Re: Soap bubble
Revenues of $600million suggest they are hardly marginalised just yet.
5716 posts • joined 28 May 2010
Revenues of $600million suggest they are hardly marginalised just yet.
I thought 2013 was the peak of the cycle.
I don't want to buy special gloves, I have ones which I like.
Sewing thread isn't an option on waterproof ones but you can buy little finger-stickers or so I hear. Maybe worth a look on Amazon
That's what I want. I'm sick of tugging my thumb out of my glove to use my phone.
It's not personal data, it's music and films and apps on their store. They keep one copy of each file and record who is allowed to access it.
Is it a massive problem if someone finds out you bought Justin Bieber's album?
Isn't FF the one that's going to be all JS/HTML - basically the same idea as ChromeOS? Or was that a rumour only?
My £150 WP lasts about a week between charges and has rebooted perhaps 4 times in the 6 months I've had it - I'd rather it rebooted than just locked up :)
Why does it need an iPlayer app, isn't iPlayer going HTML5 which is supported in IE10 (this is a guess I haven't tried).
It's got niggles and flaws but I've not really spotted bugs as such.
Final proof no doubt that El Reg are paid MS writers
MS would be well aware that businesses wouldn't suddenly jump to W8 because half of them haven't jumped to W7 yet. It's a pattern they know very well because it happens every time and forces them to support software 10 years after the consumer market has stopped using it.
If IE10 was W8 only, that would be another story.
>>Umm, I'll go out on a limb and say planned and enforced obsolescence.
WinXP is about to lose any support or patches. Why would they waste time supporting it, or implicitly supporting it? Considering IE9 doesn't run on XP this is not even an argument, they clearly aren't going to re-support XP.
The argument is only if they should be supporting Vista. I note not one single person has complained about lack of IE10 in Vista which is probably why they aren't doing it... not even Windows users want Vista. No diehard XP users are going to upgrade to Vista when patches stop being released - they'll go to W7 if they can get a copy.
You mean like how IE9/10 run on Windows desktop, phone and tablet which are essentially 3 separate OS?
What they're thinking (I suspect) is they want their new software to use the new OS features, rather than simply target everything at WinXP APIs.
I'm all for grabbing the new version and taking it for a spin... getting a bit disenchanted with Chrome and went off FF ages ago. IE9 is pretty good but still not as good as Chrome so I'd hope IE10 would be good.
BUT that "protracted development" makes me nervous it might not quite be there yet. Not that I use IE as my main browser just yet anyway so maybe I'll take the plunge as and when it wants to install.
I'd rather have a ribbon than use a full application through my web browser.
Or subscriptions to listen to music. Oh wait.
Or here's a really crazy one... a subscription to read books and you have to keep taking them back. Hmm.
The other thing is, if you look around you'll find the subscription model is the one which is taking over - hosting, source control, storage, bug-tracking, music, netflix, yada yada. I agree that the idea of the office suite being an installed app is deeply ingrained so it feels weird but maybe that's where everything is going. Or maybe it's just this decade's trend and it will revert when we get bored of it.
>>Users have total control over where documents are stored, no cloud required
You already do.
>>No restriction on transferring licenses between users and machines
I guess the problem here is that it's much harder to enforce, and we all know how a single copy of Windows will get reinstalled everywhere given half the chance.
>>Why use Office 365 - which is a cloud service then?
So you can switch devices, hot-seat on any PC, etc? Store files in your own private cloud/whatever.
Regardless you miss the point - only a large business can have their own data centre. Small biz typically have a server in a basement somewhere and someone takes a USB disk home at the weekend :)
For them, cloud-based is way MORE secure than they can afford - typically they might not even have a full-time IT guy, just someone helping out.
You might think you're pretty smart and nothing like a sheep/insect. But it's been well-known for decades that en masse, people act in ways that can be studied.
Do you really think it's going to be as simple as "oh you're near this bar, lets send you there like everyone else"? Such a system would in theory automatically avoid these kid of issues although it sounds an absolute nightmare to create.
Because as a company owner yourself, you are well aware of the legal ramifications to the company and its clients? When your employer gets sued for $millions because the guy you hired unofficially was allowed to see sensitive data they promised their client would not go outside the building, you have insurance and legal protection to cover that?
You're just a wage slave totally ignorant to what goes on above you, which is precisely why it's dangerous if you blithely do things your own way. Shortcuts are called shortcuts for a reason.
If the employee wants to do that, they should not be an employee. Be an entrepreneur and set a up a company selling the service.
An employee who does this has no protection if the people he hires screw his employer over. A service company has indemnity insurance, contracts with the sub-contractors, etc.
>>It's a poor sword that doesn't point both ways.
A sword that points both ways would be useless. That's the whole point (!) of a sword, it has a good end and a bad end.
And I don't see you saying that the flow of money from employer to employee being one directional is a bad thing.
I don't know what kind of weird entitlement utopia you live in, but here in the real world a company is not a person. A company hires you to do a job so they can make profit, not so they can help the employment figures. They can choose who to pay to do the work because it's their company, and they are the decision makers.
Or to make it simple for you... employERs do the hiring, employEEs do not.
No, they won't. Many will but it's normally not something you could enforce. IR35 is based on the reality of your working relationship, not what the contract says... if your contract says "contractor will not be subject to direct control" or "contractor is not obligated to accept work" (the other 2 pillars of the IR35 core test) but your client approves your holidays and expects you to be there 9-5 every day unless they give permission, you still fail.
Come join our community http://forums.contractoruk.com/accounting-legal/
>>in the UK, if you can't subcontract your contract then you're usually considered an employee
No you're not. IR35 is normally measured on several factors. Lacking the ability to substitute does not indicate anything. In fact while most contractors have contracts which say "the contractor can provide a substitute" this is subject to the client's approval and is hardly ever used.
Come and find out more http://forums.contractoruk.com/accounting-legal/
>>@JDX: You're a Windows Phone fanboi, we get it
Come back when you can make an argument rather than just insult people for upvotes. If a fanboi is someone who thinks WP is roughly on a par with Android and iOS then sure I'm a fanboi.
HTML5 is not the answer. It lacks many essential features and requires developing in a horrific toolset. That's WHY everyone writes apps for multiple platforms in the first place, not for fun. Maybe in 5 years your point will be valid.
Why? If we have only one dominant player or even 2, then more competition can be good. If we already have 4 (iOS, Android, WP, BB) then we have competition and differentiation already. A slew of similar competing nix-based OS does not seem to do anything but fragment the ecosystem, especially the nix part of it.
WP has something new to offer was I think the point - a massive company backing it. Whereas all the other new platforms are just rip-off of Android. Android does things just fine already...
We talk of Nuclear as being a clean sustainable power source but surely the one thing it is not is sustainable. Even coal and oil are continually being regenerated (slowly) but the very nature of radioactive material means it is always downhill... supernova creates heavy elements which accrete to a planet and then you have a fixed time span until the radiation is all gone... even if we don't use it it's disappearing (even more slowly)
Are there any sums on how much useful material we have?
You don't need a pipe, the vacuum of space works quite well.
You can make a convincing hand-waving argument either way, there are two many hard facts which make an intuitive answer very hard. We need proper empirical or theoretical work - build a scale model or simulate it on a nice super-computer.
Simply using the argument "taking energy MUST reduce the wind" isn't enough. You have to show how much. Is it like me diluting the ocean by running my garden house onto the beach, or something reasonable? We have several Km of atmosphere, how much difference does clogging up the bottom 30m make?
Let me get this perfectly clear so there's no doubt.
Collecting energy caused by the sun causing air currents to move around is a hopelessly indirect method of harnessing the sun's energy.
Collecting energy caused by the sun's light being collected by forests growing over hundreds of years which then die and rot and over millions of years are converted into coal/oil which we expend tremendous effort digging up and treating and transporting all around the world, and then burn, is sensible and efficient.
Hmm, obviously the moment science appears which supports a cynical viewpoint it's taken as gospel truth? Hardly a scientific approach.
You mean like the real scientists who disagree with them?
Sorry Jason but you're wrong. Modern onboard graphics are a huge leap forward from the i945 chepsets or whatever we used to have. It won't run a brand new game like your gaming rig but duh.
Is that even a serious question?
No mention I could see in the article.
I started off being cautiously optimistic this could be a cool device but it just ended up sounding shit, not something that should be sporting the Vaio brand at all.
Is the crap design to distract you from W8's own faults? ;)
Easy to say that but if you have a family PC 1) is not possible. Some of us object to buying multiple PCs.
You perhaps forget kids have been doing this for decades... it used to be ordering over the phone with daddy's card and putting on a deep voice.
Are you certain because I know I have iOS6 but I haven't recollected it. Unless the absense of the problem wasn't noticeable of course.
And being asked when you are paying is fine... though "are you sure" might be better than "enter your password AGAIN"... but for free stuff it gets wearing.
Some days, several times - I might download a dozen apps looking for the best one. Having to re-enter my password 10 times in a row is a PITA.
Obviously when MS do it with UAC it's crap. But if Apple do it - with a really ugly popup - it's stupid to suggest otherwise.
I was just thinking the same - every new app or app update requires a password, even free ones. I never did an in-app purchase but had assumed they were the same.
Or can you turn off the password check?
Pretty atrocious to suggest we should have some sort of accountability for our actions. I think it's an assault on our freedom I can't use my handle on my passport.
You stick to 400 accounts and passwords then. I'll get on with using my PC to make my life more rather than less easy.
Trust me, your life (data) is far less interesting than you imagine it to be.
Woah they didn't already have this? Like it or loath it, this is one of FB's biggest strengths.
Which post are YOU responding to?
You don't mean creationist, you mean young-earth creationist. They're a pretty small minority so why the rush to bring them into a serious story?
Gravity is also a theory. What's your point?
Never mind the DM, what exactly does this have to do with World IT?
Where can I get the boxset? It has to be better than the last series of Lost.