"The Frenches on the other hand all drive badly"
Yeah, come on! they don't even keep driving on the left side of the road!
853 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Oct 2010
" In the cloud-cuckoo-land of Nazi Germany, however, any and every idea - that usually had no chance of doing anything other than diverting German resources from actual good designs such as the early Heinkel jets - was followed with gusto."
Nope, this was for another reason. Research on artillery systems was prohibited by the treaty of Versailles, so the german had to find alternative systems. Rocket systems for example.
"Some day in the near future you'll have a Sailor controlling an Air Force unit's unmanned system, or an Airman sitting at a desk controlling a naval unmanned system or a Marine controlling an Army platform"
or so they'll think!
Mine is the one with the master remote control in the pocket.
Minecraft can even be played without any account : If the login fail, the alertbox gives an option to "play offline".
Despite the name, you can still play online, but with a lot of drawbacks (anonymous character, only one per server)
Still a good way to invite a friend for a quick tour of your buildings...
Heh... You know, it's not the worse portfolio title in the current french government...
It is a subdivision of the ministry of industry, now renamed "Ministere du redressement productif".
I can't even figure out how to translate the thing. Google gives a somewhat lacking "Ministry of productive recovery".
L'objet immobile est sans aucun doute l'administration française. Le terme peut également s'appliquer au cerveaux des politiciens français.
Il semble qu'il n'y ait pas tant de différences que cela d'un coté de la Manche ou de l'autre...
-----------------------------------------------------
The immovable object is without any doubt French administration. The term can also apply to french politicians' brains.
Seems like there's not that many differences between both sides of the Channel.
(Congrats on your imitation of the french accent btw, it's spot on. I blame lack of practice in my case. What about your french, dear anonymous fellow?)
Yes, they're very very sorry that this was "slipped" by their automated detection.
The best course of action would be for apps makers to rely on widely recognised advertising network, like... mmmh... Google AdWords?
Do no evil (but let others' evil "slip" if it's financially interesting)
A bit erroneous...
It's not $8m/year, but $8m total losses in 2008 (calculated by "a libertarian think tank", so probably overestimated - but let's not start on it).
Here is the link to their study : http://reason.org/files/0ed1e38947a206981804b66dfd19b9f7.pdf
You will notice that they count both "Net operating and nonoperating expenses".
According to the first definition found in google (I like irony) : "Non-operating expenses may take a variety of forms. The most common type relate to interest charges or other costs of borrowing."
Soooo... Bond repayment included. The one the city will still have to repay.
If the losses minus the cost of the bonds are less than the operating profits, then this is not that a good deal for Provo as :
- They'll still have to repay the bond.
- They lose the asset unless Google bail out.
- Google won't have the burden of debt, will get profits from the start without even doing anything.
- Google won't bail out. Provo won't get the network back.
- Provo won't get some operating profits to offset the bond repayment.
- Citizens of provo will be even more burdened by taxes than if the city kept the network...
If operating losses are greater than the operating profit, then getting rid of the thing was indeed the right move.
Yes, I heard about the sunken cost fallacy, thank you. I also heard about agendas and the art of manipulation...
(DISCLAIMER : Building such a network in the first place was a f***'up. Everyone can agree with it. I wonder where the gravy went...)
Indeed, and the fact they still existed could have meant some time in the gulag for Nikolai Kuznetsov and his engineers, because orders were given to scrap everything related to the failure of the lunar launchers...
Watched and interesting documentary on this story : http://youtu.be/rEX0IHIn0_4
BTW, there's rumor of restart of production of this unique engine.
No, no... this was only a thermal runaway leading to cell venting, which is a protective feature of the battery... Airplane systems functioned as intended!
(Reference to http://787updates.newairplane.com/Boeing787Updates/media/Boeing787Updates/Certification/Webcast/Boeing-787-solution-presentation-English.pdf - As usual, the PR dept. gets far better funding than the engineering dept.)
"How about they use a fusion reactor to make the electricity to accelerate the gas?"
You'll need to ignite the pellet, then convert the heatand/or kinetic energy of the reaction to 'leccy, then convert back the leccy to kinetic energy. quite unefficient.
A NERVA-like configuration would be a bit simpler and more efficient : you ignite the pellet, then heat the gas directly. And it might retain your "environment friendly" point.
The proposed configuration is the more direct and efficient approach.
Simple : the acceleration of a gas via electric means can have a theorical best of 100% conversion rate from electric energy to kinetic energy. You use 1kJ of electricity to get 1kJ of kinetic energy.
Of course, this is assuming a lot of physical improbability like zero losses...
Using electricity to trigger the fusion of a pellet will consume both the electricity (not much) and the nuclear energy stored in the pellet (a lot more). The same kJ of electricity will generate several dozens or hundreds of kJ of kinetic energy (A physicist would be far better than poor me to compute the actual value... Feel free to correct me in this case)
Think of the 'leccy as the few pounds of conventional explosives needed to trigger a several kilotons atomic bomb.
"It's not fission, and the elements and materials needed -hydrogen isotopes and lithium- are quite inert and inoffensive"
Unfortunately, fusion is also included in the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, and you strangely forgot the point of the fusion products - which may not be as inoffensive as the base materials.
The PNTB is mostly obsolete however, and the latter can be solved by not using this engine in the atmosphere (the minimal "safe" altitude should be defined, the conventional limit of space is a bit too close to the ground...)
All in all it's indeed an evolution of the nuclear pulse engine of Orion's fame
If there's no such thing as 'race', racism does not exist.
Not at all.
Shhhh...
*close eyes*
Those who are not racist may accept that 'races' exists, but :
- They also knows that, due to the long history of migrations, settlings, conflicts and rapes (good ol' days) there's no such thing as a 'pure race'
- They also knows what the concept of "racial purity" brought...
- They also acknowledge that the people they're talking to may have european/african/east asian/indian/plutonian* ancestry, but they simply *DON'T CARE* and talk to them as an individual. Being overcautious not to hurt "you people" seems actually quite racist to me...
* Well, i'm not racist, but those plutonian... They're not born on a real planet y'know...
Not... Really.
Propaganda is also used to demonize/ridiculize the opposing side and to enhance your own side image (by passing as a bunch of funny fellows for example).
ADDENDUM : Due to the overload of propaganda from both side (the famous Syrian Human Rights Committee is rumored to be nothing more than a propaganda office of the opposition), I'ld prefer NOT starting a flame war on this stuff.
"Someone thought that way in safety-critical code? Please reassure me it was just the in-flight entertainment system."
Erm... It was in DO-178B A-level software, so yes, it was safety-critical code.
The original bug report was about a non-disappearing warning (they usually have a 5 second timeout, but this one was stuck on the screen)