Re: Warm Braw
So this whole article is an advert? Great!
209 posts • joined 17 Aug 2010
So this whole article is an advert? Great!
Microsoft back to its old tricks I see! It is indeed a trap! My Pingu sense is tingling!
Was sure this was going to 404!
Highway Code Rule 223
Buses, coaches and trams. Give priority to these vehicles when you can do so safely, especially when they signal to pull away from stops. Look out for people getting off a bus or tram and crossing the road.
The reason buses assume they have right of way is that they do. Other road users should always give priority (i.e. cede right-of-way) to buses coaches and trams. People really shouldn't be driving without knowing this!
I think people are missing the point here. The aim of these SD cards isn't solely to play music from or store SatNav maps. It's also for Driver Assist Technology and data event recorders (i.e. crash information that manufacturers use to identify the causes of accidents, etc.)
These need to be robust, with proven long-lifetime, all the necessary additional automotive tests, suitable for low and high temperatures (so that they can survive said crash), withstand bumps and bashes (you don't want its connectors coming loose just as the car slips off the side of the road. These aren't aimed at consumers, but manufacturers. Automotive grade electronics equipment has a whole suit of additional tests. You can't pop any old diode into a power charging circuit these days, so why do so many people here think manufacturers will be content to use any old SD card?
Yup! I know that in certain applications (router firmware designers, I'm looking at you!) they used C's "rand()" function. During WPA2 auth (WPS in particular), a string of "random" characters is sent in the clear, followed by the "encrypted", sensitive data used for authentication. The rand() function can therefore be brute forced if you know roughly what the seed values will be (especially easy if srand(time(NULL)) is used.
People never seem to learn!
"I'm pretty sure that finding a viable QR code in a picture is somewhat harder than encoding the information which is just a bit pattern, albeit a complex one."
There's a website that explains how you can do it. You don't need to build a laser scanner or anything else physical. Just apply the mathematics and run through the operations. You might need an ascii table, depending on how good you are at subtracting 96.
Encoding is much harder than decoding though for a QR code. It *could* be done manually if you didn't have a smartphone or computer...
> As with the Intel Management Engine, I am fairly certain that the UEFI also had input from the NSA.
The sad history of evident 21st century media failures though is proof positive of an inherent systemic lack of providing creative constructive abilities to slave services and servant administrations which might be fully reliant upon them.
Uh... come again?
As a motorcyclist, it irks me when cars slow down to wait for a red light to turn green. It means the traffic never stops, and makes filtering through the traffic much more dangerous (I never filter through moving traffic). Given I can accelerate off the line much faster than a car, it's a bit annoying to be held up by cars (like when you're in a car, stuck behind a big lorry or bus or tractor). I'm not saying it's not a good idea, just that it'll annoy me :)
Each and every one of your points can be solved without Microsoft lock-in, and are issues with any software migration. The fact that MS make it so much harder to migrate than other solutions is the main reason I can see for making the transition ironically.
Macros are barely even compatible between Office versions, so I don't really see that as a strong point. I usually see macros being used by people who don't know how databases work to perform functions (using a lot more code) that a database could do in a jiffy.
Without you going into specifics of what addins you use, it's tricky to say much more.
Sharepoint has terrible lock-in and could be replaced by a number of collaborative software solutions.
DRM for secure govt documents? How would DRM help? Honestly.
I'd argue that Libre Office is ok for advanced users, who know what tool to use for which job, but really basic
people users should probably stick to what they know and let the world overtake them with more powerful, scaleable, transferable, automatable, open solutions.
Even a cylinder is a cubic function where as BMI is a square so your argument is pretty much invalid.
The increase of a cylinder with respect to length is actually linear. Double the length of a cylinder and its volume doubles. If you double the radius only, then it's quadratic. If you increase its length and radius in proportion, then after dividing by the length (as you would to calculate BMI), then it's back to quadratic again.
"It skipped version numbers because of lazy 3rd party app developers in the time of Windows 95 / Windows 98 who coded applications to look for Windows 9*"
Ahhhhhh that makes more sense. I was under the impression it was to keep the alternating "Good OS" "Bad OS" that they've been working on since inception. And in order to release two Bad OS's, they needed to skip a good one.
> all testing processes are a one time, and the fact "it could explode if used with a faulty lead" is true of any device, even jesus mobes.
Well I don't think that's quite factually accurate. I think the faulty lead could melt or set on fire. But just using a faulty cable should be protected against by the charging circuitry to prevent an explosion of the device.
Employ: Private Sector 668 32%
Employ: Government 151 7%
Employ: Self-Employed 154 7%
Employ: Homemaker 236 11%
Employ: Student 68 3%
Employ: Retired 481 23%
Employ: Unemployed 166 8%
Employ: Other 140 7%
Encrypted copy of the encryption key? What key do you encrypt it with?
It's encryption keys all the way down.
Open ear headphones generally sound better and have better soundstaging. The cheap s***e sold by Apple doesn't live up to this, but that's no reason to ban good headphones just because some people are arseholes!
Great original reporting El Reg... unfortunately, I'm not surprised!
They do this already. The problem is that the "supplier" review is too difficult to find, so people leave the review next to the product. Then when a better supplier comes along and sells the good product, no-one buys it because of the stupid people.
Then people complain about the supplier review next to the product and so the review gets removed and then people come onto the reg forums and moan about it like they're not the idiots. Ugh!
First clue that your post would be clueless.
Ah... audits. Say no more! Those who can, do. Those who can't audit/train.
> Or slightly later when I asked my guys to recompile sendmail to mask the version number.
Ahh security by obscurity... no wonder you're posting as AC
So you go straight to 'Trap' without waiting to see what occurs rather than actually looking at the direction Microsoft do seem to be taking now-a-days?
Implying that Microsoft has a direction now-a-days. roflcopter
That's kinda the point of Open Source. We all (developers) need a good tool to check our code, so let's *all* work together on it to share the resource investment so we can *all* benefit. I like it. What's your criticism? They've done 1%, now all we need is another 99 companies to come along and work on it and it'll be done. I don't think that's unfair.
Why? Because it's super expensive for the perceived "convenience". No-one wants them and no-one needs them.
Another skill? It's just like a standard UML diagram; they both have arrows you know. Oh and, uh, yeah... can you consistently hit treble 20 in less than a week's time, only I promised the customer you'd have it ready for a product launch demo on Friday?
>"checking the requirements for various items (passport application, driving license application, various benefits and tax breaks) would benefit more from a simple page, and a local cache than they would from encryption..."
So I know you're going on holiday soon so I can plan who and when to burgle. I know you'll be getting a new car in the not-so-distant future, so I can advertise accordingly. And I know what tax breaks you're looking into, so I know how many dependents you have and also have a reasonable handle on how much you earn.
In addition, I can splice your internet connection, adjust the content being delivered to you and give you advice that strongly encourages the use of my (paid-for) services.
There's almost no downside (HTTPS is easy as pie to set up these days and computers have long-since gotten past the point where you'll notice a performance hit). I don't see what your argument here is based on.
>""Do you understand asymmetric crypto at all?"
>Do you understand that Facebook are in the pockets of NSA and GCHQ?"
So that's a "no" then.
> Mark my words, if they got a letter through the door or a tap on the shoulder to show what you are writing to your friend via encrypted means, then they will decrypt that message faster than you could poke good ol' Zuck
Do you understand asymmetric crypto at all?
> ViaSat sells encryption technology so it has a commercial interest in trying to drive demand
> Oh but his proof will be that someone wrote a book about it.
> And further proof will be found in that famous documentary 'The Land that TIme Forgot'
I saw a documentary about this once, set in the Stone Age, it concerned humans living in a town called BedRock.
Quiet down Big Nose!
"A spokesman from the Judicial Office told El Reg that people wanting to access their site should do so by clicking past the security warning."
"... just because a certificate has expired does NOT mean that the communications are no longer encrypted"
No, but it may as well. If I can't be sure who gave me the info, or who I'm giving it to, it hardly matters that it's encrypted at all!
... who think banning encryption has even a morsel of sense?
You clearly don't know wtf you're talking about. Maybe google will help.
"On a balance of very strong probabilities we'll end up with a Labour/SNP coalition"
Twaddle. The whole post, but that sentence in particular.
Please don't spoil your ballot. Vote for one of the lesser parties/independents instead. This is the only thing that people will look at. People who spoil their ballots aren't worth campaigning to win in the eyes of those who care, they don't pose a threat.
I hate to say it FutureShock999, but you're being sexist.
Making generalisations such as "Women are GREAT as leaders at building consensus, understanding customer-centricity, at encouraging teamwork, and occasionally being ruthless and aggressive" is blatent sexism.
Ginni Rometty has a batchelors in computer science and electrical engineering, worked for General Motors, was a systems engineer for IBM and basically has a very technical background, in addition to her "fluffy wuffy soft skills and business acumen".
So can you please stop generalising about one gender or another and focus more on individual merit instead of spouting 19th century crap?
FWIW me too. Especially Major League Penguin
My little pony
For the ignorant, could you explain what a "phased dictionary attack" is? I tried googling but got squat
I can't speak for Lidl, but Aldi seems to undercut competitors by not providing a wide range of choice and not providing branded goods. And as for location, Aldi is actually my closest supermarket *by far*.
Personally, that's not the same as sitting cramped in a crowded craft with 200 promotions an hour (scratchcard, drinks, snacks, lottery, charity donation, etc. etc.) I actually prefer restricted choice and I don't have a strong affinity towards brands either. So for me, it's not a trade off that I foresee getting fed up with. At any moment, if I desire a brand, I can just pop to one of the other big names.
Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a free lunch. Your complaint about TV advertising is not relevant. The equivalent is oversized ads getting in the way of the content you want to watch. Amazon, Google, etc. have really quite modest adverts and provide a means of income for the content generators in the world.
I get it, you want quality stuff for free, without ads. But this is the real world, where free stuff doesn't really exist.
If you take to banning *all* adverts, then the content generators will have to find another means of generating revenue. Either that or the content will suffer or the content generators will go out of business. I'd rather have subtle adverts alongside my content that have to pay a subscription fee to use a service.
> Well, assuming he takes calls from his
backbenchers cabinet, he'll be well used to talking to people in that condition.
Agreed. Can it at least be a blurred/pixelated finger?
"Ebuyer refused to refund until the laptop was returned from the mystery address."
I know you won't like the suggestion, because it's really not your responsibility to deal with this, but...
Using a credit card for your next "big" online purchase would save you a lot of hassle over this sort of stuff. It becomes a simple: "Oh, you won't give me a refund? I wonder what my credit card company will think of this.... oh you will give me a refund after all? Oh good".
"Will Windows 10 really be any better than Windows 7? No."
This is the main point. Windows 7 is the best operating system MS have *ever* produced. It's stable, comes with features I actually use, doesn't get in the way with features I don't use and doesn't hog memory and resources to an absurd level. It's copied a lot of features I use on Linux (windows snapping to the edge of screen, windows updates that don't get in the way *too* much, powershell is actually surprisingly good, start menu search works well). I really really don't see how Windows X can be any better at all.
The *only* reason that people will move from Windows 7 is that MS will stop supporting it (typical MS EoL bulls**t). That's it. I guarantee that whenever W7 stops being supported, the upgrade process will be more reluctant than that seen on XP. I only hope that the businesses that are being forced to W7 from XP (they sure as heck aren't going to W8!) have enough foresight to realise that MS are forcing a costly exercise on them every 5 years or so, whereas an equivalent shift to Linux would be a one-off costly exercise.