Here we go again...

First off, the nutters who carried out the Woolwich attack are just that: barking mad, eye-rolling, loony, nutters - they're not terrorists.

Secondly: when will the anal control freaks who we elect to manage our society realise that total safety is not possible. Would the Snoopers Charter detect nutters who send each other letters in the post? No? Then the mail delivery people must be required to open every letter and record who it was from and who is was delivered to (but not the content, obviously). And what about nutters who actually talk to each other face-to-face? Better require everyone to register everyone they meet during the day then? Too complicated - how about everyone just wears a GPS enabled tracking device 24/7 - that should make everyone totally safe. Won't it?

For the hundreds of millions that would be spent enabling the Snopers Charter on the off-chance it might save a couple of lives now and again, why not spend the same money on the NHS, or improved roads or any of a dozen other things that would save hundreds of lives every year? Or is the life of a poor sick child worth less than that of anyone else?

</rant>

Brilliant idea!

Give access to all the UK criminal records to underpaid Indian developers

What could possibly go wrong?

Great idea

but only if it's compulsory that the stuff be served at all board meetings of the company making the stuff, and at all official government functions (and no-one is allowed to leave the table until they've cleared their plates).

Why should the benefits be restricted to the poor?

Do they put these loopholes in deliberately?

‘persons who, for the purpose of promoting the ... well-being of children in England are...providing information... and who require individual pupil information for the purpose

Dear Mr Gove,

Please give me the individual details of every pupil in England so that I can provide them each with information about the importance to their physical and mental well-being of a proper breakfast every morning, a breakfast such as the excellent "Happy Breakfast" of a brunch McMuffin and coke that my company offers at very reasonable prices.

Yours etc

R. McDonald

Pardon my cynicism but...

How does providing a large office space with lots of power points and ethernet sockets actually "create 6500 jobs"?

Surely the jobs will be created (if they are) by businesses who use the space which otherwise would not have been established due to their inability to find office space with working power points. And I'm sure it's impossible to find office space anywhere in the UK these days...

Hmmm....I smell business opportunities

Given how keen our government are to support small businesses so that we can save for our pensions etc, would someone (not me you underrstand) be able to get a bank loan and government export guarantees to buy a container-load of AK47s in the Niger Delta and ship them to Mexico? Even with the necessary bribes and employment of middlemen it looks like there could be a healthy profit there for someone.

Or perhaps the City chums of our beloved leader have already got the market sewn up...

millionfold reduction in the global herd?

If there's a millionfold reduction in the global herd, then that leaves about 1500 cattle on the planet, all of them presumably in zoos. Where will we get our milk and cheese, as the alternatives are very niche? Goat's milk and soya milk don't work in coffee, some sheep and goat cheeses are okay, but milking them takes ages. Sheep's milk icecream is nice, but is never going mass-market.

Billionfold reduction would mean extinction....

Oh yes?

It is more accurately an indication that within that country exist a large number of vulnerable machines and perhaps inadequate law enforcement or industry regulation

"inadequate law enforcement" - in China? Yeah, riiiiight........

Bad idea and overkill

Paasswords have weaknesses, obviously, although a sensible password strategy removes most of the problems. But this is overkill, as it means that there is a total loss of anonymity - instead of using a userid and password known to me (e.g. theresamay419@gmail.com and p/w n0T_reallY) I'd have to use biometrics to access every website? Every on-line activity linked back to a known, certified individual? A Home Secretary's (and Zuck's) wet dream!

For important accounts (online banking, email etc) some sort of enhanced validation is needed, but two-factor is pretty darn effective, and still doesn't require access to be linked to a specific individual.

Count me out

but what about....

those employees who don't want a smartphone/fondleslab, or only want a simple one that can't handle the corporate requirements, or who don't want to clutter up their phone with corporate applications and data etc.

If the company says you need a gadget then let the company pay for it - no need to buy, just rent on contract and then if they leave they get the phone back and give it to the next one in line.

"Jackal" eat your heart out.

If they develop these it's only a matter of time before the 'bad' guys get hold of some (given that it's the USA they'll probably have a constitutional right to buy them on Amazon) - and that means there's not a politician in the world will be safe. Has Obama authorised this project?

"The Last One"

Anyone else remember "The Last One" (circa early 80s) - A BASIC code generator that meant you'd never need to write another line of code again? And all the various 4GLs and CASE tools that came afterwards? And here we are, still churning out the code....plus ça change...

Another dodgy practice...

I use AdblockPlus (of course) but I can't seem to turn off the block of 3 sponsored links that appears (eventually) at the top of a google results page. The real pain is that it takes several seconds for the ads to appear after the main results have rendered, so I frequently end up trying to click the top result and suddenly ending up clicking the top sponsored link as it materialises under my mouse pointer. This is bad news for the rubbish sites that advertise at the top, as they end up paying for dud clicks.

Anyone know how to hide that block of ads?

It's a test of employability all right....

The employability of the people responsible for authorising the use of this farce.

If they are full-time civil servants they should be immediately suspended pending disciplinary action, which should result in their dismissal or transfer to being a traffic warden on Rockall. If they are politicians then they should be simply sacked and their offences made very, very public.

A good starting point for activists

a) Don't use a smartphone

b) If you need a smartphone, keep it plain vanilla and never downlaod any extra apps

c) Google to update the whole Andoid setup so that it's possible to refuse apps permissions on a permission-by-permission basis rather than all or nothing as at present. At the moment I'm sure people get bored with the long, long list and just hit OK anyway.

One program isn't a network

I'm sure Netflix is a wonderful source of entertainment, but I think they need to go a lot further than spending $100m on a single drama series before they count as an 'internet tv network'. Out of interest, how much does the Beeb spend on commissioning original drama each year?

I'm not convinced

I can see where you're coming from, but surely the tubes are still an issue? If you are generating petabytes of data you really need to store it close to where it is being created and used. So cloud storage is fine if you're also generating your data in the cloud, but not so good if you're generating it on your premises and you need a 2 foot wide fibre channel all the way from you to the cloud to transfer the stuff.

Okay, very big organisations can afford very big tubes, but they willl have to be very very big to support petabytes. And the same argument works at all levels - for a home or small business user with bog standard ADSL and 480kb upload cloud backup really isn't much use if you need to upload a few gig a day. Ditto for businesses.

I don't think the market for large on-site storage is going to completely disappear for a while.

Crap argument

Small businesses also employ people, spend money locally, help other businesses through providing them with the goods and services to develop, and their customers pay VAT BUT the the UK registered SMEs also pay 20% of their profits in Corporation tax, and generally don't do weird double Irish sandwiches with Spanish mayo (or whatever the latest trick is) to wriggle out of it.

The system should be simple: Gross income - legitimate expenses = profit, on which the company pays tax. The problem is the Government tie themselves in knots to come up with ways to make sure their chums can use all sorts of dodgy tricks to class everything as 'legit' expenses.

A $1.04bn case was brought against Sony...

They're asking for $1.04 BEELYON compensation for being locked out of their games for a few weeks? Living in the world of games seems to have made them totally lose touch with the real world and the true value of money. Next time they go into their corner shop for a pint of milk I hope the owner charges them $18.7 million!

Combine the two?

Satnav for use on a treadmill? At least it's unlikely to direct the user over a cliff or the wrong way down a one-way street.

Are biofuels Europe's sh*ttiest idea ever?

Probably not - the EU has come up with an awful lot of bad and expensive ideas over the years (anyone remember the Euro?)

In this case, it's the classic problem - fundamentally sound principle, which manages to get completely turned around by the time the eurocrats, politicians and vested interests have finished with it.

*IF* biofuels are produced by processing existing agricultural waste (and a lot of interesting research is being done on how the woody leftovers can be efficiently processed), by re-processing food waste(chip fat) or by growing interesting new crops on land that cannot be effectively used for other food production then it's an excellent idea - carbon neutral and using resources which would otherwise be wasted.

Sadly some greedy sods decided that the best use of tasty and nourishing food crops is to make bio-diesel. Where do these people come from?

Another dodgy survey?

Surely it's only worth asking people who are about to get a new phone whether they're considering buying a particular model, rather than several thousand assorted Apple owners, some of whom presumably have only had their devices for a few months.

I mean, I assume most sensible people keep a phone for three, four, five years before changing, and then they look around to decide what is best for them from the phones available at the time.

Don't they? Or am I unusual?

Interesting approach

Instead it will make available “shopping and payment records” from its e-commerce sites to help check customer solvency.

Data Protection - we've heard of it!

But they weren't in Welsh (at least on the Kindle)

Seems Amazon are refusing to allow Welsh publishers to sell Welsh books on the Kindle (although they allow Basque and Catalan) - they've got up a petition about it (www.deisebelyfrau.org) which is getting quite a lot of twitbook attention (and is now up to over 2000 signatures in a couple of days)

I remember streetmap...

They provided free maps for websites.

Google provide better ones.

I believe there used to be a number of British companies that were market leaders in cart wheels and coach lamps.

But, but, but...all payment involves the payee in costs

At least as far as business transactions are involved:

If you pay by credit card, they pay a credit card fee.

If you pay by cheque they (almost certainly) pay a cheque processing fee - and have to fill out payin slips etc. which takes time.

If you pay by cash, they have to sort the cash, take it down to the bank, stand in line and (quite possibly) have to pay a fee for depositing it

If you pay by debit card, they pay a small fee.

If you barter for a dozen eggs they have to cook the eggs.

They can't charge extra for cash payments, so why can they charge extra for debit card payments? Simple answer, if someone starts getting stroppy and demanding extra fees then pay in £1 coins!

Errrrrrgh...

my brain hurts...

Fingers crossed...

Granted that the norks are crazy as a bag of frogs, I'm still not sure about the bit about 'the Nork Army could do a lot of damage' - it's probably true that they could if they were given free rein, but realistically if they do start getting seriously aggressive and violent what would the Merkins do? Just sit back, or perhaps drop a few little bombs to try and calm them down, or do they decide they can't take any risks with a barking mad nutter with nuclear bombs and missiles? If the latter then the sensible thing is to plaster every possible military or politically important site in N Korea with everything they have short of nuclear - cutting off the head of the army may well rather limit their ability to act further. Proportionate response is rather inappropriate if the loony you are responding to has nukes.

RIP Nork if they do kick off.