343 posts • joined 24 Jun 2010
"Self Proclaimed Leader"
"I am the Pope". There you go, I am the self-proclaimed leader of the catholic church and it's billions of believers across the world.
Kid could easily just be a random skiddy from 4chan with delusions of grandeur, whose big mouth got him in trouble.
Re: But is a fluid definition a bad thing?
"Which, actually, it seems to be. The solution to absolute poverty is free markets, trade and capitalism. so let's have those until absolute poverty is gone and then we can think again about relative poverty."
Well you've just written a long article saying that absolute poverty is indeed gone. So in fact what you are saying is it's now time to address relative poverty?
Re: Square watches
"A round watch is round for one reason, it uses hands. If you watch doesn't have an analog face then it doesn't need to be round."
All quite accurate from the perspective of pure logic. But anyone who thinks that the value of a watch is determined by function alone clearly knows nothing about watches.
Round watches look nicer. And you would expect Apple of all companies to know this, after all, they practically exist in their modern form as a result of having rounding the corners off computers and gadgets!
Re: Square watches
That actually surprised me, I'm not an apple fan but didn't expect them to come out with something so.. pedestrian. The moto watch looks loads better, costs less, and I still wouldn't want one.
Pretty much that. Freedom, or security: pick one. Kidding yourself that Android is more secure is just delusional. And that's speaking as someone who'd choose android over the apple alternatives any day of the week.
Re: How about a watch that has the correct time?
Yes but if we're viewing it as a pure chronology device, I'd prefer a watch which never needs recharging but occasionally needs to be set, to one which has to get juiced up every 24 hours but never needs setting.
Re: Google Google Google
No idea where you got that idea from. The mobile phone part of motorola was spun off and sold to google, and the remainder, which is basically telecoms infrastructure went it's own way. It's definitely they 'googly' bit of motorola which is knocking out this watchphonething.
Re: TheRegister Vs. Wikipedia
You need to look at the authors really, El Reg has a number of different voices under one banner (which is a good thing) and some of them have a bit of an agenda - if you read everything you'll find pro and anti apple articles, some 'environmental sceptic' pieces leavened by the occasional bit of reportage of actual climate science, articles which are favourable to open source next to others which rave incoherently about "freetards", and yes, a peculiar neurotic dislike of Wikipedia.
Yes, the 'since Gutenberg' stuff is hyperbole, and I agree with the points that sometimes an idea is just waiting to be spawned from the zeitgeist : to some extent it's almost pot luck as to who gets credited as the 'inventor' in the end, often it's just someone who was in the right place at the right time.
Mostly I was just pointing out that, whether from altruistic motives or not, and whatever his personal qualities, he's probably had more positive impact on humanity than most, so to me, snide comments about him such as those found in the article just come across as petty jealousy.
"or the UK media, which treats “the Man from the Internet” as a great humanitarian. (For example, like Andrew Marr, here.)"
I realise a lot of people seem to have it in for the guy - the schadenfreude in this article, for example, is a little nauseating.
The thing is, much as you may dislike the guy, much as he may be an @rsehole (I have no idea, personally), he probably HAS done more for advancing access to information and self education than anyone else in history since Gutenberg. So by my understanding of what a humanitarian is - someone who has done a lot for humanity - he probably is one. Unless someone can point out why this is not the case?
I'm not a wikipedia contributor but I use it frequently, it's damn useful. Do you take what is written as gospel? Of course not. Although it's probably at least as accurate as the Enc. Brit. ever was (the only reason you didn't read a lot of crying about errors there was because unlike wikipedia, barely anyone had access to it). That doesn't make it not useful as an excellent starting point for fact finding on almost any subject, however.
Apple don't like sex
Because it's something which even they would find hard to claim to have invented.
Because money is a thing? All that good looking design you see? It cost a LOT of money, I assure you. Apple spend a LOT of time and money on aethetics, probably more than any other company on the earth, so it would be a catastrophic failure if they didn't have nice looking products.
As for never seeing a linux desktop that isn't gaudy or undesirable - linux desktops are pretty much infinitely varied - the number of different environments - often assumed to be a weakness - can be a strength too. Just do a google image search for 'pretty linux desktop' and you'll find a massive variety - some of which even look almost exactly like OSX.
Although I'm not a fan of Apple on the whole..
It must be admitted that "1 Inifnite Loop" is quite a cool postal address :).
Re: The kid I saw on the BBC News this morning...
Coding is the act of writing anything which is a code, that's pretty simple, and not really up for debate, just go and read a dictionary.
HTML is a form of code.
Therefore, writing HTML, is coding.
Actually the mistake is mis-using the word 'coding' when what is meant is 'programming'. Coding is writing in code (and therfore coding is in fact an extremely accurate term for writing HTML) whereas I would define programming to be the use of algorithms to complete a task. Unfortunately programmers have taken to describing themselves as 'coders' (I'm sure I've done so myself on occasion) which is where the confusion has arisen.
Re: The kid I saw on the BBC News this morning...
Look up the definition of the word 'code', please. HTML is a code, as are all programming languages, as is morse code, as is pig latin. So working in it is coding. As a programmer myself, I get tired of snotty programmers sneering at HTML.
Is it a complex code? Actually, it can be, when you throw CSS and the DOM into the mix. Is it 'computer programming' such as the old farts among us understood it 20 years ago? No, not really, but it IS coding.
"OK. Book the 9pm one and hire a Hertz car at Charles De Gaulle airport for my arrival"
I think you are significantly underestimating the complexities of writing software to do this kind of thing.
It would essentially require some kind of unified global payments API or protocol which currently does not exist. Right now, 'Siri' or whatever, would need to essentially 'spider' the mentioned website and intelligently work out how to enter your personal/card details, navigate the booking pages, deal with problems (no car available) etc. That or have a custom-written plugin handling every possible such request.
So while I think that there is some truth in what you are saying, that obviously Google, Apple, Microsoft are walking a fine line - providing a marketplace for app developers while also being the biggest competitive threat to those same developers - the actual 'phone that does everything for me' scenario you seem to be describing is not currently anywhere on the horizon.
Basically they need some sex in it nowadays for it to be viable - or at least that's clearly the conclusion they have reached, not entirely sure I agree - and Capaldi is a little old to be flirting with the current intergalactic companion totty, so they felt the need to over emphasise the lesbo-lizard action. A bit heavy handed, but that's modern Who for you I guess.
Re: So basically...
Sometimes it's right to bite the hand that feeds you, if the body attached to the hand is doing stuff which merits a biting.
This will be great
Assuming you have a floor which is already almost clear of obstacles, of course.
I, on the other hand, have something called a 'child'.
Given that aircraft can be downed easily enough by geese, I suspect collision with a whale will result in both the whale and the sub getting 'shredded'.
That's not a mechanical keyboard. Cherry keycaps or GTFO.
Also no mention of N-Key rollover or similar.
You're right that the prices are silly, however. Still, these keyboards are aimed at people who don't know any better and are impressed by LCDs and the like. Keyboards from companies like Ducky, Filco are better but less flashy and a little less pricey (though still expensive).
Re: Good luck with that
Given that by the sounds of it it's mostly Yet Another Gnu/Linux Mashup, porting applications might not be much of a struggle.
Someone will inevitably link this, it may as well be me:
Re: Aiding and Abetting?
The problem with a tip-off for something like that is that for every actual murderer grassed up, there would be a dozen wannabe crime novelists and fifty people with ghoulish imaginations who were simply bored and/or curious.
Re: The only way to watch whatever ya want
Plex is also good. Tried Xbmc and various other alternatives, and having actually paid for plex I don't feel like I wasted my money, it's very nicely presented, and has that 'it just works' thing down nicely.
Re: Ads are good …
Yup, nothing has done more to damage my opinion of oracle than having to uncheck the bloody 'ask toolbar' option every time java needs an update (which seems to be every day ending in a 'y' as far as I can work out). Just makes them look cheap: "You're a multinational seller of enterprise software, and yet you need to make that extra buck by bundling crapware with your installers?"
Re: @Dan 55 (was:To say nothing of the addiction factor ...)
Sons and daughters of siblings-in-law are customarily referred to as niece and nephew. If you want to be anal about it you can say step-niece. "Wife's brother's child" isn't "accurate", it's silly.
Re: Google copying
What's this "Bing" thing? Never mind, I'll google it.
Re: PHP is like democracy
Perhaps you're right, I've never been an OO purist, but it has native support for objects and my previous language of choice was perl which had OO grafted onto it in the most monstrous way imaginable (although I understand that the semi-mythical perl 6 improves on this).
Putting aside high-falutin' arguments about it not being pure OO because it has raw scalars or whatever, it is a language which let's you encapsulate logic using the object oriented paradigm, and so far as I'm concerned discussion beyond that is into the realms of 'how many angels can dance on the head of a pin' navel-gazing.
PHP is like democracy
In that it's the worst programming language for the web, except for all of the others.
Perl - I love Perl, but if you want to write code which other people can easily grok, this is not the correct language to do it in.
Java - appeals to enterprise scale application writers perhaps, but the overheads are just too high for typical use cases.
C# - I have a lot of respect for C# as a language, and it's solid for web development, the only problem being that it's a gateway drug leading to Microsoft as a wider environment, which most people don't really want on their webservers.
Ruby / Python / Node.js / Insert name of other trendy contenders - Sure, if you like. But at the moment they all a bit far out to ever see the mainstream appeal of PHP.
So people live with PHP because despite it's quirks and inconsistencies it is fundamentally a relatively sane OO language with syntax which is familiar to anyone with a background in a c-like language.
Re: What, not how
Yup and do we really want a whole load of money being spent on making up new laws for this? That would probably requires a small flotilla of lawyers, a gaggle of 'social media analysts' on consultancy fees, and a squadron of civil servants to co-ordinate them.
If the existing laws can cover the scenario I'd rather the money was spent on nurses / the police / filling potholes or generally anything more urgent.
At the price the pi comes at, if it works it's a bargain, really.
The funny thing is that Microsoft and journos (not just the Reg, all the other usual suspects went for a similar bollocks headline dragging in the Pi) are piggy-backing on the success of the Pi to get publicity. Not bad really for a computer which started out as the pet project of half a dozen well-placed nerds and costs less than an evening in the pub.
That's exactly what he said..
Odd the way basically everyone other than MS is being characterised as a 'Revolutionary' here. I guess it's just the usual Reg vision of the 'wild eyed, beard-wielding sandal-wearing freetards' who are apparently waiting to smash down the edifice of capitalism and usher in a new anarcho-communist state.
It's just common sense - publicly owned data should be stored in a public data format, otherwise you just handed the keys to the kingdom to a corporate body. The only shock here is that MS failed to grease the right palms so as to ensure that their agenda gets pushed through.
Re: As a Galaxy Note User...
The stylus will be Apple's next invention...
Apple don't copy, they "retroinnovate".
Guessing he probably didn't snag the Christmas number one that year round.
Re: re. " ... digital vagina analogues ..."
Sounds like a "new media" remake of the "Vagina Monologues".
Macs never really escaped from the desks of graphic designers or others chained to Adobe products, only the media wonks and Nathan Barleys of this world want to pay that much over the odds for what is now basically completely generic X86 PC hardware in a fancy box with a massive premium on the price.
Re: Amazon is a bit of a jungle
You mean that "it's massive?". Very true.
Re: squek squek
It's not that we are spineless, more just that we are massively cynical and have an 'oh not this shit again' attitude which results in a tendency towards political apathy. The fact that all three political parties are in on this gives you some idea why, we pretty much have one political party with three different colour schemes and a 'monster raving racist' party as the only alternative.
Re: First person on the dangerous persons' list
Yeah, he does seem to be that rarest of oxymorons, the honest politician. Probably means he won't last long in the business, sadly.
Re: True bug location.
Apparently though, if you take a unix trick which has been known about, documented and worked around for thirty years and throw it into a document with the words 'exploit', 'vulnerability' and the names of popular current unix-derived operating systems, you have 'news'.
Re: directory write access?
Yes. Basically what they are suggesting is that
- if you have the ability to create files (e.g. some webserver that allows you to upload files and stupidly doesn't rename them using an internal, safe, naming scheme)
- and if the operating system happens to also have some scripted shell glue which runs wildcard commands on the contents of that target upload directory
- and if that shell glue didn't use the ./* convention named above which has been widely used since the 80s to avoid this kind of cockup
Then there might be a problem. But this is in no way a 'newly discovered exploit'.
Re: which is why...
Indeed, this was well known about when I was first exposed to unix in the early 90s.
So basically some 2014 script kiddies just learned about a 80's era issue which has been worked around since forever, and now it's news?
The possibilities are huge
That's a nice citizenship you have there, it would be a shame if someone were to turn up the 'angry' dial on our Regional Mood Control Panel for the UK for a few weeks before the election...
So, about this 'tax on global megacorps' law you were about to pass...?
It seems of late that they have decided that it's not "Evil" if you're not actually shooting bunnies or similar, and that just being ruthless and dirty like every other big corporate entity is "fine".
Ah, you mean the £1500+ imacs? Those are even worse value for money. Who the hell spends £1500 on a computer with an i5 and 8GB of ram? The mind boggles at the sort of PC you could build for the price (and yes, that's INCLUDING a 27" monitor using the identical panel apple used).
Obviously, if you throw enough money at something you would expect a nice monitor. The point still stands though: Apple just buy their panels from LG or Samsung like everyone else, and if you build a PC instead you can always buy the same panel in a monitor with a different sticker on without paying the fruit tax. So claiming that apple is value for money because they have super duper screens is a peculiar argument - when you get down to it they have the same screens as everyone else, and until apple start building their own panels (not going to happen) that will remain the case.
Enjoy your ugly computer/girlfriend and rejoice - from your perspective saving money is all there is so congratulations, well done. You got what you paid for.
Well, with women as well as computers I find that in the long term it's wiser to look at what's under the surface.
So the same to you: enjoy your shallow, dedicated-follower-of-fashion existence, and the expensive trophy wife which from the sound of it you would consider ideal. For me, as for many engineering and science types, form comes second to function.
It's a 1920 x 1080 21.5 inch IPS screen, made with an LG panel. You can get a very similar screen made using the same panel (but with an LG sticker on it) for a desktop PC for £120. While perfectly decent, it really is nothing all that special, and I'd factored that cost into my estimate.
The one defence you could reasonably make for the pricetag is to compare it to other all in one systems, such as those made by Lenovo, in which case it only looks moderately overpriced instead of stupidly overpriced.
It's a laptop part in a desktop chassis though, so unlikely to be thermally constrained that much, and will probably spend a good portion of it's time at the 2.7GHz turbo frequency.
It's not a desktop chassis, I believe - pretty sure these are all-in-one units with the hardware packed into the 'monitor' - so performance is going to be very much like a lappy I would imagine.
And I'm not saying it won't do the job of web browsing and basic office tasks very nicely. However you can easily build a PC for £400 - including a monitor and keyboard - with much better specs - admittedly in more boring and generic cases, but with the upside that you can tinker and upgrade it should you be so inclined.
And yes, probably they will sell. But let's face it, apple could slap a logo on an iTurd, charge £100, and it would probably still sell. That doesn't make it good value for money, however.
- Crawling from the Wreckage Want a more fuel efficient car? Then redesign it – here's how
- Review Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
- Human spaceships dodge ALIEN BODY skimming Mars
- Downrange Are you a gun owner? Let us in OR ELSE, say Blighty's top cops
- Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know