Perhaps
if she had hosted it on TVAlways it might have had more success
428 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Sep 2010
innanigans that goes on in Board Rooms when they ask why should they spend money on IT Security - it doesn't provide any income.
Yeah, but it stops losses - as long as you have defence in depth. And for that these days should be starting outside your front door.
Oh and how about some regular deep dive helath checks?
When will VPs, CEO etc realise that Security costs - a bit like insurance. You hope you will never need it, resent the cost because you don't use it..... but round that corner
*infiltrating US university computers first and then routing their attacks through them*
Thought the US institutions would have had their networks locked down - what do they pay their IT Dept to do?
* Malware was installed on The Times' computers to open a backdoor for the attackers to remotely control the compromised machines,*
What and how?
A bit light on information and much on sensationalism. Daily Fail material
'There is also a bit more cloud in Office 2013, which hooks into SkyDrive so users are steered towards cloud storage. The advantage is that documents will be available across all devices.'
Steered......as in default and has to be changed by the user (and how many PICNICs have you come across!)
Yeah, great, wonderful........until something (insert disaster of your choice) happens to your Interweb connection or you want to retrieve a doc on the move and there's no signal for for dongle (and there are places in the UK where that happens) or you don't have enough credit left on your download.
causes limited uses - particularly in the Corporate arena.
HDDs can be encrypted and locked down. Great, so there is potential for use in Public Sector.
Tablets? Well to some extent yes. But you cannot lock down SD cards securely - and they are more likely to be lost than USB flash drives. And use of WiFi.....unless fed through a VPN I'd rather have it disabled.....which is damn near impossible on the iPad (yup 3G is ok if using the fruity provider).
So although there are clammerings from the masses for new shiney toys, for anything that is being used out of an office I'll stick to a laptop thanks.
Until matters improve.
This may be the means of finally eliminating, or at least reducing, costly bills incurred by parents when their offspring go over their web download limits by watching drivel on YouTube over and over (et al) again.
I say this as one whose offspring are no longer my responsibility financially (at last!!!!) but i have to listen to others at work who go through this.
How on earth are these guys going to ensure that the person connected to the data is the correct person basing it on name, DoB and address? Son/daughter named after father/mother at same address? Young children already getting voting papers? What about people already signed up for services - are they expected to re-register or will they be migrated over (heaven help us there too!).
Oh and not to forget coporate users - will these be linked to a company name or an entity within the company. Oh and agents. mustn't forget about them. See they haven't even been brought into the equation yet.
And notice the lack of any Bank names who typically deal with customers electronically except.....PayPal?! Remember this is intended as an assured identity sufficient to securely link an online identity with a Government service?!
And who will foot the bill if there is a case of an 'unauthorised' person/company gaininig access to a users account and getting benefits etc fruadulently - let alone get access to a load of personal data!
Whoever is guiding the Cabinet Office on this is really out on a limb!
And really biometrics are only as good as the metric exists. Unfortunately accidents do happen and limbs/body parts do get damaged/lost.
Passwords are something that YOU control fully, you can even (roll of drums for innovation) change them if you think they've been compromised. You can't do that with biometrics - and there are reports that fingerprint scanners are now being compromised.
Really , really suprised that if this guy was *a star programmer* that he didn't realise that security audits of logins would take place after making VPN/work at home available! Standard security practice - check up where your workers are logging in from - home network or offsite. Tsh!
You would have thought that with John Suffolk now Global Head of Cyber Security at Huawei that such suspicion would begin to evaporate. Particularly after such an illustrious career:
http://cn.linkedin.com/pub/john-suffolk/0/b72/b21?trk=pub-pbmap
Then again....
Odd you mention Nexus..........as the BBC says 'The code will initially be released as a file which can be installed on Samsung's Galaxy Nexus phone, replacing Android'.
Are El Reg staff still suffering the joys of the New Year with their news of 'The company did not say which device makers or carriers it has partnered with to date, nor which global markets it will try to crack first.'