14 posts • joined Tuesday 13th July 2010 12:19 GMT
Re: "...the watchdog believes punters will expect "moderate restrictions"..."
Actually I do expect limits on my unlimited broadband. Because I expect to be lied to by the ISPs and I expect the ASA to allow false advertising.
You know a film is bad when Asylum's rip-off is actually the better film (if you take into account the much smaller budget)
The power that be concentrate on the 'fastest' speed to 2 main reasons, in my opinion. First it's a nice headline, "The UK now has the fastest broadband in Europe, with speeds upto 1GB" sounds really good. The fact that you can only get 1Gb if you live in a 200 square metre part of London can be kept quiet.
Second, it's easier to fudge: Broadband can move from 'upto 8mb' (average speed 2.51 mb) to 'upto 16mb' (average speed 2.53 mb) quite cheaply and easily, with OFCOM's blessing as well
Re: Poor build quality is a Samsun tradition
Are you in the UK? If so the Sale of Goods act is your friend for this. The item must be fit for purpose - so if you buy a touchscreen 'phone on a 2 year contract it must work properly, with reasonable care on your part, for at least those 2 years (I also believe that it is also up to the manufacturer to prove you didn't take that reasonable care).
Re: Just a shame...
For faster speeds on Virgin's notwork, you need to have the new 'super modem' which has a built in router - much like the standard ADSL type.
I think the BigYin's problem is that you have to have their modem/router, even if you just use it as a passthrough for a decent router - hence the comment about 2 devices.
I found my Virgin supplied router to be quite poor and have a separate DSL router plugged into it, to run my network.
Not a big fine really
$92.8 fine and a total cost of $156.6 might be a lot to us (OK it's fantastically huge for us), but to him it's 9.3 and 15.6 % of his total wealth respectively. (And that's if he only has $1B exactly and not more)
Another way of looking at it is they've left him at least $844 million to survive on. Somehow I think he'll manage.
The only real penalty here is the 11 years (reduced for overcrowding) in the Florida country club
Personally I think the fine should have been a percentage of his wealth, and a large percentage at that
Interesting sequence of events
His 'phone "explodes", so the first thing he does is rush to his wife's work so she can take pictures. Once they have been taken someone calls 911 to report the emergency incident that is a cut on his ear. If it was so important the he needed an ambulance (why else 'phone 911?) why didn't he drive himself to the ER instead of his wife's school.
The cynic in me feels that the word 'compensation' was involved in the thought process long before the word 'ow'.
The hypocrisy of it
Maybe Virgin should stop massaging the truth, if they want some credibility with this.
To quote from their http://www.stopthebroadbandcon.org/ site: "You should be getting what you pay for"
Yet, their "traffic Shaping" means I now get about 5Mb connection in the evenings, whilst paying for 50Mb.
What happens if a push-bike goes past the copper first, but he ignores it before stopping the Segway? Is he not supposed to stop both seeing as they're the same offense, or use his judgment to ignore both of them?
- Facebook offshores HUGE WAD OF CASH to Caymans - via Ireland
- Review Best budget Android smartphone there is? Must be the Moto G
- NSFW Confessions of a porn site boss: How the net porn industry flopped
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene