Very nice, bus no SAS?
At these speeds / densities / prices I'd have expected dual-port SAS. Maybe that's just me being greedy.
352 posts • joined 18 Oct 2010
At these speeds / densities / prices I'd have expected dual-port SAS. Maybe that's just me being greedy.
It's nothing like handing over the house keys and inviting a rummage. It's more like handing over the documents on a keyring which *happens* to have the house keys attached, and the dealer driving over there for a rummage.
Ever so slightly different.
> I still think that the "all came of nothing" claim is just a convenience and a way of avoiding to admit that we have no clue.
Meanwhile, I consider it a tantalising, but otherwise irrelevant, distraction. A barrier beyond which we cannot possibly see. We don't have a clue, and we can never have a clue. So what's the point in worrying about it?
What was "here" "beforehand"? Could be anything. Another universe, noise and light, or just turtle-porn all the way down...
We're on a hard disc that got reformatted >13Bn years ago. Good luck finding your old files from before the reinstall... (Maybe we should be scouring the universe for bad sectors that have been mapped out beforehand.)
"Thus grow overly-large monolithic shoddy companies with market-distorting power that provide little-to-no market/social/customer benefit."
Wow - that's a mouthful when "bank" would do!
My excuse is Veeam. Doesn't cover KVM yet, but people keep asking. They've not committed, but on their forums Veeam have suggested that with the meteoric rise in popularity of KVM they'll likely be looking at it in 2018.
Used KVM plenty of times in small environments, but for work I wouldn't want to go without my backup crutch!
"...and the very best of luck to you with that."
FWIW, I'm deep into a VMware -> Hyper-V migration right now, and it's been (mostly*) a breeze. System Centre migrates smaller VMs pretty-much automatically. Big ones need the Starwinds converter. I've yet to find a "normal" VM that won't go.
Licensing SCVMM for us instead of VMware will likely save ~70% of our hypervisor licensing costs. And that's from someone who's been dyed-in-the-wool VMware since ... I don't know. '99? Running 24/7 since '03. I didn't think I'd shift until I stepped back and put my prejudice aside.
*Symantec's Web Gateway virtual appliance has a limited set of NIC drivers, and leans on ESXi's E1000 vNIC. Hyper-V has some DEC Tulip thing that I've never encountered in the flesh.
Libel, not liable.
And this is symptomatic of the problem that's caused a great many people to be surprised this year.
I've seen "post-truth" used in a number of places, but the media outlets that you've used clearly haven't employed it. Much like the different media outlets have kept themselves and their readership/viewers in isolated bubbles.
Not a judgement on you or your preferred media - just an observation that this is 2016 all over. Everyone in their own echo-chamber, oblivious to anything outside it. I'm as guilty as anyone else on that front, and been surprised as a result.
Sometimes I look at Linus Torvalds and think of Alexander the Great. Here he is building an empire, but what will happen to it when he leaves and takes his iron will with him?
Sincerely hoping that when that time comes the project can still hold together.
But they'll make it up on volume!
To be fair, Mark didn't single out Tesco Bank - just "these kinds" of fuckups. And it's a fair question. At what point are licenses revoked?
And an awfully large number of people having to change banks is surely better than the same people having their funds raided. Otherwise it looks like security should take a firm second place to convenience. Whilst there has to be a compromise between security and convenience (otherwise the system would be unworkable), I think the line needs to be drawn more logically.
Yup. I got a far as cryptographic hashing before I wondered why normal hashing would be inadequate and then decided to get more drunk.
Listening to dive Charlatans, Stone Roses and Beta Band. Better than this nonsense.
My thought precisely.
I had the privilege of seeing the Russian Knights flying Su-27s years ago - they were spectacular! You got a real impression of weight as they hauled those things through the air. It was an affront to physics.
"So while for a home PC with 1-2 disks 3TB is the sweet spot, at scale the higher the density the lower the associated costs will be and that is what drives the research."
True enough. What I will say, though, is that in my experience the hardware costs are dwarfed by software licenses.
However, if you're talking about a drive that's double the physical volume, you can fit half as many into a shelf, rack, aisle, hall or datacentre. I don't see this being a viable solution. It falls into the Quantum Bigfoot dead end.
Luckily, though, it's not my problem to invent a way to fit more into a drive. Just to afford the results...
If by doubling the drive height you can't double the platters, then just double the number of drives.
If nothing else, it halves your RAID rebuild time compared to a 2" monstrosity.
Besides that, the sweet spot for GB/£ still seems to be 3TB, quite comfortably. If you're worrying about the cost of the controller, perhaps you should store less shit. Just saying...
"specifying it as a 50nm cube is exactly what they have done."
Aww. I was reckoning on 50m x 50nm x about-a-yard.
Because the only waste or money is to sit on it.
For one, money needs to move around to be of any use. And for two, what's the point in working / defrauding / stealing for money if you can't them go on to enjoy it.
And fast cars are certainly enjoyable. Woefully bad investment, as a rule, but enjoyable.
Can't we just shove IoT onto IPX? Routable and yet completely distinguishable so we can turn it off immediately.
What do you mean you don't have an IPX router? Oh well - good enough I guess!
I watched The Spy Who Loved Me last weekend. They had this sub locating tech 40 years ago!
I can. Virtual server mobility. It's much easier with a SAN to hold the drives.
Don't get me wrong. For properly big jobs you'll want to run it on bare metal and cluster (even if it ends up being something like log shopping or AlwaysOn Availability groups), and at that point you don't need the mobility. If a node fails then another picks up the load.
For small/medium shops, though, this is overkill and inconvenient. Like every finely tuned tool, good for a specific job and useless elsewhere...
You can use lossless compression. We did have image compression before you kids turned up with your JPEGs and your Grindrs, you know...
Given that Microsoft are moving to per-core licensing on Server 2016 (and I expect other products won't be far behind), corporate users will want to see per-core performance on a par with Xeon before moving. Not an issue with Linux workloads, mind.
Besides that, there's the small matter of live-migrating virtual machines to the new architecture. That's a significant migration speedbump if you can't vmotion (or equivalent) straight across.
I like AMD. I'm running on one right now. Sadly they've just not been competitive with Intel for a while.
"The huge majority of people won't get back what they pay in but you still pay during the good years just in case you're unlucky enough to need it."
I remember discussing NICU costs with a nurse when my kids blew through the £1 million mark. Each. And they were only halfway there by that point. I think they've already drawn out more than they'll realistically put in!
The NHS is far from perfect, but I'm damn glad we have it. And I'm happy to pay for it.
We had a nice internet there, but it's been fucked by idiots with wifi candles.
And I thought the dick-pill emails were bad...
The answer, my friend,
is blowing in the wind.
The answer is blowing in the wind.
The man said a nice new mainframe would fix everything. And they put aside £500M for it. And the IBM rep probably bought a nice new yacht and everything!
"Fit 5G, cycle lanes,serious public transportation systems and provide relocation subsidies to the true middle of the UK - Morecambe!"
Aww give me a smile at least - it's Friday!
London will be just fine.
I SAID LONDON WILL BE JUST FINE!!
Linux hypervisor and Windows guests is licensed per running instance of Windows.
Licensing is not my job so I may be inaccurate, but this'll be close enough to get you within reach:
Yes, the license is attached to the hardware. A Windows Server Standard license permits (from memory) the bare metal plus 2 VMs to be run (it may be simply 2 instances including the bare metal). If the bare-metal OS is not Windows, you get 2 VMs. The VMs are limited by the number of CPUs and cores as per the Windows Edition specs.
Windows Server Datacenter permits as many instances of Windows Server as you can cram into the hardware. Again, they don't care about the hypervisor. Since it's unlimited instances, many people just install Windows Server and enable Hyper-V. I think that's a little foolish because you can run a free hypervisor in a mixed Windows/Linux environment and keep some hardware Linux-only (and not pay for a license).
Service provider licensing is changing for Windows Server 2016 to a per-core model, where the license is prices that 8 cores is the same cost as one socket on 2012R2.
Again, licensing is not my bread and butter. Speak to a reseller and they'll keep you straight. In fact, speak to Microsoft - I've always found their licensing people to be very helpful and friendly (presumably because I'm actively engaging with them and trying to make sure we're always compliant).
At the same time, if that VM on your Linux box is a Windows OS, it still needs to be licensed. I don't imagine Microsoft give much of a crap about the small hypervisor deployments, so long as they get their Windows license in there too.
(Run fully licensed Windows server nodes on bare metal, VMware, Xen, KVM, QEMU and Hyper-V - I've covered this one many times!)
I'm becoming hyper-fatigued.
On the plus side, you can buy it piecemeal. But still, I'm coming top the conclusion that I'd rather have a Vive.
That said, my 7-year-old has probably brainwashed me on the Vive. No, it's not on Santa's list...
Okay, so they've binned the headphones socket because it's too fat. But you should put a cover on it.
Couldn't they have made it a *little* thicker, a *little* more durable, and left the bloody headphone socket.
Fucking arses. It's a tool, not a museum piece. <sigh>
No - that's all I have.
For me, minimum permissions also includes a domain-wide Software Restriction Policy which stops users being able to execute any binaries from folders they have access to. So where does Chrome put Pepper Flash? Into the user's profile.
Then the users complain that websites don't work until we set "deny" permissions on their PepperFlash folder. As if all those years of Chrome installing to the user's local profile wasn't infuriating enough.
Pepper Flash couldn't burn fast enough for me.
Can it virtualise Crysis?
Microsoft Exchange service provider licensing is per mailbox, so no huge penalty there for replication.
If they have any sense they'll be using Windows Datacentre which is licensed per CPU socket regardless of number of virtual machines.
If you're hosting an Exchange service you *start* with 2x CAS, 2x Edge and 2x Mailbox servers, and you run them distributed across at least two physical hosts.
It's not hard if you plan it.
Umm, you weren't supposed to use a .local domain. Bad idea. Subdomain of your Internet domain. And I know that everyone did it back in the day - I was one of them using .private everywhere.
Unlike cables made from unicorn-sinew, HDR signalling actually *can* offer a difference in highlights and shadows whereas the cables only really highlight the sunshine reflecting off the snake oil.
But does it have real pot?
Yep. I totally get that. And as a rule I don't bother with blocking adverts. Except when I went to benchmark a DSL line and it hoovered up the bandwidth downloading ads instead.
I'm generally not bothered by adverts unless they pop up and down (Tom's Hardware) or start playing noises. Even been known to click on them when they've been relevant.
Am I close?
So they want us to pay them to *not* do something?
Say, that's a nice web browser. Shame if something were to happen to it...
No, no, a thousand times no, and whomever was suckered into this business model just doesn't live in the same world as the rest of us.
That's a funny way to spell "cock"...
Coincidentally I was speed-testing an ADSL line for a client earlier today. It got an extra 1Mb/sec when I installed AdBlock Plus...
Is it ethical to shove adverts into your speed tester *while the test is being run*?
+1 on VMware. Had to become VCP certified for work by a certain date. No problem - 15 years of experience with various VMware products saw me through. Then, with a week and a half to go they tell me I have to also complete *their* course at £1400 to prove that I know the stuff that they'd just tested me on.
One hour. That's hire long it took to skip through the online modules quickly and then score >95% on the test at the end of *that*. Do you think that maybe I know my stuff?
Daylight robbery. And now I have 6 months to requalify or I lose my cert and have to do the course again. Dicks.
*Precisely* what I was thinking.
I heard that the couple had gone missing on Nevis on the radio, and immediately realised that their chances of survival were slim. This woman did something very stupid and is lucky to have got away with it. Glad she noticed this...