This is where we know its time for the poor old dude to retire from public service. He probably still has an AOL account at home. :)
430 posts • joined 15 Oct 2010
Re: Cool!! I can buy 100 business cards for £5
>>I'm sure its a bit more complex than just having the card
Yep. You have to be part developer, part IT, have reasonable architecture skills, be geared for very dynamic environments, possess heavy duty automation skills, able to translate Devspeak and ITspeak between those two warring sides of the shop, combined with the political chops to tell both Development and IT to GTH and still have them thank you for the privilege. :) I'm sure it changes based on environment, but my sums up my last two DevOPS roles.
Quick way to tell - If someone says they're DevOPS, and Jenkins is missing on the resume, then they probably aren't DevOPS. :) Just having Jenkins doesn't make them DevOPS in and of itself, but its a positive indicator that they lean in the right direction automation wise.
Jenkins is a dessert topping and a floor wax.
I was setting it up for development environments 4 years ago, and then setup a couple more for automated transfers as well as IT automation jobs. It's primarily for continuous integration and devops, but it's good at helping to automate nearly anything, even new user creation in ad to create the account and the other setup details that would be manual steps otherwise. I mostly use it for Linux automation tasks and devops/CI. Makes it easy to setup complex tasks behind the scenes, and then hand it over to tier one support to just click a button. Once you start automating on Jenkins, it doesn't stop. :). It's an awesome general purpose automation tool.
And now I have some servers to patch after testing.....
ah, the good old days. I remember swapping an i8088 cpu out for an NEC v20 in order just to get enough of a performance boost to get the interleave down to 3:1 on my MFM 20MB HD. Reports ran much faster after that... *sigh* Does this mean I need to start yelling "get off my lawn" to all the neighborhood kids?
"OTOH, how much did the people in the pods remember between capture and release ?"
How many fish remember that? Surely there is something in the Shadow Proclamation against a capture/release program of sentients? :)
Reality Distortion Field / Suspension of Belief
Well, the problem is the reality distortion field can only be maintained if the field isn't breached by something so out of character, or out of "universe" that causes your disbelief suspension to cease. Once the Reality Distortion Field collapses, every little loose thread becomes apparent and causes you to keep looking for more. A Military Aircraft that is UNIT's equivalent of "Air Force ONE" without fancy UNIT extraterrestrial countermeasures, armaments and enough parachutes (or escape mechanism) for the crew was one of those, the UNIT unit with Bonnie under London not killing Bonnie and all the Zygons present was another. The UNIT contingent going into the church and being slaughtered instead of just killing the hostiles (who looked like family members) would also be uncharacteristic of UNIT soldiers. Sure regular Army, but UNIT's trained to deal with these sorts of things. All of those things seemed to me to be lazy writing, because had the characters actually done their normal/believable thing in the Whovian Universe , there wouldn't have been a 2 episode arc. It would have been a quick 30 minute done and DONE. Instead we had a complex circuitous route taken to a) get us back to having an Osgood, and b) get us back to having 2 Osgoods.
The Ballmer years was when Product Marketing took over, and well... yeah, that went well... Thats the nicest thing I can say about the "chair throwing" years. You can't lead when Marketing is telling your developers when/how to innovate. And that is when they lost many of their best/brightest. With that said, Nadella's MS actually stands a chance at survival and even to thrive again, but it is sure not going to look anything like the previous versions of MS when he's done.
@Vulch - Moffat has done some awesome things, and I'm quite the fan of his work, but he spent most of his creative energies on the excellent Sherlock (but much of the time writing Sherlock like it was for Matt Smith). He's neglected Doctor Who for some time.
Re: ...Finally, if you're sick and tired of endless coverage of the Ashley Madison scandal....
A real shame too, if only they could have held out a little longer, their sales could have really risen to the occasion. Particularly with all the double entendre snackfood names they had. :)
...Finally, if you're sick and tired of endless coverage of the Ashley Madison scandal....
Dolly Madison bakeries has changed their slogan:
"Life is short, have an eclair"
Re: @Six_Degrees - You mean btrfs, surely
""Even Oracle Linux doesn't come with ZFS as supported standard.""
"Of course not. If it did they wouldn't be able to charge you 6 figure support fees for ZFS on Solaris."
+1 for Oracle and crazy support fees, but in this case, BTRFS is their green field replacement for ZFS. It started off that way before the Sun acquisition, but continued afterwards. Hence ZFS doesn't come as an official option with Oracle Linux as its considered a bit "legacy" on top of the maneuvering needed for licensing compatibility issues... I wish they'd push more resources onto BTRFS and finish off the last 10% of whats needed.
Re: @ Richard_L - Your BTRFS issues used to be mine
Yep, been there. No idea why SuSE put BTRFS as the default when they did (SuSE 11.2), when the tools weren't ready, and they pulled EXT4 support out of the kernel on the same release... Unfortunately, SUSE has been making experimental filesystems default for a while, which is inappropriate for a Enterprise product. (SuSE 10 has ReiserFS as a default...)
Kernel 3.18 mostly fixes your issue along with formatting the filesystem with a 16K leaf/node size which finally became default with the newer tools. The 4K leaf sizes that the SuSE releases cause never ending suffering like yours and reduced performance. Sorry, I'm now off SuSE, so I'm not tracking their Kernel any longer, so no idea if they've backported crap or not. Meanwhile the following will recover the wastage:
btrfs balance start -dusage=55 /mnt/your_btrfs_fs &
This guy has some good BTRFS tips:
So they need an Internal Affairs Dept?
to get a handle on themselves and inside *jobs?
@JLV - actually, given that this appears to be a open barn door security bug, I think he may have been right to disclose it immediately. He probably is NOT the first person to find it, and the other folks (ala govt's, black hats, and criminal orgs) that have found it have either started using it and managed to stay under the radar, or were keeping their powder dry waiting for a good opportunity.
Something to keep in mind - how long did the exploits that allowed for Flame and Stux remain unpatched while they were surreptitiously used by different global spy agencies? Security researchers either didn't find them, or it they did, they were forced to keep quiet on it. From here on out for the white hats, immediate disclosure may actually be the best way to go, since you have to assume you aren't the first to discover it when there are some much better funded grey/black hats looking for this type of paydirt exploit. It also prevents gag orders and any NDA complications if you just disclose it immediately.
Re: Windows only though
@Dr Paul Taylor The rookit code would still be in the BIOS, but without the corresponding rootkit calling code in Microsoft Windows to execute it, it would lay dormant there.
Hmmm, regarding Spectrum sales, wonder if the FTC should get involved and investigate the FCC's allotments? Then that might mean the consumer gets even fewer choices than now... Why does this seem like a Kobyashi Maru scenario?
Re: But you will still need Excel
"I've even seen a hospital board's entire financial system run on Excel."
Umm, they're holding it wrong. :) (part joke, but also true...)
"I assume those docs were not created on LO or OO? "
Correct. These were documentation files that had never seen OO/LO ever. I went out on a limb taking the actions I did, since at the time OO wasn't technically allowed for documentation work where I was... Afterwards the stance lightened up as other folks internally were running into the same problem and using the same solution. As of Office 2010, it still had a problem importing complex documentation from their own DOC format that LO didn't. Haven't been in a position with complex DOC's since 2013 came out to test it, but I'd hope the current MS Word has compatibility with MS Word DOC's by now. :)
Ribbon works fine for the average user, but I keep doing unexpected things and it never adjusts properly for what I'm trying to do that second. So for me, menu/toolbar interface is way faster. Although ribbon did encourage me to learn keyboard shortcuts to bypass it altogether where I could. That kind of efficiency translates well regardless of interface. :)
".. I am convinced that she would not know what an .ODF document was...."
If the document opens up, she probably wouldn't even notice. Most of the end users I've run across don't know what any of this is anymore. They don't seem as knowledgeable as the end users in the 1990's which would've questioned it. *sigh* My wife surely doesn't anymore, she just expects documents to open, but she would've noticed a difference in the 1990's.
Re: What's up DOC?
"No it doesn't, An Open format no more "guarantees" anything will open these documents decades in the future than a proprietary one. "
You've TECHNICALLY got a point. The best kind of point. ;) How 'bout it makes it more likely that the document can be read decades in the future as opposed to a proprietary format where the vendor went out of business years before, or the product was decommissioned after an acquisition, the dog ate the source code, or any number of things.
Re: But you will still need Excel
depends on what you're doing. 90-95% of the population don't use the features that are missing. The feature gap also continues to decline over time. With that said, Excel itself is still missing some finance related functions from Borland Quattro Pro, (which is still my favorite spreadsheet). :) For me, the current Libre still functions adequately for 99% of what I need, but when it doesn't, I'm still dusting off Quattro Pro to handle the rest because Excel is missing features too.
ODF isn't well supported until Office 2013 though. Since SatNad's in charge now, I think MS will likely raise the white flag, but they need to help ODF fill in some feature gaps first, and then go ahead kill off OOXML. Truthfully, them maintaining their OOXML document standards just takes time away from development of the product itself. Nobody cares about ODF/OOXML at the end user level, but they do care about user interface and the application though, which is where MS is actually making their money.
Back when I was doing a bunch of documentation I had DOC compat probs with Word 2007 and 2010. To get many Word 2003 (and below) legacy docs to open in Word 2007+, I've had to open/save them in OpenOffice, (now LibreOffice) to fix the formatting in a way that Microsoft can read its own file...
Re: Old chip
Umm, Opteron 6386 is a new chip. Now the systemboards could be 5 years old, but thats because its a stable platform (which now desperately needs refreshed for PCIe3, DDR4 and such).
Re: New technology - jets
CV6 - Enterprise (Yorktown class) was retired because she was overweight, beat to hell, obsolete compared to an Essex, and a class of ONE after her other 2 classmates and 1 near classmate were sunk (ala an expensive to maintain oddball).
Many of the Essex class were retrofitted from hydraulic catapults to steam (like Lexington), but they still couldn't carry as much in way of ordnance, fuel and planes like a supercarrier of the Forrestal and later classes. In most any other postwar navy, the Essex would have been awesome to have (still would be really, it proved to be a good design). However, in the large US Navy, the Essex were just too small for effective/sustained power projection.
(yeah, nothing to do with Netapp, Naval history is a passion of mine)
Re: unworthy argument for such a worthy topic
The analogy only broke down because CV6 was beat all the hell towards the end of the war, and needed to be decommissioned anyway. The last of the Yorktown class carriers, she was still under Treaty limits for weight. This meant towards the end of the war with all the additional changes made, she was overweight, under protected, and far less desirable than the Essex class carriers which were over-abundant by that point with 3 Midway class ships nearing completion. (Incidentally - all these years later the Essex class is still a decent/balanced design for what is now a small carrier, whereas the Yorktown class preceding it is not.) Perhaps a better analogy would have been the Iowa class Battleships, which didn't get very heavy usage, but were very modern and extremely capable ships left without a role.
was beat all to hell by the end of the war. Not as bad as the Essex class USS Franklin which had a twisted hull, but she'd still paid her dues. She was also the last Yorktown class left, which would have made her ideal for a museum....
Re: Seems like an article set up for bashing NetApp, but...
For NetApp, they need to train their own employees for cluster mode, because they don't know anything other than 7 mode based our experiences with tech support so far, as well as the installer that was sent out for our new one. It was almost enough to put them back on 7 mode so we could get better support from NetApp on a version they no longer "support".
I'm currently plopping up some spare Supermicro and Dell equipment and going hyper-converged via the oVirt(RHEV)/Gluster combination. Definitely a learning curve to it, but the experiment is looking increasingly like its going to work out, which will ultimately lead to less requirements for NetApp in my environment. Its not just NetApp that hasn't been paying attention (to both their current customers and the future), several other old school awesomeness players like VMWare and Cisco haven't kept up either to the oncoming storm.
Re: "NeXT failed"
NeXT inc was acquired by Apple, and then took over Apple, so it was actually quite successful. I agree that BeOS would be a better example.
"Despite having licensees, NeXT failed."
I wouldn't necessarily consider it failed per se, it was acquired by a larger company, and effectively took over that same larger company, which isn't a fail normally. :) NeXT is the very foundation of the current OSX Mac's and the underpinnings of their iThings as well.
@Charles 9 ok, I will cede the point. :) If the patent is sold, but NOT applied, then it should not be enforceable. That would still allow for the assets of a major company whose only assets are patents (like Nortel), to have an orderly liquidation during a bankruptcy.
and since its Friday - here's a beer on me.
or, make the patent only apply to the original holder. They can license all day long, but make it so the patent cannot be sold. In the case of companies like Nortel that went bankrupt, they could choose to keep part of the business alive for patent revenue as part of restructuring, or all the patents would just expire. I'm sure there would be some unintended consequences for that, but at least patent trolls or groups of patent trolls wouldn't be buying patents off the carcasses of failed companies then.
Re: Bet it won't apply
That was my thought as well. MS in particular has been using unknown patents for extortion. If they had declared the patents, then fine, that's their right since they have the patents (even if they're found invalid later). But not declaring them and threatening for a legal shakedown? Sounds to me like they could be prosecuted under RICO if any federal prosecutor wanted to. (hint - they won't)
Put the USPTO on the hook
The current patent system is geared to the lawyers to just mint money. I think the legislation proposed will help, but it doesn't address bogus patents being issued to start with.
They should make all the US claims have to get approved/disapproved by the USPTO before going to court proper. It would be cheaper on all sides that way (except for USPTO). If a patent is invalid, then make sure to dock the employee(s) that approved it. If they get X number of docks, then fire them. Then figure out how to give bonuses for approved patents which are valid. If the patent is validated and the USPTO thinks there is infringement, then let the lawsuits begin in earnest. Right now the courts are getting clogged with crap for months or years that the USPTO should be able to clarify within a week, since they are the ones that approved the patents to begin with...
Rob's comment nailed it...
For your last bit "Don't we all use SSL tunnels for this already?" - for data in flight yes - this is for encrypting data INSIDE the tables while at rest. This seems like a good feature to have integrated straight into the DB engine without having to take an overhead hit of encrypting everything, but maybe not. I'll need to do a lot more research before I come to a conclusion on it.
Re: if the Chattanooga voters want the city to run an ISP
"Commerce among States". Not inside the State. In case anyone has forgotten why that clause is there, the first/original post-independence/confederated United States (under the Articles of Confederation) actually had tariffs between the States (like New Jersey and New York slamming each other with tariffs)... It made commerce near impossible between the "United" States prior to the current v2 Federal United States.
Agreed. CIO's appear to me to be 3 year hires on average. Just long enough to shuffle a lot of tech, switch the teams around, bring in cronies from prior job, pad the resume and then quickly leave before it completely craters. in 5 years? The company would be midway through the next CIO trying to fix the previous CIO's issues who was trying to fix the previous CIO's issues before them, and so forth. :)
@AC - That is already what HP does. This is just for a lower tier.
I worked for a company at one point that oem'd HP servers, which is how I found that out, since first article inspections were at Foxconn plants.
Without the server biz, I think they are about to find it even harder to turn things around. They need to get an advertising budget around their cloud crap, because nobody I'm around knows anything about it. I just get blank stares followed by an immediate "when did IBM get into cloud?" when I mention they have a cloud product.
@fishman Re: Good enough - ship it
"If you waited to get all the obscure bugs out, it would never get released."
Software never releases - it ESCAPES!
(line I've used for a while in final bug review meetings before a software release when evaluating defect severity's)
Re: I miss the old days
">>4.x ... Microsoft abandons its own OS kernel, adopts Linux.
>Choose any common expression of something that has a probability of less than 1 in 100 billion, and you have the chance of that happening. Just being realistic, here."
People don't buy Windows Servers for the kernel specifically, they buy it for the technologies that run on it. Same with Windows desktops. Remember, the kernel portion of Windows (and related OS areas) is a major cost center for them, not a profit center. MS sells applications, development tools, server software, and gui's across servers and desktops, not kernels. :)
I agree that MS wouldn't adopt the Linux kernel (licensing issues), but I do suspect they will adopt BSD and follow in Apple's path, and probably sooner than later. This would NEVER happen with Ballmer, but with Satya Nadella in charge it becomes a real possibility. After having done OEM Windows OS development work I can tell you underpinnings of the OS (ala interactions with several craptons of various hardware) is expensive to develop for and even more expensive to test for. In my case that was with MS already having done the most expensive heavy lifting under what my team was doing. Why not "outsource" the lowest levels which allows Microsoft to then concentrate on the MS technologies that actually make their money - AD, Exchange, SQL, IIS, S!@#epoint, etc?
Re: They shot themselves in the head
You are likely correct, since Lenovo consumer division uses different factories than Lenovo Business (formerly known as IBM's PC division) and they are pretty separate entities like all the various companies of Sony that operate independently. The last time I was dealing with doing first article inspections on OEM'd IBM servers with my previous company the former IBM PC division (Lenovo) was still in the same mfg floor as the IBM servers, but Lenovo consumer was NOT there.
HOWEVER - since it all says Lenovo on the nameplate - it still gives you pause on buying the next bit of kit from them, regardless of if its Lenovo consumer or business. Whether that is a long term pause, or short term will likely be determined by their actions in the next few weeks.
Needs more ....
Re: you have to make your mind about it.
"I have to wonder what would happen if MicroSoft just bowed down, adopted Linux as the OS, and focused on Office for it's profit margin?? Would they gain??"
Well, lets take a similar case. Apple adopted that strategy with BSD for its iDevices and dropped having its own proprietary MacOS. It is now at record profitability partly due to having outsourced the lower (and expensive to maintain) levels of the operating system to the greater open source community (and it does contribute some back to). The bowels of the OS don't generate profitability/value for stockholders, and really doesn't differentiate you like the API's and UI on top of the OS do, so why maintain that crap yourself? Given the current CEO Nadella who is very cloud and post PC era focused, I think MS will follow Apple and convert to BSD underneath to lower their overall development costs.
(and no, I'm not an Apple fan, but credit where credit is due, buying NeXT from Jobs and basing the "NeXTgen" Mac OSX on it was a stroke of genius)
Re: Price of everything, ....
Technically its all just paper and a meaningless figure. But there are some real world impacts because it does end up affecting things such as credit ratings and employee retention however. Both will make it more expensive to do business. (having been rank and file in a major tech company, I can tell you - employees with too many vested/unvested stock options being underwater with no hope of going back above water are much more likely to walk.)
Re: Usual Public Relations Nonsense
Totally agree except for "first-year coding mistakes".
Shouldn't that be "first week coding mistakes"? :)
(Paris Hilton because I suspect not even she would make that mistake.)