16 posts • joined 27 Jul 2010
On the A3090
Good address for an IBM site.
Re: Are you insane?
"Black hats would be combing it over for vulnerabilities applicable to Vista, 7, 8, and 8.1 too."
So the same as MS-DOS 1.1 then.
Re: How do you rank them?
I propose a new unit of unquantifiable performance, the Wally:
Re: Orwell vs Huxley
> TOTALLY! Shades of Pink Floyd's "The Wall" HA!
Or the Roger Waters solo album Amused to Death, which was inspired by Postman.
Re: Upgrading from JRE 1.6
To be fair to Oracle, EBS has been certified with JRE 7 since December:
The Metalink notes say they also support IE9 and Firefox ESR 17 on Win7. I have a lot of gripes about how Oracle handles certification and patching in general, but in this case the criticism isn't justified.
Re: "Should custom Android keyboards even be allowed?"
Of course not, because why would any phone user ever need an input method for a language that doesn't come pre-installed by their provider? If English was good enough for Our Lord it should be good enough for us.
What could possibly go wrong?
This worked a treat in Western Australia:
Somebody think of the mathematicians!
In maths TeX and its cubs are pretty much the standard for writing technical books. Surely Apple know the education sector well enough to realise this, and don't expect serious authors to use drag-and-droolware?
Am I the only one who hears the Quake 3 announcer voice when they read the probe's name?
Never mind the borokkusu
To be fair to the company, I can see how they might have got the name. The katakana (Japanese syllabic text) stamped on the logo reads ボロックス "borokkusu". That's also how you'd transliterate the English word "blocks" into Japanese - the extra vowels turn up because Japanese is built around what we'd consider to be consonant-vowel syllables. Since the Bollox range seems to be owner-designed kitset-style homes, "blocks" almost makes sense.
Then again I'm nowhere near fluent in Japanese, so this could all be a load of borrokusu.
Nimrod R1 retirement
Last I heard the R1 was slated for retirement in 2011, to be replaced by Rivet Joint:
Has the defence review said anythng about this?
> So how is nsLoginManagerPrompter.js modified under Windows - is it
> only people running as admin ? The article doesn't make it clear.
Well firefox.exe runs as the logged-in user, and by default unprivileged users only have read/exec privs on the Program Files directory tree. So short of finding some sneaky way to subvert a privileged service (Windows equivalent of daemon), it's hard to see how this could work without admin rights.
The more interesting part of question - which neither El Reg nor Webroot answer - is how FF is tricked into modifying this file even if the user does have write access to it. Presumably it's not an arbitrary file overwrite vuln or the trojan would be doing much worse mischief. I can't find any relevant mention of nsLoginManagerPrompter.js on bugzilla.mozilla.org, so I guess either the Mozilla team are quietly fixing this or the whole thing is bogus.
To be fair, not just Linux
> The global .js files on Linux are protected.
So are the global .js files on Windows, unless the user runs with Admin rights. Yes, I know lots of users do, but "I'm safe because I don't run as root" is different from "I'm safe because I run <insert OS here>".
Deja vu all over again
But who needs history when you can have hype?
Apples and Oranges
So how is IBM tying z/OS licenses to IBM hardware any different from Apple tying MacOS licenses to Apple hardware?
And as long as the customer purchases a legit license, isn't talk of intellectual property rights irrelevant? Even if the clone-makers need to know the secret herbs and spices to support the OS, doesn't competition law allow the OS vendor to demand a "fair and non-discriminatory" license and NDA?
- Updated Hidden network packet sniffer in MILLIONS of iPhones, iPads – expert
- Students hack Tesla Model S, make all its doors pop open IN MOTION
- BBC goes offline in MASSIVE COCKUP: Stephen Fry partly muzzled
- PROOF the Apple iPhone 6 rumor mill hype-gasm has reached its logical conclusion
- US judge: YES, cops or feds so can slurp an ENTIRE Gmail account