Re: "take advantage of the physical properties of the connected equipment"
I'll agree there's little risk to the public from untargeted malware and scams.
But for more targeted attacks, especially corporate focused ones, it would be very useful.
247 posts • joined 26 Oct 2010
I'll agree there's little risk to the public from untargeted malware and scams.
But for more targeted attacks, especially corporate focused ones, it would be very useful.
You can get exemptions, though they require masses of proof and paperwork.
Edit: Sorry Brandon, I missed your mention of "moving to Ireland". The following instead refers to setting up in Ireland for tax, but still working from the US, but I'll leave the comment up. Guus has answered your question accurately.
Corporation tax *RATE* isn't necessarily the main draw for companies to solely use Ireland for tax purposes. It's a draw for companies to use Ireland as a genuine base, but those doing it exclusively for tax are using it for a different reason than the rate.
Rather, it's traditionally been due to weird incompatibility between Us and Irish/EU tax and IP licensing laws. In particular, different views on who should be taxed for income generated in different jurisdictions, which can be played off each other to say neither the US nor Ireland have any reason to deserve the tax.
These loopholes are slowly getting closed, so you may have missed the boat, but it would have been potentially a viable tactic for you, depending on the nature of your contracting work, had you considered this a few years ago. You'd want to have had substantial income though to cover the costs of the tax lawyers to set it up, as you'll need a couple of Irish companies.
As mentioned, you'll get hit for US tax when it gets repatriated, but if you only take a small fraction of your income back to the US to live off, and use the rest to buy tropical islands, then you're probably ok. Apple has billions upon billions in Ireland or Irish linked companies that it can't repatriate to its shareholders, due to the tax bill it will get. You would be in a similar boat.
Yes. He was given an OBE by King George in 1945 for "Secret Wartime Service in the Foreign Office".
The details of why he got it were, of course, not made public.
An interesting anecdotes here, in relation to how he handled the title: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18541715
But you will do if you licence your work rather than working for hire.
> useless, in double-blind A/B comparisons (that was for 24-bit versus 16-bit).
Not really in this context.
Whilst this is absolutely true in controlled circumstances, with calibrated sound levels, you need 24 bit converters for these sort of applications (or at least 20bit).
At 16 bits on a consumer output like this, with different headphone iimpedances and different use cases and gain structures, it's very easy to encounter a situation where you'll clearly hear the dither/quantisation noise. You quickly end up in a situation where you're only using 13 bits, rather than the full sixteen available.
That out of the way... As for 32bit. That's insanity, if it's PCM. I had thought it was physically impossible to produce measurable results from a 32bit DAC at these sort of voltages.
Yeah. It's an absolute pain. I'm sure for people who are using Google's ad backend regularly, it's becomes clear, but for someone who just has a couple of monetised vids, and places an ad or two it's an absolute mess. And I'm used to dealing with complex systems.
It's like they've made no effort to distinguish sections relating to ads you host and ads you're paying for. *Never the twain should meet!*
EJ definitely does like *racing*, whatever about liking cars as such. He was a former F3 and F2 driver, and (according to wiki) a McLaren tester, before being a team boss.
I wonder if they're using him the right way? I didn't watch much of him on the new Top Gear, but there should be plenty of scope for hilarious stories based on the old pro running rings around the new guys, especially if they got their hands on some old F3 cars from the 70s.
Evans was sabotaged, by himself bottling it, the previous team refusing to adapt, or BBC management being idiots. Someone refused to change up the show, and I can't figure out which.
It was blindingly obvious that he was never going to work in a slow paced, wink-and-nod, show like Jeremy and co's Top Gear. He's just not that kind of presenter. He's the king of facepaced, chaotic shows.
Why he didn't transform it to his strengths, I'll never know. It would have been great, and it would have alienated plenty of people I'm sure, too! But at least it wouldn't have been that trainwreck!
Though, if we're talking about *extrajudicially* spiriting him away in the middle of the night, surely that's just as likely from UK or Equador, as Sweden.
For games, knowing how to make cheats and find exploits isn't the same as being able to stop them. The issue is server performance. You simply can't do all the checks required, and still have a responsive, playable game.
Yes. But the focus of the site is on versions that are not publicly available for purchase. They are not just Cd rips - often pre-mastering versions, etc.
If the record company has no intention of selling these versions, and then surely they're fair game.
And I say this as a generally anti-piracy recording engineer.
"AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS"
That's 4 BILLION spent in 2014.
It is outstanding. Especially given that El Reg frequently boast about the fact they're consistently profitable. They absolutely have the money to do it.
I think they're the only site I use that doesn't have any attempt at security.
And I could maybe understand if this was all legacy architecture stuff...
But they redeveloped the entire user/comment/forum section just a couple of years back!
I really don't understand why the US is so eager to ditch control of ICANN.
I mean I can understand why *the rest of the world* don't like them having control, but it seems like a very strategically strong role to hold - why give it up?
17mph unbraked, into the rear, is pretty significant. Most rear end collisions are much slower than that. (even if the car was initially going faster, it will have braked below that).
17mph is like getting tackled from behind unexpectedly by a rugby player.
It's gonna give whiplash, unless you were pre-braced, with your neck against the headrest.
She was appointed on the recommendation of the outgoing CEO.
And indeed, it's not even half baked!
By all accounts, the ratio of correct categorisation to mistakes is extremely good for an image detection system of this sort.
What the? NO!
That is absolutely incorrect.
You can *and should* use a properly designed digital system all the way up to just under 0dBFS. (allowing for intersample peaks of about 1dB or so).
There is no sonic advantage to having peaks 18dB below that. None. At all. Just huge disadvantages.
Unless you've got the most appallingly designed analogue components in your system/converters.
There are a million reasons for 96/24 DACs. Improved sound quality when used as a final consumer playback standard just isn't one of them.
For final playback purposes, Dan Lavry (who makes arguably the best converters going) argues that for a person with a normal ear (ignoring people who can hear 24khz sine waves) any audible improvement at higher sample rates is the DAC's manufacturer being unscrupulous and hyping above 10kHz or so, in order to make people feel they're getting extra detail. You can get the same sonic improvement at a lower sampling frequency by just applying a subtle EQ boost.
And you're not going to hear the bit depth difference (on playback) unless someone's been careless with the headroom, left out the dithering, or applied a bunch more digital processing to a 16bit source before playback, or it's being played loud enough to cause instant hearing damage. Granted it's not that unlikely that one of those scenarios is in play, but you did say "properly configured".
----This all assumes they're the same master source at different sr/bd. If they're different sources, then of course all bets are off.
> bears no resemblance to original vocals or instruments
So!? Artistically, **we don't want them to**. Otherwise, we'd just stick a single binaural mic in the rehearsal room and release that, and save everyone a fuck load of 120 hour work weeks. There is detail there. An awful lot. In automated delays, very subtle instument stacks and incidental layers, very, very nice artificial reverbs (much nicer than real rooms), very very crude reverbs, distortions, and tons of other artistic sonic choices - there's some gorgeous imaging techniques in play these days too.
Much of which gets lost at 128kbps MP3.
> Your speakers can't output these high frequencies either (and not your headphones either)
Not all the way up to 192k's nyquist of 96k, of course, but almost every tweeter and audio cable will give response way over 20kHz, though the linearity suffers.
That we can't hear those frequecies is a different point, obviously.
12 dB for headroom!? Why?
FBI != FCC
The FBI have a pretty good track record of getting involved in hacking/computer crime cases, if reported the right way. Even low level ones like personal impersonation/harassment/fraud.
> What are the chances of anyone ever finding the discs, let alone understanding the instructions to reproduce them?
Pretty damn small. In 40000 years, it will come within 1.5 LY of another star. And then continue through interstellar space.
Though not strictly applicable to Voyager, for general context, you might find this analysis of the odds of coming close to a planet or star interesting: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/2pe4oj/say_you_had_the_ability_to_fly_a_spacecraft_from_one_side_of_the_galaxy_to_the_other_in_a_straight_line_what_are_the_chances_that_you_run_into_something/cmvvytl
From the developer release notes:
"App Transport Security
App Transport Security (ATS) lets an app add a declaration to its Info.plist file that specifies the domains with which it needs secure communication. ATS prevents accidental disclosure, provides secure default behavior, and is easy to adopt. You should adopt ATS as soon as possible, regardless of whether you’re creating a new app or updating an existing one.
If you’re developing a new app, you should use HTTPS exclusively. If you have an existing app, you should use HTTPS as much as you can right now, and create a plan for migrating the rest of your app as soon as possible."
Though not related, there's some more VPN / Proxy functions you might be interested in too... https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/ios/releasenotes/General/WhatsNewIniOS/Articles/iOS9.html
The Unity plugin installer is clean as downloaded from Unity's site. Perfectly clean. No ads. No toolbars. No nothing.
If any adware is installed, it's through wrapped installers from other sites, like download.com, etc. in the same way they do with every installer.
Eh? It's a plugin. No more. No less.
Unity aren't responsible for what other stuff people put on their machines.
> Microsoft used windows update to install an advertising spam application on users machines without asking.
Apple told me about Yosemite in a similar manner on Mavericks...
> Pre SP1, XP was anything but good. I'd say fuckawful, actually
But after the car crash that was Windows Me, it was a Da Vinci masterpiece..
I'm replying late here, but yes, good catch.
The figures I had seen had "13 million", but they incorrectly stated it as a *monthly* figure, which is what I extrapolated from, hence the order of magnitude difference.
The greens probably have a point.
100 per new car is a phenomenal amount of money. Well over 10,000,000,000. Annually.
It would lead to one hell of a road safety campaign, and given the cut in death toll many of these have caused in the past, it's not hard to think it may well exceed the impact these devices will have.
Nah, I doubt that's the case.
What's being described is similar to the system we used have with the OperaMini browser on 2G before 3G and smartphones took off, where everything was stripped and condensed on Opera's proxy servers before reaching your phone.
You *could* choose to continue and access an SSL site, but you were then trusting Opera with your communications, and to their credit, they advised very strongly against proceeding.
What Facebook are doing here is pushing that optimisation onto the web developer side, rather than doing it on the fly on their proxy. Net result is the same.
These silicon valley retirees often end up using their skills to mentor startups and support open-source projects part time.
He's got children, so I guess it's understandable.
Aha. Interesting perspective.
Why is the US trying to offload its control over the Internet? I've never understood this. Surely it's a huge strategic advantage.
A live mars cam would be really cool. Probably not too far off, either. But for the record, the satellite photography NASA supplied for some regions of Google Mars is higher resolution than the aerial photography on most cities in Google Earth! Check it out, around Olympus Mons.
There's a time limit for edits, 10 minutes I believe. Perhaps you exceeded it?
I guess so, unless it's the same symptoms as a known software issue, which appears to be the case here. According to the article anyway.
That's a very good point.
What's interesting is how other social networks, especially (relatively) more anonymous ones (like Twitter, say) display almost the exact opposite.
As you point out, you can say something stupid on Facebook (on private posts), and you usually only get praise from the people who agree.
In real life, you get praise from people who agree, and someone will call you out for being a muppet. Usually it stops at one person, with everyone else just saying "yeah, he has a point, man, you were being a muppet".
What seems to happen on other networks, like twitter, or reddit, is that every one who disagrees chimes in with their own retort individually, so rather than getting slapped down once, you get pummelled twenty or thirty times.
I wonder how a balance closer to a real life discussion could be achieved.
Yeah, I'm glad they realise they have the balance right already - they're not going to ever introduce like/dislikes as a voting method (on personal posts).
Doing so would completely change the tone of FB into something much darker and more combative - probably closer to the defaults on Reddit.
On El Reg, the votes work, as it's focused on an argument or debate. It's very hard to take things personally, but on FB "dislikes" on photos, etc, could feel very personal.
I reckon it would kill the service pretty quick - people would move to other social networks with a more welcoming feel.
A similar thing happened, at a massive scale, at the Dublin Amazon AWS data centre a few years back http://www.siliconrepublic.com/enterprise/item/23084-mystery-surrounds-outage-at
They blamed a lightning strike initially but it appears to have been poorly configured failover gear.
Well there's only one Randall to pay, but scores of Reg staff...
Which raise as question. Firefox lead the field in its early days, then chrome took over when it came out of left-field.
So who's the new boy on the market these days?
MacBook pro - i7, OSX mavericks, shit-loads of RAM and Chrome is bloody awful recently
Memory leaks everywhere, page rendering bugs (have to resize the window occasionally to display a new page)
I wouldn't be the first time in comouting history that more resources have made a program run worse...
Interesting arguments I hadn't considered.
> Perhaps a lot of women are savvy enough to realise there are better opportunities elsewhere.
I'm not sure I agree, but it's certainly food for thought.
Exactly. It depends on the role not the industry. There are a ton of women in the music industry for example. But none are sound engineers at a high level. In my ten years or more in the industry, I haven't met one in woman in a professional sound engineering context. Managers, musicians, songwriters, stage managers. Yes. TONS. But none in a senior engineering role.
Music tech colleges generally have an 80:20 split between guys and girls on entry. Almost invariably, they end up focusing on the other areas I outlined - less on the tech.
My own thinking is that there needs to be a fundamental change at school level.
We need to somehow stop the situation where girls willingly accept help from boys to solve tech problems for them.
Teaching sound engineering, and having studied IT in college, I've witnessed countless situations where the girls never learnt how to problem solve tech for themselves. You'd never see a guy allowing another guy to do everything for them. And absolutely never a girl help a guy. This showed itself right from day 1.
Yet, it was far more democratic when it was book learning, as opposed to practical. They'd form balanced study groups and all help eachother.
So, I'm not sure whether it's the case of:
A/ the guys being overly enthusiastic "knights in shining armour", or
B/ guys subconsciously don't believe that girls are fundamentally capable of solving these sort of practical logic problems or
C/ if it's the case of girls finding it easier to get through life playing the "damsel in distress" card, or
D/ the girls have been conditioned to believe they can't figure out this kind of thing.
E/ another reason?
Either way, I found it so frustrating to witness intelligent girls simply not learning because of this.
I'd be very interested to hear a female perspective on this!