well, more fool them, and whoever was backing them.
2933 posts • joined 8 Oct 2006
well, more fool them, and whoever was backing them.
All these laws are well-known. You hear radio ads for special offers that say things like 'not in rhode island' in the gabbleprint at the end. Every supermarket clip-sheet or flyer has lists of the exceptions at the bottom.
Are we to understand that Groupon had not built this in before cutting code? never mind the IPO this should be in the requirements spec.
If they were trading willy-nilly I'd be inclined to mark them 'avoid' myself. Surely not? in the domain of the landshark?
should we picking on easy targets?
Yes. Like culling the runts, its for the good of the breed.
Have \violin turned a profit yet?
That's a tricky one.
Everyone is entitled to do that, and the history of a free press is a history of taking political positions, often merely to sell some more.
But there is a separate problem with excessive dominance caused by an advantageous position, especially when that advantage is granted by the governments being influence. I don't deny that.
But it is separate to his right to sell, rather than give away, his content. It is not separate to my decision not to fund him.
He's still entitled not to have his charged product stolen. Two wrongs etc etc.
I was commenting on the excuse, not on the dirty digger.
My comment on him is the one about not paying the paywall fee.
I think that old Rupe, and the rest of them, are perfectly entitled to try to charge for content. They've been open and upfront about it, and there are loads of free places to go if you don't like it. And, by not paying and not joining in, I am expressing my opinion on his worth very nicely thank you.
I think this is a bit naughty, really. I'd have canned them if I were google.
Talk of a 'free press' is disingenuous, too. Free in that context means uncensored. Free as in speech, not as in beer.
Yet 35mm is not a diagonal.
who invented this stupid notation for sensor sizes? What on earth does "1/2.3in " mean? why use something so daft, if not to pull the wool over our eyes? I make that 11.04mm, if it means what it looks like. a 35mm film is 35mm top-to-bottom. Is this 11.04 tall, wide, diagonal, or what?
Please can the reg translate all these into mm tall? for those of us who refuse to be bamboozled by advertising?
These prices seem far less greedy than HP, Samsung, etc,
Might go and have a look.
Good to see some really useful work coming out of ESA.
Now build a spaceplane, lads, on the profits. (You are going to charge a licence fee, right?)
Alan Blumlein must be doing 33 1/3rd rpm in his grave.
Look, lads, which part of "number of ears = 2" did you not understand?
Can I have my nervous breakdown now, please? I won't last much longer.
I thought it was quite clever. It got the whole 'bad drives out good' thing going without saying 'betamax'.
And the idea that the critical ecosystem is not ten thousand fart apps but support from Disney and Sony music had not occured to me (I'm not a 'content' junkie)
>People buy an iPhone because its the iPhone
Chap I know has a perfectly good HTC android. He wants his telco to replace it with an iphone. I asked what Apps he'd tried on the HTC.
"it don't do apps. You need an iphone for that".
Don't forget we are 0.5% of the population. The rest are suckers who get advertised at.
Perhaps this is what happens when you treat your customers as an endless supply of morons.
If we are desperate enough we might go asteroid mining for them.
It was called Expresso in the UK for most of the 50s & 60s, when we had coffee bars.
For some reason we reverted to the Italian spelling when it became popular again.
I'm told the french spell it with an X, but I am not fool enough to drink french coffee.
>I still don't understand how NFC is better/more secure than chip+PIN
Simple. It isn't.
But it does relieve banks of refunding the first £50 of fraud, so they are keen on it.
.. take a more informed view. I know what it is, and why they want to foist it on us, and I want none of it.
Begone, spawn of satan
Don't bother. They could not pay me enough to even stand near one, let alone drive it.
I am absolutely furious with HP for making me wait so long for such a meagre offering, and then daring to set the price to match the iPud. Just who do they think they are? Just how gullible do they think I am?
I wanted this partly out of affection for the days of my palm pilot, and partly because I was expecting good things from the OS. But I am being asked to buy a pig in a poke, and having been promised jam tomorrow if I wait for the tablet, I will still have to wait for the jam because they have not drummed up a significant developer base.
I was really really looking forward to this, and feel badly let down. I even wanted a pre3 phone to do the touch-and-couple business and use as a modem link. But I will have to wait even longer for that.
It won't do, HP, it won't do. I am furious with you.
Oh, and the 32G version is USD600 in the states, which is UKP372 today. What is the extra £107 for?
Futurologist admits futurology is bollocks, but still gets paid.
How do I get a job where I don't even need to be any good at, and still earn megabucks?
but psurely /everything/ is all google's fault?
Let's have a whip-round and buy .plonker !
I am puzzled by this idea that the OS is designed for a particular size/resolution of screen. It does suggest some very odd assumptions in the early design stage. I wonder what other corners have been cut?
That annoyed me, too. If the reg. is going to patronise its techie readers, it might try to do so accurately.
I understand the arguement, but you are right. Brave Guy.
He was my childhood hero, and I can't see a picture of him now without smiling.
Anyone dumb enough to (1) watch and (2) believe CSIwhotsit is never going to be bright enough to be in a position to specify development software.
My word yes.
err.. I have a list of $MEGACORP management who need to be taken away. Do you do requests?
?Googling? /GOOGLING/ ?
I've avoided all contact with Exchange Server for some years, but I find myself astonished that a major pieced of (allegedly) corporate-critical system can't look after itself under all imaginable circumstances.
"I know, we'll ask that bloke juggling chainsaws on a unicycle over the shark pit to remember all our important ideas for us"
First I've heard that there was an single instance store. They kept that quiet, then.
I have a couple I use all the time.
Useful for some video cameras too.
if leggings are cool, you must be wearing them wrong, shirley?
I just wanted to say that this bit of writing cheered me up at the end of a long, hard day.
A bit off-colour, yes. Slightly iffy, indeed. Near the knuckle, perhaps.
But it made me laugh. Keep up the good work.
<- We all know someone without enough of them.
In the 1970s the firm I worked for built "robot" garages - just a forecourt and pole sign, no buildings. Each pump had a "note acceptor" next to it. I designed and commissioned the note acceptors.
We built one on the A45, just after it stopped being the M45. I got a call one day that the site had gone. "Gone wrong? gone heywire?" I asked. "No. Gone."
I drove up there. The whole lot had gone. Pumps, note acceptors, pole sign. The only bit left was the tank underground, and they had emptied that.
Datapoint had a magic OS (Dos.h? dos.K?) which was agnostic about drive IDs. You defined a removable device in the form <volume label>filename.ext. During a payroll run, for example, you could knock two drives offline, spin them down, physically swap <employee details> and <timesheets>, spin up, online, and it would carry on processing from where it left off. Brilliant.
At the end of each end-of-month run we would copy the result table to a backup device so we had two copies.
or at least we thought we did. I had tested both backing up and restoring and listing the two copies, etc. without noticing that I had defined them as <wages>EOM.dat and <wages>EOM_month.dat. <wages1> remained surprisingly empty when I needed it....
Large engineering company developing its own control system.
Decided not to spend money on hardware, gave old PDP11 to software team.
Only storage was two 10" removable hard drives. Compiler and target development done on one, backed up to the other. Software man took backup platter home each day, swapped for another one the next day. Very professional.
Team on holiday during works shutdown. Compulsory that.
During works shutdown man from Dec came to do contract maintainence. Discovered lots of things wrong with both 10" drive stacks, carefully re-aligned heads (remember eyeball diagrams?) and adjusted read/write amplifiers. Got jobcards signed.
Back on Monday Morning, and neither the system nor any of the backups could be read. 2 years of development down the tubes. Large amounts of cash wasted trying to recover data. Project cancelled. Half a million quid wasted saving the price of a new vax.
And it is very interesting. But I don't trust the scores at all now, and I would like to be able to.
perhaps reg central could add a voting system? Buy/don't choices from commmentards?
I can't see that any crime is committed. Teenagers have a perfectly healthy propensity to display their bits to each other, and this is just the tech version.
OK, if someone gets hold of the picture and uses it for blackmail etc, that's a problem, but the problem is the blackmail not the picture.
The idea that the state should even care if a teenager's friends have seen his dick, or her minge, is entirely inappropriate. What next? shagging licences? a groping tax? health warning tattoos?
Same as my Dad's Grocery shop being unable to compete with Tescos 'cos they soaked up the 90% of the market who only want tinned beans and sliced bread.
I can't abide hot weather.
Jim O'Reilly is right - in a world migrating to web based services this is madness.
Nonesuch is right too. Woot!
I'm going with Woot. Imagine, being able to crack MSoffice in a few seconds. And, perhaps, being able to run MSoffice and have it display letters as quickly as I can type them!
I've waited over a year for what turns out to be a damp squib.
Just why do you suppose I'd want to buy this?
Not even got a DVD player on the telly, only on my 'buntu box. When that can play Blu-rip I might consider it, but while they try to control my other purchasing decisions they can do the other thing.
I reckon risqué games would be as unattractive as porn. Tacky, interest lost in about 15 seconds, ultimately unsatisfying. Pink pixels are still just pixels.
But, yes. surveys are very unreliable. I know, I answer one a week for Yougov...
I saw the words "scoop" and "eyes" in close proximity and could not bring myself to read the story just in case...
Given the variable quality of the advice I have been given, It has already lived too long.
Half of my mind wants to welcome this cloudy storage idea, because I grew up in the days of dumb terminals and central mainframes and it all makes sense.
But it doesn't.
The other half of my mind says "Do you mind? that's my data. I'll be having the holding of that."
The biggest missing part of this is the internet connection. If I want to listen to Beethoven's 9th, as recorded by Leonard Bernstein after the fall of the Berlin Wall, that's around 830MB. Sat at home on my hard disk, it costs me nothing to stream 830MB. The original CD cost me £6.
Now, if I am fool enough to put it on the cloud, I will have to pay for 830MB of download every time I want to listen to it. That will be £1.08 on BT's broadband package, or £4.96 on 3's payg cellular data service. Every time I want to listen to it.
This cloudy thing might be convenient for people who don't care about data privacy, but it makes no sense until the internet is completely free.