SteamOS on XBOX360? Hahaha!
5253 posts • joined 21 Jul 2010
SteamOS on XBOX360? Hahaha!
>Then again I gave up on sony when the PS4 became a PC jammed in a console box.... these days its SteamOS all the way :-)
Fair does. Personally, I judge a console by the games that are available for it, and not by its internal architecture. In the words of Oddball "I only ride 'em, I don't know what makes 'em work."
For many genres of game, Steam is very good. However, the Playstations, like other consoles, have always had some exclusive titles. Not that my reflexes are good enough for WipEout any more....
Oddball: Hi, man.
Big Joe: What are you doing?
Oddball: I'm drinking wine and eating cheese, and catching some rays, you know.
Big Joe: What's happening?
Oddball: Well, the tank's broke and they're trying to fix it.
Big Joe: Well, then, why the hell aren't you up there helping them?
Oddball: [chuckles] I only ride 'em, I don't know what makes 'em work.
Big Joe: Christ!
Oddball: Definitely an antisocial type. Woof, woof, woof! That's my other dog imitation.
In 2001, Sony, Toshiba and IBM committed themselves to spending $400 million over five years to design the Cell, not counting the millions of dollars it would take to build two production facilities for making the chip itself...
...But a funny thing happened along the way: A new "partner" entered the picture. In late 2002, Microsoft approached IBM about making the chip for Microsoft's rival game console, the (as yet unnamed) Xbox 360. In 2003, IBM's Adam Bennett showed Microsoft specs for the still-in-development Cell core. Microsoft was interested and contracted with IBM for their own chip, to be built around the core that IBM was still building with Sony.
> [lack of JRPGs] is perhaps the biggest reason besides the RRoD, why I hate the XBOX brand as much as I do.
Uh, okay,I think 'hate' is a bit strong for something that merely doesn't offer your taste in games. If the RRoD issue could have been foreseen, it wouldn't have occurred. The XBOX360 disc-scratch issue was annoying, though.
I actually do prefer the game selection for the PS3 over the Xbox360 - there were more interesting games, such as 'Flower'.
>The world such as it is DOES NOT revolve 'round Halo 5, or Gears of War 17 Fragfest. Which I kinda fail to get since those players would rather be in the PC Mustardrace.
People like to play splitscreen with friends in the same room, which Halo and Gears of War allow. It's fun, and reminds us of playing splitscreen GoldenEye on the N64.
I very much doubt it. The Xbox360 is based around a PowerPC architecture IBM Xenon CPU, a cousin of the Cell chips in the Playstation 3. Porting Windows would be a pain, with little reward.
However, both the XboxONE and the PS4 are more or less just x86 PCs, making software porting much, much easier.
Similarly, my XBOX360 hasn't been plugged in for a few years... Star Wars Battlefront looks fun, but maybe I'll wait a couple more years for some sort of unholy space combat / FPS / RTS / GTA-in-space mashup game before happily wasting my days away.
These days, I only play video games with real people in the same room, it just seems more fun. My drinking follows a similar pattern.
Perhaps a Reg article comparing the personal data polices of Google, Apple, Microsoft et al would be handy?
Certainly their motives are slightly different... Apple make money on marking-up hardware and content such as apps and music, Google make it from advertising.
>And what do actually believe that that will change, instead of MS spying on you it will be Sony...
Ah yes, Sony with their advertising network.... wait, hold on!
Okay, both MS and Sony are in the hardware, software and services games, but I suspect MS have a greater motive to retain your data. Sony haven't been great at securing the data they do have. MS have seen their personal data policies as a way of differentiating themselves from [Google's versions of] Android, though it's not something I've looked into for a while.
>those who don't regularly travel with phones (court employees, perhaps; most courts ban electronics due to multiple security concerns) or, like I said, have terrible memories.
I doubt courts have an issue with RSA hardware tokens.
[after some fuzzy logic parsing of the above]
>Hmmm? However, does the fact that they seem to do the bidding of their political masters somewhat explode and flash crash smash that myth to smithereens,
Cause one to question said myth, certainly, but immediately explode it? No; there are some causative steps missing.
Basically, some US military commanders are given an extensive and perpetual education in history, geopolitics, philosophy, responsibility, humanities etc. whereas the politicians merely won a popularity contest.
The responses to this article are interesting:
The US generals we have seen in recent years seem a lot more capable of critical thought than their political masters.
Likewise. Not immediately recognising his byline, I clicked to see his past stories.
Another area that patents affect medications: Antibiotics.
If you developed a new antibiotic that was very effective against bacteria that have developed resistance to previous antibiotics, you probably won't sell much of it initially. Why? Because doctors will want to keep it in reserve, as a last resort in order to preserve its effectiveness. Since patents only last for a finite number of years, you might not see any return on your R&D investment.
Therefore, there is little incentive to research new classes of antibiotics.
This is the internet, I'm sure you can find any number of specialist-interest websites to advise you.... when perhaps you are not using a work computer!
I see what you mean, but the reality is closer to "Because we haven't found a way in yet doesn't mean nobody has found a way in yet". There may be security vulnerabilities that don't rely upon Jailbreaking.
Yeah, it would be nice if these generic Chinese Snapdragon 80x phones came in a smaller form. Still, the Sony Z3 / 4 / 5 Compact phones are available.
Given the positive reception these sub-5" handsets have received (smaller screen helping better battery life) I'm surprised more vendors haven't followed suit.
>Since when did £500 devices become so disposible they can be destroyed out the box for a laugh?
I'm just thinking of the Lamborghini Miura - and other cars - destroyed in The Italian Job, just for a laugh.
It's very nasty stuff, we get it..
So, here's an idea: A website with a live camera of a chemist in a lab. The paying viewer can make requests such as: "please put an avocado in liquid nitrogen and hit it with a slipper".
See the example of the two female police officers, both with young children. Very sensibly, they put their heads together, and arranged their shifts so that one could care for the other's children whilst the other was at work.
The taxman got involved.
On a wider note about barter, you could probably do worse than listen to this ten part ( 15 minutes per episode) series "Promises, Promises: A History of Debt" http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b054zdp6/episodes/player
You should note that if I want one of your pears, but I only have a live chicken, sorting out change might be tricky (or at least messy and noisy!). Think of a few more examples, and you'll appreciate that debt arose hand-in-hand with bartering.
*“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.
Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.
But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
― Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms: The Play
>If you accept Worstall's logic, burglary is just as valuable as manufacturing or finance.
Well, burglary creates work for locksmiths, glaziers, burglar-alarm installers and police officers. There isn't any moral determinism in these systems; arms manufacturers, tobacco growers and slavers are all a part of the economic system.
The burglar enriches themselves by inconveniencing others. A salesman who sells a low quality product enriches themselves by inconveniencing their customer. A company sells a frustrating and buggy OS to enrich themselves by inconveniencing their users.
So, we put locks on our doors. We educate ourselves and learn that a pricier but more durable product is actually better value*. We learn to use a different OS, or just accept that life isn't perfect.
>Never in the history of web journalism has so much empty crap been served dressed up as fake intellectual mumbo jumbo
Even if that's true, what is the harm? Nobody here would jump off a cliff just because "Mr Worstall told me to!" and his points are often debated and disputed here. If we believe him to be wrong, or has overlooked something, then we can make a counter argument.
Sometimes people who believe themselves to be fighting an ideology will appear to be ideologues themselves... this is always danger, so a bit of grown up discussion is generally a Good Idea.
For the record, I don't agree with much of Worstall says, but I think it is healthy to re-examine the things he attacks to test their sturdiness or otherwise.
Thank you itzman, maybe you could have a column or two? I have been thinking idly along similar lines in recent months, but drawing parallels to system theory and ecosystems*.
I strongly support your general gist and your raising of the subject, though you cover so much ground that it is inevitable that I can nitpick individual points:
When Bertrand Russell penned 'The Case for the Leisure Society', he wasn't equating leisure with idleness. Rather, he suggested that if we all only worked say twenty hours a week for food and shelter, we wouold choose more active leisure activioties (gardening, playing musical instruments, walking) and less passive (slump in front of a DVD-boxset with bottle of scotch)
>I think if we [The IT-Crowd, system administrators etc] exercised our power and controlled it properly, we would do a better job than politicians and economists...
Maybe. But in past times, scientists have thought similar things. Of course, if we all had more leisure time, IT experts might choose to read more history and philosophy, and financial experts and politicians might educate themselves about technology and systems. The electorate, with morew free time, would also take a more informed and active role in politics, too.
*All mature ecosystems dissipate more energy than immature ecosystems. There has always seemed to me to be an economic lesson there, but i can't quite articulate it.
>The issue is that some people get massive residual incomes - being able to sell your time once and get millions for it years later kind of breaks things.
The people earning millions years later are probably the outliers, the extreme beneficiaries of systems (copyright, patents, IP) that are intended to fairly reward more people more modestly. The greater rewards can also offset the risk an individual assumes by investing their own time in an endeavour. A would-be inventor might spend months in her shed, but it isn't guaranteed that her tinkering will result in a working prototype, let alone a commercially-viable product.
Of course, real life will skew the principle.
>Or has it got a really,really,really long strap?
It does indeed have a really, really long Velcro strap.
See image here:
To wrap up, this exhaustive website 'does what it says on the tin':
My apologies for veering off the topic of 'the appearance of fictional vs real computer operators', to 'sci-fi GUIs' via 'Hollywood contemporary GUIs'.
Much of the time, the movie director just wants the fictional GUI to display a nice big status bar slowly inching towards "100% complete" before the bad guys arrive.
This site goes into more detail: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ViewerFriendlyInterface
Another type of 'Movie OS' is more flashy and futuristic.... think Minority Report, or Iron Man. Not all of them are completely silly:
Strange to think that these days mocking up a fiction GUI is fairly easy... however, the wireframe Death Star from the pre-attack briefing scene in Star Wars took Barry Cuba months to create. Ridley Scott's VFX team had CG wireframes on screens in Alien, and later reused them in Blade Runner to keep costs down.
I greatly enjoyed Mr Robot. If you feel the lead character is too good-looking, just remember that what we the viewers see is clearly signposted as being from his point of view. It makes use of the 'unreliable narrator' device, even to the extent of playing upon any comparisons the viewer might make to Fight Club.
Hmm, writing this has reminded me of a 2007 film starring Christian Slater called 'He was a Quiet Man'. Worth a watch if you enjoyed Mr Robot.
thanks for your replies guys!
I was thinking more of what the next 'feature jump' might be... some people used to pay £600 for a tiny polished Nokia 8210 when it was state if the art, but 6 or so years later a handset would have to do much much more to have that price tag.
Agreed, the list price is usually way over what a phone can be had for - at least in Android land.
Hmm, what sort of features would make a sensible person spend £600 on a flagship phone when a £250 handset is nearly as good?
With current technology, there isn't an answer to that question that is immediately obvious to me. Sure, there are esoteric features that might appeal to a few consumers - an IR camera, or Kinect-style 3D sensor, or perhaps a laser range-finder for site workers - but nothing obvious to appeal to the mass market.
If anyone of you think you know how to justify an extra few hundred quid on a handset, I'll expect you'll keep it to yourself and make money from it, rather than post it here.
What, you mean subtitles for the heathens in the next village?
Case-by-case permissions is in Android 6 Marshmallow, reports suggest the BB Priv is running Android 5 Lollipop at launch.
Details on how Android 6 manages permissions is here:
>No SD is a big no-no for me. I like to have a large music collection stored on my mobe. I spend a lot of time working down in the bowels of a data centre where phone signal and the company WiFi are non-existant.
Two suggestions: 1, look at LG's offerings - they still have SD cards and swappable batteries, plus some models can play back native 24bit 192Khz FLAC files.
2: Your phone's battery will probably take a hit by searching for a cellular signal in vain, so ease the load by just buying a dedicated audio player with SD card support... the Sansa Clip springs to mind. Don't worry about the extra bulk; it's the size of a matchbox and is a convenient thing to wrap your headphone cables around.
>I do find myself wondering how long it will be before someone thinks they'll make life easier for people and build the feature [QR code recognition] in to the camera application
With all the superfluous CP/GPU power smartphones pack these days, it can only be a matter of time. Or, more sensibly, the phone's photo gallery app automatically scans photos for QI codes and places any URL into the photo's metadata... as a user option, of course.
The Z5 and Z5 Compact have 20+Mp sensors which are said to be very good, though by default the phones save 8 Mp interpolated images - sensible enough. Some reviews say the Sony camera software is a bit slow, I don't know the effect of using any 3rd-party camera app.
>The odd thing is, it's not *that* rare. 50 machines is quite a few.
There are only around 50 Fabergé eggs in existence. They are considered rare in this world of 7 billion people.
Value is only what someone will pay on any given day... and some people will spend silly money on silly things. Your investments may go down as well as up in value etc...
EDIT: The Christies auction description states that there are around 50 Apple Is surviving.
Perhaps our views have been informed by science fiction... we have watched films in which people interact with disembodied voices. Most famously perhaps, HAL 9000 from 2001:Space Odyssey, or more recently Jarvis from the Iron Man films. The former is dangerous, because it was given poorly thought-through orders by human bureaucrats, the latter benign because it was built by its user.
We also have Colossus: The Forbin Project.
The original Cortana, from the Halo video games was a goody, but the game's developers Bungie have a history of using 'powerful AI gone haywire' as a plot driver (see 'Marathon'). In the video game, Cortana is a military ship AI, providing information pertinent to tactical decisions; in reality, Siri, Cortana et al grew out of research done for the US DOD to triage information for battlefield commanders.
[Software / Firmware] vs Hardware
If the concern is that people can operate outside of legitimate frequencies, the authorities could just insist that OEMs make routers that can't do so. That way, it doesn't matter what firmware the user installs.
I appreciate that this might add a few cents to the cost of a router. Whilst not infallible, anyone really wanting to trespass on reserved frequencies will at least have to get their soldering iron out.
Indeed Reg hacks are being more careful- hence today's Reg report of 3M's 'Privacy Film', that reduces the viewing angle of any screen it is placed over:
I dont know, it's not clear. However, from the linked document:
"9. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Apple pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 801.05(1)
because Apple is engaged in substantial and not isolated activities in this state and judicial
district, including maintaining a retail store and employees here. "
That doesnt apply to ARM
"16. Since the issuance of the ’752 patent, Apple has filed one or more patent
applications that cite the ’752 patent as relevant prior art. "
I don't know if ARM has cited patent '752
Yeah yeah this is fun and all, but did I miss the Reg report of Musk's plan to continuously explode hydrogen bombs above the poles of Mars?
Of Joseph Lucas, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Lucas
He died in Naples of typhoid after drinking contaminated water (he was a devout teetotaller and would not drink wine).
Let that be a lesson to us all.
I would recommend keeping a roll of Self Amalgamating Tape - the silicone variety - in one's car to anybody. it can be used for repairing hoses and pipes, fashioning tool handles, and some have even used it as a stop-gap fan belt. It has no adhesive, but sticks to itself.
Duck Tape and zip ties are of course essential too!
actually, I'm interestH5ed in this. Eventually like, no rush or anything. As a CAD user, the GPU is notable, because most ultrabooks neglect it.
Stylus screen might be genuinely useful, in a way plain toucscreen laptops don't appear to be.
Application UIs can only get better at taking advantage of Styli when appropriate.
Made me think of Chris Morris' film Four Lions:
The Feds can track your phone even if the battery’s out.
Really. They can see you underground right...
Can they see you if you’re not there?
I don’t know.
They can see you everywhere, Waj.
Are they looking at us through cameras?
Space cameras, yes
But me dad says I’m not supposed to be on camera - it’s haram
With the greatest of respect Fessal your dad eats newspaper
Not any more. He eats moths.
>If they're too dim to type type "FMC" into google and find out there's already several big companies with that name,
Fixed it for you! See:
Ford Motor Corporation
FMC Fairbanks Morse and Company - heavy plant
FMC Technologies - oil services
FMC.co.uk Dental industry publishing
It is acceptable to trade under an already used name if you are in a different sector. Do you remember a time when Apple Computer wasn't a player in the music industry, but Apple Corp was?
I seem to remember that is how far I got,, back when I was a spotty teenager. A hardware / media fail, not the fault of OS/2 (though as I mostly played games on my PC, I might not have had too much for it really).
In 2008, an ATM in Peru rebooted on me, and I saw an OS/2 boot screen.
>Although many of these processors are not actually manufactured specifically but are selected post-manufacture, how is the average Joe going to know which is which?
Good question, but hasn't it alwaysbeen that way? Generally, gamers will know which chip they want - they enjoy researching stuff like that! Similarly, the CAD crowd will have an idea of what they are looking for, or have a relationship with a shop or vendor who will build and guarantee (and have certified) a complete system.
The 'Average Joe', is just going to look less as a the CPU names, and maybe more at a whole laptop or PC and ask "Will it run WordyPaintWeb quickly enough", or more likely (given most CPUs have been quick enough for most tasks for some time) "How long will it last on one charge?", "How heavy is it?" and "Does the screen flip through 180 deg so I can watch movies comfortably in bed?"
Hiya, at the time of writing, the votes and comments above suggest, roughly, that half you really don't want a touscreen laptop, and half of you quite like them or the idea of them.
Maybe we can at least all agree that "Not everybody would consider a touchscreen on a laptop to be a selling point".
Personally, implementation is everything.... If a touch screen laptop only had a conventional hinge, it would be of no use to me because it would be ungainly to touch the screen. However, models with keyboards that can fold out of the way - a la Yoga Pro - I can see the point of those.
I can also see the point in just having a tablet and a laptop as two distinct machines, though well integrated - eg, the tablet can act as a second monitor for the laptop, or as a graphics tablet.
For some tasks, the latter scenario will offer the better experience.