Re: I think I've spotted..
>The ones who clog up our helpdesk with calls.
Helpdesk? What helpdesk is that, then?
2920 posts • joined 8 Oct 2006
>The ones who clog up our helpdesk with calls.
Helpdesk? What helpdesk is that, then?
I am not going to take advice from someone who can write " absolutely shined".
>believing that they could come in to the market as a new player,
> but with products launching at Apple prices.
Doing that at all was, as you say, Arrogant.
Doing it after watching HP go face-first with the WebOs products - making exactly the same mistake - is beyond Arrogant, it is Wilful Stupidity.
It's not a bad idea. It gives people the chance to try something out quickly. The $6 is cheaper than paying an engineer to do something from scratch. If he is up-front about the costs, and the timeout on the free one, well good luck to him.
And if people are stupid enough to pay him his rates on a long term basis, well good luck to him. Stupid deserves to bleed, it's how we keep the market fit.
... and all those companies and corporations whose business model is "Sell whatever Redmond makes" are going to have to start thinking for themselves. Maybe even design their own product.
Beer, popcorn, deckchair.
People have long memories of past purchases, and really don't want last year's CPU with last century's screen resolution.
I do wonder, too, if customers being ripped off for printer ink does the brand any good.
"the lender hiked its charge per transaction from 1.75 per cent to 5.45 per cent"
just like the interest-free period on yer credit card running out. You cannot base a business plan on the introductory offer. Who could not have seen this coming?
[Banker: interesting business here, why should he be making the profit instead of us? I know...]
>you are too embarrassed to state it
" We have a multi OS,...computing strategy"
-- that forces your retail customers to buy windows 8.
If it's business and you don't mind doing it in the cloud - you probably don't need to be doing it at all.
Sorry but I think that's really cool!
Just make the camera. Don't lumber us with a phone, just sell us the camera, the smallest, lightest, most capable pocket camera ever.
Tell you what lads. I've not bought one nearly every day since it came out. No, I'm wrong. It's exactly every day. Is that a big enough clue?
How about you give me $549. and I take it away? I'd be half interested in that deal.
Ooh - a mini Bussard. Lovely idea.
Perhaps with an electrotether to help with iniital accelaration?
"Is your Apple gadget made of human misery and eco-ruin?"
I can't see that Apple are any different in this regard than anyone else. You can go and buy a reasonable quality socket set (in a nasty blown plastic case) for a couple of hours wages. When I started work it would have been a couple of months wages.
When I was brining up my girls a school uniform would have cost us a few hundred pounds. Now, decades of inflation later, you can get one from Tesco for a tenner. They are not made by the school uniform fairy.
This is a major success of capitalism (I nearly wrote crapitalism) and a major failing of society.
Redmond want to find out if they can fool all of the people, all of the time.
A lot of people - including my humble self - were saying "this is madness" right from the start.
To be fair, the comment under the story by adgec is a work of genius.
>You could get the idea they are doing it just to attract companies
any other explanation? We thought the title would look nice in Hansard? A big company did it and ran away?
Congratulations to the Germans for stating the bleeding obvious. Now sod off unless you want us to quit the EU.
Isn't Inmarsat Geostationary any more?
> how long the naming committee took
12 lobster dinners in 12 different resorts around the planet, one imagines.
A nice solid bit of writing.
Oh, alright then.
You want the taxpayer to subsidise Murdoch as well?
I'd like to see the Virgin cable network in Lincolnshire.
Back in the 1950s the 'redifussion' system was part of the build when new towns were constructed.
Since the Millenium we have had estates added to Bourne and Spalding etc. that have doubled their population. Why was cable not compulsory for these builders if we are serious as a nation about competition?
I would strongly suggest that Sky are told to OffFuk, and that they aren't getting access on the cheap.
If they want cabinets, let them put their own up. Competition is not competition if it relies on the opposition doing all the work then waltzing in at the last minute.
>meaning the "big switch" would probably be trivial to implement.
I'd have thought so. Most survey-grade instruments allow you knock individual birds out of the solution, so you can limit yourself to one system, but not with a 'big switch'.
I thought, all along, the idea was to have a subscription-based service (even if it was a one-time cost rolled into the price of the reciever) to provide commerical resiliance over government fickleness. I'd even be quite happy to punch in a 20-digit number sent out each year to EU taxpayers. If I had to subscribe separately I'd pay a fiver a year.
I understand that lots of recievers have both glonass and navstar, but I have yet to see a reciever with a big switch saying "believe the yanks" or "believe the cossaks". when "believe the beethovenists" becomes available it will be interesting to see what happens.
This doesn't sound as bad as people are making out - there seems to be no intention to identify a named individual, although there is always the possiblity that the security people will want access but it all sounds stand-alone to me.
That said, since I just walk past billboards 95% of the time, and the other 5% of the time I am staring in complete bewilderment as thought at an alien culture, I do think they have some software challenges ahead.
Why don't we all wear Bill Oddie masks like Clarkson driving across america?
I have always been impressed by the quality of Eduroam, and in an earlier life Janet, and all the other academic networks: look at the volumes of data that astronomers share, with apparent ease.
I suspect that the reason is management. The institutions are clearly in the hands of the academics, and the IT people are clearly expected to provide a working system.
Compare that to the commercial world, for example $MEGACORP type working, where IT has been outsourced to the likes of ATOS, and they have no understanding of who is the tail and who is the dog. Getting anything fixed or done is all but impossible.
Now look at government: government computing fails because the people who think they are in charge have not the faintest idea of what they want to do, and even less of how it may be done, so the people selling them systems can get away with murder.
Congratulations to the academic world for running things properly, I say!
Anyone taking bets who will bid?
Who will get the contracts?
And if anything gets delivered?
I would like to see a contempt-of-court type sanction where the judge can just fine one (or both) sides for being vexatious litigants and wasting everyone's time. Would have come in handy with SCO/IBM as well.
5 billion paid to the public defence system to help the impoverished get justice would go down rather nicely, I feel.
I applaud people working hard at a good idea.
I really like the idea that the fire brigade or coastguard could lob a few of these about and get a good idea what they are up against. With that in mind, perhaps he should be interleaving IR cameras with visual light ones?
That picture of the tabletette in a monstrous keyboard dock is one of the funniest things I have seen for a long time. No-one in their right mind is going to do that with it, surely?
sodding great camera and no removable storage?
who thought of that then?
>is it self-awareness or just a simulation of such?
does it matter? (That's the round two question for you!)
Would that affect how you treat them?
If so, how can you justify treating humans differently? You have no way of knowing if the people around you are real, simulated, or a figment of your imagination. You just need to act in the right way regardless.
It persuaded Holly to trade run-time for IQ.
I'm not too worried what they look like, but if they are individually sentient and intellectually capable, I would expect to treat them as equal.
I'm not going to treat an automatic vacuum cleaner as an equal, but an Artificial Intelligence would deserve respect.
...more than once
"Hello to Jason Isaccs"
>The jitter wasn't too bad
That's a ringing endorsement, that!
> a good plot
Sorry? was there a different one I didn't see?
I saw one whose story line had been bent around the opportunities for special
deffects . Those effects were very good, and the world created fantastic. But Plot? meh.
Hence the Wittertainment code of conduct. http://www.bbc.co.uk/5live/films/code_of_conduct.jpg
If those sales figures for the XPS10 are right, they could double them by putting linux on them
And the headline reduction is in the connection fee. Who gives a stuff about the 1-off charges? it is the recurring cost & service level that matters.
i had no idea people thought the problem was to the right of the decimal place.
>I would be interested to know what other "box" you think the OEM's should
>of been building,
They could have - and still could - offer exactly the same box with a working Linux installation. Nothing stopped them doing that.
Except bullying by Microsoft
I might experiment with my old idea of 'meshing' all my family internet feeds together between the houses
>not all of us have facial hair and aged over 80
I'm bearded and barely over 60
They had a pre-release period of up to a year during which testers and pundits were telling them TIFKAM was broken: they didn't listen then. The system builders wanted to install start-menu (not button) patches and it was forbidden, instead of listened to. After the launch they were told it was wrong, and went on the offensive about education & practice.
The only people they have been listening to are their own sales force sying 'we can't shift this carp - do something'.
Yes, end-to-end encryption is clever for pre-established links. But it's poor at widespread dissemination, which is (I imagine) the mode intended for this font.