225 posts • joined 29 Aug 2010
I thought the business case was obvious?
If you don't have your own man-rated rocket then you're committing to being dependant on buying rides on the rockets of a government you're not exactly on good terms with. If you can't get to space on your own then the Russians effectively become the gatekeepers to the ISS, and do you really think Putn would not stoop to using that fact to his own advantage?
Sounds right up Orlowski's alley
I'm sure everyone else who doesn't work for Big Content or their legal attack dogs will be appalled though.
Good to know
So patents only apply in the country where they're taken out.
Good to know, means I can ignore all US patents with impunity. I'm off to build a One Click implementation!
Just listenin' to the Space Duck
Such a majestic creature.
Mine's the one with the Team Fourstar logo on the back.
So rummaging through a science lab junk drawer is probably a really bad idea.
Allen key, different allen key, weird flange-thing with a screw in one end that nobody knows it's for, some crusty old AA batteries, vial of disease that could end all life on Earth, tube of superglue welded to the side of the draw, ... used tea bag? Eww, what'd that doing in here?
What about Big Fat Doodoo Head? Is that still okay?
Soon? Fairly sure that's already happening.
Re: More official advice completely divorced from reality
@ac If by "Better" you mean "Less likely to kill me" then guilty as charged, I will spend more for the better one.
I find it very hard to believe that a mains powered charger that sells for 3 quid and is of a form factor compatible to the miniaturised USB chargers that the likes of Apple, Samsung, et al pack in with their products is going to be remotely safe. Maybe they really actually are that safe, but I also feel that my life is worth more than the hypothetical £27 difference between them. I'd rather be a sucker than a corpse.
Oh, and for the record, the actual cost of an Apple iPhone charger is £15, not 30 so you might even be able to afford two! http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MD812B/C/apple-usb-power-adapter?fnode=3c
If you really dislike apple so much there are plenty of other reputable companies that will sell you a charger for a bit more than three quid that probably won't kill you either.
Re: More official advice completely divorced from reality
That's just that though, they haven't.
Manufacturer A built their device to at least meet (and probably slightly exceed) international electrical safety standards designed to keep people from being killed by the device. They then paid to have samples tested to destruction to earn the right to put the safety certification logo on the case. They'll also pull random samples out of batches during manufacture and test those too to mitigate the risk of a bad batch of parts rendering the certification moot.
Manufacturer B is just concerned with making a profit and isn't concerned about the odd corpse here or there. They'll buy the absolute cheapest components they can get, have them assembled in the cheapest way possible, put them in the cheapest case possible and just slap a load of fake safety logos on them. The charger from manufacturer B is probably at best 10 times more likely to kill you and/or burn your house down because it was manufactured by people who just don't give a shit and just want your money.
All that risk for a saving of £27? Is your life really worth so little? If you can afford a couple hundred quid for a phone/laptop/whatever then you can afford 30 for a new charger. Or just try not to break the charger that came with it in the first place, there's an idea. I actually have a surplus of Apple chargers because the ones I've owned still work fine after years of proper use so I never need to unpack the one that come with the new phone.
Re: I need to get this to my client right away.
It's probably a bit of an exageration (but given my own experience of Adobe software not a big one).
What's not FUD is that if Adobe's cloud dies, so does EVERYBODY'S copy of the software. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/05/outage-of-adobe-creative-cloud-more-than-a-day-old-locks-out-app-users/
Please state the nature of the medical emergency.
Things to put on a highway sign
* "I know what you did"
* "If you're going on holiday here, I'd turn around now. It's shit"
* "If you're driving an Audi I hope you die in a fireball of twisted metal (and you probably will, learn to sodding drive!)"
And my personal favourite:
* "Did you leave the gas on?"
Re: Expensive & pointless
That title applies just as well to football as it does to the tellies.
If there's a hook in the software to get a decrypted stream from a DRM module, then how hard would it be to write a plugin that proxys the hook in order to save the encrypted stream to a file as it's being played back?
Unless the entire browser is closed-source and digitally signed there's no way of really stopping people circumventing any DRM scheme you put in place. As an earlier commenter suggested, Mozilla's plan is probably to just implement what Big Content want and act surprised when it doesn't work.
Also, Stallman needs to learn the meaning of the word pragmatism.
Was it the first of May?
Because according to that Jonathan Coulton song it's fine.
What to call element 117?
That's not going to happen, somebody's bound to have a patent on "method for suspending a legal professional from a supporting structure at the intersection of two or more transit conduits".
(AOL voice): You've got cancer!
But I thought that if you wanted the best workers you had to pay the best rates, plus extravagant bonuses, and that you won't attract the best talant, who will just take their experience elsewhere otherwise? That's what they said about senior executive pay, after all.
When I first got my SuperHub I had a default password for the device admin webapp. First thing I did was change it. When I needed tech support a couple of hours later (turned out the wiring was dodgy and had been marginable but acceptable to the old modem, but not for the superhub) the first thing they did was ask me to change the password back to default.
After that I just used the superhub in passive move with the wifi turned off and the device hooked up to an external router. If they require you to have the default password for tech support then they obviously can't be depended on for decent security.
Re: Limit climate change?
Yeah, I think you might just have failed to spot my sarcasm.
Lewis is constantly posting articles about how climate change isn't happening, so it seems odd that he's start posting articles about ways to limit the impact of something he says isn't happening.
Limit climate change?
But climate change isn't happening. You've posted about a thousand articles saying so.
Good, fast, cheap
Most of us of an engineering bent know the old addage "Good, fast, cheap: pick two", yet we still always cave when our managers almost invariable select "fast and cheap".
Software rot is a business expense
Nobody seems to take the fact that software isn't like traditional machinery, it needs to be constantly evolved and updated. Of course machinery needs maintainence (and eventual replacement) too, but typically of the "oil this, replace that worn out part" sort.
Businesses usually take the limited life of machinery into account, but not the limited life of software. That's an attitude that needs to change, there needs to be plans in place to keep software up to date and if necessary ported to new platforms, otherwise this is the exact situation you'll end up with.
And if those two both decide to act in the same manner and refuse to provide the service the consumer wants?
2 choices doesn't qualify as healthy competition.
Re: How is this an invention?
In America, everything is an invention. Shitting yourself is probably patentable.
The most obvious thing they could do right now is make it an offence to threaten the customers of an alleged patent infringer with lawsuits. That kind of behaviour is simply unacceptable. You should not need to factor in the risk of potentially getting sued for patent infringement into your decision whether or not to buy a god damned photocopier.
Re: The law is not the answer
How can somebody who writes such cynical claptrap be so naive? Even if you technically have legal recourse against the DM for publishing your photos and/or making scurrilous accusations against you, by the time the legal system has ground into action the damage has already been done.
Suppose the DM publishes your photograph in an article about suspected paedophiles, naturally you're outraged and take them to court. As they have no proof to back up their claims and because they violated your privacy unfairly you prevail in court and possibly win a juicy payout that more or less covers your court costs.
However, the damage done to your reputation is permanent. The news article will still exist somewhere, and it will still insinuate in writing that you're a paedophile with your photo attached. While the paper will probably also be forced to publish a retraction and an apology, they never exactly go out of their way to call much attention to them. You'll get some tiny correction printed in tiny print in the hopes nobody notices it, and nobody probably will.
Meanwhile, the thought implanted in the public mind will linger in some corners and you'll probably never escape it. There's no legal way (or indeed physical way that I'm aware of) to erase the population's memory.
Re: A Clash of Personalities
Team Rocket blast off at the speed of light.
Surrender now or prepare to fight.
I think the conviction should stand.
Hear me out here! It's not because I think gay people should be punished for being gay. I have two reasons for thinking it should stand.
1) As others have pointed out, once you start pardoning people who were punished by an unjust lawwhere do you stop? Thousands of people were persicuted under the same laws, do they all get pardons now? Or are you only entitled to one if your supporters kick up a fuss? It's got to be everyone or no-one, anything else is just empty gestures.
2) It smacks of revisionist history. Turing was a great man who we owe our relative freedom to, and for those of us who work in IT our livlihoods. He wa also treated unbelieveably shoddily and punished unfairly by an unjust law. Both those facts should be remembered, but pardoning him now feels awfully like an attempt to sweep the abuse he suffered at the hands of the law under the carpet. Instead of saying "It's okay, we overturned his conviction so we can pretend it didn't happen" we should be saying "Here's an example of how even the most remarkable people to whom we owe so much can be destroyed by blinkered bigoted arbitary hatred".
I can understand why people would campaign for this, but I can't help but feel they're misguided.
Or COBOL, the language Grace Hopper invented, for that matter?
BTW, compilers were also invented by Grace Hopper, or at least she was responsible for some of the earliest practical ones.
When I started my higher education some 20 years ago they were predicting the death of tape.
Tape is cheap, plentiful and for offline backups there's nothing that can really beat it.
I fully expect they'll be predicting the death of tape on the day I pick up my gold watch.
Database as a service?
Aren't databases already services anyway?
Or do you have to put -aaS on the end of everything these days to make it trendy and marketable
Didn't see the funny side
Of course he didn't, it's an immutable fact that the man has no sense of humour. If you don't believe me, just watch those stupid Seinfeld ads.
Or any clip where he's the butt of somebody's joke.
It's not a 1% success rate, it's a 1% hit rate. How many of the 1% were actually truthful and how many of the 99% who passed were liars?
This is one of the reasons why polygraphs are so insidious, they dress up random noise in the garb of seemingly respectible statistics
This is far from a problem exclusive to the BBC. It's a sad fact that management is happier hearing optimistic lies than unpleasant truths, and will more consistently reward their underlings for the former, whereas the latter can in extreme cases find themselves looking for a new job. It's known as the SNAFU principle.
Nobody wants to be a whistle blower for exactly that reason. The saddest case was the management clusterfuck at NASA/Nordon Thiokol that led to the Challenger disaster.
"flexibly restructure their human resources"
Let me fix that for you. "Get rid of people who haven't done anything wrong"
You didn't even make Java Larry, you picked it off the bones of Sun
In Shangri-La, maybe. Meanwhile in the real world he'll probably get 3 points on his license and a fine.
A man was recently convicted of killing a cyclist due to his negligent driving. He got community service. What's more it wasn't even the first cyclist he'd killed with his shitty driving. And they'll probably hand his license back sooner or later to see if third time's a charm. I'm betting it wont be.
This kind of exploit is sickeningly easy to avoid, yet crops with depressing regularity.
PHP, for example, has several mechanisms to avoid SQL injection (use of the DBMS parameterized/prepared statement mechanisms, input validation and filtering), yet the amount of times I see people asking questions on Stack Overflow where the've obviously followed a tutorial from the PHP 4 days and written stuff like the following just makes me want to quit web development and take up mushroom farming instead.
mysql_query ('INSERT INTO TABLE (column) VALUES (' . $_GET ['field'] . ')');
Doesn't anyone read XKCD?
We can't watch that any more?
Quick! We need to ban everything that has such filth in it!
So I guess we need to burl every copy of Game Of Thrones we can get our hands on. And Clockwork Orange, Last Tango In Paris, Blade Runner...
Fairly obvious what the plan is.
1) Force the ISPs to say their filters are "always on"
2) Wait for complaints from little Timmy's mum when she catches him looking at MILFS Gone Wild
3) Sic the ASA on them
4) Internet censorship by the back door
If you think this is going to knock so much as a penny of your gas bill then you're a bigger idiot than I gave you credit for.
In fact, expect your bills to go up as the gas companies "need to make temporary readjustments to your contribution so we can fund the next generation of sustainable, reliable energy and give you the best possible service in the long run" and fleece us to pay for the infrastructure investment.
None of the money that potentially comes in from this is going to filter down to consumers, and that's assuming that the most optimistic projections are true about there being 50 years of gas that's economically viable to extract down there. According to the earlier comment from our Polish friend that's far from a given.
What benefit? HS2 goes nowhere near Manchester.
If you feel sorry for a child rapist and murderer then all I can say is you have a very skewed sense of empathy.
Sounds like the perfect place to send Brady and Philpot.
I am beneath... enemy scrotum.
Someone had to say it.
The real question is, will it give you super powers? It'd be awesome to have a cool cape and be able to shoot gamma rays from my hands.
Maybe the government just have more important crap to deal with and don't want to enact a law that could only be a vote loser.
Or maybe they've seen that France are pretty much in the process of abandoning similar legislation on the grounds that it never worked anyway.
Re: Is there anything Graphene can't do?
I think they're working on graphene-based processors, so the Crysis one might happen.
- Stick a 4K in them: Super high-res TVs are DONE
- Review You didn't get the MeMO? Asus Pad 7 Android tab is ... not bad
- BEST BATTERY EVER: All lithium, all the time, plus a dash of carbon nano-stuff
- Bring back error correction, say Danish 'net boffins
- That GIANT ASTEROID that killed you? Just 'colossal bad luck', old DINOSAUR chap