Re: Volume or niche?
Thank you Whitter for a sane and measured comment.
Sadly, Subtle = Invisible, on the internet.
6609 posts • joined 21 Jul 2010
Thank you Whitter for a sane and measured comment.
Sadly, Subtle = Invisible, on the internet.
> Until we're able to fit the equivalent of a GTX1080 in a phone in another decade or so, mobile VR will remain very much limited to strapping a phone to your face without any chance of that "immersing yourself in VR" part.
Games can still be just as fun without the latest fancy graphics, and even gaming PCs don't fool anyone that they are looking at reality.
Heck, the only games system to make a success of more immersive games, the Nintendo Wii, had underpowered graphics compared to its peers - the fun came from how players interacted with it, not how many polygons it was pushing around.
Your level of 'acceptable' appears to be arbitrarily chosen.
Then pay for it.
If that business model is not viable, then no number of comments on The Reg (preaching to the choir) is going to fix it. Sorry folks.
If you really want it, start a discussion about how this might be achieved... probably best to start with AOSP (because Tizen, Maemo, Meago, WebOS, BB10 et al have been so well supported by developers /s), but you'll need a huge investment in alternatives to Google's services and propriety APIs - ask Amazon, Samsung or Blackberry. Then bear in mind that many people who care about their privacy decided iOS was the lesser of two evils some time ago.
Microsoft was attempting to use user privacy on phones as a selling point a few years back, but yeah...
No fancy stylus on the iPhone 7. If you don't want the stylus, many other big screened Android phones are available for far less money - though few will have a camera on par with the Note or iPhone.
>It is only one type of battery that has the problem. It's the ones with Lithium in them.
Bullshit. Batteries of other chemistries can burn or spew acid if improperly charged, so don't make assumptions. Be safe, folks.
>That said, sabotage is not as unlikely as I first thought, because given the volume it is inconceivable to me that these problems did not show up in QA - unless that was rigged or not done, and I don't see the latter happening in a company like Samsung.
Some pundits suggest the development of the Note 7 was sped up, in order to take advantage of the then upcoming (and predicted to be lacklustre) iPhone 7 launch.
That link only mention one reported G7 fire:
"It’s not clear whether the battery issues affect other handsets, including the Galaxy S7 Edge; Samsung has not issued any guidance or statements regarding other phone models. As such, we can’t say for sure whether the Galaxy S7 Edge is affected by any faults. "
Thanks for the correction, guys!
(I had read the wiki page in the past having heard of the coffee pot long ago, but I didn't read it today. As could be inferred from my post, it was written before I had drunk any coffee. That situation has now been corrected.)
The history of the internet is lost on you. The world's first 'webcam' was rigged up at MIT to see the level of coffee in a filter machine.
Right, I'm off now to use my Aeropress. I might give it a quick check for security flaws whilst I'm at it, but I'm fairly relaxed about it!
>But I don't see anything to "fear" from Pixel. The price ensures it will have next to no impact. Samsung's all round package is far superior - especially the imaging.
"With an overall DxOMark Mobile score of 89, pixel, the latest Google smartphone is the highest-rated smartphone camera we have ever tested."
"Its image quality scores are impressive across the board, but it is particularly strong in providing a very high level of detail from its 12.3MP camera, with relatively low levels of noise for every tested lighting condition. It also provides accurate exposures with very good contrast and white balance, as well as fast autofocus.
Not that I'm too fussed - many smartphones will take 'good enough' pictures, and if I was that fussed about image quality I'd use a dedicated camera.
your passcode will be needed for additional security validation:
- After restarting your device
-When more than 48 hours have elapsed from the last time you unlocked your device
- To enter the Touch ID & Passcode setting
A genuine thank you for your clarification.
Is your comment in relation to labels, or to Star Trek?
That young actor Anton Yelchin was killed by shit user interface design. Fiat Chrysler had already flagged those vehicles for recall because of the gear selector:
Or make the mouse (Human Input Device) look like a mouse (cheese thieving squeeking mammal):
"Sometimes a big cigar is just a big cigar", but still...
Also, though I am not an IP lawyer, it would seem anything printed in a T-shirt might be captured in a photograph of a crowd... it seems unfair if that photographer couldn't distribute his photograph because he'd unwittingly snapped a pic of a copyrighted image on someones clothes.
Haha! A lovely nod to Ridley Scott's '1984' advertisement for Apple.
Still, Fox's business interests sometimes overlap those of Apple and Jobs (not that the Simpsons are kinder to Murdoch or Gates).
The compromise isn't to save money, but to reduce reflection artifacts in the images the camera captures. The Reg, amongst others, had articles when Apple first used sapphire lens covers that criticised purple artifacts in iPhone photos, and knocked Apple's advice to customers: "Don't take photos when the subjects are against the sun".
Since many people use phone cases, it seems that Apple have decided that fewer reflections are worth the cost of a less scratch resistant lens.
>If Google tries to lock things down too much, OEMs might not choose to follow.
So what? If an HTC get too big for their boots, there will be a Huawei or OnePlus (or a Bloggs MK1 with Qualcomm SoC, Sony camera and LG display... same difference) to fill their place. [please update my references according to how far through 2016/17 we are].
Speaking as a fan of the Sony Xperia Z (Compact) range, there is little that Android OEMs can do to differentiate themselves.
My friend is still using his iPhone 4S - and beyond replacing its battery himself, has cheerfully taken no interest in mobile phones since he bought it. He's vaguely 'normal'. I'm not, so I'll use my cheap (and seemingly indestructibly plastic) Huawei until I get a Project Mango Lenovo (Y'know, the one with the 3D depth mapping )
That was no typo. Not sure how you think 'Strain' would work, unless you imagine me with a sieve under my puking cat in order to catch the chunky bits. Cue the joke about the waiter in an alleyway, three tramps, two cocktail sticks and a straw.
There is no reliable way to stop Windows 10 from restarting itself whenever it feels like.
There is no reliable way to stop Windows 10 from restarting itself whenever it feels like.
Yeah, I know I said it twice, but what the hell? [all caps, multiple exclamation marks etc]
How the living fuck can you leave it to do a simulation or render? The answer (apparently): Big jobs like that should be done on rented compute power like AWS - or MS's equivalent. Oh well. Arse burgers.
And no, Linux is not an option. I'm sure it's a lovely OS but the applications for many sectors just suck. Deal with it. The GIMP is to Photoshop what Windows is to Linux. As for serious CAD, don't make me laugh... it'll be streamed from the cloud to a thin client before Linux gets it properly. Sad really, cos it was all Unixy (though proprietary and useful) back in the nineties.
>As for IoT devices... ...Since the tools for Linux are generally excellent and the runtime cost is zero, it's clearly going to be the defacto choice unless there is a reason to choose differently.
Three big reasons:
The size of OSs such as QNX are a tenth the size of Linux. This is important if your application is taking power from an AA cell or harvesting it from piezo-electric switch or from elsewhere.
Also, IoT applications may be more of a pain in the arse if they go wrong- QNX has a longer, more battle-hardened pedigree in critical systems than Linux.
Yet more, Linux isn't a real time OS.
The idea that Linux is a panacea is mere shabby thinking, or at least narrow thinking based upon the presumption that a computer is a discrete lump of X Mhrtz and Z MB etc
If my cat was called Andromeda and barfed a lot, I would only be reminded of the Andromeda Stain. Yep, with HBO's adaptation of Westworld, Micheal Crichton is in vogue this week.
>There wasn't a good reason for ChromeOS and Android to be separate things in the first place.
Really? There are a lot of inherent issues with Android that Google want rid of. One was mentioned in the article - Java, and another you'll have read of many times in these forums - the slow speed of updates because each new build is specific to a specific hardware configuration (so requires the cooporation of original chip manufacturers).
Indeed. Just because Linux is good doesn't mean it's perfect. QNX, as an example, has much smaller footprint, and a real-time design, making it - or something like it - more suitable for embedded applications and the IoT. Or even for a mobile phone where it is critical that it doesn't drop a phone call because the OS is concentrating on something else.
I have no gospel answer for you, but looking at the clues should give you grounds for optomism:
1, ChromeOS is regularly updated directly from Google
2, The foot-dragging attitude of OEMs and carriers toward Android updates frustrates Google, to the extent they have had the Nexus and Google Play Edition range of phones to show OEMs 'how it's done'.
3, This new OS is a chance for Google to undo rushed decisions made in Android's early days (when they were desperate to catch up with iOS)
>No worries about wind
>or leaving behind evidence.
Depends... even lasers in non-visible spectra could hit dust particles and heat them. SpaceX could well have IR cameras in operation which conceivably show a line of heated dust from enough angles to show the origin.
>Possibly a camera on the roof. They want to find/get/expose it either for data or a red face on their competitor. Using this "excuse" to get at it.
That is plausible. In fact, It'd be surprising to learn that ULA didn't have a camera trained on their competitor's test, if they already had a convenient vantage point (unless of course there were more suitable, publicly accessible vantage points available to them closer to the test site)
That looks like a sweet story, but have you a more savoury source than the Daily Mail? :)
Broadly, I agree with you Bazza.
However, this plot, reminiscent of a 1960's espionage B-movie, does fit Elon Musk's aesthetic (he bought the submarine Lotus from The Spy Who Loved Me, and for ages his Twitter photo was of him stroking a white cat - I kid you not).
In the past though, SpaceX have been pretty efficient at identifying and rectifying the causes of their Rapid Unplanned Disassemblies - they have an edge over NASA in that they don't have to dig through a stack of sub-contracting manufacturers.
>Problem would be getting the spark needed and with the videos running, tracer or incendiary is not an option.
There was a '007 special' episode of Mythbusters in which they tried to blow up gas cylinders with bullets (a la the opening sequence of 2006's Casino Royal). Nothing went 'bang'. Of course they were using a handgun instead of anything bigger, but one assumes (I'm assuming, cos my memory isn't that good) that any spark occurs on first contact with the cylinder, i.e before there is any gas available to ignite because the puncture hasn't occurred yet. Additionally, the lead round didn't penetrate the cylinder. Also, lead anti-personal rounds don't spark (though projectiles of other metals for your bangbang-stick are available)
>So Pixel mean no more Nexus?
That's what I'm hearing, though it is confusing me - the whole reason for the Nexus line was to shame OEMs into sorting out their software. Google did this by supplying good-value phones with top-notch internals. However, I hear these Pixel phones won't be cheap.
>Hmm, no headphone socket, and a seemingly absolute impossibility of getting music onto it without iTunes destroying one's local music collection.
My iPhone using friend uses Google Music - it makes his existing local music collection available to him wherever, and I assume he can download tracks to his phone for when he is away from data.
My Google Music experience (on a low-end-ish Android) has been less than smooth, with some tracks only playing a few seconds, and not being able to scrub through tracks). Weird.
For fucks sake! We will never solve our society's issues if we all go around pretending we're perfect, fair and enlightened. We are not. We can't fix our prejudices until we accept them.
If we accept that we are all biased imperfect humans whose judgement is dodgy even with good intentions, and build systems that will compensate for that self-evident fact, we might stand a better chance of actually achieving a meritocracy. This might be too much of a pragmatic approach for some, but then I actually like people.
This article was based upon some facile dogma of the most unhelpful flavour. This 'John' person might be right, he might be wrong - in either case his argument will stand or fall by itself. At least he proposed an idea that has a better chance of being objectively fair than some recruiter thinking to themselves "I must remember not to be sexist today, M'kay?"
Please note that the responses I have made to Andrew Orlowski articles on occasion should reassure the author that it is her content, not her sex, that invokes this feeling in me. Further perusal of my posts will confirm I don't have much time for sexism. Being of a generation that read essays written on real paper by people of intellect (peer-reviewed papers and everything), wit and compassion, I'm confused as to why anyone would think we have anything to learn from this article.
>Boil 50 million kettles at once, and you bring the nation's powergrid to its knees, and not just for three minutes.
Ah, the old 'Coronation Street' effect... you don't need connected kettles to bring that about! In fact, connected devices could be used to mitigate such spikes in demand. Even if it just implemented with in a single home.
>And while academics quibble about who "owns" data, hackers get on with massive DDoS attacks using webcams and DVRs.
Did you even read the whole article? Far from quibbling, they were looking at reasons IoT security has been so poor, and what can be done - in terms of corporate and legal organisations as well as technical - to make it better. Example:
"There’s an argument that says you start from the boardroom. The pressure to be first to market doesn’t feature security. The pressure to reduce costs? If you ignore security, you do so at your peril; it's going to cost you more in the long run. Educate boardroom and senior management to build security in from the start. Appoint a Chief Information Security Officer. What I’m touting is bottom up and top down. The end message is to build security in."
Oh, and the issue of 'who owns the data' has legal consequences, so is a potential stick to beat some better practice into the IoT industry. Other sticks include market forces and and company reputation.
What @frank ly said.
C'mon guys, chemists do plenty to make our daily lives better, but their work isn't as visible as some fancy new bridge, fast car or sleek gadget. Let's show some respect from one professional sector to another. :)
>If this is about detecting the connection of analog headphones or earphones...
No, no it isn't. It is a spec for digital audio streams.
All your concerns about sound quality being degraded by poor contacts etc are unnecessary. Indeed, the analogue path will be shorter - integrated into the headphones, possibly just before the drivers - and the DAC and amp will be specified by AKG, Sennheiser or whoever, instead of Samsung, HTC or Sony. The DAC can even be factory programmed to take account of hardware tolerances (as is the case with EMUs and car engines). If you invest in a high-end DAC/amp combo (in your headphones), you can take it with you across future phone updates.
There are some downsides and inconveniences too, of course.
A DAC. And often an ADC, too, for microphones (stereo now as easy as the existing mono allowed by 3.5m TRRS)
>Great another fricking adapter. Just what we are missing in our lives.
If you buy a 5-pack of adaptors from China, you can just leave one on the end of each of your headphone cables and forget about it. As a bonus, your £0.99 adaptor will take the mechanical strain, instead of the cable on your £30 headphones.
>Consumers.. Who are buying devices not made by apple have the ability to shop elsewhere.
An observation: People collectively spend shitloads on headphones. New models are released all the time, at prices far higher than 'more than good enough' (i.e some Sennheisers reduced to £30). A great number of headphones sold already come in an (old 3.5mm) iPhone specific version, or with a swappable iPhone specific cable (the mic and and remote controls differ from various Android OEM implementations).
3.5mm is great but not perfect; a 'snap-off' magnetic connector would be better, and would have saved me money since I have damaged headphone cables be catching them on things.
>Average temperature -55C, atmosphere almost 100% CO2.
That's all right, I know of a few people happy to spend their days inside... wait, what that? Netflix takes ages to buffer? Noooooo!
Why, is Pippa's fiance an attractive fella? I having been keeping up on royal affairs.
Indeed. Since he presumably obtained the photos by taking advantage of someone's poor security (I'm guessing a guessable password), it seems very odd he didn't take more care in his own security.
>Who is this Afonin bloke? IOS 10 is secure even after he himself found that the backups were easier to break into for finding passwords than in previous IOS releases. To me, that make it [iOS 10] insecure.
The attack wasn't against iOS - it was against the user's local (iTunes) backup.
Apple smartphones are secure. iOS is also secure, and gets tougher with each subsequent generation. ...
This leaves us to logical acquisition. Forcing an iPhone or iPad to produce an offline backup and analyzing resulting data is one of the very few acquisition options available for devices running iOS 10. Local backups are easy to produce if the iPhone is unlocked. However, you may be able to produce a local backup even if the phone is locked by using a pairing record extracted from a trusted computer.
On the question of the Stig's identity:
.... "my friend thinks it's Clarkson, Hammond and May, primarily because 'Stig' is an anagram of 'gits'''
- The Thick of It (a British political satire, though the Thick of IT could have been an alternate title for The IT Crowd)
The Lightning > 3.5mm adaptor works in 'Airplane' (all radios off) mode. That you can't use wireless headphones on planes is already an issue that affects buyers of wireless headphones from Sennheiser, Bowers and Wilkens, Bose, Sony... anyone who makes wireless headphones, in facSome models will work as wired cans, but only with an extra cable, obviously, a solution no different to a dongle.
As an Android user, it doesn't affect me... and it doesn't affect you either.
>If only everything was routed over IP, it would be easy to swap from phone to phone (and carrier to carrier) according to need.
>>Really? Take your sim out of old phone, put it into new phone. Job done.
That really is a sub-optimal solution. A better situation would be being able to just grab whichever phone is most suitable for your activity as you leave your house - a cheap simple phone for drunken night out or walk in the woods, a bigger screened phone for a long train journey so you can pass the time reading TheReg, a lightweight simple phone for jogging.
What you outline is akin to having assorted footwear, but only a single pair of laces that need to swapped between your walking boots, your trainers and your black Oxfords every time you go out.
>It honestly beggers belief that some are so darn brainwashed by brands like Apple that they are prepared to buy something that doesn't fill their needs (they are of course inteligent enough to check first, right?) then complain.
Eh? It is clear that for this user, the iPhone does things an Android can't, else he would be using an Android phone. The reason he is railing at Apple to provide a feature found on Android phones - instead of railing at Google et al to provide features found in iPhones - is that iPhones work well with his Mac (as he said).