So now we'll know exactly what it is that wipes us out
5716 posts • joined 28 May 2010
It's almost like if you want an amazing service, you need to give something back.
It is a fair comparison, although I'm not sure other browsers were/are allowed to implement ActiveX even if they wanted to? PNaCl seems a dumb idea to me, you could just write a desktop app, so I can't seem other browsers wanting it really. It's technically very cool but I don't want every app to be inside the browser.
Pro is a whole lot more hardware for your money than iPad. Plug in your monitor and keyboard and it is a real computer.
Loads of people seem genuinely interested in Surface PRO, while simultaneously laughing at Surface RT.
Windows 8 has the biggest ecosystem on the planet, apart possibly from Windows 7.
How is that an issue... it's just another Android device like your smartphone. The difference is surely about the privacy of those in FRONT of the glasses, not those BEHIND?
If they can roll it out to other nations this really could scare PayPal... to get money to people overseas PP is often the easiest (and even cheapest) way, but in many countries PP isn't able to link to local bank accounts. If Google can overcome that issue, you could see freelancers switching to it in droves.
It costs about $100 to advertise a job vacancy. It probably cost more than that to get this into the production version of the website. This is not about saving money.
You'd only see it if you're a developer, you muppet. It's great when people rush in to show how clever they are and trip over their own shoelaces...
So why not use the built-in "ignore commentard" functionality on the site then?
Just like Google, Mozilla, and everyone else then.
It is processed rather than being dumped straight on, generally speaking. Raw human sewage is not used due to disease risk.
If you like O2 and hate Sky surely you should want Sky to get gouged for the extra £20m?
Anyway I don't care about that, free BB is a great deal so why cut of my nose to spite my face?
The BBC fractured the rights, they could just have let it go like they do other things costing too much.
A company is a legal entity.
Why would O2 be desperate to keep you when they're losing the contract? Free BB & £200 on my mobile account is a brilliant deal for a 12 month contract which Sky will honour, after which I'll either leave or expect Sky to offer some crazy good deal to keep ex-O2 customers.
Surely the results are very location dependent... we find O2 excellent for speed and stability but others find them slow and crap.
O2 had unlimited usage and were charging £5.99 a month IIRC... hardly bad.
Haven't plus.net always been part of BT? They are consistently #1 in customer satisfaction polls year after year.
In fact we just moved house and I was anxious to get the new contract signed before the takeover was finalised because O2 offered me free broadband for the contract duration (12 months) AND £200 credit to my mobile account. They also said they expect Sky to honour the terms/price of existing contract terms so most likely we will stay with O2/Sky for the 12 months and then move to Plus.net who were the obvious choice until O2 made their free internet offer.
Google complain on behalf of content creators, Google who are famous for putting millions of books online without permission, and everyone sides with them because the other party is MS.
Well done everybody.
1366*768 works just as well today as it did 5 years ago for internet browsing and MS Office.
Seem a bit long-winded, you can get a laptop with Windows already installed.
We're not all teenagers who want to hear Gangnam Style or "someone with a 10" knob got a text" every 5 minutes.
I'm sure Zune is always telling me I can set up my device for wireless updates.
A bit like MS Office then...
And the great thing is, you have the freedom of choice. It's your nose, if you want to cut it off nobody is going to stop you, or want to know about it.
One assumes ecosystem == appstore? But many smartphone users are not very interested in apps, it is not something we all consider the main use of our phones... I have a few but mainly it's the web-browser and email I use.
Please list one phone that has a choice of OS.
That 1GB is enough for that OS?
For one thing, it is more efficient. For another it has better security... security alone is a big deal for many corporate users.
You don't make progress without taking risks. You don't take risks without knowing some will not pay off. Ribbon has (by and large) won users over, but it took a long while - many staunch haters now actually like it. Clearly, Metro desktop is one step too far, or too big a step in one go.
But I believe MS (and other companies) should be taking these kind of risks, if we go by what people want then what they want is nearly always what they know, which is what they have already. Many said touchscreen phones were dumb, and that the iPad was a dumb idea... they were both big risks that paid off.
Use it quite often. It's not.
I use my PC about 12 hours a day for software development and I don't have a problem with W8... granted I don't use much of the Metro stuff but neither does it get in my way.
Good job they're about to bring out 8.1 then.
@Eadon - of course Linux distros never use the same tactic of simply reporting the number of downloads rather than the number of installs or number of active users? EVERYONE finds the best way to present their numbers.
Hit the windows key and you see a huge start menu listing all your applications... you don't have to type anything beyond hitting the windows key
Amazon and Google don't do it because they're evil, but because it makes financial sense - ergo every company with competent CFO will do the same by default - if they don't they give a huge concession to their competitors who are doing it.
Tough, but true.
I may be wrong but I'm sure on PS3 if I want to buy film rentals or downloadable games, the ONLY way to do this is via PSN points which you have to buy into your 'wallet' first.
Someone else's copy of InDesign.
Presumably they are more interested in professional users who use it all the time and "subscribe" already by upgrading to new versions as a matter of course.
Why? Surely they still offer a free trial at the very least?
I haven't looked, but do they allow short-term subscriptions that cost less than buying a boxed copy?
Oh jeez, we're onto "morally correct" and your "right" to electricity? That's like the people claiming conservation areas which forbid satellite dishes are "evil" because "Sky TV is a right".
Loads of households have an interest in how much they spend - "if it's yellow let it mellow..." - "turn the lights out when you leave the room" - etc.
Just send them actual meter readings...
>>The oft-repeated premise is that once we can see live charts of our energy consumption we will rush about turning stuff off, as the ruinous cost of electricity at the moment clearly isn't motivation enough.
This is a fair point, well-tested in fact. Tested by all those people who have those little boxes you attach to your meter and wirelessly broadcast your usage. You can do it already and it works great.
Congratulations on making the UN not seem like the crazies, no mean feat.
Here we go again, emotionalising a purely factual discussion.
Thanks to those who downvote a simple question but don't even bother to provide an answer. Presumably because I dared to suggest or at least imply that paying for content was OK?