Re: Back when men were men...
Not convinced that it was "to keep everyone involved" so much as they had a mountain of work to do and a deadline. I expect it was more like spreading the load.
1469 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Oct 2010
I had my home RAID6 crap itself last week. It's now taken a week to get everything back in order again. I think it's been a cooling issue, but the sweat ran cold when I saw that 4 drives had dropped at once.
Linux mdadm has hauled me out of the shit more than once on that wee box. I'm now making plans to build a new home server and repurpose this box as a backup.
Best time to deploy a backup system was 6 months ago. Second best time is today.
True, but the multiple-dies-on-a-CPU-package thing has been since before by Intel themselves. The multiple-modules-bolted-together-to create-a-complete-CPU thing has been done by ARM for decades.
That covers the two biggest components, and they'll have been going so long that the patents will be up by now.
It's this the point I should be waving around articles on Pentium Pro? I know it was just the cache, but it was still a separate chip within the same package.
Or go further back to the discreet floating point coprocessors back in the day, and you're on to the problem of making them talk to each other.
I suppose if you really wanted to stretch it, you're pretty much looking at the CPU interconnects in old supercomputers, just made very short and much faster. (For given values of "just".)
Nothing new in the world. Get off my lawn.
Networking was pretty easy if you had an NE2000 compatible card. Also IPX.exe for DOS.
After much sodding around with DOS drivers for various cards, I realised it was just easier to take the NE2000 path of least resistance, and I could get away with just ipx.exe in my autoexec.bat - didn't even need a driver in config.sys!
Yes, I got other cards working, for myself and for others, but people were wont to tinker with their startup files to optimise base RAM, and things would get missed.
Yep, and you both misunderstood. If I was being clearer I'd say that if I had to, I'd take a bit of a performance hit and a bit of extra cost just to put my money AMD's way. I know that makes me a brand whore, but hey-ho.
In this case it appears to be a bit of a no-brainer.
I've been AMD for years here. Got a couple of Intel boxes, but both picked up second-hand for a song. My desktop is an FX8350. I think it's about time to recycle done of those parts down to rebuild my home server (put in a more frugal CPU), and take the Athlon X3 from the server and build an unRAID box for backups.
That'll leave me room at the top to build out a Ryzen machine.
As I was explaining to a colleague yesterday, I'd take a bit of a performance hit and a bit of cost to have AMD, just to give Intel since competition. They need to be kept honest-ish.
300 baud? HTML? You have a valid point without having to exaggerate. 9600bps was pretty mainstream when web pages first appeared, with 14400 available.
You're right, though, in that I spent a lot of time hand-coding HTML, and squeezing every last byte it of images. Now bandwidth is plentiful so nobody cares. It's a choice between paying a human to optimise stuff Vs paying for bandwidth. Humans are expensive.
Edit - you're definitely right about the tracking/metrics though!
Just like cyclists, the majority of drive pilots are doing their own thing and minding their own business, but the ones that appear on the radar, so to speak, are the ice doing something wrong.
In all honesty, you could put any group in there. Gun owners, motorcyclists, dog owners, maybe even taxmen.
Yeah, and it always amuses me that most times you say "but why the downvotes" there's always someone who comes back and downvotes everything you've written in that thread...
I use a separate TVHeadend server with an SSD for my recordings. It's indulgent, but it means it starts instantly for pausing live TV and stuff. It's in a VM, with the tuners passed down via MiniSatIP on a Rapsberry Pi. I'll maybe look at transcoding the recordings, because it's a bit of a waste to devote swathes of SSD to Love Island... :-/
Tell me, does it work if you start watching a recording while it's still recording the other end of the show? Or does that upset the transcode?
Loving the way people are attracting spurious downvotes for stating facts here.
Also, I hopped onto eBay and get PoE adapters that just dangle in-line with the Pi. No moving parts, awh then I got them the official ones were being pretty shonky.
Anyway, have an upvote to balance the silly downvote.
Morning, Charlie. To be clear, my movie library is H.264. Whenever I've got a 4k BluRay I've got a pack with a 1080 disc in it as well, basically because I'm running it all on Pis which are limited to 1080p (until yesterday!). Hence all my HD stuff is in H.264, with a few VC-1 outliers that required me to buy that codec key (2001, I'm looking at you...).
Yes, if I recoded it to H.265 I could save space. Yes if I recoded it to AV1 I could perhaps save space again. But unless I'm recoding them from the source each time I'll be hitting accumulating artefacts which build up surprisingly quickly when you change codecs about.
I'm a little bit away from 4k video here, as I'd have to upgrade the Pis, and also my amp. I know, I could use HDMI ARC, but I hate the interface on the telly for dealing with that nonsense. Come that day, though, I'll just use the H.265 from the discs again.
I have a mate with his video library parked on USB drives in a Raspberry Pi server. He balks at my profligate waste of drive space, and recodes everything - I'm not here to judge what he or anybody else does, and if that fits somebody's use case that's fine. If it comes to TV recording / time-shifting, slamming it all to a more efficient codec isn't a bad idea because the picture quality is rubbish anyway - I hadn't thought about that!
Dunno why we're both attracting downvotes on it all, though, because it's literally a case of personal preference. There's no right or wrong answer - you choose the tradeoff you're happiest with.
Perhaps, but H.265 is on 4k BluRay discs, so if you're running on straight rips off the plastic (saves losing discs, kids mangling discs etc) then it's plenty.
Of course other people have other use cases - I'm not one for downloading movies, so AV1 is a new thing to me. Others, I'm sure, would choose to recode their disc rips to reduce size. I gave up on that game after the third time ripping all my CDs and just went lossless...
Meh - I dunno. I was the IT guy, so picked up a lot of the stuff osmotically, so to speak. It was expected of clients - 2 utility bills and a photo ID always. Maybe it was just easier that way than doing it without photo ID. I didn't take the time to ask them when they eventually fucked me over for their own individual gains...
Reading further, they've raised the money by selling Eos coins. They got some mugs to spend Ethereum coins on them.
So they sold a bunch of unicorn farts, and the buyers paid in pixie farts. But if you tried to actually spend $4Bn cash, you'd come out with $4Bn worth of goods (HP acquisitions notwithstanding). If you tried to actually spend 7.12M Ether, you'd collapse the value of the currency. In fact, their valuation assumes $561 per Ether coin, which has dropped to $280 anyway.
So - not as much dollaroo as they'd like to think...
Eos has taken much the same bath in much the same time.
But it seemed to me from the article that somebody's just plucked a figure out of their arse for the value of this cryptocurrency. And massaged the numbers to suit and to make themselves look grand.
If it turns out that they have all of the funds in one cryptocurrency (let's call them Pishcoins for brevity), and nobody else owns Pishcoins, that means they get to pluck any old dollar value out for a Pishcoin. It could be $1==P1. And who's going to argue? Certainly not the people who have an investment in it being true. It's only when you actually try to release some Pishcoins that the market will fix a value on it, which will probably be $0.
Also, countries tend to have standing armies which can help to prop up their fiat currencies. Just saying...
You've not seen us in Scotland. We're blue.
In July we turn purple for a couple of weeks, and then back to blue again.
Also, surprised you got a mortgage without government ID. Having worked in Financial Services, the FCA money-laundering regs require photo ID to prove you're you. Or did back when I was involved.
The usual script - two utility bills and a photo ID from the proscribed list. It was a short list...
Well, recently it was "Sorry that handle is already taken.", but historically DrXym first raised the term on this site in 2014, and still credited it onwards.
Still a perfect name.
And yes, I'm buggering about a bit this morning...
A significant part of the problem is that the radio signals from an advancing society are only really clear for a brief time.
There's the 1936 Olympics when Germany pushed out enough Watts on a broadcast to conceivably be detected off-planet. Since then, AM and FM signals have proliferated, analogue TV signals have swamped the airwaves, and then all of as sudden been replaced by digital signals. And the encoding on them becomes more and more fiddly, the compression more and more dense, until finally it starts to look like radio noise unless you know what you're looking for. Comms become frequency-hopping, and gradually tighter and tighter beam in the name of efficiency (yes, there are still broadcasts, but see how TV is gradually being shifted to online services delivered down a cable).
So from a European standpoint there's ~100-year window of clearly structured, widely broadcast signals that could be picked up from afar and recognised as an orderly data stream. Taken globally, I don't expect that figure to reach 150 years, In the evolution of an intelligent species, that's merely the blink of an eye.
Hell, I struggle to get HD DVB-T2, and all my equipment is designed to manage it.
I remember glimpsing a magazine on the way into the petrol station shop that jarred me so hard I had to stop and look at it. Couldn't tell you what the magazine was now - it was a while ago (so long that the petrol station has been demolished, used fora few years to sell Christmas trees, and rebuilt as townhouses). It was Cosmopolitan (or something of its ilk), though, so it had a close-up of a woman's face on the front.
Only it had stopped looking like a woman's face to me, and had started looking like a cartoon.
Still, looking at the fashion these days for heavy makeup, it all looks like people have been breaking out Homer Simpson's makeup-gun. Makes me feel like I should be shaking my fist at youngsters...
My understanding is that the wing breaks anyway in these tests. The important information is just how much abuse it takes before it breaks.
So long as it gets past n KN of force, or x degrees of flex then it's a pass, but the wing is tortured to breaking point so that they know where the breaking point is. After all, the test is to prove that the wing will permit the flight to land safely. Not to permit the next flight to depart on the same aircraft - that comes at a lower threshold.
Have you considered that they want something with a handle to carry them more conveniently with? Or to put other things in?
Ah! Now I understand the downvote. I mean in the fruit aisle, not at the till. At the till they'll have put them into another bag. If it were apples or oranges I'd totally understand the need to keep them all together, but the bananas are already in a protective sleeve and bound together.
By the time you're at the till, yes, chuck them into your bag with other stuff!
Me. You've not seen the burn at the back of my house...
My dad managed to upset a whole island once by being in charge of the site building a water treatment plant in Orkney. Then they capped the well that the bar manager drew the water for the whisky from.
I don't imagine it stayed capped for long after the construction crew left.
Dunno why you got the downvote. Chlorinated chicken is one of the hot-button topics regarding a trade deal with the USA without the protections of EU food standards.
Whether we insist on the same standards is worthy of consideration, but if it comes down to "our terms or piss off" from the USA it's pretty clear what will happen.
Last time I used satellite internet was in some lovely shiny new flats in Edinburgh. West Harbour Drive - look it up. That was all a brownfield site and they slung up these homes. Broadband was just intolerably slow to the whole lot of them.
Satellite connection, and they were suddenly looking at 25Mb/sec (what they paid for) rather than about 0.5Mb/sec on ADSL2+. Latency was a pig though.
That was a specialised case where it definitely did make sense. The guy I was helping to set it up did others in the Western Isles, Highlands and other remote places - those were the obvious options. It was remarkable, though, that in new build homes in a city the broadband was so awful.