Re: Tried papers on tablets
How about on Kindle (or Kindle App)?
5716 posts • joined 28 May 2010
How about on Kindle (or Kindle App)?
It can't be fun being the guy who has to unpack it all, scientific equipment padded out with soiled underpants...
Lots of these drunk no doubt
Ah, the typical teenage misunderstanding of the internet.... "it's the INTERNET, I can do whatever I want otherwise they're NAZIS oppressing my FREEDOM!!!1"
A website belongs to someone buddy. FaceBook is someone's property. If I own a website I can delete content on it as I damn well please if I don't like it - just like The Register deletes comments which it doesn't like.
A website gives you far fewer rights than the real world... no recourse, it's typically a dictatorship and you can't do anything to appeal.
>>Time to see Facebook for what it is, advertising.
You think it's a revelation that people using FB Pages for their business/product is advertising? You know, a bit like their own websites?
While it allows owners to try and suppress bad comments, it is still a useful feature based on the way the other changes are described.
Also, how DO you expect a tool which allows users to fight trolling/spam not to also be usable to selectively promote/demote stuff?
But finally, it's worth noting that for companies using FB effectively as a webpage, this is way less control than they can use on their own site. Deleting unfavourable forum posts or what have you is very common when you own the site so this isn't actually changing anything except giving owners more control over things rather than letting FB be in charge as much.
You should be on TV with material like that.
Then we could turn it off.
Nobody is interested in your boring documents.
A web browser needs an internet connection? Whatever next....
It's almost as bad as The Register - everytime I post a comment those bastards store it on their server.
I can't even remember Outlook crashing and I use it 8 hours a day...
Work is a subset of life. A fairly important one as it takes 50%+ of your waking hours.
Asimo is pretty big and isn't it connected to a bank of eternal CPUs? Either way, the difference between Asimo and a £1500 laptop is pretty massive.
I am not necessarily saying solar-only is a viable option for the UK. But if solar panels and a couple of lorry batteries could reduce your usage 30%, that's pretty significant and potentially worth doing. Or if you could go solar-only in a few months a year, normal power stations can adapt to that... they can't ramp up on a daily basis but can over weeks/months (I'm sure they already do in the winter).
If only there were some way to store the energy harvested during the day at a few hundred Watts, for when you need a couple of kW for a short period. Someone should work on that...
I like the way you point out a few valid points in general terms and then conclude in hand-waving generalisations that logically this means you must "find yourself blanketing an equivalent area in solar panels".
What about the billions of people who live in sunnier climates? We'll just kill the research because it might not be viable at all latitudes?
And even then we'd need proper figures. You say 1KW/m^2 is maximal (where - UK, equator, 1 mile above sea level?) but even at 10% of that with lousy weather, well doesn't the average house have 50-100m^2 of roof? If you could consistently generate only 100W, that negates a LOT of the stuff you leave turned on all day.
"I find it hard to believe that the life expectancy is as long as two years, since that’s about how long the average corporate laptop lasts when given to grownups."
a)just because a corp replaces things every 2 years, doesn't mean they only last 2 years.
b)You've not been in a school have you... they often have old PIIs chuntering away, struggling under all the 'security' software (that stops you changing the desktop wallpaper but happily lets you view hard porn), on which kids are supposed to learn about computers. Then the teachers might have 4-5 year old laptops.
The wife's school has some iPad 1 units that haven't broken yet.
For very young kids I think tablets are a great resource, you do not see 2-3 year olds able to use keyboard+mouse but they are very easily able to learn how to use an iPad (scarily so, almost - weird to see a kid who can't talk but knows how to find Cars in Video app).
You don't need accuracy for art. You need accuracy for some sorts of art. Loads of artists just fat brushes!
Looks like I touched a nerve.
Normal person watching
"Hey Billy do you wanna shoot some hoops after school?"
Reg reader watching
"Hey Billy do you wanna come and re-compile Mint after school?"
Really? So that's why in an era where main music sellers are selling music in non-DRM MP3 format, people have stopped pirating music?
Pirates will not stop simply because the content will run on all their devices because most pirates don't care about DRM any more than most paying consumers do.
Stop trying to justify why you're crusading for what's right, rather than just stealing. If it was the former you would pirate an 'open' version and then give a fair price to the author/publisher, or even to charity. But you don't, because you're a thief looking to justify it.
In countries where hygiene is a problem, you want them to try washing condoms? Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
Another con is that it would have to be much more durable and therefore it's harder to make it as comfortable as current disposables.
A pro, you can make it more expensive so different materials are in reach.
Then men will either use the pill or lie about being on the pill rather than use a condom, and continue to spread diseases.
Are you sure Islam says it's wrong?
And Catholicism doesn't preach abstinence, it preaches procreation!
I think that's a dramatically easy bet to make. I suspect you'll see that this DECADE, or start to.
This seems like the kind of claim which ends up with declaring real photos and video are "clearly fake". When you know something is fake or are trying to find evidence, you can easily fake yourself into seeing fakery :)
That's right, they hire experts on this sort of thing. When you let a regular person - a manager running a startup project for instance - design the UI it ends up FAR worse. When you let programmers design the UI, you get 19 levels of menus, with options like "abstraction 4" and "go!!", or just a lot of key-codes you have to memorise.
Is it encourages people to make up any old interface rather than use the built-in components everyone understands. Buttons no longer have to press down, no consistent language of UX, etc.
How wonderfully, scarily fast things change.
It's better to just learn to drive properly. Why are you starting from 0mph on a sliproad to join a 70mph traffic flow? You're not, you are already moving as you enter the sliproad. Even if you were, sliproads are long enough to do this anyway. For instance, you might have noticed that lorries and buses have no problem.
Granted 0-60 in 13.5s doesn't allow you to accelerate to 85 and undertake traffic before slewing out straight to the fast lane, but see original point.
Are you actually retarded? A car is not a house. Even boats - which have FAR more longevity than cars - eventually wear out.
And your point still makes no sense because you still need new parts to replace the ones that wear out. You're still building new cars, just in bits. When your engine wears out, you can replace it with a new electric one.
a)If you buy a car based on how fast it is, you're not the target market
b)If you buy a car based on how fast it is, you're a tit
c)don't you read how he said it "felt faster"?! Presumably like how a 900cc car feels fast due to the thrashing you have to give the engine to get going?
You mean the few million 'niche users' who live in cities and drive only a few miles every day? How many people exactly do you think live in Greater London alone and drive to work?
It's good to see that just as Londoners are ignorant of everywhere else, bumpkins also assume everyone is just like them with their 50mile commute.
What a stupid argument. Lets all buy 2nd hand cars because clearly then we'll never need new ones.
The point is that the new cars being introduced as old ones wear out should be as clean as possible, not that everyone should ditch their car for a new e-car. It's a long game, there is no infrastructure for everyone to switch anyway.
Stop making ludicrous arguments. Drive your car until you would buy a new one anyway, then switch.
>>I suppose the pollution generated from power stations providing the electricity for this car would fall into that category
Please learn a little something before making stupid statements like this. It never crossed your mind that the pollution per unit of energy released might differ between burning petrol in your car and burning coal in a power station?
Just as we talk about CPU power per watt these days, we need to compare CO2 per KWh for petrol Vs electric to see which is actually cleaner... it's possible your point might actually be true once all factors are taken into account but only by coincidence.
Plus of course you totally miss the point that lack of exhaust in a city centre is a good thing.
Is this feasible for a car... built into parking spaces for instance so you simply stop and it charges?
That's like saying that depending on selling your brand of ketchup in major supermarkets, or relying on selling your beer in pubs, is too risky. It's how things work.
Granted, ONLY using eBay or ONLY using Amazon is a bad idea, but not relying on 3rd-party portals in general. You can of course still sell direct, but expecting that to give the same sales is silly. Nearly anyone who manufactures anything is dependent on their reseller - lose them and you have to find another pronto.
I wonder if Feynman got this kind of stick too, for being able to articulate his thoughts and have hobbies outside science.
I came to the comments specifically to pre-empt one of our regular anti-creationist trolls. But you beat me to it.
WGAS what a minority group think?
It's generally very dim people who can earn enough to spend £500 on a phone.
I saw this mentioned in the other review too, and found it surprising. Isn't insane best-of-class JS performance one of the things Chrome is known for?
Just because a phone lacks one feature you deem essential does not mean it can't objectively be deemed the better phone, if that feature is one few users want or use.
The fact storage support hasn't become the norm even now some people provide it, seems to show it's not a big deal to the majority.
Probably because W8 embedded/etc versions are more often going to be used in tough-based scenarios, and because they have kinect-functionality so you can interface without having to even touch the screen. I can see real uses for that.
Thanks for feeling the need to tell us which brands you're snobby about Ross.
Even if that were true (doubtful for many nerds) most are not smart at all. How can you not want the ability to select your coffee type from your phone/PC as you leave your desk and find it ready waiting for you by the time you arrive?! Just think how much time talking with colleagues about their stupid pets and boring families, or pretending to care about sport, could be saved¬
In general, I think these 3 comments show who knows science and who watched Big Bang Theory.
Are you being deliberately stupid or does it just come naturally?
How is your friend possibly equivalent to a stranger trying all the door handles to see which are open?
>>I've seen plenty of documentaries in which UK policepersons will sneak up on unsuspecting people in railway stations or similar places and take their bag (which they are not watching properly) and wait until the person notices it is missing (usually when then setting off) before advising them of the error of their ways.
It used to be common practice for police on foot patrol at night (OK, I know, I'm nostalgic) to rattle the doors/gates to commercial premises to check they were secure and if not, to pop in to check that all was well and if possible, later advise the owner to apply better security.
Both of the above are laudable, and done with the best of intent.
1)Both of those are done by POLICE not VIGILANTEs
2)It's not illegal for me to pick up your bag. I'm not going inside to rummage about and then handing it back. Entering your computer system uses cycles and you cannot guarantee his code is bug-free.
Your arguments are entirely bogus:
>> How is it unethical? The ethics are in the intent
Are they? So it's not unethical to secretly use eugenics with the intent of making the human race better?
>>He purposefully designed it to eat the fewest cycles possible.
Probably lots of malicious malware is written to be efficient too so it doesn't get noticed as easily, and can spread better.
If I joyride your car but stay under 30mph does that make it OK?
Ragarath's example is bad, a better analogy is if I don't lock my front door, it's still illegal for you to come in and lounge around on my sofa. You know you aren't allowed in, regardless how easy I make it.