Re: Seems a little apples vs oranges
>Flash isn't more expensive than 15K hard drives.
I'm quoting the article:
"We should note that Violin's raw $/GB cost is higher than 15K disk, but after deduplication and compression are applied, the effective $/GB cost is similar to 15K disk, even below it, depending upon the data reduction ratio. Intuitively, these customers are storing any immediate-access data, like mail, on flash too."
Also, a comparison of the cost of a random 15k drive vs a random "non-enterprise" flash drive means nothing, you have to look at a bunch of factors , MTBF, write endurance, power usage, warranty etc.
For instance, the Samsung 850 Pro 1TB drive, which is about £350 "has enhanced endurance, built to handle a 40GB workload daily". Which is fine if you only intend to write 40GB daily to it, what if you want to write 400GB? Then you'll need an actual enterprise SSD, which are many times more expensive..
Regular hard drives don't have a write endurance, just MTBF , so that isn't a factor for them.