As he said, women can drive and wear western clothes, in Dubai. But not in Saudi.
6106 posts • joined 28 May 2010
As he said, women can drive and wear western clothes, in Dubai. But not in Saudi.
And yet we all have smartphones which need a daily charge rather than weekly as used to be the case (well my Lumia lasts nearly a week but I don't use it heavily).
If you make decisions on "because they're Apple/MS/Google" rather than on the product being offered then you deserve what you get.
I did find it interesting that nobody in that article mentioned Android, suggesting nobody in the real world gives a toss about the OS... Android phones are often customised so maybe punters don't even realise it's the same OS?!
It's nice you can tell what their time-machine would show them without having a time-machine yourself, or an advanced academic background in history.
Good: allowing you to pass on (!) your data to a family member
Bad: that people need to rely on Google to tell your family you are dead
Worse: that just by stopping using Google... you switch to MS or go to prison... family will be told you're dead
He does have a point though. Although our current "always on" for phones and home WiFi is "always on bit a bit spotty".
I can watch Netflix 24/7 for instance.
But this is clearly not something we're ready for yet, and we're a fairly well equipped nation... in many countries consistant broadband is a bit of a luxury.
Rumours were the PS4 would do this too. It doesn't.
Btw, your Apple Market share comment is totally irrelevant.
One buys a computer every 5 years versus a 2 years upgrade cycle on phones.
Um, that makes it TOTALLY irrelevant? You buy a phone 3X as often as a PC, but the fact it took Apple DECADES to even get to 10% of the laptop market isn't relevant?
Thanks a lot James, I appreciate that.
How is android with 20 different OS versions and thousands of different hardware combinations less fragmented?
It seems shortsighted to say a market cannot turn around. How many years did Apple languish at 1% of the laptop market? How dominant were Sony for cool personal audio?
As for FF OS... please, you're joking right?
I saw quite a lot of modern Nokias in Finland too, and advertised in pride-of-place in shop windows. Not that this makes Nokia less of an also-ran, but there are probably more places where it's doing better than the UK. It's not to be underestimated how much things differ between countries so basing it on the UK/US is not accurate.
Could you comment on how slick it is at switching between apps, loading web-pages, etc? I have the 610 and like it but it doesn't support Skype (too little memory) and can be slow - if the 520 is better than the 610 I'm very interested.
Oh and also... does it work with iPlayer? Windows Phone 7 apparently does not but perhaps IE10 fixes that?
Sounds like a bargain - maybe I'll upgrade my 610 sooner than I expected if El Reg would like to do a review of how the 520/620 stack up against the 'proper' Nokias? e.g. does it hang a lot or is it perfectly usable for web browsing?
Netflix HD (or superHD as they seem to call it now) is really quite good. I'm sure it's not up to blu-ray quality but on my 42" TV I never notice any artifacts or anything. So being able to get 2X as much data seems likely to make a big difference for streaming, at least.
If people think they need 1080p on a 4" smartphone, probably quite a lot of people. The newer iMacs are already at 2K or above and iPad Retina, Chrome Pixel and so on are just about there.
I take your point Peter but if I make something I want to sell, the fact you use it in software you choose to give away isn't really my problem - give your software away for free but I don't want you giving away mine.
I've looked at the H.264 license when we developed software using it and it hardly seemed crippling. I also see no particular reason why something that represents man-decades of work shouldn't require payment as long as that payment is reasonable.
The roots of the OSS movement, Stallman at least, were NOT about software being free but about it being open source so you could buy/license software and get the source-code in case you needed to alter it. That model of OSS is better in my view than the "software shouldn't cost anything" view most take now... I have no problem paying for software.
... the embarrassment of FFOS (or possible FFS) tarnishes his name?
now try searching "maps"
"Not sure when Google last prevented me from viewing Streetmap, though, which kinda undercuts their argument for abuse of market position."
Not if you have the slightest understanding of the subject. MS did not stop you installing an alternative browser to IE.
Maybe you should search for it on the internet
HIRE SOME BLOODY DEVELOPERS WITH THE SOLE JOB OF WRITING DECENT APPS. Stop waiting on everyone else, it will cost 1% of your marketing budget and do far more good.
This is exactly the kind of thing which will not deter experienced pirates - who are not scared of naked IP addresses - but could put off/confuse a vast number of casual "I just want to click download" pirates who use piracy because it's so easy.
Or a .ml?
I love how every story about TV attracts a handful of "I never had a TV"/"I got rid of my TV in 1934 and never looked back" replies. It's almost like having no TV leaves a massive amount of empty time in your life which you try to fill posting about how great your life is with no TV on the internet at every opportunity.
Shame they din't raise you to be less of a prig.
And just as they were starting to see sense and I would've been able to use my Kindle during take-off..
What about the vast number of people who don't really know much about proxies and all that, and simply want a site they can download stuff from? I could see them being affected by such activities - and they probably make up the majority just as most PC users struggle past finding the link to "the internet".
"Hardcore pirates" are like Linux users... the vocal minority only. No measures are likely to quell their piracy but if it is restricted to them, that pushes the whole thing into a much more marginal position.
And thousands of artists a huge fraction of theirs.
Is this how pirates assuage their guilt... delude themselves it's a victimless crime since only giant corporations are affected, who are 'evil', like tax fraud and fraudulent insurance claims?
Please don't get into a "$17 isn't FAAAAIIR" whinge. Learn that you're not entitled to own every CD you might want, or get a better job. CDs and DVDs and games are a luxury.
Weren't there some stats in the news recently suggesting sales HAD increased due to strict anti-piracy laws? I forget the details, maybe someone can recall...
I think lots of people would buy rather than pirate if piracy was totally impossible/impractical. Obviously nowhere near as much stuff as they pirate now.
Facist? What are you, 12? I guess they're also like totally gay?
Like it or loath it, it seems the hardware available for Windows8 is maturing fairly quickly. It'll be interesting to see where things stand in 6-12 months.
<insert douglas adams reference here>
Is that for real? I'm taking a 15-hour trainride from Helsinki to Kolari next week...
Where does it say MS are getting your surfing data?
What a sad lonely life you lead. Sitting there downloading Linux you already have, to stick your finger up at someone who isn't listening.
Sure, if you want to wait several hours and are lugging a full-blown laptop around with you. Meanwhile I could have done some actual work on my generic tablet (well I assume 365 works on tablet browsers... anyone?)
Freetards seem to have this overinflated fear that people are continuously straining to view their files. It's pretty similar to the way Americans used to be afraid of Communists hiding behind newspapers and equally silly.
You should be on TV with material like that.
Then we could turn it off.
Nobody is interested in your boring documents.
It only makes sense a subscription based suite should upgrade much more frequently and with less hoo-hah about new versions, only new features.
Does anyone know if IE10 is being included in this model or will that remain monolithic?
Clearly they are keeping it secret if they are.
How about on Kindle (or Kindle App)?
It can't be fun being the guy who has to unpack it all, scientific equipment padded out with soiled underpants...
Lots of these drunk no doubt
Ah, the typical teenage misunderstanding of the internet.... "it's the INTERNET, I can do whatever I want otherwise they're NAZIS oppressing my FREEDOM!!!1"
A website belongs to someone buddy. FaceBook is someone's property. If I own a website I can delete content on it as I damn well please if I don't like it - just like The Register deletes comments which it doesn't like.
A website gives you far fewer rights than the real world... no recourse, it's typically a dictatorship and you can't do anything to appeal.
>>Time to see Facebook for what it is, advertising.
You think it's a revelation that people using FB Pages for their business/product is advertising? You know, a bit like their own websites?
While it allows owners to try and suppress bad comments, it is still a useful feature based on the way the other changes are described.
Also, how DO you expect a tool which allows users to fight trolling/spam not to also be usable to selectively promote/demote stuff?
But finally, it's worth noting that for companies using FB effectively as a webpage, this is way less control than they can use on their own site. Deleting unfavourable forum posts or what have you is very common when you own the site so this isn't actually changing anything except giving owners more control over things rather than letting FB be in charge as much.
A web browser needs an internet connection? Whatever next....
It's almost as bad as The Register - everytime I post a comment those bastards store it on their server.
I can't even remember Outlook crashing and I use it 8 hours a day...