* Posts by Trevor_Pott

5622 posts • joined 31 May 2010

Verizon: We're throttling broadband. FCC: WTF? Verizon: Lol, jk!

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Yup

"Someone's asking you to pay for what you use, and you bitch and whine like a baby?"

I agree, this is exactly the question you need to be asking the cartels. Why do they have such a problem paying for what they use? They use our capital, but refuse to pay for it by investing in new infrastructure. Fucking babies.

As for your belief that "equality = getting some other sucker to pay for my big fat lunch", well...it's clear to me that you subscribe to the cartel mindset and propaganda.

Me, I believe that equality is where everyone pays for what they use, and nobody gets to double dip. So Netflix pays their ISP. Their ISP pays for peering. We pay our ISP.

Nowhere does our ISP get to charge Netflix. I'm paying my ISP for bits to move across the network. They don't get to charge me more or less depending on whose bits they are. They don't get to charge Netflix - or anyone else - to make their bits go faster than those of others.

Equality is where everyone pays for what they use. Netflix pays for their bandwidth. End users pay for their bandwidth. And ISPs invest in new infrastructure.

Nobody gets a free ride. Not the cartels, or their whiny baby bitches either.

10
2
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

The whole event was probably a PR stunt stages from the start in an attempt to give Wheeler a shred of credibility so that when he screws the US re: net neutrality he can claim he's "not a shill"* and that the millions of responses for Net Neutrality really were expressing their desire for internet slow lanes to be created.

But that's all a good thing, because it will keep the filthy freetards from destroying civilization as we know it. The free market will save us all, but only if we regulate against any threat to the business models of established cartels.

Back in you box, consumer. Unless you're going to pay ever more money to not actually consume anything, just get off the internet and leave those bits and bytes to someone who is higher margin than you, mmkay? There's a good prole...

*Despite being the former top lobbyist for the telecom industry

9
2

One Windows? How does that work... and WTF is a Universal App?

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Fully Instrumented

@Jack of Shadows: You've solved it!

Once I started pulling out all the store apps the constant stream of activity to Microsoft's server ceased. My next quest is to find out which of the store apps were causing this, and what, exactly, they were sending.

Also: why some of them were sending so much data...

1
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Generally, if Microsoft "takes some of your files" for something something bug reports it is as part of a problem report process. I've never heard of it just randomly firing when noone's touching the thing before, especially if there are no problem reports left to send.

1
1
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

If the damned thing works, does what it's supposed to do, doesn't have obvious privacy flaws and so forth, then absolutely. It\'ll write up a great review and talk about all the things that have changed for the better.

Unlike fanboys, I'm not biased for or against companies. I absolutely have ideals (like privacy) that I believe in, but I could give a rat fuck about vendors one way or another. That's something a lot of forum rats can't seem to grok. There's so much overwhelming brand tribalism that they just can't understand things like "shitting on a broken product, then praising a fixed one". They think we should have "loyalty" or some other mad whack crap for vendors.

I fail to see why.

Now, if Windows 10 ends up good will I stop calling Microsoft out on their other failures? No. VDI licensing, SPLA licensing, death of Technet, death of SBS, lack of a "zero American legal attack surface" ecosystem for their cloud offerings (such as Office 365). Microsoft has a long way to go before I see them as "the good guys".

But they do occasionally turn out good technology. If and when they do, I have no problems whatsoever with telling the world that. Just as I have no problems looking past the tech to talk about all the stuff they desperately want nobody to mention until the marks are committed to buy.

And the same goes for every single vendor on earth, except Ninite. Ninite gets a free pass, because they're Ninite. We all get one.

I should point out also that I have used the Microsoft Feedback mechanism to lodge about 50 issues. I'm doing the leg work. What about you?

12
4
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

"Oh yes, since then the "evangelism" has grown beyond a few "keen users" to entire divisions. Google it."

And what they're willing to pay! My lordy; but it were tempting.

4
4
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

"I think it's fair to say (given products on different platforms and the ongoing open-sourcing of many of their developer tools and other stuff) that Microsoft are a very different company in 2014"

I don't think it's fair to say that at all. Their corporate culture really hasn't changed much at all since then, with the exception of a minor focus on security...but they all just got fired. Now security is the responsibility of the same people under pressure to deliver to deadline. Which is going backwards into the 90s, thanks.

Nadella's good people, and I honestly believe he's trying to change things for the better, but he just doesn't have the cloud. He's fighting vicious piranhas in the board room and his own executives - none of which are his lieutenants, you'll remember - who are all devoted to protect their empires at all costs.

Microsoft is still very much Ballmer's baby, with Bill's hands deep in the pie, as it was throughout Ballmer's reign. It will be years yet - if it's even possible - before that changes. And Windows 8.2 (now 10) is not something that bears Nadella's personal mark.

Ad for the bundling of IE, I never had a problem with including it in the OS. I did have a problem with building other OS components such that they depended on it. (Windows Update, etc.) It's still a problem. In fact, I have 9 separate bug reports in on Windows 10 right now about elements of the OS that seem to call IE, despite my desire to banish the thing from my sight, and it not being the default browser.

For example: that integrated search shit I can't turn off? Why is it calling IE, when Firefox is my default browser? More to the point, why is it calling Metro IE? There's something broken there.

Funny, isn't it, how those problems from so long ago are still problems. Especially is Microsoft were the "good guy" company you and others so often make them out to be.

They are the product of their history. Good and bad. And change in that company is very, very slow.

16
6
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

I said cloud features <i.of the operating system</i>. Not stuff you voluntarily download after the fact.

Understand me fully here: I have zero problems with targeted advertising, with unified search, with cloud storage or any of this. None. What I have a problem with - a very large, very fundamental problem with - is the integration of these items directly into the operating system.

The OS should be as minimalistic, safe, secure and private as possible. By all means, give me an option post install to download and enable a whole host of Microsoft products and services. Pull up the Windows Store - the one element of all of this I have zero problem with being integrated into the OS, by the way - and give me a face full of Microsoft's products services and applications.

I even think the EU can jump in a lake, and Microsoft should have no reason to display Google's stuff or Apple's stuff. It their damned OS and their damned store.

But don't build it into the OS. If I want cloudy stuff I'll install it. I don't want it turning on without my knowing, or some GPO enabling it, or the feedback mechanism in the OS requiring me to feed them my Microsoft ID.

And that goes for everyone else, too. Google can eat a sack of genitalia for the deep integration of cloudy crap into Android and Chrome. Apple with iOS isn't too bad, and OSX is even better. Canonical's Ubuntu Amazon Spyfest can go straight to the hot place.

There's plenty of "damned good operating system" in Windows 10. But the cloud integration is emphatically not okay. And it would be just as not okay if it were some other company building their shit into the OS too.

If I want your cloud crap, I'll make a conscious choice to install it and punch in my credentials. Under no circumstances should giving up one's privacy be so deeply embedded into any operating system that it's just "the flick of a switch" (or a power shell command, or a GPO) away.

If you want to hate me as a person for believing the above, espousing the above, or demanding the above from vendors, you go right ahead. But I've no time for vendors who view privacy as an annoyance or a second class consideration, and I've less time for fanboys who give those companies a free ride when they do.

27
5
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

It doesn't matter if they "display a warning" or not. Your claim was that they didn't enable it by default. They do, and you're full of shit.

As for your "disable in two places" tripe, it's funny how even if you disable that stuff - when the OS lets you disable it, that is - the damned thing still calls home. There are more knobs than just those, because Microsoft reports more than just your searches. (Not that disabling those seems to stop it from communicating when you search, but I digress.)

No tinfoil hat is required. Microsoft flat out doesn't give a rat's ass about privacy. And they won't, either, unless we make them.

19
9
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: @Trevor

@SolidSquid it's odd. Because it's like half the controls are missing from PC Settings that I'd expect to be there, and those that are there are greyed out. Sort of what I'd expect if some sort of group policy were applied, but I can't find anything in the registry that would administratively disable it.

What's more, there seems to an awful lot of traffic going to MS. Enough that if I was on 4G I'd be actually angry. And there doesn't seem to be a control at all do disable unified search. Hit search in the start menu and it takes you to bing, despite my explicitly disabling that during install.

Bugs I'll accept...but these aren't new features. Windows 10 isn't a new operating system. There's nothing here but a cosmetic layer over 8.1, and a mostly unfinished one at that. There's no reason for this stuff to be broken if it was present and working in 8.1. It's not like those areas of the UI were reworked. It's all the same stuff there.

It's just bizarre.

15
5
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: @Trevor

@Kristian Walsh: part of testing the software is seeing what data it's collecting on you, how you have the ability to turn that off and how much of what gets turned on when you tweak the various knobs.

I have absolutely no problem with Microsoft collecting info on my beta copy. I signed up, I know how that works. I even logged in with my Microsoft account in order to leave feedback.

But when I go explicitly hunting to turn it all off in a separate, created for the purpose of testing that functionality, VM I should be able to do it. Ensuring privacy controls work is a critical part of ensuring that the operating system is ready for prime time. And, to me, it's far more important than making sure the graphics subsystem works, or that the Start Menu doesn't irritate me too much.

I'm beta testing the product and there are notable bugs in how it handles privacy. I'm willing to bet Microsoft won't address them unless lawsuits are involved. Quite simply because that's what it always seems to take with them to get privacy taken seriously.

So you'll have to excuse me if I make my fuss now, in beta, before the product goes out. That way at least there's a paper trail that says "no, actually, this was raised with you repeatedly."

All part of the process of holding their feet to the fire. (Well, bitching on El Reg's forums is an irrelevant part of that compared to sending formal feedback through the various other channels available, but damn it, it makes me feel better.)

27
5
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

"Microsoft never enable stuff like this by default in final release software "

Bullshit. Install Windows 8 and just skip the customization at install. It's all on and streaming your life to them, 24/7. Despite your love of that company, they are emphatically not honourable. They just put hundreds of millions of dollars into deflecting the discussion about privacy - and the selfsame data collection techniques and tactics used by Microsoft - onto their competition.

“Mind Control: To control mental output you have to control mental input. Take control of the channels by which developers receive information, then they can only think about the things you tell them. Thus, you control mindshare!” From one of Microsoft's own documents: http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/comes-3096.pdf

Sorry, but I believe what my packet sniffer says, not marketing. And I'm seeing rather more traffic out of my 8.1 VM than I authorized too. And I just did a default install. Hmm. Even after defanging the thing as extensively as I know how, I've obviously missed something, because it's calling the mothership from time to time.

But it's all good, hmm? Because it's Microsoft?

Sorry, but no beans. On the whole, I mostly like Windows 10. (Despite the now 48 feedback items I've logged about various bugs and nit picks about the UI.) Or, at least, I only hate it about as much as I hate Windows 7, once all the customization is done.

But the privacy thing...that's a no go. There's a lot more going on here than in Windows 7, and there are no obvious ways to kill it.

Google, for all their sins, give you one single location to see everything they collect on you and to delete it, opt out or quit the service. It's time Microsoft did this. And at the end of the day, I don't care whether or not you agree. My privacy isn't for sale, and it certainly won't be a coin paid in the name of your brand tribalism.

49
9
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

I am using Windows 10 right now. And despite there being an option to disable this stuff during setup, it is both re-enabled and greyed out in windows proper. Half the privacy controls are missing and I am seeing quite a lot of traffic streaming to Microsoft-held servers that I explicitly didn't authorize.

So fuck your simplistic world view, fanboy. I'll stop complaining when they act with honour.

44
18
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Also, my desktop is my fortress. I don't want to be giving my account information, search results, backup of my profile and $deity knows what else to a bunch of Americans. I want my privacy, damn it. The desktop does not need to be "cloud enabled".

51
9

Apple, Google mobe encryption good news... for TERRORISTS – EU top cop

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: The lady doth protest too much methinks.

Sure, because all I need to find you is this:

1) Logs of signal strengths of various wifi nodes in the region which can be crunched to give me an approximate location for you.

2) You to slip you and get your face on video

Combine with things like "paying by debit car/visa/using bonk-to-pay transit" or other things and I can narrow down "who you are" pretty easily, if I've a mind to.

If I have the cooperation of other international policing agencies to allow me to gather metadata enough to even narrow your initial access point then I, personally, can pwn you with just the resources of my local police force. And I'm not a cyber security expert.

Do not fool yourself: being fully anonymous on the internet is a damn difficult - and increasingly expensive - job. It involves laundering money, using mules to buy burners and disposable credit cards and various other things to accomplish. The last time I ran the numbers, a single session of true internet anonymity would cost you 4 days or prep time, two mules and $7500.

0
0

Xen sticks pin in bug behind Rackspace GLOBAL CLOUD REBOOT

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Holy shit. That's one hell of a flaw.

0
0

Apple is GOLDBRICKING IT: BEHOLD the iPad Glister-Slab

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

@AC based on the description, it doesn't seem to do anything particularly interesting. I can't see any functionality that isn't already part of my Note 2, and I'm not worried about just taking my Note 2 out of my pocket and using it when I need to. I guess it is targeted at a different market than the one I occupy. Oh well, that's okay, there are 7 billion people on the planet. Not everything has to appeal to me.

0
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

A concise and well thought out summary! Many thanks, sir.

6
2
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Since this thread will soon be colonized by raging JH hating Apple fanboys, can I please divert the attention away from ad homenims for a few comments? I have a legitimate question for the faithful that I just don't really have time to research at the moment:

...what does the iWatch actually do? I have to confess to not having actually looked into the new generation of smartwatches, and I'm wondering what we're supposed to do with one. Also: how is it different from, for example, a Galaxy Gear or a Pebble?

What's cool about it? Why should I consider getting one? If anyone knows the answers, please let me know! Thanks in advance...

9
6

Huawei promises €1.5 BILLION French investment

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Good on 'em. Huawei make some quality stuff. And since both the options on the market are companies from governments that want an abrupt end to world privacy, I'm far more happy to buy my gear from the company working under the government that has the least likelihood to do me harm.

I don't have to ever have anything to do with China other than buying their stuff. But the US I have to deal with all the time, both as a journalist and because some of my competitors are located there. Best then not to use equipment into which they have back doors.

Bring on the cheap Huawei gear, let's see the backside of this proprietary crap and actually get moving with the software defined networking revolution. More bang for the same buck, and less direct effect if they spy on me. Win/win!

2
2

US Attorney Gen latest to roast Apple, Google mobe encryption

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Eric Holder does not get a vote.

0
0

Inateck BP2001 Bluetooth speaker: The metalhead sysadmin's choice? Not exactly

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Symphony of complexity

"blah blah blah, I listen to the output of the radio telescopes overlaid with downshifted BDSM sessions"

:P

Now, the Boston Pops Orchestra, there's music. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b7bnWEP1vw as an example.)

0
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: This is art!

I do, in fact, own an iPad Mini Retina. I even used it on the plane during last week's trip to Austin for Spiceworld to watch some Primeval New World, if you would believe it.

Like it or not, iOS is a major operating system and I am called upon to review iOS-based applications more and more. Thus I need to have one. I even - $deity help me - am beginning to appreciate certain aspects of it. It's a hell of a better design, physically, than any Android or Windows tablet I've ever used.

Even is the OS is pants.

0
0

Microsoft WINDOWS 10: Seven ATE Nine. Or Eight did really

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: tiles on the start menu?

The tiles take all of 5 seconds to remove from the start menu.

2
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Seven ate nine

FINALLY! Someone gets it! Jesus fuck, I've been waiting all day for that. (I was sad when the subed didn't get, nor did ALL OF TWITTER.)

THANK YOU.

My faith in humanity is restored.

0
2
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Should have called it Windows 15

Actually, I buy that, from a marketing standpoint.

2
0

Lenovo to finish $2.1bn IBM x86 server gobble in October

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

You get to provide business to American corporations.

All the more incentive to buy Chinese.

0
1

Balls of destruction CRUSH your fancy new storage systems ... better get used to it

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

The public cloud doesn't eliminate disruption. It only eliminates your ability to deal with it in a safe, reliable and cost-effective manner. I stead you get "hope and prayer".

3
0

Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Limited audience

I've no truck with the "army of yes men" comment. Just the idea that all press become "yes men" when exposed to junkets. We do not.

1
2
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Time to rethink

@Ecofoco

IBM have over 20,000 OSX machines deployed in active service amongst their workforce. They know OSX management better than anyone excepting Google.

0
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Time to rethink

so if MS got some smart people to create a tool (or plug-in) that lets you manage OS X machines, and iOS, that would be $$$ in the bank.

Hi, the latest System Center will do this. Cheers.

1
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Limited audience

but given it's press and Microsoft are footing the bill, everyone will love it regardless

Ahem. May I kindly suggest you go to the hot place for that one. Some of us are perfectly capable of going on vendor-bought junkets and giving them not one iota of slack compared to the scathing examinations we'd give them if we had to buy the stuff ourselves.

Which is why they don't invite me to these things...but we're not all so low on self esteem that a plane ticket and some bad conference food is enough to buy our loyalty, thank you very much.

10
3

iPAD-FONDLING fanboi sparks SECURITY ALERT at Sydney airport

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: i hate this man

If you had to choose between 2 hours of flight or 8 hours in a car you'd realise that 2 hours of being glared at by fellow passengers is a *lot* easier to bear..

Why should I give a fuck about your comfort when you clearly place no value on mine, or an entire airplane's worth of people? Entitled much?

Children aren't special, they aren't wonderful and they aren't carte blanche to act luck a fuckbag. I, at least, don't scream at the parents and tell them to shape up or ship out. I do my best to ignore them, save for the odd glances to let them know that I am unimpressed and that as far as I am concerned, they have breached the boundaries of social acceptability.

So I do my part to restrain my hatred of the squealing nauseants. But fuck you in the face with a bronzed goat if you think for one second I should like having their irritating smell-larva damaging my calm.

0
5
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: i hate this man

Obviously people take kids on planes because they enjoy paying thousands of dollars to be stuck in a large pop can with their kids screaming for a few hours and smarmy entitled gits like you glaring at them all along, not because they have any other valid reason to be travelling.

Quite obviously. Otherwise, why would they do it? That seems to be your reasoning for projecting my actions, so I turn it around on your precious "parents".

You know there's this thing called first or business class,

Funny, there isn't such a beast on many regional hoppers in North America. The best you get is "Economy Plus".

"doubt there are many children in those seats, so please do go ahead and pay double, well more like quadruple, and sit there,"

Oddly enough, I happened to be on one of the few regional hoppers with first class, and it was populated by said wailing and failing larva.

or perhaps you would prefer to charter a private flight for people with children..oh you won't,

No, when I charter a private flight it is so that I can take it my own self to be rid of the children, thanks.

well then, might I kindly suggest you F off then, they have as much right to fly as you do.

Where did I say they didn't have the right to fly? Nowhere. I just said they were fucking annoying and I don't understand A) why anyone would choose to reproduce and B) why they would take their smelly, screaming, irritating-as-fuck larva onto planes.

As for procreating, yes you do have a valid point there, better ask your parents about why they brought such a pompous self important windbag of a 'larva' into the world, shame that.

I can only conclude they were mad. Much like yours, although given you sense of grandiose entitlement and self importance I would also add "soda-mascochistic" to the list.

Your baby is ugly. Deal with it.

1
5
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: i hate this man

Why can't I just hate "people" and only likes ones that prove to be markedly less irritating than the others?

0
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: i hate this man

"a large batch of kids in line after a long flight"

Know what I hate? Children on planes. I would easily pay double if only it meant that I was guaranteed a 2 foot thick soundproofed wall between me and any screeching larva. 5 hours from Houston to Edmonton with that howling larva of doom made me want to drive an ice pick into my own brain.

I still have flashbacks. Why the hell do people procreate, anyways? $deity what a pain in the ASCII...

4
0

US stakes out 'net battleground ahead of ITU meeting

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Open goal for USA bashers

I see no reason whatsoever not to be anti-American, nor are you providing me any reasons whatsoever.

As for "Toronto being a known hotbed of radical Islamic terrorists": bullshit. But there were plenty of Americans that left to fight for Allah. Guess they didn't appreciate your amazing country quite so much as you think the world should, hmm?

There are a bunch of really bad people in this world - ISIS amongst them - but America sure as hell aren't the good guys either.

1
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Open goal for USA bashers

"Let the US bashing posts come, if not for the US, Europeans could be buying head scarfs and veils for their wives and daughters already when ISIS takes over, since Europe is ruled by lamers, even too naive to realize they were spied upon. It is hard to understand that Germany did not offer Snowdon asylum after he revealed Merkel was overheard."

Prove it.

The US lost the war in Iraq. And it was the UK, Canada, France and Germany that have done the bulk of the actual work in Afganistan. The US just ran around and made life difficult for the rest of the coalition.

With friends like the Americans, who needs enemies?

1
1

Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: "mobile first, cloud first"

@Wade Burchette

You must be new here. That's Microsoft's paid AC shill. Don't be surprised or shocked that he twists the truth, stretches it beyond recognition and outright lies in order to defend Mother Microsoft. I've met slime molds with more honour.

1
2
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: "mobile first, cloud first"

Defaults don't matter when you can't use the fucking thing unless you agree to hand over your data. Such as Hotmail. Let's have a conversation about a French journalist, shall we...?

As for it sending off the contents of my local computer, of yes it fucking does. With every search information about what's on your local computer leaks to Bing.

Microsoft robs you of your privacy at every turn, but likes to play innocent. They aren't.

1
1
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Genius

Except the Windows brand name is worth fuck all after repeated stabbing of it in the face with a rusty tractor.

Maybe they should call it Microsoft Steals Your Privacy And Streams It To Bing?

6
3
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: "mobile first, cloud first"

"Robbing you of your privacy first..."

That's Google motto, MS would infringe Google copyright on data stealing....

Since when has that stopped Microsoft? Besides, they rob you of your privacy every bit as much as Google. More, in fact, because Windows now ensures that even your searches on your local computer are streamed to Bing, attached to your Microsoft ID so that they can track you and the contents of the files on your local computer.

Google rob you of your privacy, but at least they're somewhat up front about it. Microsoft lie like a fucking rug about it, put millions into bashing Google about it, then do it twice as hard.

17
4

Oracle plans German DCs to soothe NSA-ruffled nerves

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Unless the DCs are owned and operated by a company with zero American legal attack surface, this means nothing. What a waste of money on Oracle's part.

12
0

Out of stealth, Saisei pitches IP flow controller

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

I am intruiged. Must check them out.

1
1

My TIGHT PANTS made my HUGE iPHONE go all BENDY!

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: My cordless landline doesn't, and that's a phone.

"Can I be a pedant for just a moment?"

Nobody likes a pedant.

1
0
Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Spot on, ElReg.

"And avoid tight jeans so I can carry a phablet? Get lost."

No, avoid skinny jeans because hipsters are a plague that should be fired out of a cannon, into the sun.

2
0

Big dinosaur wowed females with its ENORMOUS HOOTER

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: artist's impression....

Um....I don't think Hadrosaurs had feathers? Fleshy "combs", yes...and possibly even juvenile down. But feathers? I'd love to see a link to hard evidence of this in Hadrosaurs.

0
0

AW, SNAP, Oracle. You've shrivelled up poor Larry Ellison's package even more

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Oh dear....

Yacht. Ellison has a fascination with them.

0
0

Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Chutzpah

3
1

EU dangles $6bn threat over Google in endless search abuse probe

Trevor_Pott
Gold badge

Re: Fake Investigations

Except Microsoft actually were abusing a monopoly...and continue to do so. Windows 8 was nothing more than a transparent attempt to leverage a desktop monopoly to create one in the smartphone space...to the detriment of everyone.

I have to see any evidence that Google are abusing their monopoly. For the record, keeping the really low-quality shite results from the sorts of spammy link farms that are bitching about this with Microsoft's money behind them out of my searches is exactly why I use Google. Because it keeps the trash out of sight.

That's not an abuse of monopoly; that's providing a quality service. And I'd gladly pay for that quality, when I look at what the alternatives are.

0
0

Forums