68 posts • joined 23 Jun 2010
Your lack of Ubuntu knowledge is pegging you as a Shuttleworth Cult Member.
"...There are quite a few alternative flavours to the main Ubuntu: the Xfce-based, Xubuntu, the KDE-based Kubuntu,..."
Since WHEN, in the last three years or more, has Canonical and Mark Shuttleworth produced a Linux distribution called Kubuntu?
Shutlleworth decided more than three years ago to abandon the KDE version of Ubuntu, and fired the one man (he had ONE WHOLE PERSON!) dedicated to the entire (then-Canonical) Kubuntu effort: development, maintenance, bug-fixing, improvement...
Got that? Shuttleworth fired the one person responsible for Kubuntu, and abandoned Kubuntu. Period.
The sole development and maintenance of Kubuntu was picked up by a company named Blue Systems, and--according to all accounts--has done one OUTSTANDING job of creating and maintaining what some claim to be the best of the KDE distributions, bar none. Once again, that's BLUE SYSTEMS, folks (it is VERY interesting to discover that when people (commenters to articles) started pointing out that Kubuntu is NOT a Canonical product, file photos from 2006--THAT'S 2006, MIND YOU!!--showing Mark Shuttleworth sporting a Kubuntu tee shirt--and requisite 'rock-star headgear' started showing up in articles on Canonical...articles which have absolutely NOTHING to do with Kubuntu, and articles which have been written in the last six to nine months. Canonical's crap machine does nothing if not churn out crap exceedingly well).
Of COURSE Mark Shuttleworth wants credit for this Kubuntu effort, and will NEVER admit that Kubuntu is NOT A CANONICAL PRODUCT. Go ahead. Ask him. Ask Ubuntu for help with some ginned-up problem you're having with "...the very latest version of Kubuntu...". We'll all be waiting.
Oh, and by the way, Register: You, as a supposed leader in the world of all things technical, pull another boner like this, and you're toast.
I hope I'm wrong; I sincerely do. I stay on top of developments in the Linux sphere well, and I do NOT remember having seen any news to the effect that BLUE SYSTEMS gave or sold ownership of Kubuntu back to Canonical. As a matter of fact, I downloaded Kubuntu FROM BLUE SYSTEMS not a month ago, for installation on one of my laptop computers.
The word "Canonical" appears nowhere.
Not to put TOO fine a point on this, Register, I DOWNLOADED KUBUNTU FROM BLUE SYSTEMS, AND DID NOT DOWNLOAD IT FROM CANONICAL. Want me to draw you a picture?
Prove me wrong, Register.
AND, ADVERTISERS: WATCH VERY CLOSELY; YOU'RE GOING TO LEARN SOMETHING.
Why I won't let my children resd El Reg...
Isn't that a dirty word? For shame, potty-mouth.
ONLY HALF?! THAT MEANS THAT TATA STILL HAS ALL THOSE PEOPLE TO RUIN PRODUCTS!
"Tata says USA rejecting HALF of Indians' work visa requests "
Perhaps that's because one can see direct evidence of the quality of Tata's work in what they have done to Jaguar/Land Rover since they bought it/them.
Turn out sh*tty work and then bitch about the people who complain. Tata has learned its lessons well from us..
And you think the Feds DON"T want to make an example of Edward Snowden, why?
"I am not sure why the ones who know better are so quiet..."
We have a saying in my neck of the woods which applies admirably here:
"DAMN, BROTHER, I DON'T RIGHTLY BELIEVE I'D'A SAID THAT!
The tooth fairy really exists; and Snow White is still a virgin.
There is wonderful entertainment here!
Doesn't it give you great joy and pleasure, and an almost limitless sense of entertainment, to know that common criminals, crooks, and thieves are at LEAST as smart as the cretins and boneheads at NSA and GHCQ?
"I don't write jokes. I just report on what goes on in the government."
"If it was stupidity that got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?"
"Be glad you're not getting all the government you're paying for."
"Reader: imagine that you're [a member of the government]. Now imagine that you're a blithering idiot. But I repeat myself." --Mark Twain
I can take a shot at who SHOULD be...and have every chance of getting it right.
"No, Seriously, You Probably Can't..."
Mister Sparky Electrical Contractors?
Tide Washing Detergent?
Raspberry Pi Foundation? Uuhhh, they build only real, high-quality product.
Since they've turned Jaguar/Land Rover into what they have, how about Tata?
Did I get close?
(I have since gone back and READ the article, having answered before I read it. It appears as though even though I didn't get the precise answer, I DID get very close).
Secret to success?: Don't do what you don't know
What an absolute formula for failure, and a disastrous one at that:
1. Elon Musk is really not an automobile manufacturer (please spare us all the mindless blather about your hero d'jour until you can provide pictures of an honest-to-God auto manufacturing plant--where automobiles are consructed, beginning-to-end--and with the words "MUSK AUTOMOBILE, INC." in large metal letters on the front of the building).
2. Apple and Tim Cook know ZERO about automobile manufacturing,
3. What do you get when you combine #1 with #2?
Answer: a full-fledged disaster.
(The similarities are more than apt:
What do you get when you combine a cup of wine with a barrel of sewage?
A: a barrel of sewage.
What do you get when you combine a cup of sewage with a barrel of wine?
A; A barrel of sewage.)
Must be something about South Africans:
1. Mark Shuttleworth has been overpromising and underdelivering for so long that he's considered a
jerk joke, in most circles. And the way he has been getting away with this for so long is by continually coming up with headline-class diversions to make you forget (he hopes) about his last disaster/un-fulfilled grandstanding promises (you DO have an Ubuntu TV, don't you?).
2. Elon Musk can only get away with (a) not being a REAL automobile manufacturer (anyone can put together ANYTHING from a kit of parts, and do it ANYWHERE) for just so long; and (b) can explain away his products' "ain't-my-fault" fires-for-no-reason for only so long. "WHAT WE NEED NOW IS A REAL DIVERSIONARY TACTIC, BOYS! That ought to take their minds off of what is obviously a MAJOR, BASIC design flaw."
You've learned your lessons well, Musk. Only problem is, for you and your fellow countryman, continuing to come up with NEW diversions is an end-game. That's harder than actually doing real work.
3. It wasn't apparent at first, but the honor of beginning this saga belongs to a South African by name of one Adam Osborne, who started out by flexing his massive ego brain muscle by giving seminars to Silicon Valley giants and writing books in the midst of the microprocessor craze, starting
in the mid-1970s (I was the personal
recipient victim of an Adam Osborne pontification at Fairchild Semiconductor, Inc., as to how the future of microprocessors lie in the magic of MICROCODING. In support of what he hoped would become a blockbuster of a hit book on MICROCODING (what's that you say? What's 'microcoding'? Clearly you have ZERO potential for signing up for South-African bullshit.
To make a long story short, Osborne, having a full-blown case of the South-African national disease--suffering from delusions of adequacy--started his own computer company, because he was obviously brilliant, and knew much better how to build computers than anyone else.
And then promptly ran the company into the ground.
He did this via the absolutely brilliant move of announcing his second, MUCH MORE CAPABLE machine while the first model was enjoying a modicum of success, mainly due to 'early adopters'. Because of his loud mouth and massive ego (no similarities here, right?), sales of machine #1 dropped to zero. Like, overnight. Osborne went bankrupt.
BECAUSE OF THIS FIASCO, Adam Osborne has the unique distinction as having gone down (good choice of words, that) in history as being THE source of a neologism which refers to the killing off of a product (line) by announcing its much-better successor far too soon.
This brilliant strategy--and neologism--is now universally known as 'osborning' a product, or an entire product line.
There exist enough data points now, I think, to consider that there exists a National Disease of South Africa.
The ONLY way was to find someone who'd never heard of Microsoft.
So you expected something different?
The only way to make a passenger balloon REALLY rise is to throw all the ballast overboard.
"Is modern life possible without a smartphone?"
The article which would accompany such a title is a joke, right?
I, as well as most people, can 'make a leap': That's the reason I didn't waste my time reading the "article''.
Running out of serious material, El Reg?
Hey! I've got a REAL blockbuster for you: "Is Modern Life Possible Without Mark Shuttleworth?"
Go with it!
All It Takes is a Galaxy-Sized Computer. The NSA Could Do It if They Had Spare Time
Was there ever any salmon of doubt?
Poor Heisenberg; Poor Physics Discipline; Poor Physicists; Poor Physics Students:
now , instead of not knowing which of two states (I know, I know: at the same time) is the correct one, now we don't know which of twenty-seven states, at the same time, is the correct one.
But this is great news for all the "quantum physics pseudoscientists": more fodder for their artificial intelligence.
"Aachh!"--one can almost hear him exclaim--"This [(quantum physics) paper/hypothesis] is so bad, it's not even wrong."--Wolfgang Pauli
"If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics"--Richard Feynman
All You Need is a Galaxy-Sized Computer to Figure This Out.
Was there ever any salmon of doubt?
Good show, FreeBSD worker bees (or is that 'worker-BSDs'? Sorry; I couldn't resist).
It's heartening to see FreeBSD alive and well, even if it's not giving Linux distros sleepless nights.
It's a good, solid operating system which provides a viable option if you would like a different FOSS system with good support--via the FreeBSD community--and good documentation, both on-line and via many good books. And--by the by--a good way to learn 'almost'-UNIX (I personally think of it as UNIX, but I know I'd be flamed by the purists if I had not provided the qualification).
What a bunch of wimps.
WhatEVER happened to Mark Shuttleworth's much-bragged-about (so what else is new?) Chinese adoption of Ubuntu?
Can't these Chinese wait for a few more missed deadlines--with accompanying feeble, transparent, prevaricating excuses by Mark Shuttleworth--on Ubuntu Touch?
What a bunch of wimps. WE can, and DO!
A Linux User Just MAY Buy a New HP PC To Get the Last of the Real Windows OSs.
Want to have some good, clean fun?
Just wait until the other PC manufacturers see what this move by HP does to their already non-moving inventory--and how THEY respond.
AND: watch Microsoft go apoplectic: couldn't happen to a more deserving organization.
We're all missing the main point...
The world simply does not need one more "smart phone" with features promised by an individual who has a long and unenviable history of MAKING grandiose promises, but NOT delivering on ANY of those promises.
If I had wanted a brick, I'd have bought a brick.
There is no defense (sic) for the existence of, or foisting on the general public, a 'computer' which is not a stand-alone device. Since when is a personal computer a device which absolutely NEEDS an external communications connection a personal computer?
Microsoft may be the epitome of sleaze, but not in this case: Google is.
Microsoft is merely pointing out what the press refuses to do; making the non-technical gullible aware of the fact that, in the Chromebook, they do NOT have a device which can be used in planes, trains, cars, or any place without internet--the objections of the cognicenti and artificial intelligentia notwithstanding. And yes, I realize (sic) that Microsoft is doing this, all the while practicing their own brand of larceny on the technical AND non-technical gullible.
This is the first time in my long career in CS that i have ever said, or thought, this: "Right on, Microsoft!".
As for the post(s) accusing us Yanks of having no sense of humor (sic), we created the Chromebook, didn't we?
What?! No acronyms, nor abbreviations?
It is said that eskimos have a t least forty (or more) different words for different types of ice(s).
Anyone want to hazard a guess as to their word for "ice" which stops neutrinos?
And: I realize we're talking about different parts of the world; no geography lesson needed.
Cold fusion, anyone?
Let's see if I understand correctly...
Neutrinos, which supposedly can travel from one end of the universe to the other, passing through absolutely ANYTHING, including Kryptonite, strip shopping malls, and that densest of ALL known materials, administratium, can be stopped dead in their tracks by Antarctic ice?
Sounds like we're on to a new defensive weapon which lends new meaning to the term "cold war".
Just don't let the Neo-Nazis, Neo-Commies, or the Academic-Research bandwagon-jumpers-on know about this.
"If you have anything of importance to tell me, for God’s sake begin at the end.
--Sara Jeanette Duncan, 1861-1922
I have not read any of the comments--sorry, I'll do that later--but I feel as though I could summarize the general tone fairly accurately.
I will give you a brief bio in following Ms.Duncan's advice. I will also use the term "we" rather than "I", because thinking in those terms makes, I think, for a more accurate fable.
We started programming minicomputers and writing productive programs in assembly language in the 1960s.
We also learned Fortran and Basic. We were in a good position to design and program the micros which came along; F-8, 6800, 6809, Z80, Z8000, TI9900, 680xx, I80xx series, and on and on.
We learned to program and we learned languages for the same reason we wrote our own peripheral drivers--using devices which were never meant to be used as a computer "peripheral. We wrote our own operating systems.
It was nirvana when the 8080/5 and Z80 became so popular that the CP/M operating system was created BECAUSE of these devices. Suddenly, there wa an operating system with rational demands and rational ends, and one could be more productive in a much shorter period of time.
All this changed in a very short time as IBM saw the success of machines such as the TRS-80, et al.
When Microsoft entered the picture, there was no longer any need to learn anything, except how to USE pre-written software.
And one contributing factor is the lack of any stability in the programming field. No sooner had we learned to use BASIC and Fortran, than we were told that APL, Pascal, ad nauseum were the waves of the future.
Oh,kids, don't EVER mention that you know COBOL, or BASIC. The one has only, at last tally, more than USD 60 trillion worth of installed, running code which MUST be maintained. The other? I teach, among other things, the discipline of Digital Signal Processing. I recently received a fairly new text on the subject for review. The author had to include large sets of data, complex numerical calculations, and ordered output, all in a well-formatted and labelled manner. He reproduced, for the benefit of the reader, all his computation. It was, every bit, in BASIC, one of the most powerful languages you have at your disposal.o u
Just don't EVER mention that you know how to use it, if you do.
I steadfastly maintain that this pathetic state of affairs exists because the educational process was hijacked by two groups:
a) hardware and software manufacturers who saw in the educational market an opportunity to literally print money by convincing the second group that all they had to do was teach students to USE THEIR PRODUCTS; and
b) the worst of the two groups: "PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS", who are totally and completely clueless as to the proper way to teach young people how to use--and that means ALL aspects of digital technology--this new promise of the future.
Consider this fact: if you are a "professional educator", it is career suicide to admit that there is ANYTHING
which you can't teach a young person.
NO KIDDING?! SERIOUSLY?!
"Galaxy is CRAMMED with HABITABLE WORLDS – and possibly ALIENS"
ALIENS!? NO WAY! You've obviously been brainwashed by Carl Sagan ("One must always keep an open mind, but not SO open that one's brains fall out.").
All the aliens are right here, stealing our precious body fluids (we won't even touch on Social Security funds), abducting us for all kinds of nefarious, unmentionable--even in impolite society-- experiments, and then wiping our memories so that we have ABSOLUTELY NO MEMORY OF ANY ALIENS.
What a TERRIBLE job of objective reporting. Hmmmpf!
Say, here's a thought:
perhaps you could expand this idea into, say, a television series. Call it "The X-Files", or some such. On further reflection: forget it. It would never draw any viewers.
The comment Eric Snowden made popular: "Don't believe anything, or anybody..." was always true.
I worked in the aerospace industry (company redacted) during the extremely active phase of the SR-71. It is common knowledge that whatever specifications were admitted to by the contractor or contractee were off the mark by almost any number you'd like to guess.
What do you think of whatever 'facts' will be admitted to regarding the SR-72?
Not good enough.
Don't stop here. Arrest anybody, anywhere wearing Google Glass, or anything similar which the CopyAsses are getting ready to introduce.
Invoke "Invasion of Privacy" laws.
Simply wearing the device is 'de facto' evidence of use.
A Big Surprise?
Clement Lefebvre can always be depended upon to ultimately employ the correct solution for his users.
This is why he and his work will be one of the "last men standing" when the big Linux 'shake-out' occurs
Puffery, dissembling, circumlocution, prevarication, and lying are no longer nearly as widely-tolerated and embraced (except, of course, by the ignorant) as they, unfortunately, used to be.
Absolutely nothing is to be read into this comment.
"...NOBODY STOPS YOU..."
1. Good arguments, all.
2. The REAL message of your response totally escapes me.
3. Since you've chosen the format for a reply to my (I--supposedly wrongly--thought) fairly-well-thought-out defense (sic) of one small step taken by some very selfless and very concerned individuals to START the stemming of a pernicious tide, I can assure you that we'll all be awaiting your VERY long list of EVERYTHING WHICH I AM NOT DOING BUT SHOULD BE, which no one is stopping me from doing.
I DO have to question the logic of some of the items in your list as to what they have to do with, and how the results compare with the long-term effects of the efforts of Eben Upton, Cambridge University, the Raspberry Pi Foundation, and all who have selflessly devoted themselves to the increase in knowlege of our young people. But, then again, having taught logic for many years, I can assure you that your perception of logic can differ markedly from others'.
We'll all be eagerly awaiting your voluminous additions to the list you've started.
I will read every one. I will not speak to the level of possible boredom of anyone else.
Warmest regards; hands across the sea; be careful what you wish for; and all that. ("Not ending a sentence with a preposition is one of those pathological rules of grammar up with which I will not put..."--Sir Winston Churchill).
"Is the Rπ the savior (sic)..."
Caveat: from an EE, ECE, CIS, Solid-State Physics prof:
As one of my favorite (sic) (have you ever considered that if we Yanks had lost 'The Big One', we'd probably be speaking--and spelling--English today?) tee-shirts says, "What?! Do You Think I'm a Rocket Surgeon?"
The obvious--to most, but I'll get there in a moment--answer is, "OF COURSE NOT"!
Only an idiot would (I'll get there in a moment) so think, and formulate, and implement, a program based upon such a premise. Being a college teacher, I tend to ramble, so I'll make this shorter than I can.
The problem with education at any level is that its direction and--most importantly--implementation has been hijacked by people who have no idea how to teach and motivate CHILDREN--those REAL, HONEST-TO-GOD PEOPLE, people, whose formative years are between two and seven.
Until YOU get the "Professional Educators" out of the way of the education of our young, you will see only what you're now seeing: disaster. 'Nother (sic) caveat: I quit teaching, in no small part, because of this problem.
Again: from someone who has seen for far too long what Cambridge and the Raspberry Pi Foundation has observed; and are trying, in their own small way, to provide a starting point for attacking the problem.
There's a REALLY GOOD point HERE; It simplyneeds to be better articulated.
I think the commenter might be confusing opportunity with mandatory requirement.
There's no question but that there is a desperate need to teach our children how to best handle the teaching of this "new" technology, There's also no question that the way it's been handled so far is an absolute disaster.
The reasons for all this and the methods to combat it MUST be revolutionary and are too important to be left to professional "educators" and pedagogues.
My suggestion is very complicated: it's called 'Back to the Basics Plus Two": back to 'readin', writin', and 'rithmatic, PLUS a very strong dose of DISCIPLINE and LOGIC.
You'd be amazed at what young people would accomplish under this regimen, and out from under the thumbs of "professional educators".
There can be no dignified title to these ravings.
You discredit yourself by deigning to give Mark Shuttleworth a forum. Ever.
Where did you discover your first clue, Sherlock?
"...but somehow El Reg doubts customers will be flocking to the stores. "
Re: S.O.S.S.: SAME OLD SHUTTLEWORTH SH*T
Learned some new words from your comic books, today, eh?.
Pity, but the only new word you learned, you misspelled:
The word is not "noobuntu", but rather "NoUbuntu".
Re: IT'S LACKING A LOT
What else would you expect from Shuttleworth?
A SHUTTLEWORTH DEADLINE? DOES THE WORD 'OXYMORON' RING A BELL?
"I LOVE deadlines. I like the 'whooshing' sound they make as they go rushing by."
and, obviously (based ONLY on everything he's EVER announced), so does Mark Shuttleworth.
S.O.S.S.: SAME OLD SHUTTLEWORTH SH*T
"Shuttleworth, speaking at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES), said he was committed to unleashing a “full smartphone experience”, powered by Ubuntu 13.10, on the world."
Hasn't Shuttleworth unleashed far too much on the world already?
"Shuttleworth wants his distro to power 'tablets, phones, TVs and smart screens from the car to the office kitchen'."
Hasn't Shuttleworth unleashed far too much bullshit on the world already?
"Given how far short that project [Shuttleworth's crowdsourcing fiasco] fell, and given the huge amount of coverage it generated, we were left wondering whether the whole thing wasn’t just cheap PR ..."
"Hasn't Shuttleworth unleashed far too much cheap PR bullshit on the world already?
Re: I'm NO MS supporter, but can't figure out why corporates haven't moved to Open office ?
Can't understand, eh? Choose from the following list ("all" is a perfect answer):
Couldn't understand if they would/could read.
Feel free to add to this list.
City of Munich: Four Steps Forward, π Steps Backward
"City of Munich Throws UBUNTU Lifeline..."
WTF! The tone of this article, or rather the title, suggests that Munich is doing XP hold-outs a favor.
Munich is doing a favor by suggesting that people use an operating system whose goofball, megalomaniac, SelfAppointedBenevolentDictatorForLife has gone on record as saying that Ubuntu is NOT Linux, and he'd rather people didn't refer to it as such?
XP Hold-outs: try Linux MINT instead; it's been much more popular than Ubuntu for a long time.
Everyone says it's much more XP-friendly, and every Linux user KNOWS you won't get shafted by ITS founder, Clement Lefebvre.
Suggesting they use Ubuntu, huh? Incredible. I thought these people were tech-savvy.
Balmer on skis?
We all need to read
“Schneier on NSA's encryption defeating efforts: Trust no one"
by Grant Gross, IDG News Service, September 06, 2013, 4:06 PM.
Re: John von Neumann
One question, one comment:
Someone needs to dig very deeply into why INTEL is trying to strong-arm anybody having to do with the software design of SECURITY implementation. No ties to the spooks, huh, Intel?
Perhaps the EFF needs to get involved here.
Wait...one more time; let me see if I understand correctly. A HARDWARE manufacturer is trying to INFLUENCE the DESIGN of an OPERATING SYSTEM'S SECURITY PRACTICES??!!
"I am so glad I resisted pressure from Intel engineers to let /dev/random rely only on the RDRAND instruction... Relying solely on the hardware random number generator which is using an implementation sealed inside a chip which is impossible to audit is a BAD idea."
A very, very bad idea, indeed.
Intel's got a bad case of "Let's All Follow Microsoft"
I can buy a complete computer for $199 AND it's expandable AND it can be converted to run Linux.
Here are the specs:
11.6" (1366 x 768) HD display
High-brightness, 200 nit screen
285 x 202 x 27.35 mm
3 lbs / 1.38 kg
Dual-core Intel® Celeron® Processor
3 x USB 2.0
1 x HDMI
1 x VGA
2-in-1 card reader supporting: SD, MMC
2 GB DDR3 RAM
16 GB Solid State Drive*
Stereo internal speaker
4 cell, 37 Wh battery. Up to 4 hours*
Oh, by the way, it's called an Acer Chromebook C7M!
Take your Minnowboard and stuff it, Intel!
Maybe if we spruce the old place up...
Please ask the galactic estate agent the Penultimate Question:
So, how much can we get for the old place if we do a great landcape job, replace the roof, go all-out upgrading the loos, and replace all the kitchen appliances with stainless-steel? Oh, I almost forgot: we'll replace those bourgeois formica countertops with granite.
What's the answer, meece?
If 'dumb' is what they want, let them use Windows, or Ubuntu. If not...
Will there be jubilation and dancing in the streets if the Rsapberry Pi Organization dumps all its current aids to learning the device, and, instead, forces everyone who wants to use it to write their own Linux OS from scratch? To really weed out the slackers, how about Slackware? (not sorry about that).
"...Thou hast most traitorously corrupted the youth of the realm in erecting a grammar school... thou hast caused printing to be used...".
--Shakespeare; Henry VI. Part II
"Mozilla has already lined up hardware and carrier partnerships around the world, including the US which is home ground for the iPhone-Android duopoly and where Sprint is now working to bring some sort of Firefox OS phone to the market."
And then, of course, Tizen is coming to further simplify the world.
Bye, bye Ubuntu phone..
Massively-Parallel Computing: the elusive goal (so far....)
One can only hope that this new generation of ultra-low-cost computers will keep resulting in the design and construction of more and more massively-parallel (MP) computers.
Why? Because what is and has been missing from the MP scene in order to realize the full potential of MP computers is the SOFTWARE to fully make use of the hardware. As the cost of the hardware approaches zero--relatively speaking--we self-important computer engineers are going to have to stop kidding ourselves that we are doing something REALLY IMPORTANT by designing and building the MP machinery; we've got to finally 'fess up to the fact that all along, that's been the easy part. Now we've got do the really HARD work: design the assemblers, compilers, and high-level languages to make it all really, REALLY WORK.
And one more nice feature of low, low cost MP computers: don't bet against a ten- or twelve-year old boy OR girl--or a group of them--doing the seminal work on the MP critical software (their advantage over us? They, unlike us, don't know that it can't be done).
Re: @tabman: THANK YOU!
Less than one hour, and already one downvote. How about that?
My point made!
Get a life, you gits.
Regards to all, even you mindless, ,know-nothing (except how to play games; this IS a great game, isn't it!), web-enabled super-heroes.
@tabman: THANK YOU!
A huge "THANK YOU!" for changing the subject!
I am continually amazed at the amount of time and bandwidth wasted when someone sees, and creates, an opportunity to bash an object of their disaffection; and bash the bashers.
Same ol' same ol. Ubuntu and Shuttleworth are irrelevant, and off the radar.
"...First the bad news: most of the big new features planned for Ubuntu 13.04, or Raring Ringtail, haven’t made it – they’ve been pushed back to 13.10, due in October.
"...prompted Ubuntu founder Mark Shuttleworth to promise that future releases would offer ".
"...Ubuntu 13.04 is actually the sort of release that has been missing lately from the Canonical camp...".
NO, IT IS NOT.
It is precisely the type of offal which Shuttleworth and Canonical have been serving up since rev. 11.04: bug-ridden, diminished capability, loaded with 'features' which are only there to stroke Shuttleworth's massive ego, and pre-loaded with promises from Shuttleworth to fix all the blunders in the next release.
Given your own writing and assessment of 13.04 (see above), would you please explain, Mr Gilbertson, how you arrived at the conclusion contained in the last quotation, above.
"One small deed is worth more than the most grandiose of promises"--a fact never learned by Mr Shuttleworth.
He has one year. FireFox OS will close his doors, and solve all our problems
The world is going to get an Ubuntu which really works, and will work fabulously. So much so, that the Chinese will teach us all a lesson in capitalism: it will sell ITS version of Ubuntu to the rest of the world for $4.99, and make bazeelions of dollars.
Oh, and in the process, it will tell Mark Shuttleworth to go take a hike; that they've gotten all they need from that lame organization. Yes, Mark, the Chinese are going to show you how correct you've been all along: there IS a way to 'monetize' Ubuntu. Just sit back and watch. And don't even THINK about legal matters--you're now dealing with the world's largest software pirate, and THE entity which started the crumbling of the Microsoft empire, when they told Microsoft to take a hike.
Good-bye, Mark. I'm looking forward, finally, to a really, REALLY good version of Ubuntu.
UBUNTU is NOT LINUX; no carbon-based life-form thinks it is.
"I give ubuntu another 2 or 3 years before they'll vanish completely."--I did that last year. Take a number and get in line.
"loving the fanboi down votes :)"--read this comment's title.
" Having been burned by Ubuntu, I won't be looking at Linux again, except maybe in 5 to 8 years time..."--so how do you feel these days about your Lord High Everything Else, Ubuntu cretins? And DO factor into your reply Shuttleworth's latest LINUX-KILLER (READ THE QUOTE AGAIN, BRAIN-DEADs), version 13.04.
"At the moment, if somebody asks me to install Linux for them, I use Mint..."--@Rambler88: UBUNTU IS NOT LINUX!
...and on and on and...
...this is too easy; there's no sport involved.
All you folks considering REAL LINUX, read all these comments, and more: start with the articles in PC GAMER for a real eye-opener regarding a real pro's real-life experience with Ubuntu. If anyone ever suggests you jump into LINUX by using ubuntu, tell them you said LINUX, and walk away. Then get Mint LINUX.
Yeah, yeah, yeah Shuttleworth. Where've we heard THAT before? Oh! Now I know...
"But Canonical's Shuttleworth disagreed, telling ZDNet that although Ubuntu for devices is a work in progress, the vision for the platform is clear."
Before Shuttleworth introduced his beloved Unity interface, his puffery regarding his savior of all Linuxdom was that it was "...so simple that even your Mum could use it...".
AFTER its introduction, and it bombed big time because it was executed so poorly, Shuttleworth's circumlocution was at its worst (He probably thinks he was at his best): he never actually SAID it would be READY when introduced, and that all us boobs and nincompoops should have KNOWN that it was--here it comes:--a WORK IN PROGRESS!
"I never said all them things I said!" --Casey Stengel (stolen by Yogi Berra)
"No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar." --Abraham Lincoln
By the way, has anyone noticed that "Ubuntu For Devices"--UFD--is an anagram for "FUD"?
And THE Linux problem IS...
...that there is no organization [sic] (your woord prosessor don't spiel chek good) or entity which has an interest in giving coverage to testimonials such as appeared above, to wit:
"I have no background in linux but have enjoyed setting up a home multimedia server using a Mint and an old laptop."
Please understand that this is not an indictment; merely a statement of fact. It is a fact that the best model for generating robust software must find a way, and reason, to generate revenue, which would lead to "honking its own horn."
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Did Apple's iOS make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Neil Young touts MP3 player that's no Piece of Crap
- Review Distro diaspora: Four flavours of Ubuntu unpacked
- Pics Indescructible Death Stars blow up planets using glowing KILL RAY