Re: Can I suggest..
With the phrase "journey to the cloud" meriting a full -1.0.
855 posts • joined 4 Jun 2007
With the phrase "journey to the cloud" meriting a full -1.0.
AndrueC, meet BIG DUMB GUY 555. He thinks his shtick is funny. So far, he's wrong.
"Read more on my blog"
How about . . . no.
Simple, you just split the atoms.
You, on the other hand, are my *least* favorite troll on the site.
I have installed custom firmware on my home router, so it now supports IPv6, but my DSL modem does not, so I would presumably have to tunnel IPv6 through an IPv4 connection, and I'm not sure there's even any point to that. I suppose I'll have to give it another go-round.
On the plus side, my printer's NIC died, so I no longer have to worry about IPv4 for that, clearing me to go IPv6 throughout the LAN.
I believe the tone of the review may have had something to do with it. You'll have noted that El Reg often uses rhetorical devices like sarcasm and irony, the intent of which is frequently lost on Jobsian cultists, resulting in Aggravated Butthurt in the First Degree, from which Apple has clearly not recovered.
I'm excessively literal-minded, so I am unable to make up a memorable answer to any of these questions without having a nervous breakdown.
You are my very favorite troll on the whole site, not least because there are so many people who seem to miss what you're doing and thus get their Finnish panties in a wad. Normally I'm not in favor of trolling, but yours is just subtle enough that most people seem to miss it.
Sounds better than sending intra-office email, that's for sure.
More like "Engineer Duh," amirite?
I await the many comments on this article which further demonstrate why there are so few women in IT.
I just used both Bing and Google to look up two search phrases:
Bing gives crap results
Google gives crap results
The results are quite different, actually. Which one provides more *relevant* results depends on what you're looking for, I guess. Interestingly, this very article is sixth in Google rankings but does not appear at all on the first page of Bing results. What that means, I have no idea.
My god, you're right! No one ever talks about that stuff! Someone should be alerted, and Something Should Be Done! Maybe someone could form an organic food movement and press for the categorization and labeling of foods accordingly.
Everyone has been telling me how you need to focus on more than just the pixel count. Why don't they just have one of the ISS astronauts take a few pictures with an iPhone?
Oh dear, I see you've misspelled "Apple is still smarting from El Reg's initial mockery, giving El Reg no reason not to continue sticking the boot in."
Good, good, now reeeeeel them in . . .
"These polls are highly skewed by what kind of viewer responds."
The hell you say.
China != Asia.
Yo dawg, I heard you like phones, so I put a phone on your phone, so you can phone while you phone.
Lighten up, Francis.
I would point out that you are referring to the Republic of Texas, not the USA. We take no responsibility for those yahoos.
Apple say, "Sell via us, and you can set any price you like, as long as we get 30% and you sell no cheaper through any other outlet."
Publishers respond, "So, we can set our price at whatever we like, and we can use our deal with Apple as an excuse not to lower it for anyone? Done!"
Amazon: "Hey, what happened to our volume discount?"
Publishers: "You know, it's a real bummer, but we signed this deal with Apple, so we can't offer you lower prices anymore."
Amazon: "That's really going to cut into our sales of both ebooks and ebook readers."
Publishers: "Suck it, Amazon. Suck it long and suck it hard."
Ironically, if the publishers had just negotiated harder with Amazon in the first place, they wouldn't be in this situation.
Two people (so far) have missed the subtle irony in your post.
Hell, it's 6:00 AM somewhere.
Welcome to The Register. Here's your hanky.
"I have literally no idea why anybody would want to use Facebook, ever.
That really should be an end to the matter. Off you go now."
Ah, it's the ever-popular geek fallacy of generalizing from one's own needs and desires. You prefer not to use Facebook, so everyone who uses it is an idiot. I'm sure that argument is very persuasive in real life.
You want to know how I know you didn't read the article?
"Touched by his noodly appendage" would also be pretty secure. RAmen.
"Please remain where you are. An angry mob will be around shortly to stone you to death."
Quite right. Why, I remember my time in the gulags of Mountain View like it was yesterday: being force-fed energy drinks until my bladder ached and my eyes watered, geeks with neck-beards shrieking at me to "Kiss the penguin," and Sergei Brin himself screaming "BOOM! HEADSHOT!" at me endlessly and dipping his hideous, misshapen scrotum onto my forehead.
No, wait, none of that ever happened.
Get a grip, or at least a sense of perspective.
When I worked at Be, we had an employee-submitted list of failed slogans for BeOS. The two memorable ones which are apropos of Google+ were:
"BeOS: It sucks less than you might think."
Followed by (as the fate of the company became increasingly apparent):
"It doesn't suck less enough."
G+ definitely sucks less than you might think (far less than, for example, Facebook), just as BeOS sucked less than Windows or MacOS, but it doesn't suck less enough for people to make the move.
Meeeeeemories . . .
In fairness to Tzael, it was possible to disable Metro in the Developer Preview with a registry hack, which has now been disabled, so s/he may be operating on outdated information.
I can only assume that the "Making Of" video is non-stop footage of a bunch of geeks sitting in front of their computers coding away. That should make for some fun viewing at parties: watch your guests suddenly remember important dental or proctology appointments!
If only there were some large island nearby that had historically been used to exile criminals, perhaps Mr. Dotcom could be sent there for life and the US could be spared the effort of extradition.
WHAT?! Since when?
The feigned ignorance and implied superiority of "what's a . . . ?" decidedly lose their punch these days, as it really implies you are so profoundly stupid and lazy that you can't type it into a search engine.
For example: http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=cio
No, they mean the Internet. You see, back in the Dawn of Time . . . no, you know what, go read a book, or even a Wikipedia article. Here's a hint, though: look up ARPAnet.
I was going to downvote you until your last sentence. Then I downvoted you anyway.
I just a whole galaxy. The whole thing!
Here's a question for the ages: is there such a thing as an anonymous sock puppet?
In point of fact, this is not a case of bureaucrats interfering unnecessarily. This is a case of bureaucrats interfering exactly as they're supposed to, in order to prevent calamity and mayhem.
. . . that's "made love."
This is all just so you can run Lotus Notes at speeds greater than a crawl.
It was reported some time ago in a newspaper editorial that virtually every member of Congress listed "The Sound of Music" as his/her favorite movie. The commenter went on to note that is was a sad state of affairs that either this was an accurate survey or that the members of Congress thought that's what the electorate wanted to hear.
That said, it would have been awesome if there had been some tracks from $MyFavoriteIndieBandBeforeTheyTotallySoldOutAndWentMainstream.
Cue the "Western governments are no better" comments in . . . dammit, too late.
Write once, run anywhere . . . no wait, rewrite from the ground up for new platform.
In truth, I also have a foot in both worlds (multiple, actually, since I do a lot more than Windows, including both Linux and Unix), but I knew that there would be tiresome, predictable basement-dwelling Linux fanboy trollery afoot, so I decided to get in a preemptive strike.