9 posts • joined Monday 1st November 2010 01:37 GMT
Really are you going to tell me what I had for dinner last night as well then?
Sure they are the same if your your pc doesn't run faster than a PS3. You might have heard of something called directx11 gfx's that can support 2560x1600 rez.
Sure Anonymous Coward a 3k Alienware gaming pc runs games exactly the same as console that has as much power as your mums laptop.
The AI is pretty good on pc they take cover and can pop out of no where. I've not seen any FEAR like flanking going on but its not bad at all.
The game does seem somewhat easier than the 1st title and most of what Horridbloke said is true, but it looks so god darn hot on 50fps ultra settings! Its a wonderful game for that alone.
As for consoles who cares about FPS on consoles, well I guess I know quite a few who do sorry lads and lasses, but playing this game on a console is like driving an F1 car around a car park.
"The near-identical performance of the PC and console versions might not please PC gamers"
"The near-identical performance of the PC and console versions might not please PC gamers" LMAO what a pile of rubbish! I'd like to see this magic console that runs games as well as a gaming rig. Bad reviewer making up fibs or copying and pasting misinformation. I've played it on both PC and 360 and its like comparing a fine candle light dinner to eating a packet of crisps while waiting for a bus in the rain.
An expert in what being a noob
So how long would you force a reviewer to play a game so they can say whether the game was good or bad? Would you have them play 40 hours 50 hours on a game that adds nothing to the genre. I can see how spending as much time as would be needed to play to get to an "end game expert raid" would be really worth the time, not
For all you noobs with more money than game sense you should really take a look at all the FREE to play MMO's.
You haven't got a clue matey Jim
Really because most reviews aren't reviews they are overviews. If you don't compare games of the same type then how do you know the difference between something you liked or disliked.
The game it's self was a total let down as it could have been so much better if they hadn't dumbed it down.
copy and paste
It REALLY doesn't look like you played the game. It's not even a review its an overview of the game in which you missed out the things that make the game good, bad or average.
But hey at least you got some comments for your ever so dull copy and pasted "review"
Didn't like Fallout 3, but loving the New Vegas
Well I got to disagree with you because although I loved Fallout 1 and 2 I really didn't think much of Fallout 3, but have been loving New Vegas. First up F3 was no longer a turns/action points based game and as I loved the old school format it was a little, "There aren't nearly enough games like Fallout 2 and Jagged Alliance games being made and there are so many FPS!"
So it was huge and sandboxed and I played it quite a bit, but the combat sucked so much compared to pretty and fairly ok FPS and I just didn't enjoy the combat. New Vegas is cool and all but for me its all about New Ironsights! The combat isn't quite CoD, but its good enough to be enjoyable.
I'd love to see it running on a rig that you could max out silly amount of graphics options. I'm running it on mid to high settings on a 3 year old gaming rig and she plays well and after getting the 2nd update I've not had many issues outside of vault 11's infinite XP terminal.
I'd say this is one of those games where its good to have saved your pennies and got a gaming rig rather than a console though as it's just too hardcore for consoles. It's not Fallout 4, but it is a better game than Fallout 3