. "Oh, but we can make that model for you. It will take time but for E 110,- (approx.) it can be done".
I paid and I waited, for 1.5 - 2 months or so. I recall writing them an e-mail because the whole thing went a little bit vague and at one time I was worried that I spend a lot of money on nothing. Needless worries as it turned out because eventually my keyboard arrived. Slightly larger than the one I had (this one has a larger edge at the top which now also features the 'Cherry' logo) but the touch and response is exactly what I came to love and respect so much.
A very expensive keyboard, sure, but if you spend as much time behind the keyboard & screen as I do where a good keyboard has become an essential part then believe me; its money well spent. Especially if this critter manages to last for yet another 25 years :-)
A simple thing like not having a file manager just puzzle people who purchased a Windows Phone. I know that because my co-workers bang on my door asking for help. And if you want to manage your phone on windows, you need Zune.
This! +1, spot on.
I really like my Omnia W, it does what I need it to do (though in all honesty I do wish it could sync a little more data) but I hardly update my media contents because, as you very well mentioned here, that part is totally fucked up.
The reason I'm responding is that your message could make people think that you can then use Zune to somehow copy files back and forth but you can't even do that :(
Instead you need to point Zune to a folder on your PC after which it'll keep that folder synced with your phone. Which shows the completely screwed up design; I don't want each and every one of my mp3 files to be stored on my phone. As such I can't simply tell Zune "there's my music, go sync".
But you also can't easily tell Zune "there's my music, I want this, that and that". Because Zune doesn't work with files and folders; it'll use the information retrieved from the MP3 files. So now you need to somehow give your MP3 files some info so that you know what you have, THEN copy it over. I don't have that because I didn't care for that; I ripped some of my CD's and simply let a player randomly play files (these are files from a time before we had id3.org and such).
As such you'll soon find out that the easiest way to do all that is to copy your stuff to a folder, point Zune to it and then try to get it to copy stuff. More than often it won't because you don't copy; you synchronize. That translates to: "You click a button and hope that it'll copy the media across that you want, but there's no way to be sure but to disconnect the phone and see for yourself".
And don't get me started on "What happens when you discovered that you wanted that extra file to be included afterwards?". Zune will eventually spot the changes; just not one minute after you copied a file to a directory. What idiot thinks that I want to wait 5 minutes for Zune to cope? I want my media copied NOW.
SO you're eventually done, all is well. Because you don't need the bloat you remove the folder which you made with all the mp3 files because there's not much sense keeping the same files on 2 places at once. Waste of space, no ?
And then, several months later, you connect your phone somewhat casually to your PC to charge it. Normally you'd use the adapter but you're in a hurry; you simply take the adapter with you. Then sitting in the bus you want to listen to a nice piece of music...
All of that got neatly synchronized and therefor is now also no longer available on your phone, just like its gone on your PC. Microsoft couldn't have made it any easier; apart from the fact of course that I didn't WANT my files to get removed like that.
Zune is sheer hell. Yet required for WinPhone, go figure :(
"The paradox is this: when Microsoft had a terrible product (except perhaps as a second device, or as an enterprise terminal) it was a lot noisier than it is today. But Microsoft doesn’t do noisy any more."
I'm sorry but I just don't see it. Because you could also turn this around: MIcrosoft makes noise when introducing new products (which, as we all know, are usually "so so") and makes less noise when releasing newer versions of the same product.
And when talking about the Windows Phone; have you already forgotten about that huge Winphone being placed in (iirc) New York where all sorts of stuff went down? Or the several "Smoked by Windows Phone" advertisements ?
Microsoft made a lot of noise with Windows Phone 7.
With message alerts I assume you're referring to broadcast messages aka CB messages?
Because that's supported, on Windows Phone 7.5 no less. However, there is a caveat here; many WinPhones have specific features not supported by the OS itself but provided by the manufacturer. To make it even easier on the customer there's no way to find out if a certain feature is out of the box or not..
So; on my Samsung Windows Phone (Omnia W) I have the option "Advanced text messaging" located under the 'Settings'. There I pick anything I'd need; from channels, to countries.
You should really consider contacting Microsoft to tell them that they need to revise their Windows 8 development guide (link to MSDN page), because according to your story it seems they got it all wrong.
On that page they claim that:
"With Windows 8, you can leverage your existing skills and code assets to create Windows Store apps for your customers.
* Microsoft .NET Framework and Silverlight developers can use their XAML, C#, and Visual Basic skills.
* Developers looking for maximum performance for their games and other graphics-intensive apps can use the power of Microsoft DirectX 11."
Not only do they claim that you can use .NET for Windows 8 development, they also seem to mistakenly mention C#, VB and XAML skills instead of calling it "Java skills".
We're lucky to have smartz pplz like you around I guess ;-)
Did I read this right?
"The vulnerability, originally flagged up to Google in July 2012, was patched last week, freeing Duo Security to go public with its discovery.".
So basically Google took half a year to fix a rather nasty flaw in its authentication system. And although Google deemed the risk factor to be low I think one of the reasons it was low was because it didn't make it out in the open. Yet...
But shouldn't Google out of all firms realize that there is no security through obscurity? The very moment this would have gotten out in the open then there'd be a serious problem, then what ?
Yet "men are (still) pigs"?
Even my gf sometimes jokingly uses that phrase whenever she's over and I left some laundry in my bedroom instead of the laundry basket near the washing machine, or when its really time to clean the sink while I figured I'd do that "next week"...
So what do those "One Million Moms" think about that ? Have they never called us men pigs, ever ?
But to join in on the stereotyping a bit; I wonder how many of those moms are blond. Because for all we know this insurance company took their own insurance on this project and were actually hoping that they'd stir the pot. Because thanks to them, and "One Million Moms" of course, now One Million Reg Readers have also taken notice of this commercial.
(because ask yourself this: what would be the sole purpose of a controversial commercial ?)
One problem with the article...
"Not only can Microsoft sign its own damned certs, Server 2012 makes this whole process so simple web administrators will weep."
Which is of course assuming that Microsoft actually uses that stuff themselves. Be very careful there because Microsoft has a solid history of telling the world "A" while doing "B" themselves. For example; when they started pushing Exchange forward as the big Windows MTA which could easily rival Unix environments their own e-mail facility remained hosted by Unix for several years to come. Simply because Exchange wasn't capable to handle their load. Something which they tried hard to keep under wraps of course.
Just because Microsoft has released a new server doesn't mean they immediately started using it themselves, that line of thinking is IMO a bit silly. In fact; I would deem it much more likely that parts of MS are currently running on hybrid solutions; a Windows core which is being maintained in-house themselves and as such its no longer really server 2003 yet also not really server 2008; but instead a 'hybrid' sitting somewhere in between which got all the solid enhancements to their server line of products yet without the bloat.
Because just like any other Enterprise environment Microsoft knows that with every change you apply you always risk introducing a certain danger to the system. Considering that they also maintain their own OS updates; why not utilize that themselves as well ?
"Linus is essentially defending Linux from becoming a project that is subverted by commercial interests."
Now, this is why I wrote my earlier comment because IMO this is only what this article insinuates but it isn't true perse. The way I see it Linus even stands way above petty stuff such as commercial interests; all he cares for is that the kernel which he maintains remains sane.
The reason I come to this conclusion is because "the evil Microsoft" themselves have also contributed code to the kernel. Not only that; one could even argue that their motivation for doing so was partly to get Linux to better co-exist within their Windows networks. But despite their commercial interests Linus still deemed their contributions to be valid enhancements to the kernel and as such they got implemented. IMO because Linus couldn't care less about those commercial interests but more so for getting solid additions to the kernel which he maintains.
Don't take my word for it; check out this link to a PDF file released by the Linux Foundation on kernel development. Go to page 11 (page 10 contains the header of the chart) and see for yourself what company made it into the top 20 list of kernel contributors.
Not the complete story?
Nice article but IMO you left some important details out. Now, I understand that we should obviously check the source material ourselves in order to form our opinion on it, but IMO the El Reg article as-is makes Linus look way more negative than he actually is.
The reason I think so is because your article never makes it clear as to why Linus thinks this is a stupid suggestion, Microsoft had nothing to do with that, something which can be read here (link to lkml.org):
"Umm. And which part of "We already support that, using standard X.509
certificates" did we suddenly miss?
So no. The PE file thing makes no sense what-so-ever. What you mention
we can already do, and we already do it *better*."
...in response to comments that RH only wanted to add functionality to the kernel which allows kernel module programmers to sign the module and vouch for it themselves.
We can finally stop hiding behind the couch then?
Quite a shame that he passed away. However I think one should be grateful that he passed away in his sleep. I can't think of a better, more peaceful, way to die.
"The genius of the old designers was brought about by limitations and improvisations."
Oh so true... Last week I watched 'Return of the Jedi' again and even there these things pop out, especially when compared to the last 3 movies.
During the scene with the Rancor you see Luke, Han and the rest standing on a sort of "sand glider" (I don't know the official name). Several times you get close-ups, for example the moment when Luke walks the plank. If you then focus your attention to the surroundings you'll suddenly notice that this vehicle is battered; it has bludgeons on it, scratches and even some damage here and there.
Put differently: the vehicle actually looks as if its being actively used. When looking at the modern movies you won't get that little bit of detail anymore.
That's not the issue, you're now ignoring the key fundamentals on which cloud computing was based: redundancy; the option to provide a service which can be spread across several (hardware) components. Thus if one component fails then others take over and there's no loss of continuance.
At least that's the theory. Even so; it shouldn't be that hard to (automatically) move virtual instances from one setup to a backup in disasters like these. Yet even that doesn't seem to happen.
So quite frankly I don't think people are uberly negative; they're merely demanding that Microsoft makes good on its promises.
"Wow in most places these kind of things are expected out of governments but not so much multinational enterprises."
Governments usually rely on (Enterprise-like) companies to handle the IT setup for them.
Well, except for the time when someone within the government really felt good about DigiNotar I suppose ;-)
"I would imagine that Microsoft is one of those tremendously process managed places and "it wasn't my job" can now be heard echoing from a thousand voices crying out in terror."
Lets not be too hard on them; I for one wouldn't be surprised if Win8 also had some influence in all this.
You see; when Outlook starts on my PC it pops up a window with a list of chores to keep in mind (todo items), which I then work on during the day. I can well imagine that in the full-screen Win8 interface such a pop-up could end up somewhere in the background, thus easily missed and never looked at.
Now, obviously the SSL expiration is a plain out schoolboy mistake, anyone could have foreseen that. Still; in our small Dutch country those kinds of stupidities even happen at government level.
But the other aspect is intriguing, especially if you take in mind that Microsoft has also recently released version 4.5 of their Web platform installer. Highlights in this version 'spotlight' are fully aimed at Azure; "Azure SDK for PHP", "Azure SDK for Node.js", "Windows Azure PowerShell" and obviously at first place the Azure SDK for .NET.
Those .NET SDK's are for both VS2012 and 2010, both dated at Februari 2013.
Heck; they even added a new software section: "Windows Azure", even though one could argue that Azure is basically another framework and as such should be listed as such (under 'framework' you'll also find stuff such as Python, PHP, obviously the .NET framework, Node.js and so on...).
Could it be that... ?
Microsoft is really pushing Azure as of late. And it seems either their 'success' or something else has now come to haunt them. And if you look at the prices which they charge then I think some customers have every right to be upset about all this.
(for those of you unknown to the 'web platform installer': its a sort of package manager for Windows which allows you to quickly install specific Windows products. From IIS to SQL Server Express right down to MySQL, PHP, Python, Silverlight and their Visual Studio express versions. If you're interested in (web) development on Windows then this tool is IMO the best & easiest place to start looking).
Fighting the symptoms again eh?
They probably don't agree with me but with accusations like these all I'm seeing is a "copytheft fighting company" going after symptoms and blaming others for their own shortcomings.
Because lets turn this question around: Why are those websites still capable of providing "illegal material" in the first place? Aren't organizations like the RIAA getting paid to go after those "lawbreakers" (paid from the taxpayers money I might add, and they're not exactly cheap either!) ?
So instead of blaming others for their own failures, why don't these misfits start doing their work a little better?
You see this behaviour happening everywhere btw. BREIN (another RIAA-like Dutch organisation) has "bravely fought" the Piratebay for years, thus spending thousands (if not millions) of the Dutch taxpayers money. It even went so far that the head-honcho himself travelled back and forth to Sweden to "show them".
Needless to say but despite all their "victories" BREIN ended up demanding that Dutch ISP's needed to block the Piratebay and several other IP ranges and/or domain names. Which ended up in court and this issue is still being fought over (after all, basically they're censoring us).
Even so: while BREIN claims this situation to be a major victory one could (and should!) wonder why they never managed to shut down the Piratebay in the first place? After all; that has been their main task in life for /years/, all paid by our taxes.
This is no different; by starting to put the blame (and responsibility) on other parties they're basically admitting their own failures. Yet our governments are unfortunately way too stupid (or way too deviously influenced) not to recognize it for what it really is.
When I pay someone to do something for me and they utterly fail then I'd want my money back. Strangely enough NOT the government, even though both (US & Dutch government) could really use a financial break right now.
"Remembering the faint pops and crackles after putting the needle on the start of a new album, holding my breath in anticipation for the first track to start..."
I do indeed. Heck, I'm one of the proud few who can say they got all of Metallica's "real" (before the black album) on vinyl. Heck; I even have the Phantom Menace OST on vinyl (no, I'm not a big fan of the movie; it was a gift from a good friend).
Alas, I'm also a sound designer by heart (semi-professional) and did you know that there are dozens of filters and sound effects out there for the sole purpose of re-creating this sound? For example iZotope Vinyl... I'm mentioning this because this company has a very good reputation on "sound scoping" thanks to their Ozone product range (tools for mastering a piece of music).
Oh; and that sound effect is fully free of charge; usable in any DAW of your choosing.
Denial only hurts more...
"This is not who we are"
That is a very dangerous comment, and which isn't true perse when you look at what is going on right now. This is not what they wish to be, obviously, but that's a totally different story.
Fact of the matter is that any "banded together" group, whether its Python programmers, C programmers, System engineers, etc.; you simply can't know what that group is capable of when strange things happen. Simply because you don't know every member of said group personally. This is also why it is so important to always be careful with the way in which you bring certain news because one person may act on that totally different than another.
To join the stereotyping somewhat: a "base dweller" may somehow feel that this patent request is hurting or endangering his way of life, as such will respond to that in the best way he deems fit. Possibly trying to undermine or "hurt" the event best as possible. Unfortunately that doesn't always get the desired results. And it seems the Python group isn't fully anticipating on this.
If you look at The Python blog you'll notice this for yourself. There are 3 things people can do:
1) If you work in a company that uses Python write them a company letter about it.
2) Send word of EU publications which use the name Python.
3) Financially support them.
Its good, people who want to help the cause should especially look into items 2 and 3. But where does this leave the average "base dwelling" Python programmer?
Also note this specific quote: "Please do consider helping the PSF in any way you can.".
I am generalizing here; but what could a Python using and loving scriptkiddie do best to help them out ?
That is IMO part of the program. They should try to tunnel all of that. I dunno; host a forum somewhere where people can spout of their annoyances about it. It may not really help them, but at least people get the feeling that they're actually doing something (useful). And I think that could help those people to get some steam off and maybe could provide evidence by itself when looking at the possible numbers.
At least its good to read that these folks got legal counsel; very smart move right there.
Or they're simply young and try to copy their surroundings.
And some people simply never stop doing that. I wouldn't call that a personality issue, its simply a way of life. Many people copy behaviour from their surroundings.
This even goes as far as a simple conversation. Many don't even realize it but people will even copy behaviour there. During a simple conversation try (casually) scratching / stroking your chin (or beard if you have one). Most likely you'll see this behaviour copied by others, without them even realizing it. Doesn't have to be an exact copy of course; but if you touch your face chances are high others will too.
People copy others, its in their genes. Why do you think commercials and ads are such a big deal and make so much money ?
"To sell stuff".
Sure; but how do you explain that you can sell stuff by merely showing it to someone? Because some have this urge that "they want to have it too"; they want to copy / mimic.
The money sits with a combination of both.
It was for very good reasons why company employee's were allowed to copy the version of WordPerfect (4 / 5) from their work and use it at home. Even for private usage. Better yet; this behaviour was even openly and actively promoted.
In more than one case business use sterns from home use. Don't underestimate the situations where $boss learns a new product, also learns that the same product (but a more expensive version) can be used in the office and as such now pushes $product forward as that which everyone should use.
Although many would go for "pick a product which works best" most will "pick a product they know".
MS didn't miss it; they screwed up is all...
What this whole mobile drama is basically showing is that Microsoft has no feel for innovation what so ever. Sure; they have some nice ideas and such here and there (sometimes controversial; look at the ribbon for example) but basically nothing fully innovating.
Look at their mobile stuff; at first with CE and Windows Mobile the whole idea was to make the phone look and feel like Windows. Including the start menu. Sometimes that really didn't add up at all. And don't get me started on that stupid stylus you always needed...
Basically: their main revenue came from desktop and as such everything should be modelled after it.
Now they finally discovered touch and found a pretty good working interface for their phone. I really like Metro on the Windows Phone itself since it allows you to quickly add and remove stuff and in general gives you quick access to the features you quickly want / need to access.
Yet now they're trying to go the other way around; it seems MS puts more value into mobile than desktop and as such, you guessed it, all should be based on the mobile segment.
Basically; they hope the new revenue comes from mobile and as such everything should be modelled after it.
So; what happens when it turns out they're wrong and the desktop segment turns out to be larger than anticipated. Or worse; it doesn't WANT to be "pushed" ?
MS didn't miss the bandwagon; they simply ruined all the opportunities they had.
I've been very happy with Oracle as of late...
Since Oracle's latest (mis)fortunes really helped my (small!) firm on making some rather drastic decisions. We're a small IT company doing a lot of things; main tasks lie in systems administration, website hosting, development (usually customer specific software) and information management.
Development has always been a rather (very) small portion of it all and because I've been quite experienced with Java that has always been the language which was used. For several reasons, amongst which my own experience, whenever I needed help (hired temporary co-worker) there was hardly a problem finding a Java guy, safety / security (Java actually has a Security manager (link to API docs) build right in which enhances this feel for security) and of course the cross-platform aspect (though it has mostly been Windows).
Alas; the latest Java mishappens also eventually found their way towards our totally non-technical customers who started asking questions. And that is something you really don't want to happen; esp. since security has always been a major aspect for us. Of course the main issue sits at browser level right now, but for a customer "Java" is "Java"; and right now "Java is dangerous / bad".
And that's where you get a little forced into a situation...
And so we're currently migrating. From Java to .NET; the web part is being rewritten in ASP.NET, the desktop parts are likely going to be a combination of C# & VB (depending on external help) and Centos / Glassfish / Apache is being replaced with Win2k8 / IIS.
Whether this is for good or bad; I dunno. So far its massively more expensive and a huge investment for my company (VS 2012 vs. NetBeans, CentOS / Glassfish vs. Win2k8 (both VPS so the extra costs isn't /that/ high) and not to forget all the work which goes into all this). But a good thing (IMO) is that we're also dropping MySQL in favour of PSQL for this environment. Since we're changing anyway we might as well do it right (and with ODBC / .NET integration the underlying engine doesn't differ all that much).
Even so; we have Oracle to thank for it. And although I don't quite feel "at home" with C# as much as I do with Java I have to say that the transition so far going smoother than I had anticipated. At least I can continue working with VP UML since that easily embeds itself into Visual Studio just like it does in NetBeans. Without extra costs! You don't have to get VS Enterprise for UML support you know; a mere $100,- is all you need.
Well, that's one down, how many more to go? :-)
Rumour has it...
...That the delay is caused because no one bothered to inform the XBox department. It seems XBox sits completely on Messenger functionality when it comes to online playing and all other specific XBox online activities.
One department apparently had no clue what so ever about the other department and was >< close to simply wrecking it.
I don't know if this is true or not, its a rumour I've picked up from multiple directions within my surroundings, but it is the kind of rumour I consider to be very plausible.
Last week we saw how Bill Gates wasn't so happy with the strategy on the mobile market. Well, here's another disaster in the making; while Messenger can be used on the Windows phone even when its locked, Skype cannot. I've tried Skype on Windows but ugh...
btw; Has Microsoft ever stopped to think about how company employees might feel about this? After all; Messenger is basically part of the OS whereas Skype is an 'evil' third party program. Ok; maybe being I'm a bit silly here, but there are plenty of companies where Messenger is allowed partly because of this.
How long will it last?
"In a statement, Tony Bates, president of Microsoft's Skype division, said that all Lync users would be able to share presence, IM, and voice communications with Skype users by June, with Lync-to-Skype video connectivity planned for some time in the next 18 months."
That's almost the same kind of story which Messenger users got, and now look where we're at; they're about to pull the plug on it.
SO; how long before they'll do the same to Lync?
And yes; I know Skype doesn't provide the same functionality as Lync does, but that hasn't stopped MS before; just take a look at Messenger vs. Skype on the Windows Phone...
Why not the other way around?
The Higgs particle didn't quite survive long in our reality or universe. So why can't it be the other way around instead; our universe taking the place of another ?
I only hope...
That this will be an accessory and won't replace the dual-shock controller; I just love that critter. You get a lot of controls at your fingertips and quite frankly the force feedback in that thing never stops to amaze me (provided its put to good use of course; some games excel in this, while others fail miserably).
I recently ran into Trisqual GNU/Linux and I have to say that its been very pleasant working with this one as an alternative desktop.
The distribution is based on Ubuntu but obviously doesn't copy all the lame nastyness which has been added as of late. If you're interested then here you can find a whole chart explaining how they set things up.
Their whole motto is basically providing a Linux distribution which is fully free, or in their words: "Trisquel is different. We naturally want to bring you an operating system that is tight, beautiful, and robust. We want your software to be feature-rich and work exactly as you expect it to. But we'll never compromise your freedom, either." (see their FAQ page here).
All in all a pretty decent distribution IMO, I enjoyed working with this one on occasion.
But /why/ ?
It seems to me that this whole "public domain" argument is more aiming towards making a statement then actually changing something for the benefit of FOSS.
Because in the whole article there is no argument given, - none what so ever -, how FOSS would actually benefit from all this. All we're getting are several comments on how copyright and such are outdated. For example:
"This Article argues that this IP-based approach [used by free and open-source licenses], while perhaps helpful in the beginning, is no longer necessary and in fact prevents the movements from reaching their full potential."
So what exactly is this full potential ?
Quite frankly I would have expected this to be mentioned in this article as well. If you're going to write about such topics then please come up with something a little more than merely spouting some seemingly random comments.
SO I dug up the following from the mentioned paper which curious enough is still but a draft and one which really could use some proper formatting and outlining. Its sheer hell to read, possible also why the author of this article only managed to copy a quote from the beginning...
Alas; the author first compares the public domain ("PD") model against trademarks and copyright. How he feels that those are automatically linked to FOSS is way beyond me: "A PD approach, therefore, would need to effectively override any copy rights, waive any patent rights (both with respect to any patent rights already obtained as well as prospectively), and relinquish any remedies that come with either". (page 35).
Here you see the first fail IMO. Because the author never seems to think about "the opposition". For example: would Python have been put in the PD then chances were very high that the company which is now allegedly trying to get a patent on the name could actually do so (since its completely free) after which they would fully own Python and all the assets that come with it.
I guess the author would consider that a huge win for FOSS but I only see a major failure there.
The author then goes on with arguments such as: "Containing the prospect of Trolls" (how ironic!).
He argues that a direct benefit of PD would be to limit the likelyhood of "IP Trolls". Well, I beg to differ as can be seen above. Another aspect which the author seems to be totally unaware of is how the whole patenting system actually works.
As you can see here (link to the official instructions on how to oppose a patent) one of the requirements to oppose a patent is: "In general terms, an opponent must have rights in an earlier trade mark or other form of trade sign.".
Needless to say but if you put your stuff in the PD sector you don't even have so much as copyright anymore. So instead of preventing "IP trolls" I'd say its much safer to assume that it will actually increase it. There is enough value within FOSS which a lot of companies would like to get their hands on, you can be sure of that.
Alas; all I see is a lot of 'blah blah' and theoretical approaches without being able to give one substantial argument as to how FOSS would benefit. All I see is people wanting change because of the change, possible hoping they'll be "immortalized" themselves for suggesting it.
Although I think a lot of their experiments are far fetched this is actually an area which the Mythbusters covered quite excellently (in my humble opinion that is).
Because you see; in ancient history there is a tale that a village which got under the attack of an invading army gathered together holding nothing but mirrors and in the very dry heat of the day all pointed those mirrors at the invading fleet of ships thus causing it all to go up in smoke.
The Mythbusters gathered a schoolclass or two (so plenty of people) and gave them all mirrors; I forgot the numbers but I'd say they had at least 60 or 80 mirrors. All full sized ones mind you; even somewhat bend to reflect the light a little better even though the legend spoke of regular mirrors.
One of the Busters was hauled in a fire resistant suit; put on the self-build wooden "ship" and then the "attack" began. Oh; obviously in the mid of day where the sun was at its best and hottest.
The end result ? While (iirc) Jamie mentioned that he felt that the temperatures were rising and that the bright light was distracting, there was no way that this could have stopped an invading army. They didn't manage to set fire to the boat, they didn't manage to hurt Jamie in any way nor did they even manage to set fire to the sails (which were mere cloth).
That myth got busted. And although I'm often a little bit sceptic about some of their experiments its my full believe that they couldn't have carried this one out any better.
Now; I know that the Sun is most likely to have more power outside of the atmosphere than inside. But given prior examples I think they're not that dumb to ignore this option. Simply because chances are much higher that it'll fail. And then we're not talking about saving money but wasting it.
What I considered to be really funny...
Is that the (IMO: self-proclaimed) "experts" on El Reg's chat this afternoon (regarding Win Server 2012) were quite specific when it came to Azure and its development model. I quote:
"Alun Rogers: Maybe this is more of a joining up with Azure release schedules? They iterate that like crazy"
"MJF: I think this move helps put MSFT's "Cloud OS" campaign into more context. The idea is Win Server should be the best OS for building/supporting cloud services. If that's true, it needs to be evolving in lockstep with Azure, not lagging it feature-wise for years at a time"
The topic at hand during these quotes was "Blue"; the assumed new setup where Microsoft pushes out new software more or less continuously (and on a subscription bases I might add) instead of releasing major versions.
It would appear as if both guests had no clue - what so ever - regarding the current dire state of Azure, something which IMO speaks for itself when reading the quotes. I shudder at the thought of a Windows server being released / developed at a quick pase as Azure, not merely for the current state Azure is in, but the idea in general scares me considering how Microsoft still firmly holds the reputation that a v1.0 release is usually filled with bugs and other nasty stuff.
Yet these two seemed to think that it would be the most ideal situation for customers to be in. Are you kidding me?
Now, this maybe a little bit of a cheap shot on my part, sure, but now taking the current state Azure is in into mind combined with the fact that they haven't been able to fix this within a whole week I'd say its safe to conclude that hasty releases on Enterprise level aren't the brightest of ideas.
Of course I'm no expert :-)
Time to lawyer up
Although its true that anyone can file a request to trademark a name there is a big difference between filing the request and the bureau actually granting the request.
As you can see here (link to oami.eu; detailing the trademark process) it will still take a while and there are several options for appeal. At first the trademark bureau themselves will investigate so it seems and if they accept the application and publish it then its time to file an appeal.
And as you can read on that same page even a 'final decision' can be opposed by an appeal. So right now I don't think there's too much reason to panic.
I only hope that the Python guys were smart enough to get a lawyer to look into this instead of consulting some "self proclaimed experts" who can handle all of this (for a nominal fee of course).
What I do consider odd is that if you use the search function on that page you'll notice that nothing comes up when looking for "Python".
Thanks El Reg...
That icon in the preview sure did it for me ;-)
Am I the only one who all of a sudden got the urge to watch Leia in her metal bikini, errhm: I meant to watch Return of the Jedi again ?
TBH I don't think its safe to put too much value at all in any stuff like this since you're always getting one sided stories. I mean; lets not forget that sessions like these also used to tell us how great Windows 8 was (and was going to be) and how the "experts" saw "many companies getting ready to migrate" or "many customers picking up on Win8".
Well, we all know how that turned out in the real world.
"Virtualisation is THE biggest topic for server OS right now"
Is it really or is that just keen propaganda? Just because many people have found good ways to utilize virtualization doesn't exactly make this "the thing" which is used throughout the entire market.
I think there are more servers out there which are used in-house to perform regular tasks than there are servers which require virtualization capabilities. The main difference is that when talking virtualization you're often talking about bigger thus also more expensive environments. And companies like Microsoft tend to go where the money is...
But that doesn't automatically make it THE overall topic.
My guess is that it will at least support HTML5.
My hosting provider uses KVM and thus provides console access to the VPS using a HTML5 enabled browser. Because it is a Windows server I'm hosting there I figured I might as well use MSIE9. Needless to say; that didn't work too well.
Even so; I'm not so sure I'll be implementing this update myself. For the sporadic use I have for MSIE the current 9 suits me just fine.
We're already there, and its not MS' worst nightmare either...
Check out Windows XP mode. A freely available add-on for users of Windows 7 Professional and up; you basically get Microsoft's virtual PC combined with an ISO image which contains a full version of Windows XP Professional.
I'm using this critter myself and can say it works excellent. My main usage is when I have software which I need to use temporarily; as such I don't want it to "pollute" my Win7 environment. Then I simply install on XP and run it using the virtual environment. Eventually I roll back a snapshot and I have a clean environment again.
The best part is the integration; software inside XP can be propagated in my regular Win7 start menu. So I can start programs seemingly fullscreen as native Win7 applications while they obviously retain their specific XP look and feel. Best of both worlds IMO.
"There's that Kool-aid again if you think Windows is the best OS for getting things done. You can get far, far more work done by using Ubuntu or MacOS - they are so much faster."
That heavily depends on what you're doing and how you're doing it. Right now my company is also heavily involved with Windows server maintenance and I can tell from personal experience that although this is easily doable using a Linux desktop (remote desktop connection to a server is no problem) its much quicker when you have a Windows desktop around; preferable one with PowerShell onboard.
Or what about when you actually need to develop Windows related stuff? Maybe you can get Visual Studio to run on Linux using Wine (most likely best in a virtual machine) but I don't think it'll be the most ideal situation. Especially since VS can be quite resource hungry.
As such; it depends. I can well see how anyone would benefit much more from using, say, Ubuntu and LibreOffice instead of Windows 7 & MS Office. But that doesn't make it the de-facto solution for everything. There are just as well plenty of scenario's where Windows can be the better tool for the job.
"This means they don't understand that they need to vastly improve the quality of their operating systems."
I think they do. Just look at, for example, the authorization aspect of Windows XP in comparison to Windows 7. There's a huge difference even though the user only notices this in the form of extra pop-up messages to request permission for changing OS related stuff.
And although MS sure knows how to create and produce horrible software, never underestimate their abilities to improve on it. Its not always for the best (Metro, or take a look at the "improved" user interface of a vanilla installation of Visual Studio 2012) but often they do manage to come up with some good stuff. Windows 7 vs. Vista for example, SharePoint designer vs. FrontPage, Server 2003 vs. Server 2008.
Their main problem, as I see it, is that they still retain their arrogance to think they can dictate how users should approach their products. Visual Studio 2012 is a good example and showed them that they were wrong. After protests from hundreds (if not thousands) of developers they actually had to implement hasty changes to the IDE (most likely out of fear that no one would touch it). Even a hasty "theme editor" was eventually released allowing people to turn the interface back to the way it used to be.
(for those unfamiliar with this: initially they removed all colour from the interface and basically turned it into a bright whitish full-screen window which didn't have any variation between the coding window and the control sections around it whereas VS2010 used to be somewhat dark-blue on the edges with a white coding window).
Microsoft isn't Apple...
Balmer claims in a rather bizar speech that developers are very important for the company and how they feel the need to make it as easy as possible for developers to step in. I agree about the importance and quite frankly I think they're doing a good job with on the desktop segments; I've mentioned this several times before; you can pick up Visual Studio 2012 Express free of charge and you can even use it for commercial usage. If you don't like the COOL NEW MENU INTERFACE you can even still download VS 2012 Express. All free and in comparison to their commercial counterparts also very feature rich.
I think you shouldn't underestimate what this can do for a platform. Sure; some people will never touch "the evil Microsoft" but others might be persuaded. Either for hobby, small business who knows... Its for a very good reason that we can now download compilers and such for free while we used to pay dearly for them (from Sun to Microsoft).
However, when it comes to their mobile division then this changes drastically. You can pick up the SDK for free, you can mess around in the emulator all you want but when it comes to messing with your own phone then things become different; you need to cough up $99,-/year before you can unlock yours to access it from within Visual Studio. Just like the market leader Apple does...
But Microsoft needs to realize that they aren't Apple; instead they're still a nobody on this platform. You won't convince techies that programming for your mobile platform is fun by merely giving them a free emulator. Heck; I think one of the key elements to Androids success is because anyone can program for it. You pick up the phone, you unlock it and you're good to go.
If Microsoft were smart they'd have chosen an in-between model: allow home developers to obtain a developer unlock for a price which only covers administration costs. I dunno; $10 - $25 / year? That way you'll maintain some control while also making it much more appealing to give the platform a trial run. Also: because you're not "opening the floodgates" you're still maintaining some sort of "business like" status too ("We're carefully monitoring who can access our platform all for security benefits").
Either you want developers or you want to earn a quick buck; in this day and era you can't have it both ways... Not when you're a nobody that is.
It doesn't matter who's right anymore
All this bickering does is lower the credibility of Tesla dramatically. People haven't forgotten their (lost!) lawsuit against the BBC (Top Gear). And those same people are very likely reading all this thinking "here they go again...".
Its a given that companies who produce a product aren't very keen on bad reviews. You see this happening a lot in the gaming market where some companies actually push out some extra bucks in order to get positive reviews. This was already the case in the C64 era (games magazine covering $new_game and being very positive about it while also featuring 2 full-page ads for that same game. Yeah right....) and it still holds true today.
But the last you should do is start a public fight. As this article well indicates; the people are left in the dark about who's right (they can only speculate), it only costs time and money and in the end won't change a thing. At best you can simply get other media outlets to give this car a trial run.
Maybe Top Gear US would like to have a shot at it? When looking at the massive downvotes those guys got on YouTube I'd say it could be a win-win combination ;-)
Stuff like this always reminds me of the very first laserprinter I bought: an awesome HP Laserjet 2100m. The m was important (to me) since that indicated postscript functionality; as such much better Linux support.
But the really awesome part was that HP used to have a section on their site devoted to this printer where you could find instructions on how to take the thing /completely/ apart to service it. And in full detail too; from what you should look out for when touching the toner right down to how you could use very fine sandpaper to (carefully!) roughen up the main roll should your paper no longer stick.
Of course this was last century; in the good ole days where you could find much more "geek" stuff online. Nowadays HP would do everything in their power to hide this information from you best as they can. IMO a change for the worst.
Money, money, money....
What I completely fail to understand is how Oracle manages to come to these conclusions even though Java is basically an open source project, you can see so for yourself at its Java.net download page.
When you grab it you'll immediately notice that you don't have to comply with any license or agreement before getting your hands on the code. And when you finally got the tarball and check its contents you'll notice the main license being the GPL. Now, I know GPL doesn't involve itself with copyrights, those will always remain with the original author, but just how far can you take that?
When I take a GPL project I can fork it; which means so much as using all the code one on one and adding my own code to it. How would copyright come into play there? Sure; the original author has a copyright on his code; but that doesn't mean I can't use it or even sell it.
Another thing... Oracle claims to know all that much about their licenses but it also seems they totally ignore whatever doesn't interest them. When you check Java SE's download page you'll notice a link to the Java Research License.
"Sun is supporting the JRL for most Java technologies it releases through the Java Community Process as well as research projects surrounding this code. "
"...Sun requires a click-through license. "
"While not every Sun Java technology has been released under the JRL, many have. Please contact JRLFeedback@sun.com if you have any questions. "
"10. Am I required to purchase a support contract from Sun under this license? "
Not only does that license date from the Sun days, it would also appear as if Oracle never bothered to change or update it, which seems strange. And although this license does state that "COMMERCIAL USE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TECHNOLOGY AND MODIFICATIONS IS PERMITTED ONLY UNDER A SUN COMMERCIAL LICENSE." this is obviously superseded by the inclusion of the GPL in the actual sourcecode tarball.
So quite frankly I can't help think that its kinda obvious that this seems very much like a wild goose chase.
That's no "power user"
I've been using my WinPhone for almost one year now and quite frankly I don't quite agree that the blogwriter is "on the money". In fact; if you call yourself a "hardcore user" and eventually give up with the installation of your previous apps. because its too tedious then you're basically showing your own ignorance.
I'd expect any "power user" who (I quote): "Yep, that wouldn’t be me - as a “hardcore” smartphone users – I need all the new apps, new features, timely updates, good support and the list goes on."
I'm by -far- a power user, merely a casual business / techfreak user yet even I managed to come across ReInstaller. A free app which does just that: re-install everything in your purchased list. Its also not that hard to find: simply search for "reinstaller" and you'll find it.
A "power user" giving up on a task while there's an app for it ?
And when it comes to his endless list of shortcomings I can't help wonder why he got a WinPhone in the first place. I can understand the desire for a notification centre, I don't agree with it because the live tiles work fine for me, but I can see where he's coming from. However... He claims to be a power user yet gives us: "Fair enough but am I supposed to sit blankly at the screen every second of the day or wait 30 minutes for a tile to be updated or better yet wait for a push notification to come and decide to pick between a sip of coffee or clicking on the notification before it goes to a never to be discovered black hole?".
What black hole? That's totally bogus; the notifications only disappear when you activated 'm. When I see "5" on my e-mail tile I know there are 5 unread messages. When I click it the 5 disappears. Which by itself is something which annoys some real power users: they want an option to make it so that the 5 only disappears when they actually read (or handled) all 5 new messages.
Well; and quite frankly its about there when I gave up reading on that rant blog. I mean really; VPN is a mandatory feature on a smartphone ? Heck, I wonder if he actually knows that you can adjust the interval in which the phone checks for new e-mail.
Doesn't mean I disagree with his points perse; there are quite a few things which should be fixed on the WP platform. But there is a difference between constructive criticism or a rant which makes some people wonder why you'd got that phone in the first place. Sounds like the "I gave into the hype, bought a phone, now I hate it" kind of thing.
So the whole NYT article is faked but they're still going to provide new chargers to close the gap ?
When someone starts telling a completely bogus story about something I build and I know its bogus; heck I can even prove it with logs and such, then there's no way I'm going to invest hundreds if not thousands of dollars to change stuff. Why should I when if I know that it simply works as it should?
Doesn't quite add up.
Calc is the wrong tool for the job. For formula's you'd really want to grab Microsoft Mathematics (download link) which can easily build and parse formula's. Then you'll get -1.4142135623731 as the answer (minus the square root of 2).
For a super cheesey movie (though I think its kinda funny) check this Youtube video on what Math 4.0 can do for schools. It'll also give you a good impression as to what Math 4 actually is.
SO to help them out with their impressions I fired up Yahoo.com to see what kind of a search engine we're dealing with (which is basically the only aspect that might interest me).
The icon says it all.. First it loads a page filled with content; which also takes its sweet time. And before I can enter anything some flash-like bar sssllloowwwlly appears at the top and urges me to stay with Yahoo. Sure; we're not talking minutes here, but it feels slow and sluggish. I don't care for a ton of news items to lead; during my visit all I care for is a search query.
Google starts clean, the page loads in a second and I can start searching. Bing starts less clean yet IMO non-intrusive since their daily background easily loads, the name already suggests as much, in the background. And for me it somewhat adds to the overall experience too.
If I want news I'll go "news.google.com" or "news.bing.com" (though 'news.msn.com' makes more sense). I'm not going to a search engine to wait for a news page to load.
The fail should be obvious: I was using SeaMonkey which has both AdBlock Plus and NoScript. I can't imagine what kind of stuff I would have gotten without those two.
Too little, too late
First I once again get the feeling Oracle is looking for cheap labour but alas. They should have pushed FX years ago, in the mean time it has become completely redundant on both the desktop as well as the web.
IMO the whole project is a fail. It started off not that bad IMO; the demo's looked good and with only a few lines of code you could indeed make very interesting applications. Of course, as usual, in the beginning there were lots of nice words but hardly a decent editor which supported JavaFX (that was still Sun's doing back then mind you). Eventually Netbeans did support it but it also made one wonder; why would I use this (it was also pushed forward as a solid solution for easy desktop GUI's). Especially since NetBeans had already provided for that with the evergoing impressive 'Project Matisse' aka the Swing GUI builder, even now this sits firm in both NetBeans and the Java runtime.
Mobile? At that time mobile support was pretty much waning; lots of devices didn't support Java ME anymore and basically made room for something else. So all that was left was the web; but that part is covered by EE mostly (lets ignore applets shall we?) which comes with its own dose of limitations. Or put differently: I don't see anyone who wants to push out RIA's to opt with Java at first, its way too cumbersome on so many levels.. Don't forget that the GUI is but one thing, you'll also need to administer and regulate whatever data comes out of said GUI, and then you'll enter the depths of EE again.
Now, I'm not saying EE is bad; as a matter of a fact I kinda like working with it. But I don't think its the best tool for the job when talking RIA's. I'd be more tempted to look into Flash, Silverlight or perhaps get a dose of HTML5.
Its one of those classics too little, too late kind of things IMO.
Sounds quite a bit expensive. Granted; you get 1TB storage and an additional 200Gb for every new team member but something tells me that this isn't as feasible as they make it out to be. Because apart from the storage itself you'll also need ease of access. And while 1TB sounds awesome; are 5 people actually going to manage and use all that ?
$795/year divided by 5 people makes E 159,- per person per year, so approx. E 13,25 per person per month.
For $1,- more per month you could consider Office 365. Not merely storage (25Gb e-mail storage per user) but also an hosted website, online office apps. conferencing tools, options to seemingly store your Office desktop apps there and of course entitlement to Microsoft support.
But Microsoft isn't alone here; Google's enterprise apps. go as low as $ 10/month per user. Also 25Gb e-mail storage yet "only" 5Gb app. storage, so lets raise that to 25Gb as well (for an additional $4/month thus also going onto $14,-/month). Your own e-mail address, video chat, conferencing and document editing (which is also quite good, I speak from personal experience) as well as full support.
So apart from approx. 25Gb storage for your data both company plans also include extra business services and features such as video conferencing, easy office integration and also important: e-mail.
As mentioned earlier; 1Tb sounds awesome. But ask yourself just how much of that amount you're going to use (don't forget upload and possible download limitations) and if its only storage you need?
And that's not even mentioning their somewhat odd reputation, as mentioned by others. In this case I'd say you're better off with either Google or Microsoft.
- 'Kim Kardashian snaps naked selfies with a BLACKBERRY'. *Twitterati gasps*
- Crawling from the Wreckage THE DEATH OF ECONOMICS: Aircraft design vs flat-lining financial models
- Pics Facebook's Oculus unveils 360-degree VR head tracking Crescent Bay prototype
- Bargain basement iPhone shoppers BEWARE! eBay exposes users to phishing vuln
- Google+ GOING, GOING ... ? Newbie Gmailers no longer forced into mandatory ID slurp