As Sir Isaac Newton once famously said...
...you should take with a pinch of salt any fact found on the internet.
1712 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Jul 2010
Don't worry, I did a little Googling and found the image the OP was on about. It really is quite amazing why this hasn't been widely reported by anyone other than zany conspiracy theorists.
"It just shows how far behind Apple are now"
Sorry, now? Apple have rarely been first to market with a technology; what they do best is innovate around the user interaction side of things to make a technology that's already been invented far more usable for the average punter. They do this by designing very usable UIs, and/or locking it down so it works seamlessly with other Apple products.
Wireless charging will only really work if it either becomes so cheap you can get one for each of your devices, or they finally come up with a standard so your charger will work with all your stuff. Granting Apple a patent in this area won't really help with either of those.
"Girlfriend has suggested that if that place exists, we go there on the 21st to watch the doomsdayers gather"
Leading to the amusing situation of having 12 doomsdayers and 30,000 amused spectators, unfortunately misidentified by the media as doomsdayers.
YouView should have been an IPTV specification for UK broadcasters, allowing for catch-up and Live TV, perhaps with some UI requirements attached (but not enough to scare off the manufacturers). Then all manufacturers could have implemented it their own way, and take-up could have been as good as Freeview.
Personally I have no interest in it as my terrestrial reception is awful, and I suspect I'm not the only one.
Wow! I read Mr Worstall's article with interest and was swayed by his argument. But then, upon checking to see what El Reg's world-famous group of commentards had to say about the issue, I came upon your concise and thoroughly well-researched rebuttal which has completely changed my mind. Thank-you sir for preventing me from becoming misinformed about this complex issue which you have rendered so simple in my mind.
"Apple's model is to produce pleasant but limited devices which need replaced every couple of years"
True, but arguably an old no-longer-updated iPhone is still a perfectly usable interface for a phone, it just lacks certain newer features. I wouldn't expect manufacturers would update their sets for the 5,6,7 year lifespans but if they started with a better UI it would be a huge improvement, and Apple's competition might help with that.
@Danny4 - I guess it depends on the quality of the UI - as the article points out they're usually not so good. And maybe there are some preconceptions that each function has to have its own button, and thus a workflow-based system that only allows you to make valid choices might be confusing to some. But I reckon with minimal retraining pretty much anyone can get the hang of a decent UI-based system, and new users find them more intuitive. Else phones and the like would have more buttons ;-)
Remember these UIs are designed by companies that figured it would be a great idea to put a button per function on their old, non-smart TV remote controls. Cue users looking at a baffling array of little-used function keys, and the main reason for the old cliche of not being able to program your VCR. Usability experts (or indeed enthusiastic amateurs) they are not.
I reckon Apple might not get it 100% right if they were to enter the market in a big way, but they would get enough right that it might shock some of the manufacturers to look harder at the problem. I am quite disappointed Google hasn't pushed Google TV as a better solution for manufacturers - if it became as successful as Android at providing a decent usable interface on something (phones) that were previously mainly rubbish, it would be a great thing.
As others have said, for now ignore the smart stuff and just buy an add-on box that you can easily replace. The RaspberryPi/Raspbian is pretty good for techies, else Roku and WDTV Live.
"But, bizarrely, every route from outer London to inner London tested utilised bus and tube, but not mainline rail routes"
For that you can thank ATOC and their crazy license terms for timetable data. I think you might now be able to get some info on London-area trains from TFL, but that might just be London Overground ones.
Personally I think timetable data should be public. Fair enough, don't provide an API, but provide a data dump whenever it changes (sorry, *well before* so apps have time to update!) so people can update their own systems.
"and of course the blokes that say they have no change and then pat their pockets to the obvious sound of jingling coins"
Just curious (because I am one of those very blokes) would you rather I walked past and said "sorry mate I'd rather keep my change for something more worthy"? I'm not sure why you'd get offended by random strangers telling little white lies.
Not saying your examples aren't worthy causes, but the very fact that different people consider different things to be worthy causes is pretty much why charities exist and why a lot of stuff isn't paid for by tax.
For example I might be quite happy for my taxes to go up to help fund a local animal charity, but someone else might say "well they're only animals" and resent it. Who is to say who is right? At least with a charity we can make our own choices.
"why can't I uninstall Goggles, Facebook, Books, etc. etc. without rooting my phone?"
Because your handset manufacturer put it into the ROM.
To be fair to Google, in Android 4 and above you can "disable" these apps so they don't start services, don't take up RAM and don't appear in your launcher menus. You can't remove them entirely from the phone as it's pointless - they're not installed in user-modifiable storage and wouldn't give you any more space for apps if you were to remove them.
Well the small, well-built phones that fit in your pocket and have a battery life measured in weeks can now be had even in your local supermarket for about £20 nowadays. They've certainly gotten less popular than the newer pocket computers you can fit in your pocket (just) but they're still available, so I'm not entirely sure I understand your gripe.
I am not a lawyer, but if there's one thing I've noticed about Samsung's case, it's that they have their good points but they seem to bury them under a heap of only-vaguely-likely conspiracy theories. It's very much quanity over quality of evidence. And it seemed to annoy Judge Koh before, so perhaps isn't the best strategy for the appeal.
I agree completely about HTC, although to be fair it's a problem with most Android OEMs. Basically only the top sellers ever get an upgrade right up until they're superceded by the next top model. My Samsung Galaxy S3 is getting regular updates at the moment as their flagship device (note the lack of upgrades for the cheaper Samsungs) but I don't expect that to last much longer as soon as the S4 is announced and released.
What annoyed me most about Sony regarding the Xperia Ray wasn't that it didn't get an upgrade, it was that they *promised* it would get an upgrade (on the box, no less), half rolled out an upgrade and then spent the rest of the time telling people how great it was they rolled out the upgrade "as promised" when only a few Nordic phones and those willing to unlock their bootloaders ever got the upgrade at all. It was deceitful and shoddy behaviour in my book.
I bought an Xperia Ray for my wife on the understanding that it would get an Android Ice Cream Sandwich update later on in the year. Did it? Of course not. The only way you can get an official ICS build on a UK unlocked Ray is by unlocking the bootloader and destroying your warranty. The official update to ICS was also a buggy mess, as evidenced by the fact that O2 actually declined permission for Sony to roll it out.
The latest and greatest software might not be everything, but it is a lot of things for me, at least with ICS. I was relying on ICS' built-in "disable apps" feature to cut down on the insane amount of bloatware Sony install on the device - it takes up tonnes of the limited RAM. I also quite liked ICS being able to tether via Bluetooth for those occasions when I'm abroad and the hotel has limited me to one device on the wifi. Neither of those features are available on the shipped Gingerbread build.
My current plan is to wait for CM10 to be stable enough for the wife to use and then switch to that, but in the meantime I'm very disappointed with Sony. The Ray is the last Sony I'll ever buy.
One thing I've never worked out about the HD channels is why they don't just replace the SD channels. Why would I want to watch BBC1 when BBC1 HD is available?
Also - I wish Virgin would stop displaying channels you haven't subscribed to in the EPG. It doesn't make me want to rush out and upgrade, it just frustrates me.
Personally I'd keep the names in large text, and maybe have a subtitle beneath it that says what is actually in each drink, rather than replace the names of each drink entirely.
But I kinda agree with them regarding replacing the words grande and tall. Nowt wrong with small, medium and large - especially as the Italians didn't invent sizes! ;-)
"So for the additional notes the Samsung gear delivers 4G, a tenth of an inch in screen estate and an FM radio"
You mean 4G on some versions
And you forgot to mention the SD card slot on the S3, which was the reason I bought mine rather than the HTC One X and which it still has over the Nexus 4.
Although, granted, if the Nexus 4 had been announced earlier I would have probably gone for that instead considering the cost - an SD slot and FM radio I never use isn't worth £200.