Re: $60.00(USD) difference
Could be worse. Apple charge $125.00(USD) for the same upgrade (16 -> 64) on the iPhone 6.
363 posts • joined 24 Jun 2010
Could be worse. Apple charge $125.00(USD) for the same upgrade (16 -> 64) on the iPhone 6.
There's also a flash banner on the front page of el reg.
I've had flash disabled in chrome for a year or so now, can't say I've really missed it, everything worthwhile runs without it and I can elect to run it in the rare case where I need to.
Yeah HoMM2 was the high point, 3 was 'okay' but since then (and the ubisoft buyout) they have increasing levels of polish but decreasing levels of charm.
Am I the only one who just clicks on a URL in my favourites list?"
That was the norm back in the 90s. But I suspect that most people (like myself) found at some point that ever-growing favourites folders are cumbersome, and become a crutch rather than a valuable tool.
Nowadays I only tend to bookmark very specific pages, usually reference pages which required a bit of digging to search up.
It's due to the 'intellect distortion field' which surrounds the devices.
How else do you think they sell so many at that price?
If El Reg really understood the point of terrorism - and in particular the fact that media coverage is what makes it 'work' - they probably wouldn't have written anything at all on the subject.
I'm not saying western media should censor themselves and not cover terrorism. But the fact that the amount of coverage is so completely out of proportion to the actual effect (when you compare e.g deaths through road traffic vs deaths through terrorism) is precisely how terrorism works - essentially people like to be scared, governments like people to be scared, terrorists like people to be scared, and the media like to be profitable and can do by facilitating all of the above. It's just the rest of us who don't profit from this equation of misery.
I do take your point though that if you have to write about it, it's better to write a 'two fingers up to terrorism' article than a 'hide under the bed the terrorists are coming' article.
I think you're missing the point of terrorism, which has absolutely nothing to do with achieving a traditional military victory such as could be judged based on a 'us dead vs. them dead' calculation.
Strange how many people completely fail to understand the point of Glass, which was never intended to be a commercial product at this stage, being more in the way of an R&D exercise. Par for the course for the BBC News, but you might expect a bit more acumen from a 'tech' news site.
Thanks a lot, very informative answer, cheers for taking the time :).
However, with SATA, unlike SAS/SCSI, the drives aren't on a shared bus, they are each cabled individually to the controller, rather than being on a chain, so wouldn't a SATA raid controller be able to speak to all drives simultaneously using the full SATA bandwidth? Or do SATA controllers acually share bandwidth between the attached SATA devices?
I can see how it would make sense though in the scenario you initially described, where a controller could maximise thoughput by interleaving the dumping of drive-ram-buffer-sized chunks of data very quickly over a highspeed interface.
That doesn't really explain it. There is no reason why RAID would require a much higher interface speed than the disk is capable of. The raid CONTROLLER would obviously require a higher interface speed, but not the drives connected to it.
What exactly IS the benefit of a 12Gbit/sec interface on a device which tops out at maybe 200MB/sec read speed?
Faster access to cached data I suppose, but surely the benefit from that 12GB/sec will be relatively small with a 128M cache on a 4GB disk?
This is a serious question btw, I don't really know my SAS, and I've never really fully understood why companies pay so much more for SAS drives over SATA, though I am sure there must be a reason?
How many recharge cycles do you think the iWatch will survive before it too needs replacement or servicing? At one recharge for 18 hours use on the wrist tablet, my guess is the Rolex / Omega would win that particular comparison.
The swimming pools in Cupertino are all filled with dollar bills instead of water anyway, so I guess it just never occurred to them.
In all honesty, I consider anything which deletes Adobe Reader from my PC to be a good thing, it's just a shame it stops at only removing the installer.
As posted by others, the threats are not hugely credible, but they don't need to be. There was a BBC news article last month mentioning a socially awkward 14 year old boy who killed himself due to falling foul of one of these rackets and believing their threats that they would 'ruin his life', very sad.
I'm guessing it must have been the ResellerExpress software marking it as complete i.e. shipped. I've written software to integrate with Amazon, and normally that's definitely something the company listing on Amazon has to do itself.
The form factor is basically dictated by the screen. Basically if you think about it a smartphone is a screen with as little plastic/material around the edge and as little material on the back as possible.
They don't all look alike because they are copying iPhones. They all look alike because that's the nature of a mobile touchscreen device.
I've certainly seen plenty of garbage code written in both.
A degree and thirty years of programming experience means nothing, clearly I should be posting about my lunch on FaceTwatter and uploading amusing photos of my cat on instagram if I want to be a true "IT Authority".
Amazon also have a business outside of 'cloud services', several in fact.
"I am the Pope". There you go, I am the self-proclaimed leader of the catholic church and it's billions of believers across the world.
Kid could easily just be a random skiddy from 4chan with delusions of grandeur, whose big mouth got him in trouble.
"Which, actually, it seems to be. The solution to absolute poverty is free markets, trade and capitalism. so let's have those until absolute poverty is gone and then we can think again about relative poverty."
Well you've just written a long article saying that absolute poverty is indeed gone. So in fact what you are saying is it's now time to address relative poverty?
"A round watch is round for one reason, it uses hands. If you watch doesn't have an analog face then it doesn't need to be round."
All quite accurate from the perspective of pure logic. But anyone who thinks that the value of a watch is determined by function alone clearly knows nothing about watches.
Round watches look nicer. And you would expect Apple of all companies to know this, after all, they practically exist in their modern form as a result of having rounding the corners off computers and gadgets!
That actually surprised me, I'm not an apple fan but didn't expect them to come out with something so.. pedestrian. The moto watch looks loads better, costs less, and I still wouldn't want one.
Pretty much that. Freedom, or security: pick one. Kidding yourself that Android is more secure is just delusional. And that's speaking as someone who'd choose android over the apple alternatives any day of the week.
Yes but if we're viewing it as a pure chronology device, I'd prefer a watch which never needs recharging but occasionally needs to be set, to one which has to get juiced up every 24 hours but never needs setting.
No idea where you got that idea from. The mobile phone part of motorola was spun off and sold to google, and the remainder, which is basically telecoms infrastructure went it's own way. It's definitely they 'googly' bit of motorola which is knocking out this watchphonething.
You need to look at the authors really, El Reg has a number of different voices under one banner (which is a good thing) and some of them have a bit of an agenda - if you read everything you'll find pro and anti apple articles, some 'environmental sceptic' pieces leavened by the occasional bit of reportage of actual climate science, articles which are favourable to open source next to others which rave incoherently about "freetards", and yes, a peculiar neurotic dislike of Wikipedia.
Yes, the 'since Gutenberg' stuff is hyperbole, and I agree with the points that sometimes an idea is just waiting to be spawned from the zeitgeist : to some extent it's almost pot luck as to who gets credited as the 'inventor' in the end, often it's just someone who was in the right place at the right time.
Mostly I was just pointing out that, whether from altruistic motives or not, and whatever his personal qualities, he's probably had more positive impact on humanity than most, so to me, snide comments about him such as those found in the article just come across as petty jealousy.
"or the UK media, which treats “the Man from the Internet” as a great humanitarian. (For example, like Andrew Marr, here.)"
I realise a lot of people seem to have it in for the guy - the schadenfreude in this article, for example, is a little nauseating.
The thing is, much as you may dislike the guy, much as he may be an @rsehole (I have no idea, personally), he probably HAS done more for advancing access to information and self education than anyone else in history since Gutenberg. So by my understanding of what a humanitarian is - someone who has done a lot for humanity - he probably is one. Unless someone can point out why this is not the case?
I'm not a wikipedia contributor but I use it frequently, it's damn useful. Do you take what is written as gospel? Of course not. Although it's probably at least as accurate as the Enc. Brit. ever was (the only reason you didn't read a lot of crying about errors there was because unlike wikipedia, barely anyone had access to it). That doesn't make it not useful as an excellent starting point for fact finding on almost any subject, however.
Because it's something which even they would find hard to claim to have invented.
Because money is a thing? All that good looking design you see? It cost a LOT of money, I assure you. Apple spend a LOT of time and money on aethetics, probably more than any other company on the earth, so it would be a catastrophic failure if they didn't have nice looking products.
As for never seeing a linux desktop that isn't gaudy or undesirable - linux desktops are pretty much infinitely varied - the number of different environments - often assumed to be a weakness - can be a strength too. Just do a google image search for 'pretty linux desktop' and you'll find a massive variety - some of which even look almost exactly like OSX.
It must be admitted that "1 Inifnite Loop" is quite a cool postal address :).
Coding is the act of writing anything which is a code, that's pretty simple, and not really up for debate, just go and read a dictionary.
HTML is a form of code.
Therefore, writing HTML, is coding.
Actually the mistake is mis-using the word 'coding' when what is meant is 'programming'. Coding is writing in code (and therfore coding is in fact an extremely accurate term for writing HTML) whereas I would define programming to be the use of algorithms to complete a task. Unfortunately programmers have taken to describing themselves as 'coders' (I'm sure I've done so myself on occasion) which is where the confusion has arisen.
Look up the definition of the word 'code', please. HTML is a code, as are all programming languages, as is morse code, as is pig latin. So working in it is coding. As a programmer myself, I get tired of snotty programmers sneering at HTML.
Is it a complex code? Actually, it can be, when you throw CSS and the DOM into the mix. Is it 'computer programming' such as the old farts among us understood it 20 years ago? No, not really, but it IS coding.
I think you are significantly underestimating the complexities of writing software to do this kind of thing.
It would essentially require some kind of unified global payments API or protocol which currently does not exist. Right now, 'Siri' or whatever, would need to essentially 'spider' the mentioned website and intelligently work out how to enter your personal/card details, navigate the booking pages, deal with problems (no car available) etc. That or have a custom-written plugin handling every possible such request.
So while I think that there is some truth in what you are saying, that obviously Google, Apple, Microsoft are walking a fine line - providing a marketplace for app developers while also being the biggest competitive threat to those same developers - the actual 'phone that does everything for me' scenario you seem to be describing is not currently anywhere on the horizon.
Basically they need some sex in it nowadays for it to be viable - or at least that's clearly the conclusion they have reached, not entirely sure I agree - and Capaldi is a little old to be flirting with the current intergalactic companion totty, so they felt the need to over emphasise the lesbo-lizard action. A bit heavy handed, but that's modern Who for you I guess.
Sometimes it's right to bite the hand that feeds you, if the body attached to the hand is doing stuff which merits a biting.
Assuming you have a floor which is already almost clear of obstacles, of course.
I, on the other hand, have something called a 'child'.
Given that aircraft can be downed easily enough by geese, I suspect collision with a whale will result in both the whale and the sub getting 'shredded'.
That's not a mechanical keyboard. Cherry keycaps or GTFO.
Also no mention of N-Key rollover or similar.
You're right that the prices are silly, however. Still, these keyboards are aimed at people who don't know any better and are impressed by LCDs and the like. Keyboards from companies like Ducky, Filco are better but less flashy and a little less pricey (though still expensive).
Given that by the sounds of it it's mostly Yet Another Gnu/Linux Mashup, porting applications might not be much of a struggle.
Someone will inevitably link this, it may as well be me:
The problem with a tip-off for something like that is that for every actual murderer grassed up, there would be a dozen wannabe crime novelists and fifty people with ghoulish imaginations who were simply bored and/or curious.
Plex is also good. Tried Xbmc and various other alternatives, and having actually paid for plex I don't feel like I wasted my money, it's very nicely presented, and has that 'it just works' thing down nicely.
Yup, nothing has done more to damage my opinion of oracle than having to uncheck the bloody 'ask toolbar' option every time java needs an update (which seems to be every day ending in a 'y' as far as I can work out). Just makes them look cheap: "You're a multinational seller of enterprise software, and yet you need to make that extra buck by bundling crapware with your installers?"
Sons and daughters of siblings-in-law are customarily referred to as niece and nephew. If you want to be anal about it you can say step-niece. "Wife's brother's child" isn't "accurate", it's silly.
What's this "Bing" thing? Never mind, I'll google it.
Perhaps you're right, I've never been an OO purist, but it has native support for objects and my previous language of choice was perl which had OO grafted onto it in the most monstrous way imaginable (although I understand that the semi-mythical perl 6 improves on this).
Putting aside high-falutin' arguments about it not being pure OO because it has raw scalars or whatever, it is a language which let's you encapsulate logic using the object oriented paradigm, and so far as I'm concerned discussion beyond that is into the realms of 'how many angels can dance on the head of a pin' navel-gazing.
In that it's the worst programming language for the web, except for all of the others.
Perl - I love Perl, but if you want to write code which other people can easily grok, this is not the correct language to do it in.
Java - appeals to enterprise scale application writers perhaps, but the overheads are just too high for typical use cases.
C# - I have a lot of respect for C# as a language, and it's solid for web development, the only problem being that it's a gateway drug leading to Microsoft as a wider environment, which most people don't really want on their webservers.
Ruby / Python / Node.js / Insert name of other trendy contenders - Sure, if you like. But at the moment they all a bit far out to ever see the mainstream appeal of PHP.
So people live with PHP because despite it's quirks and inconsistencies it is fundamentally a relatively sane OO language with syntax which is familiar to anyone with a background in a c-like language.