40 posts • joined 1 Jul 2010
Re: Which services are they actually talking about?
Remarkably, I get Gmail at number 19 when searching for 'free webmail'.
Re: Who cares?
Agreed: by the time you've eliminated those which require the elaborate sign-up dance, and the elaborate login dance, and the give-us-your-money dance, and those which are broken because the host doesn't know how to maintain the system, and those where the connection is so slow as to be useless, and those which require me to receive a verification text message on my data-only tablet, and those that are time-limited, what's left is far more often a hindrance than a help.
Re: A year?
In the temperate southern hemisphere, spring 2015 is about a year from now.
"More or less nothing"?
If you've heard nothing, maybe it's because you haven't been listening in the right places.
Try http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/ or http://rosetta.esa.int/ or https://www.facebook.com/RosettaMission or https://twitter.com/ESA_Rosetta, plus various tech/astronomy websites, etc. etc.
Even the Mail Online, once past the populist dross, gives reasonable coverage: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2721752/The-face-Rosettas-comet-Eerily-human-features-spotted-67P-icy-rock-hurtles-deep-space.html
The weird thing is my brain substituted 'month' for 'week' automatically, and I couldn't understand the original problem until I read AC's reply.
But not on Sundays, so they have a Monday opening time (6am round here).
I read it to mean that 63% of primary TVs (living room) are watching via satellite (whether that be Sky or Freesat) or cable. Seems high to me, but it at least makes sense in principle. Most secondary TVs (bedrooms, kitchens, etc.) are then still using Freeview, which is where the wording of the article perhaps becomes loose.
Re: Not wanting to pour cold water on a good rant....
The data shows the increase (or decrease) in extreme rainfall events. Ofcom couldn't care less about how often it rains or the total rainfall, but extremely heavy rain is what it is apparently interested in.
The data show that the heaviest rainfall rates (the 0.01% of top rainfall rates) have generally got heavier, and therefore more likely to interfere with communications (among other problems).
If a bit of rock is found on the surface of the ice in Antarctica (or at any rate in an intelligently chosen subset of such locations), it is a meteorite, pretty much guaranteed. And rocks show on ice very well. And not many people about. And in places the ability to survey large areas with relative ease.
Taken together, they make it an ideal hunting ground. Compare temperate zones where there are rocks everywhere, lots of forest and private land, etc.
Still no buttons
Still no page-turning buttons on these new Kindles. Why? Sure, the touch-screen interface is great for navigation, etc., but I spend very little time navigating, and most of the time reading. The page-turn buttons on my Kindle Keyboard get pressed thousands of times a week. Surely the cost of including real page-turn buttons in addition to the touchscreen would be tiny. The focus should be on making the reading experience perfect. That "horribly intrusive" flash to refresh the screen bothers me not one jot - but having to stick my thumb in front of the text every page seems a lot more intrusive and is definitely a retrograde step.
...but Norway is in the Single Market (except for agriculture and fisheries).
Re: 50km if they were printed out...
The 0.73 might raise a few eyebrows.
To be fair...
...the site does say to "Enter your full postcode". It should deal more elegantly with those who fail to follow instructions and enter "N1" and the like, but garbage in, garbage out, and all that.
What a surprise - the 13 exchanges around me are all described as "Not currently in rollout plans".
Clearly not for me
I thought I'd look for interest at the quotes being offered for me.
One refused to quote because I'm too old (at 38)
One refused to quote because I do too many miles per year (25,000)
One refused to quote because I use the car to drive to business meetings.
One refused to quote because parking sensors have been fitted to the car.
Not quite ready for the mainstream yet?
Re: How is it a shock sales surge...
I don't think there is any requirement for a shock to be nasty, just surprising, though they often go together.
Chambers: 1 a strong emotional disturbance, especially a feeling of extreme surprise, outrage or disgust.
Concise OED: 1. a sudden upsetting or surprising event or experience
Agree with all of that, but actually I spent 95% of the time on my Kindle reading books (who'd have guessed it?) and much prefer the handily placed buttons for page advance than moving a finger over the screen and back every page. Each to their own, but retaining the page advance buttons on the touch versions would have seemed to have kept the best of both worlds.
I was under the impression that XP SP3 extended support ends in 2014, not 2012:
But the time mid-way between sunrise and sunset or when the sun is at its highest in the sky isn't fixed, either, but varies considerably (more than 30 minutes) during the course of the year.
Anachronistic perhaps, but sounds terrible?
My new car has a wonderful analogue radio rather than the DAB one I had in my previous car. The FM quality is similar or worse than DAB, and the MW & LW quality much worse. And the choice of stations is reduced.
Changing the tax law costs virtually nothing - from the perspective of the Treasury, the ROI on such a move is vast.
£130m here, £130m there, pretty soon you're talking serious money.
I don't buy the "because someone's been profligate with public money in one area (many areas) we can therefore ignore everything else" argument. Improving procurement procedures so that we get what we need (not more and not less) for the right price is _much_ more difficult than changing the tax law.
As a play.com customer I find it hard to justify such a loophole.
I refer you to my comment about aerials not being up to the job. I get an uninterrupted signal between the A14 and Diss; can't comment about further north.
DAB is excellent
Well, not quite, but I thought I'd try to introduce a little balance.
I have DAB in the car and the range of stations available to me in rural Suffolk is vastly superior to FM - I can actually find things I want to listen to. Possibly the bit rate is poor but I'm afraid I can't tell: it sounds the same as FM most of the time and better the rest.
I have driven 120,000 miles in the car and have had barely a handful of signal dropouts on national stations. And listening to Test Match Special on Five Live Sports Extra is pleasant and practical - compare with the same programme on Radio 4 long wave where the quality in the car is hideous and I used to get deafened every time I went under a high voltage cable.
Are too many DAB radios being sold with aerials that aren't up to the job?
This doesn't make sense unless the real conspiracy theory is why El Reg has been keeping from us the fact that time travel has been perfected.
Not just you
In my admittedly limited experience, I find the glasses uncomfortable to wear over my prescription glasses, find the outcome fuzzy even if occasionally impressive, and am generally underwhelmed.
Last time I went to the cinema I had pre-purchased 2D tickets for a film with a 3D option - the showing of the 2D version was full so it was 3D or nothing for latecomers.
Odd units of measurement
"a disc of glass no bigger than the screen of a basic mobile phone". I don't quite understand - surely you mean with a diameter of about one fifth of a linguine?
Agreed - I've always seen it as a car.
"Tweaks"? Surely some mistake. What they meant was "price increases".
I'm on a £7.50/mo plan with Orange which gives me 1Gb a month, which is more than adequate for my occasional use. Is this now available as "Microscopic" or would I have to pay 33% more for "Small" to get less?
Something odd in the maths
"Symantec reports that junk mail volumes that reached a high of 230 billion spam messages per day in July 2010, 90 per cent of all email traffic, are down to 39.2 billion messages per day, 72.9 per cent of all email."
So in July 2010, total email was 230 / 0.9 = 256 billion
Now, total email is 39.2 / 0.729 = 54 billion.
Email volumes have not dropped by 80%. Shurely some mishtake.
Most of us have the screen facing slightly up, so the back will be facing partly downwards.
And even worse, what really grates with me is the "We're proud only to accept Visa". Really? Proud to inconvenience customers?
From the SARTRE website: "A scheme will be developed whereby a lead vehicle with a professional driver will take responsibility for a platoon."
Money for nothing?
"For every kilowatt of power you put in it produces 43.5 kilowatts of cooling capacity".
What does this mean? I'm pretty sure they haven't produced a power source with greater than 100% efficiency, or else they'd be jumping up and down a bit more.
And if you don't have MobileMe (and don't want to pay for it)?
Surely the reason why Firefox bothered is in your statement that the problem is with Apple - Firefox are drawing attention to the situation in a clear but non-confrontational way.
Get it right, please
I know headlines are supposed to grab attention, but they should be accurate too and reflect the data in the article. More partners is not the same as more sex.
There are some arguments that it's wise to give up on, however correct you are. This one was "lost" several decades ago and I'm afraid most British people use the "American" billion.
Put a sheep on the next Soyuz up to the ISS, give it a good kick it out of the door, and I think you'll find it is doing just over 100% of the speed of the ISS.
Trick-cyclist = psychiatrist.
Marginally more relevant, but still seems a bit peripheral.
Quite -- an interesting use of the word "normally" which I wasn't previously aware of.
I can understand how they can advertise it with a straight face - they're in business to make money and will try to get away with whatever they legally can.
What I can't for the life of me understand is how the ASA can reject complaints about this with a straight face. It beggars belief.
Section 43 of the FOI Act exempts from its provisions information the release of which might prejudice someone's commercial interests (it's bound to prejudice someone's). Admittedly there is a public interest clause to set against this, but you're starting uphill.
- Product round-up Ten excellent FREE PC apps to brighten your Windows
- Hi-torque tank engines: EXTREME car hacking with The Register
- Review What's MISSING on Amazon Fire Phone... and why it WON'T set the world alight
- Product round-up Trousers down for six of the best affordable Androids
- Chromecast video on UK, Euro TVs hertz so badly it makes us judder – but Google 'won't fix'