* Posts by juice

935 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Nov 2010

How experimental was Microsoft's 'experimental banner' in File Explorer?

juice

Re: Usual answer

> I really do hate them all. It is 2022 and the interface of Windows NT 4.0 from ~1996 was arguably more crisp, more consistent and used less than 16MB of RAM.

Nostalgia ain't always what it used to be. Personally, I run a lot more stuff than I did back in 1996. At a much higher resolution than the 1024*768 CRT I had at the time.

And across three monitors and two graphics cards, to boot. And then there's all the stuff in the background, like realtime audio mixing, etc.

Modern GUIs may chew up a lot more resources than they used to, but they're also dealing with a lot of stuff - and adding a lot of value-add stuff to boot. Even if (as with office software), everyone uses a different subset of said features.

OTOH, my preferred dev environment is a Terminal window with a dozen tabs on it, most of which are running Vi. Swings and roundabouts, or somesuch...

Machine-learning models more powerful, toxic than ever

juice

Re: So much for copyright!

> If it is being used for training there is no copyright issue

I'm not sure how well that argument holds up. Certainly, the books I had to use at university weren't made available for free!

114 billion transistors, one big meh. Apple's M1 Ultra wake-up call

juice

Re: I'm holding off

It's not too bad for noise. Otoh, between the dual CPUs and the many sata drives crammed into it, it does add about 50p/day to the electricity bill when switched on.

Which is pretty much going to double come April.

So I am thinking about upgrading to something newer! Since some £200 jobbie off Ebay will pay for itself within a year or so...

juice

> I'm not sure the author is suggesting it's harder to learn, but that it's harder to excite potential learners.

People are excited about doing things - it's just all that extra memory and processing power has enabled us to create tools which abstract away the underlying hardware and processes.

And the newer generations are excited about using those tools and abstractions to create new things - as well as new tools and layers which will then be used in turn by the generations which follow them.

Admittedly, this also means that it's much harder for each new generation to peel back the layers of the onion. And that could meant that finding - and training - people to do things with those deeper layers is going to get more difficult.

On the other hand, it also means that the older generation of tekkies will generally always be able to find work. COBOL 4 LIFE, or somesuch ;)

juice

Re: I'm holding off

... maybe.

Personally, I'd say that we've been seeing diminishing returns on new hardware for the best part of the last decade. Once we got past 4 cores and more than 8GB of ram - on both computers and mobile phones - then we hit the point where 99% of tasks can be done in memory, and on a secondary process/thread, thereby keeping the OS responsive.

Which isn't to say that there aren't things which can bring computers to their knees, even in the consumer market; video encoding, video games and VR are all power and memory hogs. But they're very much a tiny percentage of what people use their machines for.

And at the risk of being hoisted on my own "640kb should be enough for anyone" petard, it's difficult to think of what might come along to change that. Not least because our network infrastructure has also improved in both bandwidth and latency, to the point where most tasks (barring video encoding) can potentially be offloaded to the cloud. Voice processing for Siri, Google and Alexa are prime examples of this.

Still, that's the good - and sometimes bad - thing about the future. It always has ways to surprise us ;)

juice

Re: I'm holding off

The problem is that we've hit the law of diminishing returns when it comes to making use of all that processing power, especially now that we've moved a lot of the more complex stuff to either parallel-processing algorithms or pre-trained AI models.

Because the parallel-processing stuff will generally be Fast Enough on any halfway decent CPU produced in the last decade; I'm running an 2012-vintage dual-CPU Xeon (16 cores total) with 24GB of ram, and that's more than capable of churning out 1080p video encoding in realtime.

And the AI models require little or no processing power, since all the hard work was done at the training stage.

For the most part, unless you're some sort of power user running half a dozen docker containers, while also rendering 4K live video streams, all those architectural improvements are arguably just reducing the machine's power usage and thereby improving the battery life.

Because 99% of the time, those machines will be ticking along and using less than 10% of their CPUs capabilities.

juice

Not just for the skilled or experienced...

> What the personal supercomputer has become is a divinely powerful construction set for ideas in any medium, technical and artistic, but only for the skilled and the experienced. You have to push it: golden age IT pulled you along behind it, if you just had the wit to hold on.

I think that's completely wrong.

Modern computers - backed by the cloud - have made it incredibly easy for the "unskilled and inexperienced" to do stuff. Because they're powerful enough that we've been able to build tools to help people do what they want.

Whether that's programming, video editing, audio mixing, writing, digital painting, live streaming, 3d modelling or any of the millions of other things which people are using their machines for.

Whatever you want to do, there's a tool for it. And thousands - if not millions - of examples, tutorials and prior art to use while learning.

Fundamentally, more people are doing more things than ever. And they don't need to get down to the metal to do it, either.

(and that has a few knock-on effects, particularly when it comes to discoverability and the perceived/actual value of said activities. But that's a separate topic...)

Huawei UK board members resign over silence on Ukraine invasion

juice

Re: Another Possible Take on the He/She/IT/They being Questioned ‽

> A Q2A [Question to Answer] .... Do Bots Smoke Dope?

Depends if there's any sheep to dream about...

juice

Re: Thank you for your service. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

> After a decade of scratching my head over their posts I'm largely convinced it's a human, albeit one that should smoke a bit less pot.

Why not both? ;)

My take is that it's a guy who had a bit of fun setting up an "AI" (probably trained on past Register forum posts for extra giggles), and left it to spew random comments out for a while.

Now either he's vastly improved his AI (in which case I for one welcome our new El Reg overlord), or he's simply turned it off and is now posting his own comments...

Where are the (serious) Russian cyberattacks?

juice

Re: Maybe we've got it all wrong

> I think there's a good chance Ukraine can hold out on the defensive - even if Russia commit fully. But that means a few thousand dead civilians a week

Aye - I think we're generally in broad agreement on this one; when a "short victorious war" failed to occur, the only realistic outcome is a long, dragged out and messy slugfest which is unlikely to end until one side runs out of resources and is forced to compromise.

And a whole lot of people will suffer or die along the way.

This morning, a friend mentioned The Battle of Grozny, which I hadn't previously looked into. And having read that, there's definitely a worrying number of parallels between what happened when Russia tried to invade Chechnya in 1994, and what's happening now.

And it's perhaps telling that Grozny was 30 years ago, which is long enough for virtually all of the surviving Russian soldiers and commanders to have retired...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1994%E2%80%931995)

One key point from that article is what I alluded to above, about the possibility that Russian soldiers will decide to take a more brutal approach:

The Russians proceeded to bombard Grozny with artillery, tank, and rocket fire as the rest of the battle centered on new tactics in which the Russians proceeded to destroy the city block by block. White phosphorus rounds and fuel-air explosive Shmel rockets were used by the Russian forces. They would then send in small groups of men sometimes spearheaded by special forces, making effective use of sniper teams. Two long weeks of costly bitter fighting ensued as the Russians moved to take the Presidential Palace.

It also notes that the Russian forces repeatedly broke ceasefires and agreements to limit the use of heavy weapons. All of which I'm sure the Ukranian leadership has taken very careful note of...

juice

Re: Maybe we've got it all wrong

I'll agree with most of that,, except for...

> And is taking losses of close to 3% a week - meaning that in 6 weeks time the best units of the Russian army will be 20% dead and have had 20% of its equipment either blown up or stolen by Ukrainian farmers.

It's a sad truth that losses are always higher at the start of the war; Darwin's law is ruthlessly applied and the weak, incompetent, inexperienced and plain unlucky are blown away like chaff.

And similar applies to their equipment; anything unreliable or nearing EOL will be winnowed out.

But the survivors learn. New doctrine evolves. Losses will drop. And they'll get better at protecting their equipment and vehicles, because their lives literally depend on it.

Admittedly, the Ukrainians are undergoing the exact same process, and learning the exact same lessons.

Which means that the war is likely to bog down even more, as both sides adopt more cautious approaches to taking on the opposition.

That is, unless Russia can persuade it's conscripts to keep running head first into situations where they're likely to get killed. After all, a war of attrition worked in WW2... but this isn't WW2, and they've not got any allies willing to send them money and war materiel to keep the grinder working.

And that also gives rise to another concern, especially when it comes to the Russians, since it makes them increasingly likely to adopt more brutal approaches to dealing with enemy attacks and ambushes. Sniper in a building? Call in an artillery strike, and to hell with collateral damage or any nearby civilians.

We just have to hope that some sort of diplomatic solution can be found sooner rather than later.

Rate of autonomous vehicle safety improvement slowing – research

juice

How's the old saying go?

"The last 10% of building anything takes 90% of the effort"

So far, the various autonomous vehicle initiatives have been able to pick off some relatively low-hanging fruit. Motorway driving, where vehicles are generally going at the same speed, lanes are clearly marked and rules are clearly defined. Supermarket car parks, where everything is slow moving and clearly marked. Etc.

But now, we're hitting the complex stuff. Town and city driving, where pedestrians and cyclists can - and do - behave irrationally or unsafely. Road layouts (at least in Europe) inherited from the romans and then mutated through centuries of gradual evolution and hasty modern hacks to deal with population growth and the mass adoption of motorised vehicles. And so on.

And dealing with all these scenarios is exponentially more difficult than what's already been solved. And they all need to be solved to the level where 99.99% of situations can be safely dealt with, because neither the public nor the various government car-safety departments will accept anything less...

Russia acknowledges sanctions could hurt its tech companies

juice

> We're all now rebuilding our Cold War state institutions (having had this shock) and I bet they'll be turned on China next. For Russia and China, this has been a policy disaster.

It certainly seems to be not going too well for Russia.

One thing which doesn't seem to get mentioned too much is that there's a number of financial, economic and political implications if Russia is successfully able to take over Ukraine. E.g. 80% of russian gas exports go through Ukraine (which was meant to be negated by Nord Stream 2), and Russia and Ukraine produce almost a third of the world's total wheat production.

Put simply, taking ownership of those gas pipes and wheat fields would give Russia a hell of a lot more revenue and a lot more political clout.

Meanwhile, China is stuck in a sanctions war with the USA, and is always looking for ways to legitimise it's claims over Taiwan, so was quite happy to side with Russia.

However, they've now seen what happens when a large but relatively inexperienced and underequipped conscript army attempts to invade a country with a modern military which has had time to prepare.

And how the West has reacted far more strongly to this invasion than most people would have predicted, both in terms of sanctions and by providing the Ukraine with lots of weapons and other forms of indirect support.

And how Putin has decided to up the ante by threatening to use nukes.

And all of the global economic impacts that this war is having, at a time when we're still dealing with the shocks caused by Coronavirus. Which in turn could devastate their export industries.

Overall, I don't think it's been a full blown policy disaster for China, but I do suspect that they're quietly shifting from tacit approval of Russia's actions to a more neutral stance.

And the more that Putin waves his magic nuke card, the more they'll sidestep away from him...

Russia is the advanced persistent threat that just triggered. Ready?

juice

> Frantic much? A lot of fear, uncertainty and delusion in this one.

Fear, yes. Uncertainty, yes. Delusion? You might want to look in the mirror...

Russia has been dabbling with cyber hacking, espionage, propaganda and theft for the last few decades. While tacitly supporting "private" hacking groups, so long as they were attacking and stealing from non-Russians.

Now, with Russia actively being at war and with embargoes slamming into place against them, we're going to get a lot of things happening.

First, a lot more of the tools being used for state-level hacking are going to leak into the public domain, simply because they're being used more. I'd expect a flurry of new zero-day exploits to appear Real Soon Now. And once those are picked up by commercial black hats, there won't be a safe server in the world.

Secondly, as with North Korea, Russian hackers are going to be targeting anything with financial value that can either be stolen or ransomed. Because their economy is about to seriously tank and they'll be desperate for money in general and foreign currency in particular.

Thirdly, you're going to get lots of amateur "affiliated" people on both sides going on hacking and defacement sprees.

And so on.

It's all going to get very very messy, and thinking "it won't affect me" is frankly more delusional than expecting trouble.

BOFH: All hail the job cuts consultant

juice
Pint

"Gerard's going to recommend firing the board."

Most cost effective move ever.

Work chat app Slack suffers services outage

juice

It's been b0rked for the last 18 months...

... if not longer.

For some reason, it seems significantly worse when you use the mobile app, as compared to the desktop/web version.

During Christmas 2020, the app was effectively completely unusable: channels wouldn't load, messages wouldn't send - or would send, but still show up as a draft after being sent.

And the same during Christmas 2021. Which makes me think that there's some sort of bottleneck in their "app" infrastructure, which has a bad tendency to show itself over the festive holidays when a lot of people switch over to using their mobile to access Slack.

Certainly, things improved straight after the festive holidays for both 2020 and 2021.

But over the last 2 weeks, the app's performance has been rapidly deteriorating again.

And a messaging system where you can't reliably send or receive messages isn't really that useful...

Beware the techie who takes things literally

juice

Re: this got me thinking.

> Also turns out that I'm running V5.00 Beta 8. How is it even possible that's still running and working perfectly on a daily basis? I think it came out in 2013. I should probably fix that

I've had my licence.rar (or whatever it's called) for WinRAR for at least a decade, and all credit to the company for still letting me use it to upgrade to the latest version.

... and that's probably worth doing, since there was that fuss a while ago about (IIRC) a major security hole in the ACE library they were using. OTOH, the odds of anyone throwing around ACE-compressed files is pretty low, these days ;)

Amazon, Visa strike global truce on credit card charges

juice

Re: Still Avoiding Them

> OK I'l bite - HDDs ?? WTF !?!

Prices are starting to drop for solid state drives - after wading through Amazon's[*] surprisingly clunky search mechanisms, I can see 2TB SATA drives for as little as £132.

But a 2TB HDD is just £45, or roughly a third of the cost.

Similarly, a 10TB SATA HDD is £245, where as the largest SSD I can spot is just 8TB and £560.

Spinning rust is still the most cost effective storage, and it's still ridiculously easy to fill local storage, especially if you're doing things like 4K video editing/rendering.

... though I must confess that I'm tempted to grab one of those cheap Crucial 2TB SSDs for my photo/video storage. Should make editing and thumbnail-rendering a whole lot faster!

Though maybe from Scan, rather than Amazon...

[*] Using them is perhaps ironic, given the article, but hey.

The end of free Google storage for education

juice

Ish...

> Google and the like are modern drug dealers. You get hooked on the "free" tier and then you must pay double when you are dependent

For the most part, Google (and others like Facebook) have been employing a business model where they give free services to end-users, and then sell two things:

a) Access to the end-user

b) Access to the end-user's data

I.e. the end-user is the product; the services offered by Google are just a way to attract said users and generate a saleable product.

And as such, they've generally had a vested interest in making their products as "sticky" as possible. And they're always on a quest to find new ways to attract end-users who can be sold to their customers.

So. They launch a service, and if it fails to generate enough saleable product, they shut it down.

As such, I'm not sure I'd compare them to drug dealers. More like a massive fishing boat, setting huge nets to trawl for fish, which can then be canned and sold to their actual customers...

Samsung reveals new smartphones, tablets... and yes. The S22 Ultra is undeniably good

juice

Re: For 1K in cash I want

> In my design book I'd like to see them slickly integrated into one master lens, at least from an external viewpoint.

It's incredibly difficult - if not impossible - to make one single lens within the constraints of a mobile phone's form factor, which can then do All The Things.

And no matter how much "AI" Google and Apple throw at the problem, there's equally a limit as to how much you can compensate for this via software.

Hell, there's a reason pro photographers tend to carry around half a dozen lenses for use with their DSLRs.

Personally, with my S21U, the main lens gets the most use, followed by the wide-angle lens. Then the 3x lens.

The 10x... hasn't been used that much, admittedly. But it's still useful on occasion - I've used it when on holidays, or to take pictures of wildlife without having to worry about the risk of spooking them by getting too close!

juice

As the owner of an S21U, I'm bemused...

> As well it should – the RRP of the base S22 Ultra is £1,149 (and it will sell for $1,210 in the US; this is not a currency conversion). For over a grand, you only get 128GB of non-upgradeable storage and a disappointing 8GB of RAM.

Does any phone really need more than 8GB?

Looking on my handset atm, it's using 7.8gb (of 12), of which 6.6GB is marked as cleanable. 1.9GB of that is classed as "Apps not used recently".

I very strongly suspect that few - if any - people will see any tangible benefits from having 12GB of ram.

> It smacks a little of cost-cutting to us, which is a shame in such a premium device.

Probably. Though with the supply chain woes everyone's having, it may simply be that there's not enough chips to go around, and as per above, few if any people will actually notice the difference. If anything, it's kinda nice seeing a company backing off the need to keep upping things simply to make the tickybox list of features look better than the competition.

> Other than memory and storage, the processor (including a Neural Processing Unit that runs twice as fast the preceding S21) keeps things ticking along at an impressive pace atop Android 12.

What does the NPU actually do in day-to-day processing? AI processing on phones has generally been a gimmick so far

(To be fair, I'm mildly impressed with the features being added to the S21U's camera. E.g. auto-QR code processing, the ability to airbrush out unwanted items in photos, and even to identify "rectangles" which it can then straighten for you. But these have mostly come over from the Pixel as part of Android's standard feature build, so I'm curious as to whether they actually involve any use of said NPU...)

> However, the cameras covering the back corner of the phone are the stars of the show.

> The four snappers are a 12MP ultra-wide, a 108MP wide, a 10MP 3x optical zoom, and a 10x optical zoom camera. Selfie fans also get a 40MP front camera.

... which is exactly the same spec as per the S21U. Which makes me wonder if there's actually been any hardware improvements, or if they're just trying to throw some more software at improving the photo quality. Fire up that NPU!

I've been vaguely debating buying the S22U, since between the pre-order freebies and the trade-in value of my current handset, I can potentially get a brand new phone and a small lump of extra cash, while maintaining the same monthly contract cost.

But so far, I've seen nothing which indicates the S22U is anything other than a cosmetic refresh of the S21U, with some gimmicks and snake-oil thrown atop.

(Yeah, I know it's now got a slot to put an S-pen in. But the S21U already supports the S pen and I never cared/bothered to try and use this, so from my perspective, this new feature is actually a negative point, since it's taking up room which could be used for a larger battery...)

12-year-old revives Unity desktop, develops software repo client, builds gaming environment for Ubuntu...

juice

Re: What is there to say?

> All this talk of the US school system and US politics is hilarious. It just goes to show that people can argue about anything without actually reading the story

To be fair, my entire point was that Rudhra lives in Bangalore/Delhi, and therefore is probably having a significantly different educational experience to the one which Bombastic Bob had.

And then Cliff continued the conversation by musing about the perceived differences between US and UK educations. Which felt like a valid branch for the conversation to take, even if it's arguably moving away from the original topic.

Sometimes, it's worth reading both the story and the comments, before adding anything else to a conversation! Even (or perhaps) especially if you've going to do so as an AC...

juice

Re: What is there to say?

> (how many millionaires dropped out of college to run a business? Yeah, that)

And how many people dropped out of college and didn't become millionaires? I suspect their numbers will be a lot higher.

There's also the question as to whether Rudra has either the skillset to run a business - dealing with humans/paperwork/taxes/regulations/etc is very different to tinkering with makefiles on a computer.

And then there's the question as to whether he'd even want to. Especially since that he's presumably not even reached the point of having his voice break. There's potentially an entire new world waiting to be explored in the next few years, when his age-group's hormones kick in!

> Paragraph with LOTS of SHOUTY words randomly interspersed throughout

I apologise if I'm reading too much into this paragraph, but it sounds like a very USA-based view of school. And while I have no real knowledge of the educational system in Bangalore, I suspect it'll have some differences to the USA educational system and the culture which is wrapped around it.

As to whether staying in school is worthwhile and whether or not it increases your chances of being successful? That's a big and highly subjective subject, and as such, needs to be discussed in the proper place at the proper time.

Which is to say, in the pub, on a Friday, with several pints of the establishment's finest beverages...

Prince of Packaging HP Inc snaps up zero-plastic bottle maker

juice

Re: Advertisement Gold

> A relative, who at the time was running research in a big manufacturer of aroma and fragrances explained: "We develop all-natural processes to create all those artificial flavors, because the manufacturers want the 'all natural' label.

One of my pet peeves are the food and drinks which proudly claim to have "no artificial flavourings", but which are then stuffed with sweetner.

After all, said sweetner is both artificial and added purely for the flavour!

Mind you, there's also the "juice drink" stuff, which is fruit juice that's been watered down and then boosted back up with some of the aforementioned sweetners. Ugh.

Admittedly, I'm a touch biased, since I'm one of the people for whom sweetners tend to leave a bitter aftertaste...

https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/why-do-artificial-sweeteners-taste-bitter/

India to adopt digital rupee and slap a 30 per cent tax on cryptocurrency income

juice

Re: How do you ensure it stays viable

> But how do you engage in transactions using a digital currency if there's no power? You may have your wallet on a USB stick, but that does little good if the coffee shop doesn't have power, the bank doesn't have power, or your SmartPhone battery has been dead from lack of an ability to charge it, etc etc etc.

To be fair, the same issue applies with any digital payment.

I was recently in Argentina with my housemate who was dealing with some family stuff. And it was hot, since it's their summer.

As in 45-50c hot.

As a result, when we were getting ready at their family house to return back to the UK, there was a power-cut, since everyone was running their aircon at max.

Which was a bit of a problem, since we needed to summon a taxi to get to the airport. I don't know if the Argentinian phone network stays up during a power cut, but it's something of a moot point, since there wasn't any power for the house's router.

No router, no wifi.

Thankfully, the mobile phone network was still up, and I'd bought a local sim card with enough data left on it to summon a Uber.

(Perhaps ironically, unlike my housemate, who'd decided against doing similar "since we can just use wifi everywhere"!)

It was certainly a useful reminder of how so many things are now dependent on access to the internet, and how disruptive it can be if anything happens to block said access.

Oh, and we paid the Uber in cash, since that's how they roll over there :)

God of War: How do you improve on perfection? You port it to PC, obviously

juice

Re: I'm always curious about GoW's high ratings

I ploughed through to the end for the story - which as per my ramblings above, I was sorely disappointed to discover ended in a blatant "to be continued" way.

But if it hadn't been for the strength of the story, I'd have walked away from the game. The amount of grinding and backtracking was frankly OTT, especially when I did "just one more mission" to try and boost Kratos's abilities, only to discover that I'd accidentally completed the game, but there were still a number of challenges which my current build would still struggle with.

Not least because the aforementioned "locked behind doors you need a chisel for" challenges are meant to be optional, but at the same time, the story tied into them is integrated into the main plot, given the amount of exposition in the later part of the game which relates to said challenges. Which I hadn't completed and therefore had no in-game context for.

I mean, it's still a good game. But it's not a great game.

On the other hand, I did make the mistake of picking up the ps4 "uplift" of GoW 3. And if there's ever been a prime example of a video game trying too hard to cater for "hormonal and horny teenage males living in 90s America who love games from Acclaim", that game is it...

juice

> Small correction, I think you mean AMD, there is no nVidia chips in the PS4 or 5 (or X-Box for that matter).

Yep. Absolutely no idea where I got Nvidia from.

The only thing I can offer in my defence is that it was a Monday and my caffeine levels were woefully depleted...

juice

> I think the main point of these ports is to show PC gamers what they are missing out on. Now with The sequel to GOW and HZD coming some PC gamers may not want to wait another 4 years to play them

I think the key point was that Sony realised that there's an untapped market where they can make large sums of money, for relatively little outlay, and with little risk of affecting their core market.

E.g. HDZ sold over 700k copies in the first month on the PC, and allegedly earned a 250% ROI (https://twitter.com/benjisales/status/1397707647856545792?lang=en).

I'm not entirely sure how they're measuring their RO; it launched at £40, so even wiith the inevitable drop-off in sales and price reductions (plus taxes, Steam's fees, etc), I'd be surprised if they came away with less than £20-30 million in profit.

I'm sure it may help to persuade some "PC Master Race" people to buy a PS5 to play future games from these series, but I suspect that'll just be icing on the cake, money-wise.

After all, the PS4 and PS5 are just multi-core x86 machines with an Nvidia chipset. There's some nifty hardward in there - especially around the memory architecture - which even a high-end PC will struggle to keep up with, but porting stuff from them should be several orders of magnitude easier than porting stuff over from the PS2 and PS3, given how different/complex their architectures were.

Easy money, especially when the PS5 is still so supply-constrained.

juice

I'm always curious about GoW's high ratings

Since for me, it was just good, not great.

(Warning: long and potentially grumpy musings to follow; I'll try to avoid any spoilers though!)

I recently played through Hellblade: Senna's Sacrifice for the first time. Which, despite the somewhat cheesy name, turned out to be a fantastically bleak tale, with some spectacular graphics and voicework, set within a Norse framework.

So having finished it, I was in the mood for more such things. And seeing as GoW is now pretty cheap on the PS4, and how it has high scores all across the board, I figured I'd pick it up.

And, well. While I played it through to the end, mainly for the story, there was disappointment.

tl;dr: whole lot of grinding and returning to previous areas. Combat is frustrating, and the ending is a let-down

Graphically, it's generally fantastic - I even found myself watching a 1-hour video on YT about how they implemented realistic wind/grass movement for the game. The bit with the turtle in the witch's garden is a particular standout.

And the story is generally pretty well written and interesting; I especially liked the little conversations to be had when travelling by water, especially once Kratos and the Boy get ahead of things[*]. And the awkward relationship between father and son was well done.

OTOH, the way in which the Boy's reaction to certain revelations is handled felt distinctly clumsy, especially as regards how it affects the two dwarves. It felt like something which the game's writers had insisted needed to be part of the plot, only for the director to hand-waved it through as quickly as possible.

And that then takes us to the gameplay, which falls somewhere between Zelda, Metroid and the Batman Arkham series. You run around a series of areas which are designed to look like an open-world map, but which really aren't. And in best Metroid/Arkham style, these areas are filled with puzzles and secrets, many of which can only be solved once you've acquired certain abilities.

Which is annoying on a few fronts.

First, for the ability-specific puzzles, there's often the confusion over whether you've simply missed a bit of the puzzle, or if it can only be solved by something which you don't yet even know about.

Secondly, this also means that you're expected to do a lot of backtracking to previously explored areas. Which can be a pain, since you don't get fast-travel until about halfway through the game - and even then, it initially just allows you to travel back to the central area, and then (after completing some more quests) after that, only to specific "portals" on the map. So you spend a lot of time trudging back and forth, even after you get fast-travel.

(Pro-tip: you don't actually need to walk when fast-travelling. Just go through the portal, and then stand still and wait...)

Thirdly, and perhaps more abstractly, is the fact that pretty much all of the puzzles in the game are designed specifically for Kratos. Which was also true in the Arkham series, but there, they were set up specifically for Batman by the Riddler.

Conversely, in GoW, it just somewhat tweaks my suspension of disbelief when coming across some millennia-old massive mechanism which can only be activated by someone carrying a giant boomerang-axe with the ability to freeze cogwheels. It's almost as if the entire game is just a giant playground...

Oh, and there's also the annoying way in which rifts and chests can be sat in the middle of relatively low-level areas, but which spawn one or more ultra-high-level enemies without warning. Again, I'm guessing this is meant to encourage you to return to these areas once you've levelled up, but I'm really not a fan of any game which expects you to learn and explore via character-death.

And then there's the combat, which I generally just found frustrating.

There's the fact that the God of War - the guy who literally killed every single fighter, animal, demon, monster and god over in the Grecian world - initially has the combat abilities of a spineless hedgehog, and must start again from scratch with gathering XP and equipment to unlock moves and improve his equipment.

And the stamina of said hedgehog, to boot; at the start, one hit from a shambling zombie armed with a toothpick is pretty much enough to take Kratos down.

Then there's the way in which so many enemies - including the Visitor, who's pretty much your first opponent - are partially or completely immune to axe attacks. Which is all the more frustrating in this initial battle, since Kratos does so many cool things - including all those things mentioned in the review, and more besides, such as self-healing - in cut-scenes. WHY IS KRATOS SO LIMITED WHEN I'M CONTROLLING HIM, WHEN HE'S SO AWESOME IN THE CUT-SCENES???[**]

Things did improve once Kratos's abilities were levelled up, and once I got a better handle on using The Boy's archery to distract or stun enemies [***]. But it's still a very far cry from the fluid combat of the original GoW games, and once you pick up the old Blades of Chaos and can indulge in the old moves, it genuinely almost felt like a different game altogether.

And enemies only have a single "stunned" death animation. Which feels a bit cheap, especially when it comes to some of the mini-bosses, such as the trolls.

Finally on the combat front, and while trying to stay spoiler-free, there's a set of optional 1vs1 challenges which can be taken on, once you've got the key to unlock the doors for them.

And these enemies are ridiculously tough. After a lot of retries, I managed to do one, and was debating trying to grind Kratos up to make it easier to take down the others, but then discovered that I'd accidentally reached the end of the campaign. At which point, I just couldn't be bothered!

Which also takes me to the way the campaign ends. Which frankly - and despite an interesting revelation about the Boy - was distinctly underwhelming. Because - and while still trying to stay spoiler free - we only really get to meet (and/or kill) a small handful of Norse z-list characters in this game. Everyone else - including several popularised in Marvel movies - gets little more than a bit of a story in one of the various tales you hear while boating around the lake or fast-travelling.

I don't really have an issue with setting things up for a sequel, but the way it was handled here definitely felt like a letdown.

And then there's various other things. E.g. I'm not a great fan of crafting mechanisms at the best of times, and the plethora of stuff thrown at you in this game felt a bit overwhelming, especially when you can start to socket stuff and/or craft new things. I'm just here to hit things in the face with sharp and heavy weapons!

But that's enough grumpiness for a Monday morning. Suffice to say that for me, it was a good game rather than a great game. And while I'll probably pick up the sequel (assuming I can find a PS5 to play it on), it'll be at some point long after release, when it's in the cheap section of CEX!

[*] Look, I have to get some pleasure out of this Monday...

[**] Admittedly, the obvious answer is that I'm crap at playing this game. Still...

[***] On a brighter note, summoning Ratatoskr is one of the greatest video-game pleasures I've had for a while!

European silicon output shrinking, metal smelters closing as electricity prices quadruple, trade body warns

juice

Re: recycled glass

> Citation welcome.

It's not too hard to find some citations...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_recycling

To be honest, I'd guess that using recycled glass as an aggregate is popular because it's the lowest-cost way to reuse the glass, and there isn't a need to separate out the different colours.

There's also this interesting quote about the UK in particular:

The waste recycling industry in the UK cannot consume all of the recycled container glass that will become available over the coming years, mainly due to the colour imbalance between that which is manufactured and that which is consumed. The UK imports much more green glass in the form of wine bottles than it uses, leading to a surplus amount for recycling.

Equally, a lot of people don't really seem to pay much more than lip service to recycling. E.g. the communal bins at the flats where I live are basically split into three groups: glass/metal/plastic, cardboard and other.

And while I know there's increasing amounts of automation in the recycling process, I suspect the efficiencies involved in splitting out things from a mixed lump of glass, plastic and metal is going to be low. Especially since you've also got to consider the various colours of glass, the many grades of plastic, etc, etc.

Similarly, I was mildly bemused to see that Yazoo milk drinks come in a recyclable plastic bottle which is fully sheathed in a non-recyclable plastic label. So they expect you to cut the entire sheath off before consigning the bottle for recycling.

I'd be genuinely surprised if more than 10% of the people drinking from those bottles even realise that they're meant to do this...

Google sours on legacy G Suite freeloaders, demands fee or flee

juice

> I've signed up to Zoho with one of my secondary domains and am in the process of getting everything setup. Overall, it looks pretty decent so far, and does support catch-all processing. I'll try to remember to report back here once I get it going.

I'll be interested to see how that goes.

I've got a vanity domain/email, which is currently just an alias to an old ISP email address. I did start to look into pointing it at gmail, but was put off by the cost.

But I can probably live with Zoho's £0.80 per month/£9.60 per year :)

Low on passengers, low on memory: A bad day on the London Underground

juice

Re: Shocking Service!

> Why would one want to return to the pre-Covid normal? At various times in my life, I've commuted by foot, bike, motor scooter, car, public transit in US (lousy), public transit in Japan (better). I've also worked from home. IMO, home is by far the best with walking second and traveling by car a distant third.

I think "work from home" is definitely going to play a much larger part in many people's plans going forward. In the company I work for, the lack of enthusiasm for coming back into the office has led to us closing down some of our office space, and implementing a hot-desk system. Albeit the latter hasn't really been tested yet, thanks to Omicron.

Sad to say, the benefits of working from home very much depend on your personal circumstances.

Living in a shared house? Got kids or pets? Not got anywhere to use as a dedicated office? Do you not get any support from your company to cover heating bills, etc?

If the answer to any of the above is Yes, then working from home may not be preferable.

E.g. I know someone who recently started a call-centre job, and is literally sitting on the couch in their living room.

And if I didn't have the room for a dedicated "home office" with a triple-monitor setup (one to type, one to view the results of said typing, and a third for our internal messaging system), my performance and mental health would definitely suffer.

> But I think overall, that cities as we knew them in the 20th century may be headed for long term decline.

Dunno. I think there's potentially going to be changes, certainly when it comes to city centres. After all, above and beyond the people fleeing to the country in search of larger properties with gardens, we're almost certainly going to end up with far more office space than is needed.

And I have my doubts as to how many "luxury student apartments" are actually needed, especially at the rate they're springing up round my way. And then there's all the recently vacated shop spaces. And so on.

On the other hand, there's a distinctly finite number of large houses in the countryside with nice gardens, and cities offer a lot of things which you can't get in the countryside. E.g. easy access to schools, supermarkets, gyms, etc - and social evening activities above and beyond playing the weekly pub quiz at the village pub.

As such, once things die down I'm actually hoping that we might actually see something of people actually living in city centres, rather than them being hollowed out commercial/office husks.

Time will tell :)

Developer creates ‘Quite OK Image Format’ – but it performs better than just OK

juice

Re: Colour me impressed...

> RLE? So it's basically a take on PCX, then, which also used RLE

Aye. In fact, at a glance, RLE has been around since the sixties, and Hitachi got a "computer" patent on it back in 1983[*].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run-length_encoding

And if you fire up any halfway decent image viewer (e.g. Irfanview, my personal favorite), you'll see dozens if not hundreds of potential image codecs; any which are lossless will almost certainly be using RLE.

QOI has an interesting feature, in that it also includes a couple of "lookback" mechanisms, in which you can describe a pixel relative to the last pixel, using either one or two bytes. I'm guessing this may be one place where it gets it's slight advantage over PNG, though with just one byte (aka 2 bits per colour channel), I'm guessing it only really works for relatively smooth and consistent gradients (e.g. a sunset sky).

Any which way, there's definitely no shortages of RLE-based algorithms out there!

[*] Which doesn't necessarily mean they were the first; Namco got a patent for "playable games on a loading screen" in the 90s on the PSX, despite the fact that there were several examples of prior art on the ZX Spectrum and Commodore 64 (e.g. Joe Blade II)...

juice

Re: Colour me impressed...

> Amen: I frickin' hate JPEG artefacts

To be fair, that's not the fault of JPEG, in much the same way as it's not the fault of MPEG-2, WebP, h.264 or any of the other mainstream lossy compression systems.

The problem is that bandwidth and storage are expensive, at least when it comes to major content carriers like Google, Facebook, Twitter, digital TV channels, etc.

And so they crank the compression levels to the most they can get away with.

Sadly, that equation is never likely to change, even as we get better compression algorithms. Because there's always going to be a measurable cost saving to be had by tweaking the compression levels to a level which 95% of consumers will accept...

juice

Re: Colour me impressed...

> I'm fed up of seeing jpeg compression artefacts on images; I shall have to play with this and see what happens

It's a nice bit of work, and as other people have said, it's nice having a image-compression spec which is easy to read.

But at the same time, it's pretty much just Run Length Encoding (RLE) with a couple of tricks thrown in. And that means that while it's great for encoding "drawings" (e.g. the Register logo at the top of this page, or a screenshot of my browser), it'll be significantly less good at encoding photographs.

Because photographs very rarely have long sequences of a single colour, unless you perform some sort of lossy transform on them.

Then too, part of the reason for other image formats being so "bloated" is that they have a lot of other useful features. Which admittedly, don't always get used that much. But they do get used.

E.g. PNG has transparency, and an option to create animated images. Which admittedly/sadly, never really got anywhere against the almighty gif.

Similarly, when it comes to JPG, I know few websites use things like the interlaced-progressive download option.

And both PNG and JPG offer metadata features, which can be very useful. E.g. width/height, date taken (both useful when searching in Windows Explorer), camera make/model, image orientation, geo-coordinates, etc.

Also, out of curiosity, I grabbed the test archives from the website, to see how well the compression fares against standard compression tools such as gzip and 72.

I can't comment on the performance, since I CBA compiling up a qoi executable and going through the faff of doing lots of benchmarking tests.

But this is what I got from a few quick tests (assuming I can use lists in El Reg comments):

  • dice.bmp: 1920138 bytes

    • png: 349827 bytes (82%)

    • qoi: 519653 bytes (73%)

    • gz: 384789 bytes (80%)

    • 7z: 297566 bytes (85%)

  • qoi_logo.bmp: 394378 bytes

    • png: 16605 bytes (96%)

    • qoi: 16488 bytes (96%)

    • gz: 12132 bytes (97%)

    • 7z: 9950 bytes (98%)

I.e. 7z and gzip are generally as effective if not more so than PNG and QOI!

Admittedly, they're also far more complex to implement, and have the benefits of decades of tuning, but by the same token, reference implementations are far more widely available, and 7z in particular has lots of useful features such as multi-core processing.

For a final bit of fun, I grabbed a recent street-art photo from my phone: it's bright, colourful, lots of details and comes in the shape of a 4.3mb 4000x3000 JPG which decompresses into a 36mb BMP.

And with that image, PNG clocked in at 19mb, and 7z came in at 20.5mb.

Which means that even with the most optimistic "20%" improvement over PNG, QOI would come in at around 16mb, or around four times larger than the JPG. Which most definitely does not have any visible artefacts :)

So, yeah. A small and clever RLE algorithm is a good thing, and that sort of thing definitely has uses in certain niches (e.g. video games, 64kb demo competitions, etc). And the author definitely deserves credit for making it clear, simple and competitive with PNG when it comes to performance and compression ratios.

But it's not a replacement for JPG and it'd arguably need at least some extra features added to be truly competitive with PNG. At which point, the number of lines of code would start to grow...

Fans of original gangster editors, look away now: It's Tilde, a text editor that doesn't work like it's 1976

juice

> On and off over the years I've been using it to massage data files from one format to another

Yeps.

Recently, i had to take a column from a spreadsheet and convert it into a list of values I could plug into a query.

One quick copy-pasta into vi, and I could then:

1) add a single quote to the start of every line ( :1,$ s/^/'/)

2) add a single quote and a comma to the end of every line ( :1,$ s/$/',/)

3) concatenate every row into a single line (400J)

Now, I know I could do the same with a bit of cat and awk, or by faffing with function calls in a spreadsheet. But after a few decades of using Vi, the above is pretty much just muscle memory!

RAF shoots down 'terrorist drone' over US-owned special ops base in Syria

juice

Re: Technically fantastic but...

> and a replacement "small hostile drone" was purchased on Amazon for £39.99 with free next day delivery.

I doubt it's an Amazon special - whatever it was, it had to be fully autonomous, capable of carrying some sort of load (e.g. explosives or sensors/transmitting equipment) over long distances and large enough to be both picked up by radar and targetted by a missile.

But I am willing to bet it'll cost them significantly less than £200,000 to replace it.

Shocking: UK electricity tariffs are among world's most expensive

juice

Re: 70's electricty

> They do harm wildlife. Particularly, but not exclusively, bats. The rarest are migratory and particularly affected, but it's a fairly general problem. As they get near the blade tips the rapid pressure change causes their internal organs to rupture.

I was curious about this, so I did a quick google. And lo, the first result which popped up was this:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0242485

The abstract sums things up quite nicely (trimmed, my emphasis):

Because there are no data available that characterize the pressure changes that cause barotrauma in bats, we compared our results to changes in pressure levels that cause barotrauma and mortality in other mammals of similar size.

[...]

The magnitude of the high-pressures that bats may experience are approximately 80 times smaller than the exposure level that causes 50% mortality in mice, which have a body mass similar to several bat species that are killed by wind turbines.

[...]

Accordingly, if bats have a physiological response to rapid low- and high-pressure exposure that is similar to other mammals, we conclude that it is unlikely that barotrauma is responsible for a significant number of turbine-related bat fatalities, and that impact trauma is the likely cause of the majority of wind-turbine-related bat fatalities.

> Apparently the problem for bats and some birds is the insects. Basically the insects get smashed on the blades, leaving the smell of food drifting downwind

Equally, I was curious about this. And surprisingly, it looks to be true, though most of the articles seem to be linked back to a single study from Germany.

https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/csp2.366

So, yeah. It sounds like the bats and birds are turning up in hopes of a feast, and simply aren't paying enough attention to the big spinny thing, which they then crash into.

Meanwhile, the various animals on the ground are both well fed and relatively safe, bar the occasional stunned beast spiralling out of the sky and smacking them on the head...

Joking aside, it does make you wonder what can be done to minimise animal casualties; maybe even something as basic as a sonic repeller or a change in paint!

The dark equation of harm versus good means blockchain’s had its day

juice

Re: Lack of comprehension and imagination ...

> The green agenda is simply another mechanism for the global elite to squeeze every last drop of cash from the masses. It's been estimated that going net zero will cost $150 trillion. Who do you think will pay for this?

Conversely, the cost of not going "green" is that billions will die as climate change sweeps across the world.

> This is the real reason bitcoin is being attacked from all angles. It's simply unacceptable that the little people can have a store of wealth that's completely out of reach of those that run the show.

No: it's being attacked because the negatives hugely outweigh the positives.

It deliberately burns vast quantities of energy for no directly useful purpose, thereby driving up energy costs for everyone else and measurably increasing the amount of pollution being pumped out.

It ties up vast quantities of computing technology for no directly useful purpose.

It's volatile nature makes it useless as a transactional currency, As does the crippling bottleneck around how many transactions can be processed simultaneously.

(The volatility also arguably makes it useless as a long term investment, too...)

It's "anonymous" nature has made it a prime vector for blackmail and criminal money activities.

Personally, I don't think that's all balanced out by the possibility that the "the little people can have a store of wealth". And looking at how many "little people" lost huge amounts of money back when the big bitcoin bubble burst, I think there's a lot of them who'd actively disagree with you...

juice

Re: The power consumption thing

> The problem with energy is that it cannot be transported over long distances nor stored easily

I must have imagined all of those high-voltage AC and DC lines which criss-cross the globe. Such as this one in Brazil, which is over 1500 miles long:

https://www.power-technology.com/features/featurethe-worlds-longest-power-transmission-lines-4167964/

If you have the infrastructure to hook your power plant up to the internet for mining hashes, then I'm pretty sure that you'll have the infrastructure to set up a power transmission line and sell your electricity to the local power grid.

It's just that at present, with all the boom/bust speculation around eCurriencies, it's more profitable to literally burn energy for no real-world benefits.

Feds charge two men with claiming ownership of others' songs to steal YouTube royalty payments

juice

I think I know a musician who was affected by this[*]; the key problem has always been that a lot of the affected musicians aren't in the USA, and individually, few of them could justify the cost of mounting an international legal challenge.

The last time they mentioned it, I got the impression that some sort of group had been set up to properly challenge Teran and Batista, which makes me wonder if that's how the US Feds finally got involved!

[*] Long-time rock artist, who had several decades worth of recordings on YT, from which all the revenues were going to T&B

Why your external monitor looks awful on Arm-based Macs, the open source fix – and the guy who wrote it

juice

Re: Amazing....

> Maybe you should look at what PIs are appearing in. The days of them being a fun tinker project are long gone

To be fair to the original poster, I think that's missing the point somewhat.

The Raspberry Pi inherited the spirit of the original BBC Micro, in that it was intended to be used as the base for interesting hardware integrations. By it's very nature (and with the caveat around the IP restrictions for the hardware they're using), it's designed to be flexible and configurable.

Conversely, Apple makes machines which are intended to be black-box devices which all integrate into the great Apple eco-system. You pay the Apple Tax, buy the thing, settle it in next to all your other Apple things and it Just Works.

Or at least, that's the theory. Results may well vary, especially if you're trying to use Apple devices with non-Apple things.

And with their ongoing move towards entirely in-house technology, that may well get worse; in the past, they've been at least somewhat constrained by the fact that they were using components from other companies.

(Which isn't to say that Apple won't adhere to industry standards. But the level of effort they put into making their technology compatible with third party systems may well dwindle. After all, it'd work so much better if you just bought another Apple device...)

What a bunch of bricks: Crooks knock hole in toyshop wall, flee with €35k Lego haul

juice

Lego is surprisingly valuable

I had a friend who made a comfortable living from buying lego "model" sets and breaking them up to sell as individual parts. I've never dug into it to find out quite how this worked - presumably a small percentage of the parts were valuable as individual items, and everything else got bagged up and sold in bundles.

As to who's buying them? I'd guess it's mainly people building custom kits. Case in point; someone I know has just finally finished an ED-209 model after 8 years; it's ten inches tall, he used 2,400 lego pieces to build it, and apparently, some of the pieces needed were only released in the last two years!

To be fair, it does look pretty impressive, too :)

BOFH: What if International Bad Actors designed the vaccine to make us watch more Steven Seagal movies?

juice

Re: brilliant

> I'd love to have this conversation with one of these loonies, although i fear patience would wear thin fairly quickly

It's really not worth the effort. You either nod and smile, which reinforces their beliefs, or if you attempt to engage, things generally spiral down into "well, we don't know", or "you can't prove a negative", which further reinforces their beliefs - after all, you've not been able to prove them wrong!

Humans are stubborn that way: they also only tend to trust information from within their own social group; anything from outside that circle which challenges their beliefs is highly likely to be rejected.

Personally, I generally prefer to avoid getting trapped in a social media echo-box, so I tend to keep people on my facebook feed regardless of what they're posting.

(Except for one British ex-pat living in Malta, who's both a born again christian and an ardent Trump supporter, despite being neither American nor living in America. When it became clear that he was happy to ignore even the people in his radical born-again church who thought he was going too far, it was time to drop the hammer)

As such, I had three anti-vax people on my Facebook.

The first was a middle-aged militant vegan with hippy leanings - the kind of vegan who drops anti-meat flyers into supermarket freezers atop the lamb chops. And they went for the full tin-foil-hat menu, bringing 5G, government conspiracies and the whole shebang into things, despite people - including their own daughter - trying to engage them and point out the various flaws and contradictions in the various conspiracy theories.

To be fair, something presumably got through at some point, since they've mostly reverted back to posting about animal rights, with just an occasional "world government conspiracy" post sneaking it. But for a long while, any engagement attempts bounced off like a champagne cork fired at a challenger tank.

The second was an upper-middle class party girl, who used to be in a band I liked; the kind of person who keeps a horse (and occasionally falls asleep in the stables) and mostly posts photos of exciting parties with Beautiful People in various exotic places.

But when lockdown hit and they couldn't party anymore, they went nuclear. Coronavirus isn't real, the hospitals aren't full, the vaccine doesn't work, lockdown should be lifted, we shouldn't be wearing masks, etc, etc. Complete with lots of citations from various dubious sources, and even some efforts to coordinate protests and campaigns.

Oddly, their various rationales seem to have changed over time, as it turned out that coronavirus is real, lockdown minimised the effects and while the vaccines aren't perfect, they do make a sizable difference to the number of deaths and hospitalisations, as even a cursory comparison of international trends will show.

It's almost as if they've just been constantly searching for a justification which would allow them to go back to their party lifestyle...

And then there's the third: a person with some mental health issues, who was under a lot of stress after a divorce. And their initial concerns were pretty valid, since they centered around the mental-health impacts of the lockdown, and how it affects both adults and children.

But from there, things rapidly descended as they worked themselves into a frothing stew of anti-vax paranoia, to the point where they did actually/literally post "wake up sheeple".

Sadly, I didn't get to see what happened after that, since my attempts to politely engage with them were met with a Facebook unfriending, along with several other people who'd made similar attempts.

For this person, I do suspect it was mainly driven by mental health issues and stress; from what I've since heard, they have actually been vaccinated, but are refusing to do LFT tests and are therefore moaning bitterly about the fact that they're therefore unable to attend any events which require testing proof prior to entry.

So, yeah. From my experience, for all that I'm happy to talk to people like these - and keep them on my social media - in my experience, actually engaging them on any coronavirus-related subject is pretty much a losing proposition, no matter what you do.

Equally, it is quite interesting to see how both the more extreme edges of left and right wing are unified in their rejection of lockdown/vaccinations/etc and how their adoption of conspiracy theories seems to evolve over time.

It's almost as if they're just trying to justfiy sticking with their existing anti-goverment biases, rather than it being about the pandemic...

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s: Impressively average, which is how corporate buyers like it

juice

Re: Nice set of options, but Ethernet?

> To be honest, for the sake of a £10 dongle...I really don't mind losing ethernet.

I'm in two minds about this.

In day-to-day use, ethernet isn't generally of much use on a laptop, but even with Windows 10 (and presumably, Windows 11), getting wifi working during installation can still involve crossing your fingers and hoping for the best.

If wifi configuration fails, getting things up and running with ethernet is generally easiest, since then Win10 will generally sort its drivers out and/or you can download things without having to faff around with having another PC and a USB drive handy...

Admittedly, it can go the other way. I've got an IdeaPad Z570, which works perfectly when you slap Win10 onto it, wifi and all. But then Win10 updates itself, and the wifi stops working.

Rolling back the update seems to work, but only until the next time Win10 decides to give it another go. And the various online suggestions I've found haven't helped at all. So at some point, I'll probably either sell it or just slap linux on it...

Do not try this at home: Man spends $5,000 on a 48TB Raspberry Pi storage server

juice

Re: '"how far can I push this before it gets silly". A true engineer'

> He literally spends several minutes talking about "while you can do this, there's really no reason other than curiosity to do so" adding "the processor is a huge bottleneck and is unable to deliver at full speeds. He goes on to test it in several configurations that highlight this fact.

So, what we're saying is that the guy knew that this wouldn't work, and spent $5000 to show that yep, as per the documented hardware specs and all the existing empirical evidence from nearly a decade of people tinkering with Pi hardware, this wouldn't work.

And he then spent several minutes in his video talking about this, to pad out the runtime.

Between that, and the deliberately OTT cover photo for the video, I don't think he's trying to see "how far I can push this before it gets silly". Instead, I think he's producing deliberate clickbait videos to drive traffic to him and maximise the amount of money he gets from sponsorship and referral links.

And, y'know, good luck to him with that. But my time, money and general interest will go into watching videos which show something more interesting!

(Such as "How to drink tea in a tank". Which is sponsored by World of Tanks, oddly enough. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyGVR95P8t0)

RIP Bernie Drummond: Celebrated ZX Spectrum artist and programmer on Batman, Head Over Heels, Match Day II

juice
Pint

Ahead of his time...

The 80s was a great time for video game experimentation, and Bernie's surreal isometric artwork paved the way for a lot of the games which followed (e.g. Sweevo's Whirled). And Head over Heels is a classic by any standards.

Thanks for the games and the memories. Even if I never actually figured out how to play HoH, back in the day ;)

Reg reader returns Samsung TV after finding giant ads splattered everywhere

juice

Re: "you're also paying to be part of Samsung's global TV advertising network"

> I'm sure it's only a question of time before they will require an Internet connection to function. Cf. HP printers, Adobe software, etc.

Adobe is separate to this; they've simply moved to a subscription model, rather than demanding that you have an internet connection so that they can snoop on your preferred drawing techniques.

One thing which may help is the fact that TVs and PC monitors have been converging for a while, thanks to everything becoming just a digital input. And the "business" market for tech is always going to be larger than the "consumer" market, and be far less tolerant of this type of shenannigans.

Admittedly, that still leaves us with a mess, especially for people who don't have the time/knowledge/budget to go shopping for stuff which isn't riddled with spyware and adware!

juice

Re: "you're also paying to be part of Samsung's global TV advertising network"

> They're finding ways to monetize that, too. Probably see a return of whispernets and powerline networks, too, so they'll be able to phone home just by being plugged in.

I'd be impressed if anything managed to connect to a powerline network, given that I don't actually own any powerline devices...

TBH, that sounds suspiciously like black-hat behaviour at best and tin-foil paranoia at worst.

In the first instance, that'd require the TV to have built-in powerline functionality as a "just in case" scenario. Which'd chew even further into the aforementioned razor-thin profit margins on the hardware, and which probably would never even break even on the data-selling front.

(E.g. let's say that adding powerline functionality to a TV costs $1. The company sells 1 million TVs, of which 10,000 successfully fall back to the powerline connectivity feature.

Let's say the company makes $0.50 per year from selling your TVs data. Those 10,000 TVs are therefore earning them approx. $5000 per year. Which means it'll take 20 year to recoup the extra $1 million it cost to add this functionality to the hardware...)

And in the second instance, the company building the TV would be opening themselves up to a huge can of legal worms, if their device is found to be silently connecting to any network it can find, without permission, whether that's via powerline or some form of wifi snooping/cracking tool.

I mean, I've no doubt that there's already plenty of similar Internet Of Things hacks dreamed up by black-hat hackers.

But built into the hardware by the manufacturer? There'd be a dozen class-action lawsuits thrown at them within minutes of the first white-hat hacker noticing something odd going on.

juice

Re: "you're also paying to be part of Samsung's global TV advertising network"

>> "Why do you think the TVs are so cheap these days?"

> They're not.

I think I both agree and disagree. They are cheap from a direct-cost perspective, thanks both to manufacturing improvements (who can remember the last time they bought a display with dead pixels?) to some vicious competition which has driven profit margins down to virtually zero.

And even then, we've arguably long since hit "good enough" in terms of both quality and screen size; see the almost desperate way in which TV companies have jumped on various bandwagons (3D displays, curved screens, 4K, etc) and then dropped them when it became clear that the market wasn't actually all that interested.

TVs are now a commodity - one which uses standardised parts and standardised interfaces to do standardised things. And that makes it very hard to make any significant profits from them.

On the other hand, the manufacturing companies have to make their money from somewhere. And that is where all this integrated advertising and tracking stuff comes in, since it's all a small but recurring/ongoing revenue stream.

Personally, I prefer to use the TV as a dumb display, and hook in various standalone devices for my media consumption. And that's what I'll keep doing.