559 posts • joined Tuesday 26th October 2010 14:16 GMT
Funny Story But...
It is a funny story, but it's an amusing side anecdote. Marketing only works when the product does too. They may well have caught up, but.... perhaps too late.
It's like my Nan quotes from Shakespeare:
"And enterprises of great pitch and moment, With this regard their Currents turn awry, And lose the name of Action."
It's very unusual she quotes from Shakespeare, I guess the quote must have particular resonance for her.
Re: [Why do I ever want 4G - can someone remind me?]
Nifty did a great job, but I'll put my twopence in.
4G is a higher capacity shared medium than 3G. Whichever way you cut it, that's more reliable, harder to congest and faster. What's not to love about that?
4G has been designed for much lower latencies for a snappier, faster experience even if you only had the same bandwidth as with 3G. Why would anyone not want a lower ping? I love quick response times.
I can't wait for 3's 4G rollout.
Re: 5GB for £26/month
If you were able to get EE's doublespeed 4G with their starting allowance of 500 Mb for £21 a month (SIM only) you could burn through it at top speed (60 Mbps) in 66.6 seconds before empty.
60 Mbps = 7.5 MB/s
500 MB / 7.5MB/s = 66.667 s
It's such a shame Kevin Bacon never starred in Gone in 60 Seconds.
At least the 5GB will last you 10 minutes :D
Personally I want more than 10 minutes of data a month.
Re: There is a reason why it's free...
You know what, you're kind of right. Do I choose between great customer service over the phone, or a great network without data limits?
Hmm.... What will I be doing the most of?.... Support calls or using the service?
I'm going to pick the better network! Wait... I already did!
In my experience 3 run a cracking network unless you're in rural Scotland, then it gets ropey.
I think they're the most competitive network so long as you don't need hand holding too much. I keep my dealings with their support to the minimum.
They also seem to be the only network not seeing 4G as a cash cow, but as a way to really strengthen their product. They seem to realise that a stronger product will lead them into a stronger position. I like their style. It's seems to be engineering lead rather than marketing lead.
Ending In Tears?
I love bitcoin, but it wasn't a finalised production piece of software, if only in distribution. Maybe that's changed now, anyone can feel free to update me, but when I was using it, the windows download was an unsigned executable. There are big chinks in the guarantee of the software's integrity on the client side (not disputing the impressiveness of the cryptography, but it's only as strong as it's weakest link).
I think the biggest currency theft in history is not a question of if, but when.
Re: HTML5 ?
"You mean, there is equivalent animation processing technology in HTML5 standard?
Wow, I'm impressed. Wonder what next will W3C standardize - voice control perhaps?"
Re: > so bright ... because it was so close to Earth
"Indeed. And the actual event happened over 3 billion years ago :D"
This is true.
Come on reg! More up to date reporting please!
Cheap as Chips?
Intel don't sell their latest chips cheap. If the Nexus 5 had an Intel chip, it might have been £395. Look at how much they nobbled the atom platform (Netbooks limited to 2GB RAM) just because they were afraid of their low price experiment cutting into the desktop share.
Re: Gives the standard momentum??
If other countries decided to use it too? You mean like the UK? You're looking for the unpaired 2.6Ghz slot in the recent 4G Auctions.
I find TDD intriguing, I just hope it's efficiency compares well against FDD when links are loaded and that upload doesn't become too much of a second class citizen.
Re: That's not graphene!
I think we might be venturing into the 'little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing' zone.
I'm not a graphene expert, but I imagine that graphite is a lot more of a patchy sandwich of small 'graphene like' pieces. Also if in graphite there are occasional stray carbon to carbon bonds, it will change the structure of the carbon 'sheet'. Layering graphene together could have radically different properties to graphite.
Also at this level, intermolecular forces will keep the layers stuck together (just not with a huge amount of strength).
Dear stu 4,
Until you started swearing, I found reading your message in a Sheldon Cooper voice worked quite well for me.
Software quality is often something you could contrast sharply with say, the quality of bridge engineering. I think if you assume software engineers are all idiots, you have cast yourself perilously close to the label you are so happy slapping on other people.
I feel that a more enlightened, less aggressive approach to the subject might simply be to realise that the economic decision by managers of what is "good enough" dictates the entire culture of an engineering discipline. The balance between cost and product quality is determined by people trying to get a feel for what customers will accept.
Software that crashes occasionally but allows productive work to be done is somewhat tolerated. Bridges that fall down occasionally killing hundreds of people are frowned upon.
Did you just criticise it for having a high megapixel count and then say that you understood why the Lumia has a high megapixel count?
Re: For me, a good sign
I rather like the idea that every country (yes including you America) get's it's own TLD and then decides how it wants to do things after that.
Placenames as TLDs are going to work real well right up until someone realises that there's a Birmingham in Alabama as well as England. There's a Sutton in Surrey and one in the West Midlands. All of a sudden that meaning behind the TLD becomes a bit more vague.
Didn't Get the Memo
Nothing ruins a sleek, neat design like a logo. There's a reason you don't see an apple logo on the front of an iPhone or the Google brand on the front of a new Nexus.
The Big Five
I've always found it being the big five who are asked to do these blocks quite fascinating. It's a really interesting decision. I certainly don't want to knock it in any way, but it somewhat amuses me that the most determined freetard™ will simply seek other ISPs such as plusnet.
"Judge encourages ISP market diversity by blocking certain sites from the most popular ISPs" - Just an amusing notion.
Short term gain, long term pain
"Frankly, all this hand-wringing about BT having a monopoly on rural broadband is utter bollocks."
LTE may challenge that somewhat, but I can't think of any other providers in rural areas. I'm with plus.net (owned by BT) who can't offer me anything other than ADSL 1 because of decisions made by BT Wholesale who supply the service.
I hear what you're saying. You want broadband and you don't care if you have to play tonsil hockey with the devil to get it, but history teaches us that monopolies don't work in favour of the consumer. If you don't believe this I'd suggest you look into it. It's not just you affected by these decisions.
Short term gain, long term pain. Yay!
(Wait for it)
I remember I tried to get regular FTTC Infinity once, after the engineer who was already hooked up across the street came round to install the line, I was told that it wasn't in my area (after a month or two of back and forth). Then BT tried to bill me for a cancelled contract to the tune of £576 or something. Ended up getting Virgin in the end, took them a week to get it working without trouble.
....dary .... Legendary.
Bless you BT, bless you.
Google Chrome Undead H264 Support
Ladies and Gentlemen....
Once again, for your amusement I present the fabulous, undead, zombie for your fascination and curiosity....
Chrome (on Windows at least) still hasn't stopped supporting H264 without any drama:
Re: What a bunch...
I'm glad you pointed them out. I did notice that they're around 20% more expensive, but I'm glad to see they're doing a 12 month term instead of defaulting to BT's 18 months.
However, Zen or not, I'm pretty sure that it's all just BT wholesale to the ISP.
All I'm trying to say is that if BT has had their grubby mits on it I'm sure it's not a shining beacon of unsullied light.
Re: Hahaha, Oh wait, they're serious.
@Graham Marsden, @AC
Firstly I'd like to thank you both for your replies. It very much confirms my suspicions of why what I said has proven unpopular.
I think there's always a question of who watches the watchers. I don't really believe that transparency and spying go hand in hand, though I think the gist of what has been said is admirable. If the government did tell us about thwarted plots though:
A) Would you believe them?
B) Is open sourcing failed terrorist plots really a good idea?
Getting back to whether security agencies thwart plots and do us all good...
I don't seek to prove this to anyone here. I would have thought that a lot of people would have come to this conclusion from their own thinking. Do we really think that a mass of smart, intelligent people get up to go to work in the morning just to undermine our freedom and privacy? I don't believe that. If you don't think they offer us some protection and do some good, what do you actually think they do and what do you think motivates these people?
I worry this will be just as splendidly well thought through as the EU enforcing annoying pop ups about accepting cookies that did nothing but waste end users time.
Who wants to replace them all with Monkey's on typewriters?
Re: Hahaha, Oh wait, they're serious.
Since no one who down voted cared to share their wisdom or perspective with me so far I'm going to be forced to conclude that it was my degree of sympathy with the security services that got me in trouble with the 'Rage Against the Machine' brigade.
I'm not afraid of opposing views to my own you know, you can speak up. Come on, try and enlighten me ;)
Re: Social Engineering
>You don't really need to go that far.
I'll grant you that, although I was trying to illustrate as well that you don't need to be registered with Square for this service for it decrease the security of others.
These two statements don't mix well:
"Email can be faked. Be careful and don't trust email if in doubt."
"You can now safely send and receive money via email."
I think this is good news dressed up as chaos. I'm very happy that this spectrum is being made available.
Phone releases don't usually mean spectrum authorities releasing spectrum. Spectrum authorities releasing spectrum however, do usually mean phones released that can use it.
I can go with TDD, but I want my fat upload. I want to be able to stream HD video from my phone to someone else, because why not?
I wonder at full duplex, full load usage, what the efficiency of TDD is in relation to FDD.
Let's not forget the social engineering risk.
Bob's heard of cash via email, so he knows it's real and not necessarily a scam. Why, Alice got some cash via Square yesterday and was telling Bob all about it. Come to think of it, Bob's antics almost always involve Alice, funny that, Bob wondered.
So anyhow, Bob sees this email from Triangle that he's got new funds but needs to run SecureTriangleRegistration.exe in order to secure the transfer to keep his money safe. Bob, believing what he wants to believe and buoyed by Alice getting cash yesterday, runs the attachment.
Oh nos!! :( Bob's computer has been pwned.
Hahaha, Oh wait, they're serious.
If the computers are outside America, then there'll be less data slurping. *snigger*
Maybe now is a good time to suggest The Menwith Hill Ballooning Experience with Mark Thomas.
Since I'm poking fun, I might as well take the time to say for the sake of balance (and I do believe it) that a lot of people are working hard to keep us safe and have almost certainly averted some major disasters. It's churlish not to be thankful to them for that.
It's difficult to resolve top secret citizen surveillance against the principles of democracy though, and the massive potential powers any government could have over it's citizens if this sort of thing went wrong.
It's a tricky one.
Re: Cloud cuckoo land thinking...
> Nuclear power - great (i'm massively in favour), but how much? Those championing nuclear as a solution clearly don't have much handle on the total costs - renewable subsidies have nothing on decommissioning costs.
Just to make that clear (it's been said above but buried in a larger reply.
Nuclear decommissioning costs are minimal because new plants have the decommissioning cost paid up front gathering interest. Considering a 40 to 60 year period of operation, the amount up front doesn't have to be much even with low interest rates.
Re: It's great having ideals......... But we can't afford eat, heat or have a bath.
It's not a problem with ideologies. It's a problem with competence and having the backbone to do the right thing and that's a profound issue running across the entire political spectrum.
It makes me so angry that something so basic as power generation is in danger. It's not the 1970s anymore. The economy can't afford the loss of basic infrastructure. Business doesn't run on pen and paper like it used to, it's mostly run on computers and networks.
I'd like to see our civil servants held to account for any extreme dereliction of duty. I think that actual black outs on the power grid would amount to that as well.
An up vote wasn't enough. I was properly laughing out loud, cheers for the XKCD, very appropriate.
If I Was a Security Agency
I would have ensured a back door existed in an incredibly common driver binary for DD-WRT and received endless amusement watching people installing it to escape the other firmware I nobbled some time ago.
Is your router secure?
Monopolies, bad for everyone but the owners of the aforementioned.
Of course eventually they loose the plot so badly that a smaller, more flexible upstart will challenge them, but luckily this problem is being fixed by patent libraries so large than any attempt to infringe on an established market will lead to immediate financial ruin.
Whatever happened to a good old honest free market economy powered by ideas, innovation and meritocracy? (With social safeguards of course)
It's because he's got an Android phone, clearly. He's gotten all into the fancy (and rather pretty) Ice Cream Sandwich user interface restyle, then been upset by the music app now being white and orange.
It's a move as popular as the one to drop decades old national road colour schemes and turn all roads in Google maps either white or a shade of orange. Yay!
Google - Making software we all love, then destroying it slowly with annoying updates.
The good news for those in favour of internationalisation of the Internet's authority is that it doesn't require the US to relinquish control.
You see when you look bottom up, from a country's ISP subscriber, you can easily implement a system that takes control. This works for DNS and IP routing (or can be made to). The only area that would take more time to take control over would be secure certificates and authorities (covering control over HTTPS for example).
Re: 2G shutdown
Sorry Lee, but I'm calling BS on your assertions, but with very good reason.
I'd like to say firstly that I'm sure you're correct about older smart meters and GPS trackers. I don't have an issue with that.
> And every phone falls back to 2G for a reason - it's the most ubiquitous, most kitted-out, and most easily received cell signal in the whole of the country
My phone along with a few million other people don't fall back to 2G. That's because I'm with three for my mobile service. I find the reception on a 3G only provider to be great and perhaps a little better than my previous provider of Vodafone. I live in a rural location and get great HSPA speeds. The skies haven't fallen in, the world hasn't ended and my separation from 2G hasn't caused me any battery life issues, strokes or respiratory failures.
So no. We don't need 2G anymore on networks that are ready to switch.
Re: Cumberbatch as Kahn
I was really looking forward to this film, but I've just read a couple of online reviews. Looks like despite a very promising premise and some great talent it's fallen flat.
My understanding at present is that wikileaks has hosted genuine evidence of appalling events, perhaps even bad enough to be called atrocities, but that Assange really is a piece of work.
If my understanding is correct I feel like this could have been such an interesting, complex blend of right and wrong, something really good, gritty and human. It sounds from reviews though like he really has just been turned into a cartoon bad guy with just a couple of token gestures towards balance.
Can anyone recommend any other films to watch for this weekend?
Send annoying colleagues to prison
> They're not stupid, and they will find a way to make sure it's not them that gets brought to book.
Yeah, alternatively the movie industry is pressing for a brand new tool for the ethically loose to send their enemies to prison.
Competition tight for that job promotion? Successfully copy a colleagues version of the latest 4K movie, stick it on a torrent site and watch the cops take them away. Job Bingo!
Sending someone to prison for the detection of their movie watermarking on the net? Did someone who wasn't a raging alcoholic really think that was a good idea?
> So, you mean copyright infringers? That's a different legal context and an entirely different thing.
Couldn't agree more. Calling IP infringement theft is just weasel wording. It doesn't take much thought to realise that actual theft requires you to deprive the aggrieved party of their item. I believe IP infringement can be harmful to new music, but it can also be beneficial. I've bought music from hearing it on shared youtube links before. The best of which was me buying directly from the artist via their website. Principally there needs to be balance, as in all things in life.
If your fans really enjoy your work and respect you as an artist, they will support you.n At least I like to think that. :)
Re: a Decade?
I'm all for a thoughtful assessment of the varying pros and cons of different sections of spectrum, but what's all this nonsense about companies and WiFi?
When spectrum costs money, companies only buy it if it's profitable. It's only profitable if people want the services the operator plans for it. The end result is that spectrum goes to the end user that wants a service according to the free market economy approach. It's not always a perfect fit, WiFi shows us that, but it's still a good model that works for things like Mobile Phones. I will accept that sometimes the spectrum is granted for too long, but that's a spectrum allocation error, not one of business. I also accept that companies should use it or loose it too.
I'm shocked and disturbed that you're so against the proliferation of WiFi. I don't think you could have got it more back to front. We've never been able to do more with radio, never had it more capable, never had it smarter, never had so much damn bandwidth and you're attacking the principle enabling technology!?
The reason WiFi is dominating the band is because so many people want it. Nothing could be more democratic and fair.
Re: Fear and Piracy
Can I suggest a range of sentences instead of just 15 years? I believe my ideas will be more cost effective.
1) People campaigning against fracking, persistently asserting falsehoods after having been warned (they would be given chance to back up their claims) would be forced to pay 3x more for their energy bills, this would subsidise lower bills for everyone else. This would persist for at least 5 years.
2) People who are vehemently against a particular power source should put their money where their mouth was and be forced to source their electricity only from sources they approve of. When renewable power couldn't provide for these people (assuming at least some would be dead against gas, coal and nuclear), they would be cut off until renewables returned. It's harsh, but they'd be allowed to change their mind about other sources of power but would have to do so on a big public stage in a town centre. This would be filmed and put on youtube.
3) People who buy a Prius for environmental reasons would be taken away for re-education about the global supply chain for battery technology and it's ecological impact.
Re: Ultimate cop out here...
1) Some sort of climate change does appear to be occurring, man made or not, even if we're just talking global weirding.
2) If you efficiently burn natural gas instead of coal you release a lot less carbon.
3) Some of the most effective solutions to the problem (e.g. progressive regreening of land appeared on TED, nuclear power, fire safe wooden skyscrapers) get little to no time in the public consciousness and some are even fought by radical environmentalists. The point here is that I wouldn't worry about your domestic energy consumption amidst deforestation and the construction industries emissions.
4) The cost of reducing carbon emissions is so immense that people like Bjørn Lomborg have argued that spending the same money elsewhere may bring a much greater benefit to humanity. When you see this argument in full it's rather hard to argue against.
5) One way or another, we'll be OK. It might take hard work and a lot of people who care about doing the right thing, but I'm sure we'll solve problems along the way.
Re: Your article goes on a bit
It's wonderful news.
What made you suggest they condense it? Did you drop off while reading it? :P
Is it just me or does he sound like a guy on a Grand Theft Auto radio station?
Wireless charging isn't equivalent to wired charging, so I don't see the logic there.
With wireless charging, you're selling a couple of seconds to several seconds (depending on how organised you are with your charging cables) a day. It's not much, but I'd buy into it at the right price for the right advantage. QI chargers that require exact positioning don't do it for me at the moment, but I'm looking forward to the future.
Temptation Vs Apathy (Side order of spectacle)
For Delta it all seems like a good deal, but for Microsoft?
I've already got an HP Touchpad that runs Android that I barely use. Though it would be tempting to use Windows 8 in an environment (touchscreen) that it was actually designed to work in. Ahhh who am I kidding, I wont use it, it's hardly like I can run the iPlayer radio app on it.
Maybe what I need is the Surface X Pro (where X is whatever number). It's got some exciting specs and the idea of being able to run all that PC software on it is quite tantalising. I'll just wait a bit longer for one with a decent sized screen and perhaps an integrated keyboard. If only I could get my hands on one of those now. Though with those added extras it certainly would have to be more expensive than a Surface X Pro.
Re: Simplify the rules - it's the only way.
You can't make tax simple and easy, it would put a lot of accountants out of work. Nobody would want that.
Poor accountants :(
Re: Says it all? (moneyweek)
"How to make it, how to keep it, how to spend it." - 4 Week Free Trial!
On the upside, I've got a special hydrophobic, oleophilic, hypoallergenic cream that will make your skin seem like a baby's! (It'll give you nappy rash) I source it from genetically engineered, wild, organically farmed, hand reared serpents.
Re: Standardised connector
> What we'll end up with is something with all the appeal and elegance of a SCART connector.
It's all well and good being facetious about it, but you could quite legitimately attack the poor implementations of Micro USB instead. I've had to replace the Micro USB port on my Samsung Galaxy Nexus already because it failed.
The notion of one connector to rule them all for charging is kind of nice in one sense, but it must be acknowledged that this move could harm innovation in the future.
I've never bought an Apple product, but I recognise that they may quite legitimately have simply tried to improve on Micro USB.
Including a microchip in the lightning charging cable to prevent cheap cables being made though, that just makes them assholes. Would it really be so hard for Apple to sell reasonably priced charging cables from the get go?
Please Don't Encourage Them
The fastest 802.11ac equipment released so far that I can see operates with real throughput of ~340 Mbps:
This is on 1.3 Gb/s equipment.
This is 26% of 'suggested bandwidth'.
My 802.11n 300 Mbps link manages to achieve around 95 Mbps of real throughput and I know that's very high and around 32% of 'suggested bandwidth'.
My old 802.11g kit managed around 24 Mbps out of 54 Mbps of 'suggested bandwidth'.,that's 44%.
With every new wireless release the amount of bandwidth we actually get compared to the big numbers happily splashed all over the boxes gets less and less. I'm tired of this dishonest way of selling wireless. I think they should have to put actual numbers of ideal conditions performance on the box instead.
Re: Commercial fusion may not be as far away as you think
I'd be delighted to see Lockheed Martin succeed at this, of course, but it does sound a little too good to be true.
Time to test the new waterproofing feature of iOS 7 I think. :)
Why is anyone surprised?
From the very beginning Apple have been a company that doesn't shy away of laying down the law when it wants to. It's not unusual for it to adopt the "My Way or the Highway" attitude. I think this approach is both good and bad.
If you're an iPhone user/licensee that wants to go back to the older iOS, I implore you... go throw on a nice cardigan and maybe a suit jacket, go get yourself a Latte from Starbucks, sit down, take a sip and then look deep in your heart and ask yourself: "Who am I to dilute Apple's brand image?".