Re: If I'm not sending private details..
You clearly don't know wtf you're talking about. Maybe google will help.
174 posts • joined 17 Aug 2010
You clearly don't know wtf you're talking about. Maybe google will help.
"On a balance of very strong probabilities we'll end up with a Labour/SNP coalition"
Twaddle. The whole post, but that sentence in particular.
Please don't spoil your ballot. Vote for one of the lesser parties/independents instead. This is the only thing that people will look at. People who spoil their ballots aren't worth campaigning to win in the eyes of those who care, they don't pose a threat.
I hate to say it FutureShock999, but you're being sexist.
Making generalisations such as "Women are GREAT as leaders at building consensus, understanding customer-centricity, at encouraging teamwork, and occasionally being ruthless and aggressive" is blatent sexism.
Ginni Rometty has a batchelors in computer science and electrical engineering, worked for General Motors, was a systems engineer for IBM and basically has a very technical background, in addition to her "fluffy wuffy soft skills and business acumen".
So can you please stop generalising about one gender or another and focus more on individual merit instead of spouting 19th century crap?
FWIW me too. Especially Major League Penguin
My little pony
For the ignorant, could you explain what a "phased dictionary attack" is? I tried googling but got squat
I can't speak for Lidl, but Aldi seems to undercut competitors by not providing a wide range of choice and not providing branded goods. And as for location, Aldi is actually my closest supermarket *by far*.
Personally, that's not the same as sitting cramped in a crowded craft with 200 promotions an hour (scratchcard, drinks, snacks, lottery, charity donation, etc. etc.) I actually prefer restricted choice and I don't have a strong affinity towards brands either. So for me, it's not a trade off that I foresee getting fed up with. At any moment, if I desire a brand, I can just pop to one of the other big names.
Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a free lunch. Your complaint about TV advertising is not relevant. The equivalent is oversized ads getting in the way of the content you want to watch. Amazon, Google, etc. have really quite modest adverts and provide a means of income for the content generators in the world.
I get it, you want quality stuff for free, without ads. But this is the real world, where free stuff doesn't really exist.
If you take to banning *all* adverts, then the content generators will have to find another means of generating revenue. Either that or the content will suffer or the content generators will go out of business. I'd rather have subtle adverts alongside my content that have to pay a subscription fee to use a service.
> Well, assuming he takes calls from his
backbenchers cabinet, he'll be well used to talking to people in that condition.
Agreed. Can it at least be a blurred/pixelated finger?
"Ebuyer refused to refund until the laptop was returned from the mystery address."
I know you won't like the suggestion, because it's really not your responsibility to deal with this, but...
Using a credit card for your next "big" online purchase would save you a lot of hassle over this sort of stuff. It becomes a simple: "Oh, you won't give me a refund? I wonder what my credit card company will think of this.... oh you will give me a refund after all? Oh good".
"Will Windows 10 really be any better than Windows 7? No."
This is the main point. Windows 7 is the best operating system MS have *ever* produced. It's stable, comes with features I actually use, doesn't get in the way with features I don't use and doesn't hog memory and resources to an absurd level. It's copied a lot of features I use on Linux (windows snapping to the edge of screen, windows updates that don't get in the way *too* much, powershell is actually surprisingly good, start menu search works well). I really really don't see how Windows X can be any better at all.
The *only* reason that people will move from Windows 7 is that MS will stop supporting it (typical MS EoL bulls**t). That's it. I guarantee that whenever W7 stops being supported, the upgrade process will be more reluctant than that seen on XP. I only hope that the businesses that are being forced to W7 from XP (they sure as heck aren't going to W8!) have enough foresight to realise that MS are forcing a costly exercise on them every 5 years or so, whereas an equivalent shift to Linux would be a one-off costly exercise.
Bug free? Seriously?
In reply to DrXym:
I hope you get an actual fact-filled explanation, rather than just downvoted to hell.
"After all, they should have the aptitude for it."
heh, I see what you did there.
"Is it just that the containers share the RAM associated with the "parent" operating system, so there's some efficiency and performance gains, or are there some specific technical differences aside from performance?"
Effectively, that's my understanding of it. There's much less overhead with a container vs a full-fat OS. The difference is likely very substantial, if my peddlings in virtualisation are anything to go by.
Haha, thanks for that, I totally missed it on my first read. It's undoubtedly very important from a physics point of view, but for us plebs, room temperature would make more sense!
Vive la revolution - (almost?) all words ending -tion in French are feminine.
"I find that mentioning anything to do with Microsoft tends to raise a similar reaction, lets not evaluate products on their merit, lets just go with whatever we THINK is best."
I don't hate Microsoft for their current product lineup. I hate them for their entire history of corporate nastiness. My memory is not as short as a couple of years.
I live in the city centre of Manchester and even I only achieve half the quoted "up to" speed. And that's at off-peak times, without throttling.
It's about time the broadband companies were forced to publish the median speed achieved, not the maximum. Ideally with a 95%ile bracket to show the most likely slowest speed.
Agreed - Remote execution is much, much worse.
In addition, I find the line "Proof of concept released" followed by "Exploit will be hard to achieve", slightly odd.
I'm surprised he's taken this long to "come out". It's a real shame that some people care about this kind of stuff.
I was thinking more "You will be assimilated"
Is it just me, or does Klingon software development model remind anyone else of a certain Linux-related developer?
>"In the end we all benefit."
IFF Microsoft uses and expands, then distributes, the source code per the GPL. If it just nabs the idea, implements its own "intentionally" faulty version of whatever standard and then uses foul means to dominate the market, then no-one benefits. I'm torn between wanting software patents and not wanting them. I think a 2 year software patent would suffice in this instance.
"Those who refuse to learn from History are doomed to repeat it."
> The correct term should be: "People should get paid depending on their work, regardless of sex"
Agreed, but you have to realise that there *is* a gender pay gap and the only way to address it is to investigate gender as a factor to see *why*. It'd be great if we lived in a world where there were no biases, but that's not here yet.
@Hans 1: You forgot your towel!!
"Your uptime represents the amount of time since you last tested your startup."
And my long term health represents the amount of time since I last tested my immune system. I don't want to get sick to test how good I am at getting better thank you very much.
I also don't want to lose all my data to test my backup/recovery process. Sure, I'll schedule it in on my own planned schedule; when it's convenient for me. Maybe I'll eat something a little bit "iffy" tonight to test my digestive system...
Why don't you just use Linux, it does everything and it's free. It even orders your round in at the bar while you don't even wait for the ticks, cause it's all fully hidden away and automated (if you like that sort of thing)
You'll only get downvoted if people think your question is rhetorical.
Your main problem with lacking understanding of "What is Linux" comes down, probably, through lack of experimentation and experience of it.
Linux is, at its core, just a way of bringing together hardware interfaces with software ones. That's the kernel: it manages memory usage, separation of separate "programs", etc. It's all the invisible stuff that you don't think about. On top of that, you can place whatever you want.
Most people place free and open source (FOSS) software on top, which has sort of been known as "Gnu/Linux", since a lot of software that falls into this category and is used is made by Gnu. It was originally intended as a unix clone, but has now grown its own wings and deviated significantly.
A collection of different software and configurations is known as a Linux distribution ("Distro"), of which Ubuntu is one, Fedora is another, Red Hat is a 3rd, Debian, Gentoo, etc. They're all just subtly different ways of pulling together a whole system, which is useable by someone like you to run things like a Web Browser or Office program.
The main topic of this article was "Window Managers". These are what you would recognise as "The Desktop + Start Menu". There are a few of these about, the main traditional ones being KDE and Gnome. Basically, different people have different preferences, so they prefer different Window Managers. If you think about the difference between Windows 7 and Windows 8, the main differences that you see will be in the Window Manager used. Android could be argued to be another window manager, designed primarily for mobile application.
The best way to find what you like is to install a couple of versions (probably in a virtual environment for ease) and give them a go. You can even run many different versions from USB stick; no installation required!
Doctor Syntax - you may want to read up on the importance of authentication in asymmetric key crypto. i.e. How do you know you're sending the message to Alice and not Charlie? If you can't validate the authenticity of the public key (i.e. that it definitely *is* Alice's), then you're wide open to man-in-the-middle attacks.
The other thing is that quantum computing threatens to undermine the whole P=NP robustness of many asymmetric key crypto. And you can bet the NSA are somewhere in the frontline of getting this stuff working (if they haven't already).
I have fingers, irises, retinas and DNA in my cells... Looks like something I have rather than something that defines me. I think I'm being overly pedantic here though.
>> 'N^a&$1nG' could be cracked in approximately 3.75 days
>That was the most worrying part of the article!
Agreed, nearly crapped my pants when I read that. 17 years isn't much better. Time we switched to storing out private keys on a USB stick and using those for authentication. Or something else. I'm getting super paranoid right now!
What's the difference between Something you Have and Something you Are? [serious]
"Yup... That sounds like me when I was younger. I remember sending a few absolute, er, 'gems' to usenet back in the day. I'm a bit more controlled these days."
"I'm sure there's a lesson there, but I can't quite find it."
You have to speculate to accumulate.
"people need to be rewarded compensate with their talent"
I believe you might have meant "commensurate with their talent", i.e. in proportion to.
Please excuse my piggybacking ignorance, but how is Huawei pronounced? At the minute, I've got Ant and Dec saying it in a thick Geordie accent and I'm not sure that's right?
@Matt Bryant - I can't tell if you're trolling or serious. I'm gonna assume trolling, because the alternative depresses me too much.
FM? To transmit audio in any sort of decent quality? Are you serious? It's maybe not as bad as just turning the music up louder so you can still hear it through the walls, but not much better.
There are a lot of ways that multi-room audio can be done on the cheap - this ain't one I'd like to use though.
I thought that the quantum computing algorithms only worked against asymmetric keys? Or am I hugely mistaken?
"Where do you park?"
Nice try, but my tank barely ever has more than £15 worth of petrol in it (that's a full tank by the way).
This could actually alleviate many of the problems with short battery life and long charge times. I had the idea of just using plug-n-play batteries, that you trade in at petrol stations; but then found out almost the whole car is made of battery. However, something like a hire-car scheme where you can pick up a car at a charge point and drop it off at one closer to your destination: that just might work.
Please don't tell me you're one of the ones who paid for their own data due to crap security/backup practises?
"By their very point of being anonymous, these services are designed to be used for illegal activity" - There are probably many things people want/need/like to do without people knowing about it. Nose picking is the first thing I can think of.