Re: In a word
Wouldn't that be .denied?
17 posts • joined 21 Oct 2010
Wouldn't that be .denied?
They are just banning ISPs with a French presence from allowing those sites to be shown to their customers. Doesn't matter where the site is located.
Wouldn't it be just easier to generate the electricity without burning fossil fuels and then you wouldn't have to worry about capturing the CO2? Especially since the current methods of sequestration use up about 40% of the electricity generated.
That doesn't work with the metadata.
They seem to have theirs working pretty well.
Isn't it weird that when they see a packet come a computer with an IP address that isn't North Korea then they assume proxy but when it's got a North Korean IP address they assume it's a direct connection? I'm not jumping to conclusions to who did the hacking but just saying that I don't see why it isn't possible for a computer in North Korea to have been hacked and used as a proxy just as easily as anywhere else.
Probably less fatal than all 1000 at once. Unfortunately I have the feeling that the person giving out the lashes has lots of practice in such things and will be able to inflict the most damage without it being fatal.
When I was doing admin work I could put multiple clients on a Linux server and know that they wouldn't impact one another. But when it came to the Windows group it was a strict one function per server rule so that a misbehaving application wouldn't impact others.
It was only a business analyst guessing before it was launched that said the 5c would be a budget model and everyone jumped on the bandwagon.
Of course they aren't going to run Windows on ARM in the data centre. They need all the horsepower in the CPU just to run the OS, GUI, anti-virus, etc before even putting on the application.
It'll soon be easier to contact the people who weren't in the database. Or Target should just buy a one year blanket fraud insurance coverage for everyone in the US. Probably be cheaper.
Was he afraid that all of the press photographers there might somehow miss him and he might not get a photo of himself at the ceremony?
Creating applications to the lowest common denominator of four operating systems is going to work so well. It worked out great for Java didn't it? (And yes I know this is a different approach to the problem but Java apps never looked truly native because you were always working with a subset of the OS's features.)
You have system admins based on the number of machines, not on the number of employees. I'm pretty sure that the NSA has a large number of servers in the back end to look after.
Files are not the property of the owner unless it suits the US government to believe the opposite.
One of my favourite applications, FreeMind, requires Java. I won't be upgrading to Lion if you aren't going to let me run it. I hate having to run a VM just for a particular application. Leaving it open takes up a bunch of resources. Starting up a VM wastes time.
I'm not going to complain about how iOS is so closed. It's always been that way. But I will look somewhere else for my hardware and software if OS X moves towards iOS. And I'm sure that many others will do the same.