Re: @jakeisatwat
Clearly a typo of Jakie Satwat
898 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jun 2007
In a former life I worked for the company responsible for putting those magazines online.
Razzle and Fiesta were always the low point in my month. Mayfair and Club International the high points.
Of course, these were the days when the women in them still had some bush and "Shaven havens" was a fetish mag... *nostalgic sigh*
If we're talking about me personally...
This is the only site I use Caffeine Addict or it's associated email address on.
Facebook has a fake name and an unconnected email address.
My twitter accounts have names not used elsewhere.
My imgur account uses a unique username and email address
My Reddit account uses a unique username and email address (although that's only because someone else got my imgur name)
Stack overflow uses a unique username and email address
Metafilter has multiple unique usernames and email address
You get the idea.
And, until I worked for a PR company about 5 years ago, none of the uses of myfirstname mylastname were actually me, despite there only being about 30 entries for mylastname in the phonebook UK wide. Thanks to that PR company, there are now 3 photos of me that come up on the second page of google image results for my name.
I don't know enough about how internet traffic is monitored by anyone other than the website, but I really hope that someone is monitoring traffic levels to adult sites and traffic through VPNs.
I'd be delighted if UK adult traffic drops to bugger all and VPNs simultaneous spike massively.
I mean, I'm sure it will happen. I just want to see the stats that show it...
I once had a client phone up in a complete panic because he'd discovered the browser dev console. More importantly, he'd discovered that he could change the content on the page by fiddling with content of the "Elements" tab.
Took an hour to convince him that he was only affecting what was displayed in his own browser. And another hour to convince him that we couldn't stop other people doing it to their own browsers, and that he wasn't responsible if they changed it to something libellous.
Clients with a little bit of knowledge are bloody dangerous.
I would guess that a flail mower is a drum with lengths of chain hanging from it, that use brute force to cut things instead of a single spinning blade. Great for never jamming, or stalling if it hits something like a tree. But it tends to leave things looking like they were cut with a machine gun.
Wordpress is good for what it's intended for - a small blogging site.
I continue to be bemused by people using it for everything and anything. I can only assume people like TechCrunch and The Sun only use it for their blogs (hohoho) because you can get Wordpress developers cheap. In which case, they deserve everything they get.
So, deep fakes are getting good enough that they're convincing. Good enough that you can make anyone say or do anything.
This is great for privacy.
After a few years of embarrassment, people will stop believing video and we can all go back to doing whatever the hell we want without fear that someone is recording us. Huzzah!
If China announced that there was going to be an export tax of 100% on all mobile phones leaving China until Christmas or Trump grew up (whichever came first) I wonder who would blink first.
China can easily cope with the loss of a couple of hundred thousand units. Could America cope with a doubling in price of basically everything bar a few Samsung models?
90% of any crime is looking like you're supposed to be doing.
I once broke into a friend's house by smashing the front window, climbing in, and opening the front door.
At 6pm. On a Friday. Less than 10ft from the hometime traffic jam that always blocked the highstreet for 2 hours.
To think that the average terrorist not only knows how to make a bomb without killing himself and, on top of that, also has the hardware and software skills to program something that goes and "polls a random Reddit page" is frankly pushing the bar.
Great. Thanks. That's "knowing cron and curl" added to the signs you're a terrorist...
Watching mainstream news try and cram a Brexit angle into everything even vaguely tangential is tedious. Having ElReg add it to things completely irrelevant is annoying.
If it's about, or affected by, Brexit then shout about it. But bringing it up in irrelevant articles just turns the comments into the same old predictable bollocks from both sides.
What multiple choice questions do you mean? And what is 'right'?
I mean, for Brexit, would a valid question have been
"do you believe this thing MP X said?"
OR "do you believe the side of a bus?"
OR "would we be better off out"
OR "which is bigger, the sun or the moon?"
Because the first three are all subjective (in advance of the event) and the last one (if OkCupid is to be believed) would be failed by half the population...
Regardless of the vote it's being applied to (referenda, national elections, local elections, internation changes) I hate this argument. Unless we go all Australia and force people to vote, of course a result of x% isn't x% of the population.
The argument that 3/4 of the population didn't vote to leave can be just as accurately refuted with the statement that just over 3/4 of the population didn't vote to remain.
By all means, argue that the result was wrong. Or that a higher threshold should have been used. But this particular argument abusing statistics is wilfully ignoring how votes have always worked in the UK.