Re: Wikipedia is a byword for an unreliable source of information
Try Ten Word Wiki ( http://www.tenwordwiki.com) instead, it's still inaccurate but gets to the point a lot quicker and includes a measure of humour, usually.
111 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Oct 2010
I read it more as a warning against password reuse & repetition than as a result of a direct attack on your own network. Granted, if someone has access to stored hashes on your network you have a problem larger than their ability to decrypt said hashes, more to the point, why would they even bother looking at them if you're the actual target of the attack? However, if one of your users has their work email and their work password as the login for that specialist Russian film archive they're fond of...
"Drone units were advised to stop using the removable drives to prevent another outbreak."
There's something which makes me uneasy about use of the word "advised" in context with military hardware that I can't quite put my finger on. Perhaps if it were changed to "ordered", it would make me feel less uneasy...
So supermarkets know what you (think French vous, not tu) bought and, soon, where you went to buy the stuff they don't stock (yet - but will soon just as quickly as they can drive the price down with their buying power so it's unprofitable for the place you used to buy it to stock it any longer).
I suspect it would likely benefit Tesco/Asda/Morrison/Sainsbury far more than it will benefit the smaller traders... once again we, the consumer, are product not customer.
...somewhere in the region of 42,000 in a lifetime, shall we say? If someone lives until they're 70 and starts at 14 then that's only an average of 2 units a day... did they forget to include Christmas in their study then? Oh... and Scotland.
Pint icon - no need to qualify that really is there?
I've a rather luxurious 4TB, of which almost 50% is in use. Granted very little of thats database, but even so, $8k (USD always seems to equal GBP for hard and software for some reason any way) to 'upgrade' compared with $130 to replace, those performance dividends had better show up long before that flash RAM hits it's lifecycle read/write limit or the beancounters will be calling open season on CIO scalp regardless of the performance advantages.
Advantages Dior small businesses/home users? Not seeing any tbh.
NO! That's what banks and credit cards would like you to believe. In reality it's more like this:
"But it's ok, you've already overpaid by a huge margin just so we can afford insurance (which we provide to ourselves at a HUGE markup) to mitigate the costs of potential litigation ensuing from damages alleged due to our inability to adequately secure your data, with which you have entrusted us. Besides, most of you won't do any more than whine to your mates about it so our exposure is really quite small... at least compared to yours. Yours faithfully, Iain McBanker."
The bank doesn't pay anything... it's customers, collectively, do.
...mine's been almost completely unaffected. It starts, logs in, dials, connects (to a netbook on a separate network but same internet connection) voice/video.
It did crash on the netbook on first start, but an immediate restart works fine and has ever since.
Running Ubuntu 10.04 32bit Desktop/Skype (Beta) Version 2.2.0.25 on this and Ubuntu 10.10 32bit Desktop/Skype (Beta) 2.2.0.25 on the netbook.
I should coco and rightly so! Data protection act 1998 anyone?
The guidelines here are useful; http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/security_measures.aspx ; in particular this little gem:
# Encrypt any personal information held electronically that would cause damage or distress if it were lost or stolen.
So a plain text authkey which doesn't expire for a fortnight but which is, potentially, "safeguarding" some pretty personal information, was a complete joke. Glad they fixed it... err... they really have fixed it though right?